30.06.2015 Views

Slides - Northwest Center for Public Health Practice

Slides - Northwest Center for Public Health Practice

Slides - Northwest Center for Public Health Practice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Return on Investment<br />

Wendy Baesler, MAcc<br />

Evidence-Based <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Health</strong>


From the CDC…<br />

• How do you really know you’re making the most<br />

of your limited resources?<br />

• How do you decide between two promising<br />

program options when you can only af<strong>for</strong>d one?<br />

• How do you demonstrate to decision-makers<br />

that the benefits of your program are worth the<br />

cost?


From the CDC…<br />

The answer: Economic evaluation—a powerful<br />

tool that can help with all these situations.


Motivation <strong>for</strong> Economic Analysis<br />

INPUTS<br />

Resources used<br />

such as money,<br />

time, labor,<br />

supplies<br />

OUTPUTS<br />

Change in<br />

health<br />

outcomes


Value of Economic Evaluation<br />

“More important than deciding whether dollar benefits<br />

exceed dollar costs is the questioning approach inherent in<br />

these frameworks. One cannot assume that a program is<br />

efficacious without evidence, even though prestigious<br />

experts may ‘feel’ that it is. One cannot begin with the<br />

notion that resources are plentiful so that one need make<br />

only some emotional plea in order to be able to mount a<br />

major health program. More attention to defining goals and<br />

to evaluating efficacy should be combined with benefit-cost<br />

analysis if we are to improve the health of the nation.”<br />

—Lester Lave


Cost of Economic Evaluation<br />

“We should keep in mind that it takes many resources<br />

(time, skill, and money) to do CBA well, especially where<br />

the projects are large, complex, and have unique features.<br />

The costs of conducting CBA can be very large. For<br />

example, Thomas Hopkins reported in 1992 that a CBA of<br />

reducing lead in gasoline cost the Environmental Protection<br />

Agency (EPA) roughly $1 million.”<br />

—Boardman, Greenberg, Vining & Weimer


Economic Evaluation Concerns<br />

“Does CBA debase the terms of public discourse? A number of<br />

objections have been raised to the ef<strong>for</strong>t made in CBA to value all<br />

policy impacts in terms of dollars: Pricing goods not normally traded in<br />

markets—<strong>for</strong> example life itself—decreases their perceived value by<br />

implying they can be compared to goods that are traded in markets…”<br />

“Does CBA undermine democracy? Some critics of CBA charge that<br />

it undermines democracy by imposing a single goal, efficiency, in the<br />

assessment of public policies. The general public, politicians, and<br />

even economists, however, very often consider goals reflecting other<br />

values to be relevant.”<br />

—Boardman, Greenberg, Vining & Weimer


Various Measures of Economic Evaluation<br />

Cost effectiveness analysis<br />

Cost utility analysis<br />

Cost benefit analysis<br />

Cost per unit of health<br />

outcome<br />

Cost per life saved or per<br />

year of life saved<br />

Benefits : Costs<br />

Return on investment<br />

Social return on investment<br />

Percentage showing benefits<br />

as percent of costs<br />

ROI from a societal<br />

perspective


Cost Benefit Analysis<br />

• A <strong>for</strong>m of economic evaluation that standardizes costs<br />

and benefits into dollars and compares them<br />

• Ratio Benefits : Costs<br />

• Fraction Benefits<br />

Costs<br />

www.jala.com/homecba.php<br />

www.americantrails.org/resources/health/trailinvest.html


Return on Investment<br />

ROI =<br />

Benefits of investment - Amount invested<br />

Amount invested<br />

Decision rule: If ROI is greater than 0%, the program’s<br />

benefits exceed its costs.


Traditional ROI Calculation<br />

Purchase a share of stock <strong>for</strong><br />

$82 and sell it <strong>for</strong> $91. What<br />

is the ROI?<br />

(91 - 82) 8<br />

= = 11%<br />

82 82


ROI Expressed as a Ratio<br />

Benefits : Costs<br />

Each benefits and costs are<br />

divided by costs so that the ratio is<br />

some number : 1<br />

Abstract of Trust <strong>for</strong> America's <strong>Health</strong> in July 2008<br />

www.healthyamericans.org/reports/prevention08


Sample Calculations<br />

Program ABC<br />

Benefits: $6,000,000<br />

Costs: $5,260,000<br />

Compute cost benefit ratio: 1.14 : 1<br />

Compute ROI as percentage: 14%<br />

Compute ROI as a ratio: 1.14 : 1<br />

Program XYZ<br />

Benefits: $400,000<br />

Costs: $432,000<br />

Compute cost benefit ratio: 0.93 : 1<br />

Compute ROI as percentage: - 7%<br />

Compute ROI as a ratio: 0.93 : 1


You try a calculation…<br />

Benefits = $52,000 and Costs = $48,000<br />

What is the return on investment expressed as a percent?<br />

A. $4,000<br />

B. 83%<br />

C. 8.3%<br />

D. 7.7%


Steps to Determining Costs and Benefits<br />

1. Specify the set of alternative projects<br />

2. Decide whose benefits and costs count<br />

3. Catalog the impacts and select measurements<br />

4. Predict the impacts quantitatively over project life<br />

5. Monetize (attach dollar values to) all impacts<br />

6. Discount benefits and costs to obtain present values<br />

7. Per<strong>for</strong>m the net present value of each alternative<br />

8. Per<strong>for</strong>m sensitivity analysis<br />

9. Make a recommendation


Perspective of an Economic Analysis<br />

Viewpoint from which the<br />

economic evaluation is<br />

conducted. Costs to whom?<br />

Benefits to whom?<br />

Perspectives <strong>for</strong> ROI or CBA<br />

1. Patient<br />

2. Provider<br />

3. Payer<br />

4. <strong>Health</strong> care system<br />

5. Society (this is social ROI)


Patient Perspective<br />

Costs born by the patient<br />

and benefits accruing to<br />

the patient are relevant.<br />

Example: Should I get a flu<br />

shot this year?


Provider Perspective<br />

People or institutions<br />

providing health-related<br />

services (physicians,<br />

hospitals, nursing homes,<br />

public health clinics, and local<br />

and state health departments).<br />

Provider costs and provider<br />

benefits are relevant.<br />

Example: Should we set up<br />

and operate a childhood<br />

immunization reminder<br />

system?


Payer Perspective<br />

Person or entity ultimately responsible <strong>for</strong> the financial<br />

costs (households, businesses, private insurers, Medicare<br />

or Medicaid, or government). Costs to the payer and<br />

benefits to the payer are relevant.<br />

Example: Should General Motors adopt a health promotion<br />

program, LifeSteps, designed to improve employees’ and<br />

dependents' health status?


<strong>Health</strong> Care System Perspective<br />

Costs <strong>for</strong> the entire health care system are relevant<br />

as are benefits to the entire health care system.<br />

Example: Considering a program to treat STDs.


Society Perspective (SROI)<br />

Broadest perspective. Consider all costs regardless of who<br />

pays them and all benefits regardless of who accrues them.<br />

Example: ROI of Mobile <strong>Health</strong>care by Oriol et.al. 2009


Social Return on Investment<br />

• A return on investment that considers the benefits to the<br />

entire society as well as the costs to the entire society.<br />

• Differs from return on investment only in perspective.


Steps to Determining Costs and Benefits<br />

1. Specify the set of alternative projects<br />

2. Decide whose benefits and costs count<br />

3. Catalog the impacts and select measurements<br />

4. Predict the impacts quantitatively over project life<br />

5. Monetize (attach dollar values to) all impacts<br />

6. Discount benefits and costs to obtain present values<br />

7. Per<strong>for</strong>m the net present value of each alternative<br />

8. Per<strong>for</strong>m sensitivity analysis<br />

9. Make a recommendation


Identifying Costs & Benefits<br />

• Goal: express costs and<br />

benefits in monetary<br />

terms.<br />

• Start with a list of costs<br />

and benefits in words.<br />

• Do your best to determine<br />

whether those costs and<br />

benefits can be measured.<br />

You will have to estimate<br />

more than you may be<br />

com<strong>for</strong>table with.


Types of Benefits<br />

Direct benefits<br />

Indirect benefits<br />

Intangible benefits<br />

Medical dollars directly<br />

saved<br />

Potential increases in<br />

earnings or productivity or<br />

medical dollars indirectly<br />

saved, reduced disability,<br />

increased life expectancy,<br />

etc.<br />

Psychological benefits of<br />

health, reduced pain and<br />

suffering, peace of mind, etc.


Measuring Direct Benefits<br />

• Direct benefits are medical dollars saved.<br />

• Tricky because “…you’re measuring something that<br />

doesn’t happen.” (Kimberly Redding, M.D.)I*<br />

• One option: Use estimates of what it would have cost.<br />

Example: the mobile healthcare provides a visit that had<br />

a 80% chance of becoming an emergency room visit that<br />

costs on average $923.<br />

• Another option: Use research estimates of cost of that<br />

illness either annually or over a lifetime.<br />

*Director of <strong>Health</strong> Promotion and Disease Prevention,<br />

Georgia Department of Community <strong>Health</strong>, Division of <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Health</strong>


Measuring Indirect Benefits: Human Capital<br />

Approach<br />

• Value of life saved or extended.<br />

– QALY = Quality-Adjusted Life Year<br />

– DALY = Disability-Adjusted Life Year<br />

• Value of a life year derived from value of life. The value<br />

of a year of life ranges from $70,000 to $175,000<br />

depending on the source of the estimation.<br />

• Value of life ranges from $300,000 to $2,000,000<br />

depending upon the source of the estimate.


Measuring Indirect Benefits: Human Capital<br />

Approach<br />

Australian study estimate<br />

• Value of life = Loss of work<strong>for</strong>ce productivity + Loss of<br />

household productivity + Loss of quality of life<br />

• $1,400,000 = $540,000. $500,000 + $319,000.<br />

FAA (1980 citation)<br />

• Value of life = $300,000 based on recent court awards<br />

Nuclear Regulatory Commission<br />

• Cost of premature death = $1,000,000


Measuring Indirect Benefits: Survey Methods<br />

• Revealed preference: A survey figures out the value of<br />

something by asking questions around the subject.<br />

Example: Salary expected in post office with 0 risk of<br />

death vs. salary expected in post office with 2% chance<br />

of death.<br />

• Stated preference: Ask directly what a person would be<br />

willing to pay <strong>for</strong> the benefit.<br />

Example: How much would you pay <strong>for</strong> security service<br />

that reduces risk of terrorist attack on an airplane that<br />

you are flying on?<br />

• A person will pay from $250,000 to $500,000 <strong>for</strong> a<br />

decrease in the probability of death.


Types of Costs<br />

Direct costs<br />

Value of people, equipment,<br />

facilities, and supplies used<br />

in a particular program<br />

including appropriately<br />

allocated shared costs<br />

Indirect costs<br />

Costs not directly related to<br />

the program (time taken off<br />

work to receive medical<br />

treatment, childcare, travel<br />

costs, productivity loss due<br />

to side effects of treatments)


Types of Costs<br />

Intangible costs<br />

Non-cash costs<br />

Opportunity costs<br />

Otherwise preferred private<br />

behavior cost<br />

Emotional anxiety, fear, pain,<br />

suffering, etc. (e.g., pain<br />

from immunization)<br />

Costs of volunteers and<br />

donated resources<br />

Benefit of the <strong>for</strong>egone<br />

alternative<br />

If a public health message<br />

convinces you to bike with a<br />

helmet, but you prefer to ride<br />

without, that loss is a cost


Measuring Direct Costs<br />

• Cost of all personnel, equipment, facilities, and supplies<br />

used. Shared costs should be appropriately allocated.<br />

• Ideally include only the avoidable costs—the costs that<br />

would go away if the program went away. Example:<br />

administrative costs allocated to the program are usually<br />

not avoidable.


Measuring Indirect Costs<br />

• Can only be estimated. No standard practices exist.<br />

• Opportunity cost is the value that could be received<br />

from the <strong>for</strong>egone alternative.<br />

Example: Personnel <strong>for</strong> a mobile health van.


Alternative Is ROI in Words<br />

• Many costs not tracked<br />

• Many benefits difficult to<br />

determine<br />

Photo: John Johnston


ROI Analysis of Bikes on Busses (BOB)<br />

Costs<br />

• Capital cost of purchasing racks<br />

• Maintenance cost of<br />

repairing/replacing racks<br />

• Administrative cost of day-to-day<br />

operations<br />

• Marketing costs of program<br />

• Insurance claims and incidents<br />

• Permitting process and training<br />

• Funding of bicycle facilities to<br />

access transit<br />

• Provision of bicycle parting<br />

• Bicycles abandoned on racks<br />

• Route delay and increased dwell<br />

time<br />

• Impact of rack capacity limitations<br />

Benefits<br />

• BOB ridership/boardings<br />

• Expansion of transit service area<br />

• Attraction of new transit riders<br />

• More frequent use of transit<br />

• Bicycle locker rental fees<br />

• Improved bicycle safety<br />

• Reduction in traffic congestion<br />

• Improved air quality<br />

• Promotion of healthy lifestyle<br />

• Improved transit agency image<br />

• Increased mobility


Let’s consider a public health program to increase<br />

hand washing…<br />

Lets adopt a society perspective<br />

Everybody type a cost of such a program in the chat box<br />

Everybody type a benefit of such a program in the chat box


Steps to Determining Costs and Benefits<br />

1. Specify the set of alternative projects<br />

2. Decide whose benefits and costs count<br />

3. Catalog the impacts and select measurements<br />

4. Predict the impacts quantitatively over project life<br />

5. Monetize (attach dollar values to) all impacts<br />

6. Discount benefits and costs to obtain present values<br />

7. Per<strong>for</strong>m the net present value of each alternative<br />

8. Per<strong>for</strong>m sensitivity analysis<br />

9. Make a recommendation


Computing Present Values<br />

If the costs or benefits are far in the future, state those<br />

costs or benefits in today’s dollars.<br />

Present value = Future value / (1+i) n<br />

n = number of years in future<br />

i = annual interest rate or discount rate = 3%<br />

Can use Present Value Tables<br />

Can use Excel =PV(rate,nper,pmt,[fv],[type])<br />

Sum of the present value of all the future net cash flows is<br />

called the Net Present Value. If NPV is greater than 0, the<br />

project is financially worthwhile.


Partial Present Value Table<br />

Present value of $1 to be received at the end of n periods (PV)<br />

Period 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00%<br />

1.00 0.9901 0.9804 0.9709 0.9615<br />

2.00 0.9803 0.9612 0.9426 0.9246<br />

3.00 0.9706 0.9423 0.9151 0.8890<br />

4.00 0.9610 0.9238 0.8885 0.8548<br />

5.00 0.9515 0.9057 0.8626 0.8219


Time Period Adjustments<br />

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total<br />

Benefits 5,000 5,000 70,000 100,000 160,000 340,000<br />

Costs 100,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 250,000<br />

ROI 36.0%<br />

Benefit -<br />

Cost<br />

PV net<br />

benefits<br />

PV<br />

Costs<br />

-95,000 -25,000 35,000 60,000 115,000 90,000<br />

-92,245 -23,575 32,030 53,280 99,245 68,735<br />

97,100 28,290 32,025 35,520 38,835 231,770<br />

ROI 29.8%


Steps to Determining Costs and Benefits<br />

1. Specify the set of alternative projects<br />

2. Decide whose benefits and costs count<br />

3. Catalog the impacts and select measurements<br />

4. Predict the impacts quantitatively over project life<br />

5. Monetize (attach dollar values to) all impacts<br />

6. Discount benefits and costs to obtain present values<br />

7. Per<strong>for</strong>m the net present value of each alternative<br />

8. Per<strong>for</strong>m sensitivity analysis<br />

9. Make a recommendation


ROI Studies in <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Health</strong><br />

• Trust <strong>for</strong> America’s <strong>Health</strong> report included public health<br />

programs that produced very large returns on investment<br />

• Community Preventative Services Website<br />

• “An Ounce of Prevention” by the CDC in 1999<br />

• Minnesota Institute of <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Health</strong> blog<br />

• Worksite health promotion<br />

• Value-based Insurance Design


Summary<br />

• Cost benefit analysis<br />

• Return on investment<br />

• Social return on investment<br />

• ROI has limitations<br />

• Designing a program and building in measurement of<br />

costs and benefits at the onset is important

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!