03.07.2015 Views

What's a Woo? - Branch 9 NALC

What's a Woo? - Branch 9 NALC

What's a Woo? - Branch 9 NALC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

VOLUME 64 No 4 Official Publication of <strong>Branch</strong> Nine, <strong>NALC</strong> May 2012<br />

What’s a <strong>Woo</strong>?<br />

◄This is not a WOO.<br />

WOO (Window of Operation) is the new acronym being<br />

used by management in an attempt to justify that all<br />

outgoing mail will make the last truck dispatch. Management<br />

has served notice that they will simultaniously<br />

schedule overtime and 8-hour only carrier’s to be back in<br />

the office 15 minutes before DOV (Dispatch of Value)<br />

departs.<br />

In a letter to <strong>Branch</strong> 9 President, Mike Zagaros, the Minneapolis Postmaster<br />

stated that managers will openly violate Article 8.5.G. with the misguided notion<br />

that they have the right to do so.<br />

Being proactive, <strong>Branch</strong> 9 is in the process of developing a step-by-step<br />

guide that even the most inexperienced steward will use to file a successful<br />

grievance.<br />

<strong>Branch</strong> 9 officer’s cannot emphasize enough that if you (yes, you) see or<br />

know of an 8-hour only carrier working overtime, let your steward know.<br />

Management may try to “work” some private deal with an 8-hour carrier in<br />

violation of our National Agreement. The Contract is just that; an agreement<br />

by both parties.<br />

Upper management has trimmed staffing (both clerks and carriers) beyond a<br />

sane limit, and now cannot adequately get mail delivered at a reasonable time.<br />

So much for customer service.<br />

USPS/<strong>NALC</strong> headed to arbitration.<br />

From the Federal Mediation & Conciliation Service, the USPS picks an<br />

arbiter, and the <strong>NALC</strong> picks an arbiter. These two arbiter’s pick a neutral<br />

third arbiter who will be the lead arbiter. The three-person panel then must<br />

set a calendar schedule to hear arguements from the two parties.<br />

Memorial Day Issue:<br />

President’s Article<br />

.. Page 3<br />

Right to Work Fallacy<br />

..Page 4<br />

Vice President’s Article<br />

..Page 5<br />

Stewards’ Corner<br />

..Page 6<br />

Unfair, Unsafe, Unnessary<br />

..Page 8<br />

MDA Bowl-A-Thon<br />

..Page 9<br />

Save the USPS Rally<br />

..Page 10<br />

Wisconsin Governor’s Rebuke<br />

..Page 10<br />

Memorial Day Salute<br />

..Page 12 & 13<br />

USPS Executive Salaries<br />

..Page 14


2<br />

Brian Emke (Robbinsdale)<br />

is honored at his surprise<br />

retirement party at the St.<br />

Michael American Legion.<br />

West Bloomington carriers<br />

with their 25 year pins, 30<br />

year pins and 35 year pins.<br />

Jim Greenfield (St Louis<br />

Park) clocks out for the final<br />

time as Steward, Steve<br />

Rowland witnesses.<br />

<strong>Branch</strong> 9 President, Mike<br />

Zagaros presents new retiree<br />

Pat Rein (Shakopee) with his<br />

gold watch.<br />

<strong>Branch</strong> Nine News<br />

From<br />

the Editor’s<br />

Desk<br />

Submitted Amendments<br />

to <strong>Branch</strong> 9 By-Laws<br />

were acted upon at the<br />

April 24th GMM.<br />

By-Law submission #1.<br />

Voted down<br />

By-Law submission #2.<br />

Voted down<br />

Mike Pearson (Shakopee)<br />

with his 25 year pin.<br />

(l) Tom Taykalo (Steward)<br />

gives a celebratory handshake<br />

to new retiree Dave<br />

Bradley (Metro Hub).<br />

May 2012<br />

<strong>Branch</strong> Nine, <strong>NALC</strong><br />

2408 Central Ave. NE<br />

Minneapolis, MN 55418<br />

Voice: (612) 781-9858<br />

Fax: (612) 781-9849<br />

E-Mail Addresses:<br />

Website: branch9nalc.com<br />

Editor:<br />

branch9news@branch9nalc.com<br />

<strong>Branch</strong> Nine Officers<br />

President<br />

Mike Zagaros<br />

Exec. Vice President<br />

Darrell Maus<br />

Recording Secretary<br />

Jeremy Rothstein<br />

Treasurer<br />

Lisa O’Neill<br />

Financial Secretary<br />

Melia Derrick<br />

Editor<br />

Chuck Glover<br />

Sergeant at Arms<br />

Jim Nelson<br />

Trustee<br />

Barb Watczak<br />

Trustee<br />

Mike Smith<br />

Trustee<br />

Samantha Hartwig<br />

Director of Retirees<br />

Cheryl Stately<br />

<strong>NALC</strong> Health Benefits Rep.<br />

Julie Waldemar<br />

(612) 963-6252<br />

The <strong>Branch</strong> Nine News is a monthly<br />

publication of <strong>NALC</strong> <strong>Branch</strong> 9, and<br />

is published in the interest of and for<br />

the members of <strong>NALC</strong> <strong>Branch</strong> 9.<br />

The opinions expressed by the<br />

writers are not necessarily those of<br />

the OFFICERS, or of <strong>NALC</strong> <strong>Branch</strong> 9.<br />

Articles MUST be submitted to<br />

the editor by the 2nd Friday of the<br />

month, and must be signed. The<br />

Editorial Staff reserves the right to<br />

edit or refuse to print articles which<br />

are derogatory in nature. Any official<br />

<strong>NALC</strong> organization may reproduce<br />

our articles provided appropriate<br />

credit is given.


May 2012 <strong>Branch</strong> Nine News 3<br />

President’s Report<br />

I got a letter the other day. It<br />

began with “No customer is<br />

satisfied with the delivery of<br />

mail late into the evening. It is<br />

not practicable to deliver mail<br />

at a time when our customers<br />

do not want it (Ex: 6:00PM &<br />

beyond) or when businesses are<br />

closed and not available to receive<br />

it. …” These are the opening<br />

sentences of a letter sent notifying<br />

the <strong>Branch</strong> of management’s<br />

(in this case the Postmaster of<br />

Minneapolis) intentions regarding the<br />

“simultaneous scheduling of OTDL<br />

carriers and non-OTDL carriers.”<br />

This is the working of carriers on<br />

and off the Overtime Desired List at<br />

the same time “without maximizing<br />

the list to the limits set forth in<br />

Article 8.5.G…” Management is<br />

giving notice that they are attempting<br />

to establish an operational window<br />

for the Minneapolis Installation<br />

beginning May 14 th . So what is an<br />

operational window or Window of<br />

Operation (WOO)?<br />

The term, simply put, refers to the<br />

timeframe that a delivery unit works<br />

its carriers from start to finish. Often<br />

operational windows are defined with<br />

absolutes like “all carriers off the<br />

street by 5:00 or 5:30PM or whatever.<br />

It has been referred to by arbitrators<br />

as a service goal or commitment<br />

that is used “to effectuate the<br />

timely delivery of mail as well as<br />

the timely dispatch of mail brought<br />

back to the station by carriers.”<br />

But the operational window in the<br />

Minneapolis Installation has not been<br />

defined with a specific time. Instead<br />

the notice provides examples of what<br />

the operational window will be. It<br />

“will be considered open when 80%<br />

of the respective routes caseable<br />

mail volume is anticipated to be<br />

available to be cased by a carrier. It<br />

will be considered closed 15 minutes<br />

prior to the Dispatch of Value’s<br />

(DOV) scheduled departure. ...”<br />

This explanation could allow for<br />

different time frames or windows to<br />

be used at different stations inside<br />

the 554 area. What’s most important<br />

to realize is that management has<br />

the right to do this. They have the<br />

right to establish an operational<br />

window. Article 3 of the National<br />

Agreement (Management Rights)<br />

gives management the ability to set<br />

a service goal that has carriers off<br />

the street by a certain time. BUT,<br />

Article 3 also says that this right<br />

is “subject to the provisions of<br />

this Agreement.” This means that<br />

while management has the right to<br />

determine the method, means and<br />

personnel they will use to manage<br />

the Postal Service. They must do so<br />

within the confines of the contract<br />

including all of Article 8.<br />

What we really are talking about<br />

is the forcing of carriers not on<br />

the Overtime Desired List to work<br />

overtime possibly before the OTDL<br />

is maxed out, which is a violation of<br />

the National Agreement. One of the<br />

purposes of the OTDL is to excuse<br />

full-time carriers not wishing to<br />

work overtime from having to work<br />

overtime when there are carriers on<br />

the OTDL who are available. The<br />

JCAM spells out when a carrier not<br />

on the OTDL can be required to<br />

work overtime. If you are not on the<br />

OTDL and management has you<br />

working overtime, see your steward.<br />

If you are asked to volunteer to work<br />

overtime, see your steward. If you<br />

are on the Work<br />

Mike Zagaros<br />

Assignment List and asked to work<br />

on another assignment, see your<br />

steward. Grievances will be filed each<br />

and every time there is a violation.<br />

Management can’t pick and choose<br />

which parts of the contract they will<br />

follow and which they will ignore.<br />

They are expected to give meaning to<br />

all of it.<br />

Recently the Federal Times published<br />

an article about postal employees<br />

working more overtime. They<br />

reported that overtime pay has<br />

increased by 1/3 since 2009. At the<br />

same time the workforce has shrunk<br />

by 10%. We know that overtime is<br />

usually caused by either too much<br />

mail (from volume or poorly adjusted<br />

routes) or not enough people,<br />

sometimes it’s both. The main<br />

issue in Minneapolis is staffing, and<br />

everyone knows it. The major cause<br />

with late deliveries is not enough<br />

people. Look around at the number<br />

of carriers who have retired and have<br />

not been replaced and you can see it.<br />

Management’s operational window<br />

won’t work in Minneapolis based<br />

on the current staffing. They know<br />

it but that doesn’t mean they won’t<br />

try even if it means that they will<br />

have to violate the contract. In their<br />

notice they said that “management<br />

acknowledges and recognizes the<br />

President’s Report continued on page 12


4 <strong>Branch</strong> Nine News<br />

The Right To Work Fallacy<br />

Many of us in Minnesota have<br />

been hearing about the Right To<br />

Work, however many of us do not<br />

understand what that actually means.<br />

Here in Minnesota we are currently<br />

not a Right To Work state; but some<br />

Senators, and Representatives in the<br />

State Legislature feel there needs to<br />

be a Constitutional Amendment to<br />

turn Minnesota into a Right To Work<br />

state.<br />

On Monday, March 12, 2012 the<br />

Minnesota Senate Judiciary and<br />

Public Safety Committee held a<br />

hearing on a proposed Constitutional<br />

Amendment that would allow the<br />

voters to decide if Minnesota should<br />

become a Right To Work state. There<br />

was an hour of testimony for those<br />

in favor of Right To Work, an hour<br />

of testimony for those opposed<br />

to Right To Work, and an hour of<br />

debate among the Senators before<br />

voting on whether or not a Right To<br />

Work Constitutional Amendment<br />

will be added to the November ballot<br />

for the citizens of Minnesota to<br />

decide the Right To Work issue.<br />

The Senators voted, and the vote<br />

was along party lines, to add the<br />

Right To Work Constitutional<br />

Amendment to the November Ballot,<br />

this is the first step to adding this<br />

unfair constitutional amendment to<br />

the ballot in November. This is<br />

why it is important to contact the<br />

State Legislators and let them know<br />

the working people of Minnesota<br />

are opposed to the Right To Work<br />

Constitutional Amendment.<br />

In 1961 the Reverend Martin Luther<br />

King Jr. had this to say about the<br />

By: Samantha Hartwig<br />

Eastside<br />

Right To Work: “In our glorious<br />

fight for civil rights, we must guard<br />

against being fooled by false slogans,<br />

such as ‘right to work.’ It is a law to<br />

rob us of our civil rights and job<br />

rights. . . Its purpose is to destroy<br />

labor unions and the freedom of<br />

collective bargaining by which unions<br />

have improved wages and working<br />

conditions of everyone. Wherever<br />

these laws have been passed, wages<br />

are lower, job opportunities are fewer<br />

and there are no civil rights. We do<br />

not intend to let them do this to us.<br />

We demand this fraud be stopped.<br />

Our weapon is our vote.” These<br />

words uttered in 1961 still remain<br />

relevant today, and we need to make<br />

our collective voice heard in the<br />

legislature.<br />

If the Right To Work Constitutional<br />

Amendment is approved it means<br />

that union members in private<br />

sector unions can withdraw from<br />

the Union, not have to pay any dues,<br />

and still reap all of the benefits a<br />

Union job offers. As letter carriers<br />

we already deal with this issue daily<br />

because we are an open shop union.<br />

For the private sector unions this<br />

legislation will financially hurt many<br />

of them, weakening their ability to<br />

bargain collectively, and shift a focus<br />

from representation of members<br />

to collecting dues, and soliciting<br />

members to stay in the union. We<br />

need to support our brothers and<br />

sisters in the private sector; an injury<br />

to one is an injury to all. This is<br />

just the beginning of attacks on<br />

the working class in Minnesota, but<br />

together we can make a difference,<br />

and be heard.<br />

May 2012<br />

In April, I took a trip back to God’s<br />

County, the land of my youth.<br />

Renewed acquaintances with some<br />

childhood friends I hadn’t seen in 40<br />

years or more. We caught each other<br />

up on our lives, our families, etc.<br />

When I told them that I had spent<br />

37-1/2 years in the Postal Service,<br />

a couple of them asked me, “What<br />

is going on with the Post Office? It<br />

ran so well for 225 years. Why is it in<br />

such trouble now?”<br />

That got me to thinking: how would<br />

you describe the Postal Service in a<br />

paragraph? Maybe Chuck should run<br />

a contest in the <strong>Branch</strong> Nine News,<br />

and the winner gets a <strong>Branch</strong> Nine<br />

ball cap (if there is such a thing) or<br />

something.<br />

Some say that it’s a very complex<br />

issue, but I disagree. And since I<br />

posed the question, I’ll go first and<br />

tell you my response. I said to my<br />

old friends: “Well, it’s like this. You<br />

take a venerable American institution<br />

of hundreds of thousands of<br />

employees. You find the 5% looking<br />

for an easy path, combine them with<br />

the 5% who are blind to reality. You<br />

put this 10% together, and let them<br />

manage the outfit for 30 years. And<br />

in a nutshell, that’s what wrong with<br />

the Postal Service today.”<br />

Rotten Rodney Anderson, Retired<br />

The Following is a list of Paid<br />

Members of PAL 9 for April 2012.<br />

Very Concerned Members<br />

Kieran Hughes<br />

Charles Glover<br />

Regular Members<br />

Roger G Harwarth<br />

Carlos A Garcia<br />

George B Gray<br />

David J Johnson<br />

Bradley J Knutson<br />

Ron Lawrence<br />

Treasurer PAL 9


May 2012 <strong>Branch</strong> Nine News 5<br />

Executive Vice President’s<br />

Report<br />

WE MUST NEVER FORGET<br />

<strong>Branch</strong> 9 members voted at a special<br />

March meeting in 1970 to go out on<br />

strike. This was not just Union chatter<br />

and idle talk, they followed up the<br />

vote with action. On the morning of<br />

March 21, 1970, <strong>Branch</strong> 9 carriers<br />

did not report to work. Instead, they<br />

showed up en masse at a parking<br />

lot, grabbed a picket sign and then<br />

walked over the Hennepin Avenue<br />

Bridge to the Main Post Office in<br />

Minneapolis. The Postal Inspectors<br />

were also there on the higher floors<br />

taking pictures (for evidence) of<br />

the unlawful actions of carriers that<br />

were participating in the strike. Our<br />

<strong>Branch</strong> members walked with “ON<br />

STRIKE” signs defiantly hoisted in<br />

the air. We had now joined the other<br />

<strong>NALC</strong> carriers from branches across<br />

the country in the movement for<br />

better wages and benefits. In the days<br />

to follow we saw continued strike activities.<br />

President Nixon got involved<br />

and ordered the National Guard in<br />

to sort and deliver the mail - that did<br />

not work out so well. The troops<br />

went to the letter cases without any<br />

idea of what the job involved. Some<br />

carriers had taken their case labels<br />

home, leaving the guardsmen with no<br />

idea of how or where to deliver the<br />

piles of mail.<br />

The detailed news articles and<br />

other preserved artifacts here in our<br />

<strong>Branch</strong> and around the country are<br />

very interesting. This is a rich piece<br />

of our own Labor History, that is not<br />

only important, but also intriguing<br />

for myself and current members to<br />

hear the stories of these brave men<br />

and women who were involved in the<br />

strike. I am sure they would all gladly<br />

share their personal recollection of<br />

the events, the financial sacrifice (as<br />

they certainly did not get paid by<br />

the US Postal Department while on<br />

strike) and the fear they had of losing<br />

their jobs as a result of the illegal<br />

strike. At the time of the strike, letter<br />

carriers made $3.06 per hour, and<br />

literally had to beg for raises from<br />

Congress.<br />

The strike was possible and<br />

successful because each carrier<br />

made a personal decision to act<br />

in unison with the other brothers<br />

and sisters of this Union<br />

Each March, we must remember and<br />

recognize these bold letter carriers<br />

and the stand they took. They<br />

showed what is possible when everyone<br />

works together towards the same<br />

goal and are not afraid of what might<br />

happen because of their actions.<br />

They were not to be denied or overcome<br />

(over 200,000 carriers stopped<br />

working around the country)!<br />

The current members are (and will<br />

continue to be) eternally grateful<br />

for their heroism and for having the<br />

strength to complete their goal. Our<br />

current benefits are a direct result<br />

of this action taken by our previous<br />

members. THANK YOU!<br />

EAP<br />

Sometimes, when we are in need the<br />

most, we are the least likely to recognize<br />

it. Suffering from grief, financial<br />

issues, serious disease, divorce, or<br />

other family problems outside of<br />

the workplace can affect our day at<br />

work. Most of us can identify with<br />

the enormous impact these issues<br />

Darrell Maus<br />

create in our lives - both at home<br />

and at work. We may witness this<br />

happening to someone else and we<br />

may say we know exactly what we<br />

would do if these events were to<br />

happen in our lives, but the truth is,<br />

no one knows what they will do until<br />

it happens. Being able to recognize a<br />

behavior or action that is not normal<br />

by one of our brothers or sisters on<br />

the workroom floor is the first clue<br />

and it may be the only one. Realizing<br />

and acknowledging that there may be<br />

ongoing issues in someone else’s (or<br />

even our own) life is key to what we<br />

are dealing with and getting the help<br />

needed. EAP is staffed with professionals<br />

and if they are unable to help<br />

there is information available on who<br />

can.<br />

Remember, EAP is FREE to you,<br />

your family and anyone living in your<br />

household (except tenants or live-in<br />

employees). Your privacy is strictly<br />

protected. If you happen to be a<br />

family member and wish to use EAP<br />

anonymously, you can! Your participation<br />

is completely confidential.<br />

There is help waiting and it’s just a<br />

phone call away. Life can be better.<br />

Phone 1-800-EAP-4-You (1-800-<br />

327-4968) 24 hours<br />

Minneapolis 612-349-4421<br />

www.EAP4YOU.com


6<br />

Sometimes it’s the little things.<br />

Sometimes when stewards write<br />

or discuss grievances we spend so<br />

much time and energy with<br />

investigation, arguing, and reading<br />

the JCAM and handbooks and manuals,<br />

that we forget about the little<br />

things. The things that if not covered<br />

and done correctly may make<br />

a difference in the outcome at the<br />

next step of the grievance procedure<br />

or even at arbitration. The Postal<br />

Service’s weapon of choice right now<br />

at the later steps of the grievance<br />

procedure and at arbitration is to argue<br />

arbitrability or procedural issues.<br />

It looks like it’s time for a refresher in<br />

basic grievances.<br />

Put time extensions and<br />

requests for information in<br />

writing.<br />

Yes, we all know that there is no<br />

contractual requirement to put<br />

requests for information or extensions<br />

of time limits in writing. But, if<br />

you don’t, you are simply asking for<br />

trouble. You have nothing to put in<br />

your grievance file to prove that you<br />

had that extension or that you<br />

requested that information. It’s your<br />

word against theirs. Not a chance you<br />

want to take. Put the extension in<br />

writing and have an end date. Open<br />

ended extensions are contrary to the<br />

intent of the DRT process. There<br />

have been too many times where<br />

the local union had a great working<br />

relationship with local management<br />

and these things were never an issue.<br />

Then,all of a sudden, the relationship<br />

changes. You don’t have something<br />

documented and now you, well your<br />

grievant, is up a creek.<br />

In some cases this happens when a<br />

new Postmaster comes in and takes<br />

Stewards’<br />

Corner<br />

<strong>Branch</strong> Nine News<br />

over. In one installation recently the<br />

branch had hundreds of grievances<br />

backed up on hold for many months<br />

waiting for meeting time and/or<br />

information. The office was understaffed<br />

and there was an “understanding”<br />

that the steward time and<br />

information would be provided as<br />

soon as possible. Well, a new sheriff<br />

came to town and declared all of the<br />

grievances untimely. Was it right?<br />

Ethically, no. But contractually, there<br />

was no proof of any extensions.<br />

Article 15 Section 2 of the National<br />

Agreement, Grievance Procedure,<br />

Informal Step A states in relevant<br />

part:<br />

(a) Any employee who feels aggrieved<br />

must discuss the grievance<br />

with the employee’s immediate supervisor<br />

within fourteen (14) days<br />

of the date on which the employee<br />

or the Union first learned or may reasonably<br />

have been expected to have<br />

learned of its cause. This constitutes<br />

the Informal Step A filing date.<br />

Without an extension, in writing, the<br />

grievances may not stand the test of<br />

the grievance procedure. Argue all<br />

you want about management not being<br />

timely with providing requested<br />

information or in their issuance of<br />

discipline. We make those arguments<br />

in the grievance procedure and move<br />

on. But, if the union is untimely in<br />

filing a grievance we lose. Get extensions<br />

in writing and keep copies.<br />

These extensions should always be<br />

part of the grievance file.<br />

Ok, now you’re asking, “But what if<br />

they wouldn’t give me an extension<br />

and have not provided the information<br />

I need? How can I file a grievance<br />

without getting the time or the<br />

May 2012<br />

Reprinted From:<br />

<strong>NALC</strong> Activist<br />

March 2010<br />

information? ” I know many people<br />

won’t want to hear this but the answer<br />

is to do the work on your own<br />

time and document that time noting<br />

what you did and when. No, that is<br />

not the way it is supposed to be but<br />

in order to protect your time limits<br />

and your grievant that is what you<br />

must do. Not only that, but you must<br />

also file a second grievance for the<br />

time you spent off the clock and,<br />

if you didn’t get the information you<br />

requested, file yet another grievance<br />

on that issue. These issues will become<br />

part of your contentions and a<br />

copy of these additional grievances<br />

should be included in the original<br />

grievance file as well. No one ever<br />

said being a good steward was easy.<br />

When issues such as this arise make<br />

sure that your branch president and<br />

the NBA are notified. Repeated issues<br />

of this sort are indicators that<br />

an intervention may be needed.<br />

Make sure the entire 8190 is<br />

correct and complete.<br />

Timeliness can also become an issue<br />

with the dates on the 8190. Article 15<br />

Section 2.F states:<br />

The Formal Step A decision is to<br />

be made and the Joint Step A<br />

Grievance Form completed the day of the<br />

meeting, unless the time frame is mutually<br />

extended. The Union may appeal an<br />

impasse to Step B within seven (7) days of<br />

the date of the decision.<br />

It is not uncommon for Formal A<br />

meetings to be extended. You meet<br />

and then decide to get back together<br />

to discuss the matter further or<br />

exchange paperwork. In order to<br />

protect your time limits, make sure to<br />

document the original meeting, but<br />

also don’t forget to document the extension.<br />

Remember to sign and date


May 2012 <strong>Branch</strong> Nine News 7<br />

the 8190 when the Formal A meeting<br />

is concluded. You might actually have<br />

two or more dates on the 8190 if you<br />

had multiple meetings. Make sure<br />

that the last date is the final meeting,<br />

so that it does not appear as if your<br />

appeal to Step B was untimely.<br />

When you appeal a grievance to<br />

Step B within seven days, any additions<br />

and corrections must be<br />

included in that grievance packet.<br />

Article 15.2.g of the national agreement<br />

states: Additions and corrections to<br />

the Formal Step A record may be submitted<br />

by the Union with the Step B appeal letter<br />

within the time frame for initiating the Step<br />

B appeal with a copy to the management<br />

Formal Step A official. Any such statement<br />

must be included in the file as part of the<br />

grievance record in the case.<br />

The JCAM provides that the union<br />

may submit written additions and<br />

corrections to the Formal Step A<br />

record with the Step B appeal within<br />

the time limit for filing an appeal to<br />

Step B. The filing of any corrections<br />

or additions does not extend the time<br />

limits for filing the appeal. A copy<br />

of the additions and corrections<br />

must be sent to the management<br />

Formal Step A official at the same<br />

time. Management may respond by<br />

sending additional information to the<br />

Step B team which is directly related<br />

to the union’s additions and corrections,<br />

provided that it is received<br />

prior to the Step B decision. At the<br />

same time, management must send<br />

a copy to the union Formal Step A<br />

representative. Any statement of<br />

additions and corrections must be<br />

included in the file as part of the<br />

grievance record in the case. Additions<br />

and corrections received at Step<br />

B after the grievance file could be<br />

found to be untimely and those arguments<br />

and contentions<br />

ignored. Don’t give the Postal<br />

Service the chance to make that argument.<br />

While additions and corrections<br />

should not be needed in every<br />

case and should be the exception<br />

to the rule, if you find that they are<br />

needed in a particular case be sure to<br />

include them in the grievance appeal<br />

to Step B.<br />

“Or” or “and”?<br />

This may sound like a small issue but<br />

in rare cases it may have an affect on<br />

the outcome of a grievance. When<br />

you write an issue statement on<br />

Form 8190 use the word “or” instead<br />

of the word “and.” For instance,<br />

instead of writing “Did management<br />

violate articles 3, 5, and 8 of<br />

the national agreement when they<br />

. . .” write “Did management violate<br />

article 3, 5, or 8 of the national<br />

agreement when they. . .” Using the<br />

word “or” means that if a violation<br />

is found for any of these articles the<br />

grievance should be sustained. On<br />

the other hand, if you use the word<br />

“and,” management could argue, and<br />

an uneducated arbitrator could agree,<br />

that if there was not a violation of all<br />

of those articles of the contract the<br />

grievance should be denied. Don’t<br />

limit yourself. Always remember that<br />

usually you are not grieving a violation<br />

of the JCAM. You are grieving a<br />

violation of the National Agreement.<br />

Those are the terms that should be<br />

Don’t Take a Chance:<br />

Put The Extension<br />

In Writing<br />

used in your issue statement.<br />

Proper use of shop stewards<br />

certified under Article 17.2.A<br />

means that a shop steward certified<br />

to represent carriers in a specific<br />

work location is not certified to<br />

represent carriers in another work<br />

location. A steward certified to be a<br />

steward in one unit within an installation<br />

can not be used as a steward<br />

in another unit without proper certification<br />

for that unit.<br />

In a recent arbitration decision<br />

the arbitrator found that a grievance<br />

was not arbitrable because while the<br />

steward was certified prior to the<br />

Informal A meeting, he was not<br />

certified in writing when he requested<br />

information to investigate the<br />

grievance. The Postal Service<br />

received the certification the following<br />

day. While the <strong>NALC</strong> believes<br />

that this arbitrator was in error in<br />

his judgment in this case, why take<br />

a chance. Be sure that stewards are<br />

properly certified prior to performing<br />

any steward duties. Article 17.2.A<br />

is certainly not the extent of the<br />

contract language regarding steward<br />

certification, so be sure you read and<br />

understand all of the steward certification<br />

provisions in the JCAM. The<br />

“Contract Talk” article in the April<br />

2010 Postal Record provides<br />

some additional sage advice on this<br />

issue.<br />

Proposed Removals<br />

The JCAM instructs that grievances<br />

concerning proposed removal<br />

actions which are subject<br />

to the 30-day notification period<br />

in Article 16.5 will be held at Formal<br />

Step A of the grievance procedure<br />

until the decision letter is issued.<br />

Consistent with the Dispute<br />

Resolution Process Memorandum,<br />

the employee will remain on the job<br />

or on the clock until after the Step<br />

B decision has been rendered or 14<br />

days after the appeal is received at<br />

Step B (except for emergency or<br />

crime situations as provided for in<br />

Articles 16.6 and 16.7). The JCAM<br />

also states that the union does not<br />

file a separate grievance on the deci-<br />

<strong>NALC</strong> Activist continued on page 8


8<br />

Unfair,<br />

Unsafe,<br />

Unnecessary<br />

Samantha Hartwig<br />

Eastside<br />

The Right to Work Constitutional<br />

Amendment that some legislators<br />

are trying to place on the November<br />

ballot in Minnesota will be bad for<br />

the working class across the state.<br />

Governor Dayton is opposed to<br />

making Minnesota a Right to Work<br />

state, but that is not stopping many<br />

legislators from taking a back door<br />

approach to making this a Right<br />

to Work state. Knowing that the<br />

Governor will veto any bill that<br />

makes Minnesota a Right to Work<br />

state, many Republican legislators are<br />

attempting to place a constitutional<br />

amendment on the November ballot,<br />

which will prevent the Governor<br />

from being able to veto any Right to<br />

Work legislation.<br />

After attending the debate at the<br />

state capital on March 12, 2012,<br />

on Right to Work, it became clear<br />

to me that many people have a<br />

misunderstanding on what a union<br />

really does. The union not only<br />

represents workers during times<br />

of contract negotiation, but also<br />

represents the workers when their<br />

rights within the confines of the<br />

contract have been violated. For<br />

example, in a private sector union,<br />

one important role the union plays<br />

is to train the workers. The union<br />

spends the money and time to train<br />

workers, which benefits employers.<br />

The Right to Work legislation would<br />

take away the ability of the union<br />

to not only negotiate a contract and<br />

<strong>Branch</strong> Nine News<br />

safe working conditions; but also<br />

take away the resources of the union<br />

for training workers. The union<br />

would have to shift their focus from<br />

representing members to collection<br />

of dues. This unfair, unsafe, and<br />

unnecessary legislation would make<br />

it possible for workers to not be in<br />

the union, not have to pay dues, and<br />

still reap the benefits a union job<br />

offers.<br />

In Right to Work states wages of<br />

workers tend to be lower than non-<br />

Right to Work states. It is more<br />

important than ever that we stay<br />

engaged and informed with the<br />

path the current state legislators are<br />

walking. We need make our voices<br />

heard, and make sure all of the<br />

legislators know that Right to Work<br />

is not right for Minnesota.<br />

<strong>NALC</strong> Activist continued from page 7<br />

sion letter. Rather, the union may<br />

make additions to the file based on<br />

the decision letter at either Step A or<br />

Step B.<br />

While the parties have agreed<br />

that the union is not required to<br />

file two separate grievances, one on<br />

the proposed removal and one on<br />

the decision letter, it is the <strong>NALC</strong>’s<br />

position that a grievance filed within<br />

14 days of receipt of the decision<br />

letter is timely. Be aware though<br />

that arbitrators have ruled both for<br />

and against the <strong>NALC</strong>’s position on<br />

this issue. Because it has never been<br />

tested at national level arbitration,<br />

stewards should not wait until receipt<br />

of the decision letter to file a grievance.<br />

You don’t want your<br />

grievance to become a test case on<br />

the issue. Play it safe and don’t<br />

May 2012<br />

give the Postal Service an argument<br />

you don’t have to give it. File the<br />

grievance within 14 days of receipt<br />

of the proposed removal.<br />

Step B<br />

Even at Step B the little things<br />

can become an issue down the road.<br />

The JCAM states that a Step B impasse<br />

decision must state in detail<br />

the reasons for the impasse, and<br />

also must include a statement of<br />

any additional facts and contentions<br />

not included in the Step A appeal.<br />

The parties have agreed that the<br />

impasse decision should contain all<br />

issues in dispute and the parties’<br />

respective positions on those issues<br />

and that an arbitration would thus<br />

generally be limited to those issues.<br />

While there are always exceptions<br />

to general statements like this, an<br />

arbitrator could use his or her authority<br />

to hear additional arguments<br />

if persuaded of the necessity.<br />

Again, why take the chance that the<br />

arbitrator might decide not to hear<br />

additional arguments that were<br />

brought forward in the earlier steps<br />

of the process? A Step B impasse<br />

decision should include enough<br />

information that anyone can identify<br />

the issue and what both sides’<br />

arguments and positions are without<br />

looking at the rest of the file.<br />

The <strong>NALC</strong> has used procedural<br />

issues to argue against management<br />

for many years reasoning that it failed<br />

to meet, failed to provide information<br />

or issued discipline in an untimely<br />

manner. USPS has finally learned<br />

to do the same. Let’s learn to defend<br />

ourselves against these arguments<br />

better than the Service has done in<br />

the past.<br />

Document everything and don’t<br />

forget the little things. The basics.<br />

It’s that little dog that can jump<br />

up and bite you in the butt.


May 2012 <strong>Branch</strong> Nine News 9<br />

<strong>Branch</strong> 9<br />

MDA<br />

Bowl-A-Thon<br />

On Saturday, April 14, 2012, carriers<br />

descended upon Park Tavern in<br />

St. Louis Park for the Annual<br />

Ron St. Clair MDA Bowl-a-thon.<br />

Along with bowling, our <strong>Branch</strong> 9<br />

members raised money with a Silent<br />

Auction, 50/50 drawings and raffles.<br />

By the end of the night, we had<br />

raised over $5000 for MDA in our<br />

effort to “Deliver the Cure”! The<br />

winner of the Best Silent Auction<br />

was Anoka, with their “Everyone<br />

Wins” basket. The winner of Best<br />

Individual Series was Bob Phillips of<br />

Brooklyn Park Station. The Team<br />

Best Series winner was the Brooklyn<br />

Park Team, knocking Lake Street<br />

from their long-standing 1 st place<br />

status. Thank you to everyone who<br />

participated, and donated silent<br />

auction baskets. Our lane sponsors<br />

this year were Betts and Hayes<br />

Accounting and The Fink Agency.<br />

Special thanks to Kevin Lane of<br />

Bloomington Station, who went the<br />

extra mile and obtained many, many<br />

raffle items for the event. As always,<br />

an extra thank you to our volunteers<br />

who make the event happen.<br />

JoAnn Gilbaugh<br />

<strong>Branch</strong> 9 MDA Coordinator


10<br />

<strong>Branch</strong> Nine News<br />

On Thursday, April 12th, between<br />

6:00 & 7:00PM, over one hundred<br />

letter carriers gathered, to do their<br />

part in the <strong>NALC</strong> Day of Action,<br />

outside of Senator Klobuchar’s Minneapolis<br />

office. Letter carriers and<br />

their supporters across the nation<br />

met outside senate offices to send a<br />

simple message. “Congress, don’t dismantle<br />

the U.S. Postal Service.” Here<br />

in Minneapolis, the rally brought<br />

carrier’s together to listen to MN<br />

Senator Barb Goodwin, and MN<br />

AFL-CIO Secretary-Treasurer Steve<br />

Hunter. Commuters on their way<br />

home on Washington Avenue saw<br />

signs held by letter carriers asking for<br />

their support to preserve 6-day door<br />

to door delivery. Some pulled over<br />

to ask questions, but most honked<br />

their car horns in support as they<br />

passed. Thanks to all who did more<br />

than talk the talk, but stood up to be<br />

counted and got our message out.<br />

May 2012<br />

Wisconsin’s<br />

Governor Walker<br />

gets a slap on the hand<br />

By Lisa O’Neill<br />

Source: Alternate.org<br />

Wisconsin’s recall-facing Republican<br />

Governor Scott Walker and his<br />

legislative allies received a stunning<br />

rebuke from a federal court on Friday<br />

that ruled the state’s Act 10 that<br />

stripped most state employee unions<br />

of the collective bargaining rights<br />

and dues-collecting authority was an<br />

unconstitutional abuse of power.<br />

The ruling by U.S. District Court<br />

Judge William Conley, which struck<br />

down those sections of the law, held<br />

that the Legislature had the right to<br />

deny union bargaining rights, so long<br />

as that policy was applied evenly<br />

across all state employee unions--not<br />

just the ones opposing the Governor’s<br />

or his party’s policies. Conley<br />

wrote, saying that targeting of some<br />

unions violated the Constitution’s<br />

equal protection clause.<br />

“There is no dispute that a state<br />

may bar its public employees from<br />

engaging in any form of collective<br />

bargaining. The only question<br />

is whether a state may restrict the<br />

collective bargaining rights to one<br />

category of public unions while allowing<br />

full rights to another category,”<br />

he wrote. The Court also said<br />

that Walker and his GOP allies also<br />

went too far in trying to stop the<br />

collection of union dues for some<br />

state employee unions but not others,<br />

saying that restriction violated<br />

both equal protection and freedom<br />

of assembly rights.<br />

The judge also said in a footnote<br />

that Walker’s vendetta against the<br />

unions was not related to Act’s supposed<br />

purpose of saving taxpayers<br />

money.


May 2012 <strong>Branch</strong> Nine News 11<br />

<strong>Branch</strong> 9 <strong>NALC</strong><br />

Fishing on Lake Mille Lacs<br />

Twin Pines Resort & Motel-Restaurant<br />

Located just two hours north of the Twin Cities on U.S. Highway 169 (mile marker 232).<br />

Poles and bait provided, but feel free to bring your own poles. For more<br />

information call 1.800.450.4682 or visit www.twinpinesmillelacs.com<br />

Sunday, June 10th<br />

8:00AM - 12:00PM<br />

(Meet at the resort at 7:45AM)<br />

*Twin Pines opens for breakfast at 7:00AM*<br />

$30/Adult<br />

$25/Children under 12<br />

*The <strong>Branch</strong> will be hosting a roasted chicken lunch<br />

(with hash browns, cole slaw and a drink) at Twin Pines Resort<br />

after we return from fishing. This lunch is included in the price.*<br />

Name:<br />

Amount Paid:<br />

Name of Guests (if under 14 include age):<br />

Station:<br />

Deadline is on<br />

Friday, June 1st<br />

Checks payable to: <strong>Branch</strong> 9 Fishing<br />

2408 Central Avenue NE<br />

Minneapolis, MN 55418


12<br />

President’s article from page 3<br />

obligation to make every effort to<br />

minimize the mandating of non-<br />

OTDL list carriers in accordance<br />

with Article 8.5. However, it can not<br />

be considered reasonable to deliver<br />

mail well into the evening hours. …”<br />

The problem is that the contract<br />

doesn’t call for “every effort to<br />

minimize the mandating of non-<br />

OTDL...” It requires much more.<br />

For more information see your<br />

steward.<br />

Traditional observance of<br />

Memorial Day has diminished<br />

over the years. Many Americans<br />

nowadays have forgotten<br />

the meaning and traditions of<br />

Memorial Day. At many cemeteries,<br />

the graves of the fallen<br />

are increasingly ignored and neglected.<br />

Most people no longer<br />

remember the proper flag etiquette<br />

for the day. While there<br />

are towns and cities that still<br />

hold Memorial Day parades,<br />

many have not held a parade in<br />

decades. Some people think the<br />

day is for honoring any and all<br />

dead, and not just those fallen in<br />

service to our country.<br />

To help re-educate and remind<br />

Americans of the true meaning<br />

of Memorial Day, the "National<br />

Moment of Remembrance"<br />

resolution was passed on December<br />

2000 which asks that<br />

at 3:00PM local time, for all<br />

Americans "To voluntarily and<br />

informally observe in their own<br />

way a moment of remembrance<br />

and respect, pausing from<br />

whatever they are doing for a<br />

moment of silence or listening<br />

to “Taps."<br />

<strong>Branch</strong> Nine News<br />

Twas the Night<br />

Before Christmas...<br />

Submitted by: Peter Joseph<br />

(Elmwood)<br />

Are you tired of hearing the misinformed<br />

reports of the doom &<br />

gloom of the postal sevice? Frustrated<br />

with the horrible management<br />

tactics and their lack of direction and<br />

honesty? Well gather round boys and<br />

girls and let me tell you a story about<br />

the heart and soul of the post office;<br />

the dedicated men and women in<br />

blue- the letter carrier.<br />

This story starts on December 1st<br />

at the Elmwood station. My wife,<br />

Cheryl and I have made a few sacrifices<br />

along the way to provide great<br />

education opportunities for our kids,<br />

Zach & Julie. We just went to Las<br />

Vegas for Cheryl’s 50th birthday, so<br />

this year it was all about me. With<br />

hip replacement surgery coming in<br />

March, I was going to take my tip<br />

money and get a big, comfy, leather<br />

recliner.<br />

On the day I reached my goal I<br />

found out my son needed his wisdom<br />

teeth removed and another<br />

minor surgery done. Oh well, easy<br />

come easy go, and my old beat up<br />

sofa still kinda looked comfortable.<br />

Arriving home on Christmas Eve,<br />

I sensed a giddy, excited family<br />

awaiting me. After a little chit-chat,<br />

I walked through the living room<br />

and, to my great shock, there was<br />

the most beautiful leather recliner<br />

evveerrr. I turned to thank my wife<br />

and kids but they just shrugged their<br />

shoulders and said it was not from<br />

them. I was going to call my mother<br />

in Florida to thank her, but nope,<br />

wrong again. I’m kindof old to believe<br />

in Santa Claus, but????<br />

Cheryl finally told me that Mike<br />

Erhard, P.O. Johnson, Kelly Kjeseth-<br />

Goering, and Perry Korzenowski,<br />

had ponied up their money and<br />

May 2012<br />

bought it for me. She said that they<br />

(allegedly) went off their routes, went<br />

to Slumberland Furniture at the last<br />

minute, delivered the chair, and vanished.<br />

I was in complete shock and<br />

can honestly say I was speechless ( a<br />

status my wife and many co-workers<br />

wish would become permanent). It<br />

was a Christmas I will never forget.<br />

We have a unique, crazy cast of<br />

characters at Elmwood Station, but<br />

we really do look out for each other.<br />

When I quizzed them why they did<br />

this selfless act, they said it’s because<br />

I’m willing to give 110%, and I point<br />

out daily that we are turning the corner,<br />

and Elmwood is on the verge of<br />

greatness. Thanks so much to those<br />

four wonderful fellow carriers.<br />

Peter Joe<br />

P.S. I wonder if they noticed that I<br />

don’t have a big screen TV? Hmmm?<br />

Reprinted From:<br />

savethepostoffice.com


May 2012 <strong>Branch</strong> Nine News 13<br />

Memorial Day Salute<br />

At each General Membership Meeting, we begin by standing and reciting the Pledge of Allegiance. We as a union<br />

can be proud that, regardless of our differences, be it political or religious, we stand together in support of our<br />

republic. Red Skelton (a 50’s & 60’s comic) recited the Pledge of Allegiance on his television show. It may make<br />

reciting it more meaningful for us at the next GMM.<br />

On January 14, 1969, I presented “The Little Old Man” as a teacher. The time was 1923. The students had finished<br />

reciting the Pledge of Allegiance which at the time was but 10 years old. The old sage called the children together<br />

and said--<br />

“Boys and girls, I have been listening to you recite the Pledge of Allegiance all semester and it appears that it has<br />

become monotonous to you or could it be you do not know the meaning of those words. If I may, I would like to<br />

recite the Pledge and give to you a definition of the words.<br />

I----meaning me, an individual, a committee of one.<br />

Pledge----dedicate all of my worldly goods to give without self pity.<br />

Allegiance----my love and my devotion.<br />

To the Flag----our standard, Old Glory, a symbol of freedom. Wherever she waves, there is respect because your<br />

loyalty has given her a dignity that shouts freedom is everybody’s job.<br />

Of the United----that means that we have all come together.<br />

States----individual communities that have united into 48 great states. 48 individual communities with pride and dignity<br />

and purpose, all divided with imaginary boundaries, yet united to a common cause, and that’s love of country.<br />

Of America.<br />

And to the Republic----a republic, a state in which sovereign power is invested in representatives chosen by the<br />

people to govern. And government is the people and it’s from the people to the leaders, not from the leaders to the<br />

people.<br />

For which it stands!<br />

One nation----meaning, so blessed by God.<br />

Indivisible----incapable of being divided.<br />

With Liberty----which is freedom and the right of power to live one’s life without threats or fear or any sort of<br />

retaliation.<br />

And justice----The principle and quality of dealing fairly with others.<br />

For all.----which means, boys and girls, it’s as much your country as it is mine.”<br />

Since I was a small boy, two states have been added to our nation, and two words have been added to the Pledge of<br />

Allegiance “under God.” Wouldn’t it be a pity if someone said, “That’s a prayer” and that would be eliminated from<br />

schools, too?<br />

The Twin Cities Postal Headquarters<br />

Minneapolis<br />

2220 Lyndale Avenue South<br />

Minneapolis, MN 55405<br />

612-377-0011<br />

USA<br />

Union preferred<br />

St. Paul<br />

935 N. Dale Street<br />

St. Paul, MN 55103<br />

651- 224 - 7567


14<br />

<strong>Branch</strong> Nine News<br />

May 2012<br />

It was a very good year: The salaries of USPS executives<br />

Source: Save the Post Office http://www.savethepostoffice.com<br />

The Gannett 2012 salary finder for USPS employees came out this week, and it contains a wealth of information.<br />

You can find the salary, job title, workplace, and year of hire for any postal employee. That includes all the executives<br />

in L’Enfant Plaza.<br />

Unfortunately, the salary finder doesn’t contain information about bonuses and compensation packages, which for<br />

upper echelon executives can add up to almost as much as the base salary. For example, according to the USPS Form<br />

10-K for 2011 (p. 54), Chief Operating Officer Megan Brennan earned $225,308 in 2011, but brought in a total of<br />

358,996, and Chief Information Officer Ellis Burgoyne earned $220,846 but brought in $508,688.<br />

Even though the salary finder does not provide this kind of information about total compensation, it is still a useful<br />

tool and lots of fun. For instance, here’s one use for the salary finder.<br />

Back in November, the Federal Times revealed that “as the U.S. Postal Service was careening toward a record $8.5 billion<br />

loss in 2010, it was paying more than three dozen top executives and officers salaries and bonuses exceeding that<br />

of Cabinet secretaries.” A list was not available at that time, but using the salary finder, we’ve produced a list of the<br />

38 postal executives earning the highest (base) salary as of February 2012. You can see the list here.<br />

Searching the salary finder for zip code 20260, the zip for postal headquarters at L’Enfant Plaza, and then sorting by<br />

salary, we’ve learned that there are over one thousand employees in HQ who earn $100,000 a year or more.<br />

We’ve also analyzed the data for the top 300 salaries in HQ, the 28 Vice Presidents (not all are in HQ), the 49 District<br />

Managers, and 57 plant managers. (There are over a hundred job titles listed on the website, so we probably missed a<br />

few other high-paying jobs.)<br />

There are 415 employees who fall into one of these categories. You can see a list of their salaries here. We’ve omitted<br />

names as a courtesy, but if you’re curious about anyone in particular, the salary finder can help.<br />

The salaries of these 415 employees range from $103,480 to $276,840, and the average is about $152,500. Here’s the<br />

breakdown:<br />

Position<br />

Number in<br />

group Average Salary Average years of service<br />

Top 300 salaries in HQ 300 $151,210 22<br />

Vice Presidents 28 $189,000 25<br />

District Managers 49 $163,135 32<br />

Plant Managers 57 $143,101 29<br />

Combined list 415 $152,428 25<br />

The salary finder also provides the<br />

date of hire for postal employees, from<br />

which we’ve calculated years of service.<br />

Most of these 415 executives and<br />

managers have put in a lot of time at<br />

the Postal Service, some as many as 44<br />

years. The median is 28 years, and the<br />

average is 24 years.<br />

If you’d like to put some faces on some<br />

of the top earners, the USPS website provides an organizational chart — complete with photos — of Postal Leadership,<br />

the 37 folks running the show.<br />

As for the significance of the information on the salary-finder website, make of it what you will. Wages and salaries<br />

are relative — what looks like a huge salary to one person may look meager to another. It just depends on where<br />

you’re sitting.<br />

Wages around the world range from virtually nothing — Third-World peasants earn a dollar or two a day — to the<br />

millions of dollars earned annually by the super rich. The bottom 90% of American households average $31,244 a<br />

year, while the top 0.1% average $3.2 million a year and the top 0.01% average $27 million a year. (See this article in<br />

Mother Jones for more data on income inequality.)<br />

Just to take an example, consider Fred Smith, CEO of the Postal Service’s biggest supplier, FedEx. Smith earns $8 to<br />

$10 million a year — about $4,500 an hour (if he’s putting in a 40-hour week) — which puts him in the top 0.1% of<br />

the nation. For the rest of us — the other 99.9% — that sounds like a pretty nice salary, but from the point of view<br />

of the billionaire Koch brothers, two of the richest people in the world, it’s probably not very impressive. They’re<br />

worth $25 billion each, and between March 2010 and September 2011, they accumulated $15 billion in wealth. (Some<br />

of that wealth goes to fund think tanks that publish books and articles advocating postal privatization.)As for postsalaries<br />

overall, the average USPS employee — this includes the entire workforce, from non-career casuals to the Post-


May 2012 <strong>Branch</strong> Nine News 15<br />

master General — earns $57,000 a year, not counting benefits. The following numbers come from the Form 10-K for<br />

FY 2011, and the averages use 645,950 as the total workforce, as indicated in the 10-K.<br />

Category of payment Total(in billions) Average<br />

Compensation $36.8 $57,003<br />

Retirement $5.9 $9,101<br />

Health benefits $5.2 $8,084<br />

Other $0.4 $601<br />

Total $48.3 $74,789<br />

From the point of view of a Wal-Mart employee earning $10 an<br />

hour, the salaries of postal workers must look quite enviable. Lots<br />

of people think postal workers make too much, and there are many<br />

stakeholders in the mail industry who argue that high wages and<br />

generous benefits are driving up costs and making rates too high.<br />

Postal management seems to think the same way. It’s been saying<br />

that it needs to get rid of the no-layoff clause in union contracts,<br />

replace full-time employees with contract workers, and take control<br />

of the pension plans and retiree health care plan so that wages and benefits can be brought down to meet the “private<br />

sector comparability standard.”<br />

That’s a reference to a passage Title 39, the 1971 Postal Reorganization Act (PRA), which says, “As an employer, the<br />

Postal Service shall achieve and maintain compensation for its officers and employees comparable to the rates and<br />

types of compensation paid in the private sector of the economy of the United States.”<br />

The irony is that postal executives use the same passage in Title 39 to justify their large compensation packages. The<br />

Form 10-K states that given the “size and scope of operations, the comparability requirement in Title 39 would suggest<br />

that the Postal Service’s executive officer compensation and benefits should be on par with the compensation and<br />

benefits of the very largest private sector companies in the United States. Even in these challenging economic times,<br />

comparably sized companies typically provide their top executives with annual salaries well in excess of $1 million and<br />

total compensation and benefits valued at several million dollars.”<br />

If postal executives had their way, then, the salaries and benefits of regular postal workers would be decreased while<br />

their own compensation packages would be increased — all to bring postal salaries into compliance with Title 39 and<br />

the “private sector comparability standard.”<br />

Needless to say, postal management would probably prefer if the public did not know very much about their compensation<br />

packages, and they’ve fought the APWU’s effort to find out more about performance bonuses. But as the<br />

salary finder FAQ page explains, government workers aren’t entitled to the same kind of privacy as workers in the<br />

private sector:<br />

“Open record laws and court decisions for at least the last 40 years have maintained that a government employee’s<br />

name, salary and job-related information is open to anyone who requests it. Courts and government rules have long<br />

held that federal employees are public servants, and that the public has a ‘significant interest’ in knowing how their<br />

employees are paid.”<br />

With the fiscal situation of the Postal Service a matter of intense public debate right now, there’s obviously “significant<br />

interest” in how postal workers and executives are paid. Last week, revelations about the postal salaries of<br />

executives, coupled with news about impending plant closings, prompted New York Congresswoman Kathy Hochul<br />

to introduce legislation limiting compensation for postal executives to the same level of pay as the President’s Cabinet.<br />

Huchel is concerned about the 700 jobs that will be lost in Buffalo when its mail processing plant closes.<br />

“The Postal Service cannot make the argument that they need to cuts costs and let go hard-working postal workers<br />

when their own management team continues to rake in bonuses and make more than the President’s Cabinet,” said<br />

Hochul. “The jobs of over 700 Western New Yorkers and thousands of Americans across this country are worth<br />

more than bonuses for a handful of individuals at the United States Postal Service.”<br />

In response to Hochul’s proposal, postal officials are using the argument they make in the Form 10-K. They say that<br />

because the Postal Service functions like a business, it is important for executive salaries to remain competitive with<br />

the private sector.<br />

USPS spokesman Mark Saunders put it this way: “When you compare the size and scope of an organization that employs<br />

well over half a million employees operating among 32,000 locations linked by more than 210,000 vehicles, our<br />

officer compensation is well below that of similar private sector positions.”<br />

Maybe so, but there are a lot of people wondering how postal officers and managers can pay themselves so well and<br />

at the same time say that the financial crisis is so bad that they need to eliminate 155,000 jobs and close half of those<br />

“32,000 locations” (a.k.a. “post offices”). It’s something to wonder about.


<strong>Branch</strong> Nine News<br />

2408 Central Avenue NE<br />

Minneapolis, MN 55418-3712<br />

Change Service Requested<br />

PRSRT STD<br />

US POSTAGE<br />

PAID<br />

TWIN CITIES MN<br />

PERMIT NO. 91964<br />

<strong>Branch</strong> Nine Calendar<br />

May 22<br />

Nokomis Retiree Breakfast<br />

9:00AM<br />

Fred Babcock VFW<br />

6715 Lakeshore Drive<br />

Richfield<br />

June 5<br />

Northside Retiree’s Breakfast<br />

9:30AM<br />

Elsie’s<br />

729 Marshall St. NE<br />

Minneapolis<br />

Sunday, June 10<br />

Fishing on Lake Mille Lacs<br />

Twin Pines Resort<br />

2hrs. north on U.S. Hwy 169<br />

mile marker 232<br />

8:00AM - Noon<br />

June 12<br />

Southside Retiree Breakfast<br />

9:00AM<br />

Fred Babcock VFW<br />

6715 Lakeshore Drive, Richfield<br />

June 12<br />

Stewards Meeting<br />

7:00PM<br />

Golden Valley VFW Post 7051<br />

7775 Medicine Lake Rd<br />

Golden Valley<br />

June 26<br />

Nokomis Retiree Breakfast<br />

9:00AM<br />

Fred Babcock VFW<br />

6715 Lakeshore Drive<br />

Richfield<br />

Tuesday, June 26<br />

General Membership Meeting<br />

7:00PM<br />

Golden Valley VFW Post 7051<br />

7775 Medicine Lake Rd<br />

Golden Valley<br />

July 3<br />

Northside Retiree’s Breakfast<br />

9:30AM<br />

Elsie’s<br />

729 Marshall St. NE<br />

Minneapolis<br />

July 10<br />

Stewards Meeting<br />

7:00PM<br />

Golden Valley VFW Post 7051<br />

7775 Medicine Lake Rd<br />

Golden Valley<br />

July 10<br />

Southside Retiree Breakfast<br />

9:00AM<br />

Fred Babcock VFW<br />

6715 Lakeshore Drive<br />

Richfield

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!