What's a Woo? - Branch 9 NALC
What's a Woo? - Branch 9 NALC
What's a Woo? - Branch 9 NALC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
VOLUME 64 No 4 Official Publication of <strong>Branch</strong> Nine, <strong>NALC</strong> May 2012<br />
What’s a <strong>Woo</strong>?<br />
◄This is not a WOO.<br />
WOO (Window of Operation) is the new acronym being<br />
used by management in an attempt to justify that all<br />
outgoing mail will make the last truck dispatch. Management<br />
has served notice that they will simultaniously<br />
schedule overtime and 8-hour only carrier’s to be back in<br />
the office 15 minutes before DOV (Dispatch of Value)<br />
departs.<br />
In a letter to <strong>Branch</strong> 9 President, Mike Zagaros, the Minneapolis Postmaster<br />
stated that managers will openly violate Article 8.5.G. with the misguided notion<br />
that they have the right to do so.<br />
Being proactive, <strong>Branch</strong> 9 is in the process of developing a step-by-step<br />
guide that even the most inexperienced steward will use to file a successful<br />
grievance.<br />
<strong>Branch</strong> 9 officer’s cannot emphasize enough that if you (yes, you) see or<br />
know of an 8-hour only carrier working overtime, let your steward know.<br />
Management may try to “work” some private deal with an 8-hour carrier in<br />
violation of our National Agreement. The Contract is just that; an agreement<br />
by both parties.<br />
Upper management has trimmed staffing (both clerks and carriers) beyond a<br />
sane limit, and now cannot adequately get mail delivered at a reasonable time.<br />
So much for customer service.<br />
USPS/<strong>NALC</strong> headed to arbitration.<br />
From the Federal Mediation & Conciliation Service, the USPS picks an<br />
arbiter, and the <strong>NALC</strong> picks an arbiter. These two arbiter’s pick a neutral<br />
third arbiter who will be the lead arbiter. The three-person panel then must<br />
set a calendar schedule to hear arguements from the two parties.<br />
Memorial Day Issue:<br />
President’s Article<br />
.. Page 3<br />
Right to Work Fallacy<br />
..Page 4<br />
Vice President’s Article<br />
..Page 5<br />
Stewards’ Corner<br />
..Page 6<br />
Unfair, Unsafe, Unnessary<br />
..Page 8<br />
MDA Bowl-A-Thon<br />
..Page 9<br />
Save the USPS Rally<br />
..Page 10<br />
Wisconsin Governor’s Rebuke<br />
..Page 10<br />
Memorial Day Salute<br />
..Page 12 & 13<br />
USPS Executive Salaries<br />
..Page 14
2<br />
Brian Emke (Robbinsdale)<br />
is honored at his surprise<br />
retirement party at the St.<br />
Michael American Legion.<br />
West Bloomington carriers<br />
with their 25 year pins, 30<br />
year pins and 35 year pins.<br />
Jim Greenfield (St Louis<br />
Park) clocks out for the final<br />
time as Steward, Steve<br />
Rowland witnesses.<br />
<strong>Branch</strong> 9 President, Mike<br />
Zagaros presents new retiree<br />
Pat Rein (Shakopee) with his<br />
gold watch.<br />
<strong>Branch</strong> Nine News<br />
From<br />
the Editor’s<br />
Desk<br />
Submitted Amendments<br />
to <strong>Branch</strong> 9 By-Laws<br />
were acted upon at the<br />
April 24th GMM.<br />
By-Law submission #1.<br />
Voted down<br />
By-Law submission #2.<br />
Voted down<br />
Mike Pearson (Shakopee)<br />
with his 25 year pin.<br />
(l) Tom Taykalo (Steward)<br />
gives a celebratory handshake<br />
to new retiree Dave<br />
Bradley (Metro Hub).<br />
May 2012<br />
<strong>Branch</strong> Nine, <strong>NALC</strong><br />
2408 Central Ave. NE<br />
Minneapolis, MN 55418<br />
Voice: (612) 781-9858<br />
Fax: (612) 781-9849<br />
E-Mail Addresses:<br />
Website: branch9nalc.com<br />
Editor:<br />
branch9news@branch9nalc.com<br />
<strong>Branch</strong> Nine Officers<br />
President<br />
Mike Zagaros<br />
Exec. Vice President<br />
Darrell Maus<br />
Recording Secretary<br />
Jeremy Rothstein<br />
Treasurer<br />
Lisa O’Neill<br />
Financial Secretary<br />
Melia Derrick<br />
Editor<br />
Chuck Glover<br />
Sergeant at Arms<br />
Jim Nelson<br />
Trustee<br />
Barb Watczak<br />
Trustee<br />
Mike Smith<br />
Trustee<br />
Samantha Hartwig<br />
Director of Retirees<br />
Cheryl Stately<br />
<strong>NALC</strong> Health Benefits Rep.<br />
Julie Waldemar<br />
(612) 963-6252<br />
The <strong>Branch</strong> Nine News is a monthly<br />
publication of <strong>NALC</strong> <strong>Branch</strong> 9, and<br />
is published in the interest of and for<br />
the members of <strong>NALC</strong> <strong>Branch</strong> 9.<br />
The opinions expressed by the<br />
writers are not necessarily those of<br />
the OFFICERS, or of <strong>NALC</strong> <strong>Branch</strong> 9.<br />
Articles MUST be submitted to<br />
the editor by the 2nd Friday of the<br />
month, and must be signed. The<br />
Editorial Staff reserves the right to<br />
edit or refuse to print articles which<br />
are derogatory in nature. Any official<br />
<strong>NALC</strong> organization may reproduce<br />
our articles provided appropriate<br />
credit is given.
May 2012 <strong>Branch</strong> Nine News 3<br />
President’s Report<br />
I got a letter the other day. It<br />
began with “No customer is<br />
satisfied with the delivery of<br />
mail late into the evening. It is<br />
not practicable to deliver mail<br />
at a time when our customers<br />
do not want it (Ex: 6:00PM &<br />
beyond) or when businesses are<br />
closed and not available to receive<br />
it. …” These are the opening<br />
sentences of a letter sent notifying<br />
the <strong>Branch</strong> of management’s<br />
(in this case the Postmaster of<br />
Minneapolis) intentions regarding the<br />
“simultaneous scheduling of OTDL<br />
carriers and non-OTDL carriers.”<br />
This is the working of carriers on<br />
and off the Overtime Desired List at<br />
the same time “without maximizing<br />
the list to the limits set forth in<br />
Article 8.5.G…” Management is<br />
giving notice that they are attempting<br />
to establish an operational window<br />
for the Minneapolis Installation<br />
beginning May 14 th . So what is an<br />
operational window or Window of<br />
Operation (WOO)?<br />
The term, simply put, refers to the<br />
timeframe that a delivery unit works<br />
its carriers from start to finish. Often<br />
operational windows are defined with<br />
absolutes like “all carriers off the<br />
street by 5:00 or 5:30PM or whatever.<br />
It has been referred to by arbitrators<br />
as a service goal or commitment<br />
that is used “to effectuate the<br />
timely delivery of mail as well as<br />
the timely dispatch of mail brought<br />
back to the station by carriers.”<br />
But the operational window in the<br />
Minneapolis Installation has not been<br />
defined with a specific time. Instead<br />
the notice provides examples of what<br />
the operational window will be. It<br />
“will be considered open when 80%<br />
of the respective routes caseable<br />
mail volume is anticipated to be<br />
available to be cased by a carrier. It<br />
will be considered closed 15 minutes<br />
prior to the Dispatch of Value’s<br />
(DOV) scheduled departure. ...”<br />
This explanation could allow for<br />
different time frames or windows to<br />
be used at different stations inside<br />
the 554 area. What’s most important<br />
to realize is that management has<br />
the right to do this. They have the<br />
right to establish an operational<br />
window. Article 3 of the National<br />
Agreement (Management Rights)<br />
gives management the ability to set<br />
a service goal that has carriers off<br />
the street by a certain time. BUT,<br />
Article 3 also says that this right<br />
is “subject to the provisions of<br />
this Agreement.” This means that<br />
while management has the right to<br />
determine the method, means and<br />
personnel they will use to manage<br />
the Postal Service. They must do so<br />
within the confines of the contract<br />
including all of Article 8.<br />
What we really are talking about<br />
is the forcing of carriers not on<br />
the Overtime Desired List to work<br />
overtime possibly before the OTDL<br />
is maxed out, which is a violation of<br />
the National Agreement. One of the<br />
purposes of the OTDL is to excuse<br />
full-time carriers not wishing to<br />
work overtime from having to work<br />
overtime when there are carriers on<br />
the OTDL who are available. The<br />
JCAM spells out when a carrier not<br />
on the OTDL can be required to<br />
work overtime. If you are not on the<br />
OTDL and management has you<br />
working overtime, see your steward.<br />
If you are asked to volunteer to work<br />
overtime, see your steward. If you<br />
are on the Work<br />
Mike Zagaros<br />
Assignment List and asked to work<br />
on another assignment, see your<br />
steward. Grievances will be filed each<br />
and every time there is a violation.<br />
Management can’t pick and choose<br />
which parts of the contract they will<br />
follow and which they will ignore.<br />
They are expected to give meaning to<br />
all of it.<br />
Recently the Federal Times published<br />
an article about postal employees<br />
working more overtime. They<br />
reported that overtime pay has<br />
increased by 1/3 since 2009. At the<br />
same time the workforce has shrunk<br />
by 10%. We know that overtime is<br />
usually caused by either too much<br />
mail (from volume or poorly adjusted<br />
routes) or not enough people,<br />
sometimes it’s both. The main<br />
issue in Minneapolis is staffing, and<br />
everyone knows it. The major cause<br />
with late deliveries is not enough<br />
people. Look around at the number<br />
of carriers who have retired and have<br />
not been replaced and you can see it.<br />
Management’s operational window<br />
won’t work in Minneapolis based<br />
on the current staffing. They know<br />
it but that doesn’t mean they won’t<br />
try even if it means that they will<br />
have to violate the contract. In their<br />
notice they said that “management<br />
acknowledges and recognizes the<br />
President’s Report continued on page 12
4 <strong>Branch</strong> Nine News<br />
The Right To Work Fallacy<br />
Many of us in Minnesota have<br />
been hearing about the Right To<br />
Work, however many of us do not<br />
understand what that actually means.<br />
Here in Minnesota we are currently<br />
not a Right To Work state; but some<br />
Senators, and Representatives in the<br />
State Legislature feel there needs to<br />
be a Constitutional Amendment to<br />
turn Minnesota into a Right To Work<br />
state.<br />
On Monday, March 12, 2012 the<br />
Minnesota Senate Judiciary and<br />
Public Safety Committee held a<br />
hearing on a proposed Constitutional<br />
Amendment that would allow the<br />
voters to decide if Minnesota should<br />
become a Right To Work state. There<br />
was an hour of testimony for those<br />
in favor of Right To Work, an hour<br />
of testimony for those opposed<br />
to Right To Work, and an hour of<br />
debate among the Senators before<br />
voting on whether or not a Right To<br />
Work Constitutional Amendment<br />
will be added to the November ballot<br />
for the citizens of Minnesota to<br />
decide the Right To Work issue.<br />
The Senators voted, and the vote<br />
was along party lines, to add the<br />
Right To Work Constitutional<br />
Amendment to the November Ballot,<br />
this is the first step to adding this<br />
unfair constitutional amendment to<br />
the ballot in November. This is<br />
why it is important to contact the<br />
State Legislators and let them know<br />
the working people of Minnesota<br />
are opposed to the Right To Work<br />
Constitutional Amendment.<br />
In 1961 the Reverend Martin Luther<br />
King Jr. had this to say about the<br />
By: Samantha Hartwig<br />
Eastside<br />
Right To Work: “In our glorious<br />
fight for civil rights, we must guard<br />
against being fooled by false slogans,<br />
such as ‘right to work.’ It is a law to<br />
rob us of our civil rights and job<br />
rights. . . Its purpose is to destroy<br />
labor unions and the freedom of<br />
collective bargaining by which unions<br />
have improved wages and working<br />
conditions of everyone. Wherever<br />
these laws have been passed, wages<br />
are lower, job opportunities are fewer<br />
and there are no civil rights. We do<br />
not intend to let them do this to us.<br />
We demand this fraud be stopped.<br />
Our weapon is our vote.” These<br />
words uttered in 1961 still remain<br />
relevant today, and we need to make<br />
our collective voice heard in the<br />
legislature.<br />
If the Right To Work Constitutional<br />
Amendment is approved it means<br />
that union members in private<br />
sector unions can withdraw from<br />
the Union, not have to pay any dues,<br />
and still reap all of the benefits a<br />
Union job offers. As letter carriers<br />
we already deal with this issue daily<br />
because we are an open shop union.<br />
For the private sector unions this<br />
legislation will financially hurt many<br />
of them, weakening their ability to<br />
bargain collectively, and shift a focus<br />
from representation of members<br />
to collecting dues, and soliciting<br />
members to stay in the union. We<br />
need to support our brothers and<br />
sisters in the private sector; an injury<br />
to one is an injury to all. This is<br />
just the beginning of attacks on<br />
the working class in Minnesota, but<br />
together we can make a difference,<br />
and be heard.<br />
May 2012<br />
In April, I took a trip back to God’s<br />
County, the land of my youth.<br />
Renewed acquaintances with some<br />
childhood friends I hadn’t seen in 40<br />
years or more. We caught each other<br />
up on our lives, our families, etc.<br />
When I told them that I had spent<br />
37-1/2 years in the Postal Service,<br />
a couple of them asked me, “What<br />
is going on with the Post Office? It<br />
ran so well for 225 years. Why is it in<br />
such trouble now?”<br />
That got me to thinking: how would<br />
you describe the Postal Service in a<br />
paragraph? Maybe Chuck should run<br />
a contest in the <strong>Branch</strong> Nine News,<br />
and the winner gets a <strong>Branch</strong> Nine<br />
ball cap (if there is such a thing) or<br />
something.<br />
Some say that it’s a very complex<br />
issue, but I disagree. And since I<br />
posed the question, I’ll go first and<br />
tell you my response. I said to my<br />
old friends: “Well, it’s like this. You<br />
take a venerable American institution<br />
of hundreds of thousands of<br />
employees. You find the 5% looking<br />
for an easy path, combine them with<br />
the 5% who are blind to reality. You<br />
put this 10% together, and let them<br />
manage the outfit for 30 years. And<br />
in a nutshell, that’s what wrong with<br />
the Postal Service today.”<br />
Rotten Rodney Anderson, Retired<br />
The Following is a list of Paid<br />
Members of PAL 9 for April 2012.<br />
Very Concerned Members<br />
Kieran Hughes<br />
Charles Glover<br />
Regular Members<br />
Roger G Harwarth<br />
Carlos A Garcia<br />
George B Gray<br />
David J Johnson<br />
Bradley J Knutson<br />
Ron Lawrence<br />
Treasurer PAL 9
May 2012 <strong>Branch</strong> Nine News 5<br />
Executive Vice President’s<br />
Report<br />
WE MUST NEVER FORGET<br />
<strong>Branch</strong> 9 members voted at a special<br />
March meeting in 1970 to go out on<br />
strike. This was not just Union chatter<br />
and idle talk, they followed up the<br />
vote with action. On the morning of<br />
March 21, 1970, <strong>Branch</strong> 9 carriers<br />
did not report to work. Instead, they<br />
showed up en masse at a parking<br />
lot, grabbed a picket sign and then<br />
walked over the Hennepin Avenue<br />
Bridge to the Main Post Office in<br />
Minneapolis. The Postal Inspectors<br />
were also there on the higher floors<br />
taking pictures (for evidence) of<br />
the unlawful actions of carriers that<br />
were participating in the strike. Our<br />
<strong>Branch</strong> members walked with “ON<br />
STRIKE” signs defiantly hoisted in<br />
the air. We had now joined the other<br />
<strong>NALC</strong> carriers from branches across<br />
the country in the movement for<br />
better wages and benefits. In the days<br />
to follow we saw continued strike activities.<br />
President Nixon got involved<br />
and ordered the National Guard in<br />
to sort and deliver the mail - that did<br />
not work out so well. The troops<br />
went to the letter cases without any<br />
idea of what the job involved. Some<br />
carriers had taken their case labels<br />
home, leaving the guardsmen with no<br />
idea of how or where to deliver the<br />
piles of mail.<br />
The detailed news articles and<br />
other preserved artifacts here in our<br />
<strong>Branch</strong> and around the country are<br />
very interesting. This is a rich piece<br />
of our own Labor History, that is not<br />
only important, but also intriguing<br />
for myself and current members to<br />
hear the stories of these brave men<br />
and women who were involved in the<br />
strike. I am sure they would all gladly<br />
share their personal recollection of<br />
the events, the financial sacrifice (as<br />
they certainly did not get paid by<br />
the US Postal Department while on<br />
strike) and the fear they had of losing<br />
their jobs as a result of the illegal<br />
strike. At the time of the strike, letter<br />
carriers made $3.06 per hour, and<br />
literally had to beg for raises from<br />
Congress.<br />
The strike was possible and<br />
successful because each carrier<br />
made a personal decision to act<br />
in unison with the other brothers<br />
and sisters of this Union<br />
Each March, we must remember and<br />
recognize these bold letter carriers<br />
and the stand they took. They<br />
showed what is possible when everyone<br />
works together towards the same<br />
goal and are not afraid of what might<br />
happen because of their actions.<br />
They were not to be denied or overcome<br />
(over 200,000 carriers stopped<br />
working around the country)!<br />
The current members are (and will<br />
continue to be) eternally grateful<br />
for their heroism and for having the<br />
strength to complete their goal. Our<br />
current benefits are a direct result<br />
of this action taken by our previous<br />
members. THANK YOU!<br />
EAP<br />
Sometimes, when we are in need the<br />
most, we are the least likely to recognize<br />
it. Suffering from grief, financial<br />
issues, serious disease, divorce, or<br />
other family problems outside of<br />
the workplace can affect our day at<br />
work. Most of us can identify with<br />
the enormous impact these issues<br />
Darrell Maus<br />
create in our lives - both at home<br />
and at work. We may witness this<br />
happening to someone else and we<br />
may say we know exactly what we<br />
would do if these events were to<br />
happen in our lives, but the truth is,<br />
no one knows what they will do until<br />
it happens. Being able to recognize a<br />
behavior or action that is not normal<br />
by one of our brothers or sisters on<br />
the workroom floor is the first clue<br />
and it may be the only one. Realizing<br />
and acknowledging that there may be<br />
ongoing issues in someone else’s (or<br />
even our own) life is key to what we<br />
are dealing with and getting the help<br />
needed. EAP is staffed with professionals<br />
and if they are unable to help<br />
there is information available on who<br />
can.<br />
Remember, EAP is FREE to you,<br />
your family and anyone living in your<br />
household (except tenants or live-in<br />
employees). Your privacy is strictly<br />
protected. If you happen to be a<br />
family member and wish to use EAP<br />
anonymously, you can! Your participation<br />
is completely confidential.<br />
There is help waiting and it’s just a<br />
phone call away. Life can be better.<br />
Phone 1-800-EAP-4-You (1-800-<br />
327-4968) 24 hours<br />
Minneapolis 612-349-4421<br />
www.EAP4YOU.com
6<br />
Sometimes it’s the little things.<br />
Sometimes when stewards write<br />
or discuss grievances we spend so<br />
much time and energy with<br />
investigation, arguing, and reading<br />
the JCAM and handbooks and manuals,<br />
that we forget about the little<br />
things. The things that if not covered<br />
and done correctly may make<br />
a difference in the outcome at the<br />
next step of the grievance procedure<br />
or even at arbitration. The Postal<br />
Service’s weapon of choice right now<br />
at the later steps of the grievance<br />
procedure and at arbitration is to argue<br />
arbitrability or procedural issues.<br />
It looks like it’s time for a refresher in<br />
basic grievances.<br />
Put time extensions and<br />
requests for information in<br />
writing.<br />
Yes, we all know that there is no<br />
contractual requirement to put<br />
requests for information or extensions<br />
of time limits in writing. But, if<br />
you don’t, you are simply asking for<br />
trouble. You have nothing to put in<br />
your grievance file to prove that you<br />
had that extension or that you<br />
requested that information. It’s your<br />
word against theirs. Not a chance you<br />
want to take. Put the extension in<br />
writing and have an end date. Open<br />
ended extensions are contrary to the<br />
intent of the DRT process. There<br />
have been too many times where<br />
the local union had a great working<br />
relationship with local management<br />
and these things were never an issue.<br />
Then,all of a sudden, the relationship<br />
changes. You don’t have something<br />
documented and now you, well your<br />
grievant, is up a creek.<br />
In some cases this happens when a<br />
new Postmaster comes in and takes<br />
Stewards’<br />
Corner<br />
<strong>Branch</strong> Nine News<br />
over. In one installation recently the<br />
branch had hundreds of grievances<br />
backed up on hold for many months<br />
waiting for meeting time and/or<br />
information. The office was understaffed<br />
and there was an “understanding”<br />
that the steward time and<br />
information would be provided as<br />
soon as possible. Well, a new sheriff<br />
came to town and declared all of the<br />
grievances untimely. Was it right?<br />
Ethically, no. But contractually, there<br />
was no proof of any extensions.<br />
Article 15 Section 2 of the National<br />
Agreement, Grievance Procedure,<br />
Informal Step A states in relevant<br />
part:<br />
(a) Any employee who feels aggrieved<br />
must discuss the grievance<br />
with the employee’s immediate supervisor<br />
within fourteen (14) days<br />
of the date on which the employee<br />
or the Union first learned or may reasonably<br />
have been expected to have<br />
learned of its cause. This constitutes<br />
the Informal Step A filing date.<br />
Without an extension, in writing, the<br />
grievances may not stand the test of<br />
the grievance procedure. Argue all<br />
you want about management not being<br />
timely with providing requested<br />
information or in their issuance of<br />
discipline. We make those arguments<br />
in the grievance procedure and move<br />
on. But, if the union is untimely in<br />
filing a grievance we lose. Get extensions<br />
in writing and keep copies.<br />
These extensions should always be<br />
part of the grievance file.<br />
Ok, now you’re asking, “But what if<br />
they wouldn’t give me an extension<br />
and have not provided the information<br />
I need? How can I file a grievance<br />
without getting the time or the<br />
May 2012<br />
Reprinted From:<br />
<strong>NALC</strong> Activist<br />
March 2010<br />
information? ” I know many people<br />
won’t want to hear this but the answer<br />
is to do the work on your own<br />
time and document that time noting<br />
what you did and when. No, that is<br />
not the way it is supposed to be but<br />
in order to protect your time limits<br />
and your grievant that is what you<br />
must do. Not only that, but you must<br />
also file a second grievance for the<br />
time you spent off the clock and,<br />
if you didn’t get the information you<br />
requested, file yet another grievance<br />
on that issue. These issues will become<br />
part of your contentions and a<br />
copy of these additional grievances<br />
should be included in the original<br />
grievance file as well. No one ever<br />
said being a good steward was easy.<br />
When issues such as this arise make<br />
sure that your branch president and<br />
the NBA are notified. Repeated issues<br />
of this sort are indicators that<br />
an intervention may be needed.<br />
Make sure the entire 8190 is<br />
correct and complete.<br />
Timeliness can also become an issue<br />
with the dates on the 8190. Article 15<br />
Section 2.F states:<br />
The Formal Step A decision is to<br />
be made and the Joint Step A<br />
Grievance Form completed the day of the<br />
meeting, unless the time frame is mutually<br />
extended. The Union may appeal an<br />
impasse to Step B within seven (7) days of<br />
the date of the decision.<br />
It is not uncommon for Formal A<br />
meetings to be extended. You meet<br />
and then decide to get back together<br />
to discuss the matter further or<br />
exchange paperwork. In order to<br />
protect your time limits, make sure to<br />
document the original meeting, but<br />
also don’t forget to document the extension.<br />
Remember to sign and date
May 2012 <strong>Branch</strong> Nine News 7<br />
the 8190 when the Formal A meeting<br />
is concluded. You might actually have<br />
two or more dates on the 8190 if you<br />
had multiple meetings. Make sure<br />
that the last date is the final meeting,<br />
so that it does not appear as if your<br />
appeal to Step B was untimely.<br />
When you appeal a grievance to<br />
Step B within seven days, any additions<br />
and corrections must be<br />
included in that grievance packet.<br />
Article 15.2.g of the national agreement<br />
states: Additions and corrections to<br />
the Formal Step A record may be submitted<br />
by the Union with the Step B appeal letter<br />
within the time frame for initiating the Step<br />
B appeal with a copy to the management<br />
Formal Step A official. Any such statement<br />
must be included in the file as part of the<br />
grievance record in the case.<br />
The JCAM provides that the union<br />
may submit written additions and<br />
corrections to the Formal Step A<br />
record with the Step B appeal within<br />
the time limit for filing an appeal to<br />
Step B. The filing of any corrections<br />
or additions does not extend the time<br />
limits for filing the appeal. A copy<br />
of the additions and corrections<br />
must be sent to the management<br />
Formal Step A official at the same<br />
time. Management may respond by<br />
sending additional information to the<br />
Step B team which is directly related<br />
to the union’s additions and corrections,<br />
provided that it is received<br />
prior to the Step B decision. At the<br />
same time, management must send<br />
a copy to the union Formal Step A<br />
representative. Any statement of<br />
additions and corrections must be<br />
included in the file as part of the<br />
grievance record in the case. Additions<br />
and corrections received at Step<br />
B after the grievance file could be<br />
found to be untimely and those arguments<br />
and contentions<br />
ignored. Don’t give the Postal<br />
Service the chance to make that argument.<br />
While additions and corrections<br />
should not be needed in every<br />
case and should be the exception<br />
to the rule, if you find that they are<br />
needed in a particular case be sure to<br />
include them in the grievance appeal<br />
to Step B.<br />
“Or” or “and”?<br />
This may sound like a small issue but<br />
in rare cases it may have an affect on<br />
the outcome of a grievance. When<br />
you write an issue statement on<br />
Form 8190 use the word “or” instead<br />
of the word “and.” For instance,<br />
instead of writing “Did management<br />
violate articles 3, 5, and 8 of<br />
the national agreement when they<br />
. . .” write “Did management violate<br />
article 3, 5, or 8 of the national<br />
agreement when they. . .” Using the<br />
word “or” means that if a violation<br />
is found for any of these articles the<br />
grievance should be sustained. On<br />
the other hand, if you use the word<br />
“and,” management could argue, and<br />
an uneducated arbitrator could agree,<br />
that if there was not a violation of all<br />
of those articles of the contract the<br />
grievance should be denied. Don’t<br />
limit yourself. Always remember that<br />
usually you are not grieving a violation<br />
of the JCAM. You are grieving a<br />
violation of the National Agreement.<br />
Those are the terms that should be<br />
Don’t Take a Chance:<br />
Put The Extension<br />
In Writing<br />
used in your issue statement.<br />
Proper use of shop stewards<br />
certified under Article 17.2.A<br />
means that a shop steward certified<br />
to represent carriers in a specific<br />
work location is not certified to<br />
represent carriers in another work<br />
location. A steward certified to be a<br />
steward in one unit within an installation<br />
can not be used as a steward<br />
in another unit without proper certification<br />
for that unit.<br />
In a recent arbitration decision<br />
the arbitrator found that a grievance<br />
was not arbitrable because while the<br />
steward was certified prior to the<br />
Informal A meeting, he was not<br />
certified in writing when he requested<br />
information to investigate the<br />
grievance. The Postal Service<br />
received the certification the following<br />
day. While the <strong>NALC</strong> believes<br />
that this arbitrator was in error in<br />
his judgment in this case, why take<br />
a chance. Be sure that stewards are<br />
properly certified prior to performing<br />
any steward duties. Article 17.2.A<br />
is certainly not the extent of the<br />
contract language regarding steward<br />
certification, so be sure you read and<br />
understand all of the steward certification<br />
provisions in the JCAM. The<br />
“Contract Talk” article in the April<br />
2010 Postal Record provides<br />
some additional sage advice on this<br />
issue.<br />
Proposed Removals<br />
The JCAM instructs that grievances<br />
concerning proposed removal<br />
actions which are subject<br />
to the 30-day notification period<br />
in Article 16.5 will be held at Formal<br />
Step A of the grievance procedure<br />
until the decision letter is issued.<br />
Consistent with the Dispute<br />
Resolution Process Memorandum,<br />
the employee will remain on the job<br />
or on the clock until after the Step<br />
B decision has been rendered or 14<br />
days after the appeal is received at<br />
Step B (except for emergency or<br />
crime situations as provided for in<br />
Articles 16.6 and 16.7). The JCAM<br />
also states that the union does not<br />
file a separate grievance on the deci-<br />
<strong>NALC</strong> Activist continued on page 8
8<br />
Unfair,<br />
Unsafe,<br />
Unnecessary<br />
Samantha Hartwig<br />
Eastside<br />
The Right to Work Constitutional<br />
Amendment that some legislators<br />
are trying to place on the November<br />
ballot in Minnesota will be bad for<br />
the working class across the state.<br />
Governor Dayton is opposed to<br />
making Minnesota a Right to Work<br />
state, but that is not stopping many<br />
legislators from taking a back door<br />
approach to making this a Right<br />
to Work state. Knowing that the<br />
Governor will veto any bill that<br />
makes Minnesota a Right to Work<br />
state, many Republican legislators are<br />
attempting to place a constitutional<br />
amendment on the November ballot,<br />
which will prevent the Governor<br />
from being able to veto any Right to<br />
Work legislation.<br />
After attending the debate at the<br />
state capital on March 12, 2012,<br />
on Right to Work, it became clear<br />
to me that many people have a<br />
misunderstanding on what a union<br />
really does. The union not only<br />
represents workers during times<br />
of contract negotiation, but also<br />
represents the workers when their<br />
rights within the confines of the<br />
contract have been violated. For<br />
example, in a private sector union,<br />
one important role the union plays<br />
is to train the workers. The union<br />
spends the money and time to train<br />
workers, which benefits employers.<br />
The Right to Work legislation would<br />
take away the ability of the union<br />
to not only negotiate a contract and<br />
<strong>Branch</strong> Nine News<br />
safe working conditions; but also<br />
take away the resources of the union<br />
for training workers. The union<br />
would have to shift their focus from<br />
representing members to collection<br />
of dues. This unfair, unsafe, and<br />
unnecessary legislation would make<br />
it possible for workers to not be in<br />
the union, not have to pay dues, and<br />
still reap the benefits a union job<br />
offers.<br />
In Right to Work states wages of<br />
workers tend to be lower than non-<br />
Right to Work states. It is more<br />
important than ever that we stay<br />
engaged and informed with the<br />
path the current state legislators are<br />
walking. We need make our voices<br />
heard, and make sure all of the<br />
legislators know that Right to Work<br />
is not right for Minnesota.<br />
<strong>NALC</strong> Activist continued from page 7<br />
sion letter. Rather, the union may<br />
make additions to the file based on<br />
the decision letter at either Step A or<br />
Step B.<br />
While the parties have agreed<br />
that the union is not required to<br />
file two separate grievances, one on<br />
the proposed removal and one on<br />
the decision letter, it is the <strong>NALC</strong>’s<br />
position that a grievance filed within<br />
14 days of receipt of the decision<br />
letter is timely. Be aware though<br />
that arbitrators have ruled both for<br />
and against the <strong>NALC</strong>’s position on<br />
this issue. Because it has never been<br />
tested at national level arbitration,<br />
stewards should not wait until receipt<br />
of the decision letter to file a grievance.<br />
You don’t want your<br />
grievance to become a test case on<br />
the issue. Play it safe and don’t<br />
May 2012<br />
give the Postal Service an argument<br />
you don’t have to give it. File the<br />
grievance within 14 days of receipt<br />
of the proposed removal.<br />
Step B<br />
Even at Step B the little things<br />
can become an issue down the road.<br />
The JCAM states that a Step B impasse<br />
decision must state in detail<br />
the reasons for the impasse, and<br />
also must include a statement of<br />
any additional facts and contentions<br />
not included in the Step A appeal.<br />
The parties have agreed that the<br />
impasse decision should contain all<br />
issues in dispute and the parties’<br />
respective positions on those issues<br />
and that an arbitration would thus<br />
generally be limited to those issues.<br />
While there are always exceptions<br />
to general statements like this, an<br />
arbitrator could use his or her authority<br />
to hear additional arguments<br />
if persuaded of the necessity.<br />
Again, why take the chance that the<br />
arbitrator might decide not to hear<br />
additional arguments that were<br />
brought forward in the earlier steps<br />
of the process? A Step B impasse<br />
decision should include enough<br />
information that anyone can identify<br />
the issue and what both sides’<br />
arguments and positions are without<br />
looking at the rest of the file.<br />
The <strong>NALC</strong> has used procedural<br />
issues to argue against management<br />
for many years reasoning that it failed<br />
to meet, failed to provide information<br />
or issued discipline in an untimely<br />
manner. USPS has finally learned<br />
to do the same. Let’s learn to defend<br />
ourselves against these arguments<br />
better than the Service has done in<br />
the past.<br />
Document everything and don’t<br />
forget the little things. The basics.<br />
It’s that little dog that can jump<br />
up and bite you in the butt.
May 2012 <strong>Branch</strong> Nine News 9<br />
<strong>Branch</strong> 9<br />
MDA<br />
Bowl-A-Thon<br />
On Saturday, April 14, 2012, carriers<br />
descended upon Park Tavern in<br />
St. Louis Park for the Annual<br />
Ron St. Clair MDA Bowl-a-thon.<br />
Along with bowling, our <strong>Branch</strong> 9<br />
members raised money with a Silent<br />
Auction, 50/50 drawings and raffles.<br />
By the end of the night, we had<br />
raised over $5000 for MDA in our<br />
effort to “Deliver the Cure”! The<br />
winner of the Best Silent Auction<br />
was Anoka, with their “Everyone<br />
Wins” basket. The winner of Best<br />
Individual Series was Bob Phillips of<br />
Brooklyn Park Station. The Team<br />
Best Series winner was the Brooklyn<br />
Park Team, knocking Lake Street<br />
from their long-standing 1 st place<br />
status. Thank you to everyone who<br />
participated, and donated silent<br />
auction baskets. Our lane sponsors<br />
this year were Betts and Hayes<br />
Accounting and The Fink Agency.<br />
Special thanks to Kevin Lane of<br />
Bloomington Station, who went the<br />
extra mile and obtained many, many<br />
raffle items for the event. As always,<br />
an extra thank you to our volunteers<br />
who make the event happen.<br />
JoAnn Gilbaugh<br />
<strong>Branch</strong> 9 MDA Coordinator
10<br />
<strong>Branch</strong> Nine News<br />
On Thursday, April 12th, between<br />
6:00 & 7:00PM, over one hundred<br />
letter carriers gathered, to do their<br />
part in the <strong>NALC</strong> Day of Action,<br />
outside of Senator Klobuchar’s Minneapolis<br />
office. Letter carriers and<br />
their supporters across the nation<br />
met outside senate offices to send a<br />
simple message. “Congress, don’t dismantle<br />
the U.S. Postal Service.” Here<br />
in Minneapolis, the rally brought<br />
carrier’s together to listen to MN<br />
Senator Barb Goodwin, and MN<br />
AFL-CIO Secretary-Treasurer Steve<br />
Hunter. Commuters on their way<br />
home on Washington Avenue saw<br />
signs held by letter carriers asking for<br />
their support to preserve 6-day door<br />
to door delivery. Some pulled over<br />
to ask questions, but most honked<br />
their car horns in support as they<br />
passed. Thanks to all who did more<br />
than talk the talk, but stood up to be<br />
counted and got our message out.<br />
May 2012<br />
Wisconsin’s<br />
Governor Walker<br />
gets a slap on the hand<br />
By Lisa O’Neill<br />
Source: Alternate.org<br />
Wisconsin’s recall-facing Republican<br />
Governor Scott Walker and his<br />
legislative allies received a stunning<br />
rebuke from a federal court on Friday<br />
that ruled the state’s Act 10 that<br />
stripped most state employee unions<br />
of the collective bargaining rights<br />
and dues-collecting authority was an<br />
unconstitutional abuse of power.<br />
The ruling by U.S. District Court<br />
Judge William Conley, which struck<br />
down those sections of the law, held<br />
that the Legislature had the right to<br />
deny union bargaining rights, so long<br />
as that policy was applied evenly<br />
across all state employee unions--not<br />
just the ones opposing the Governor’s<br />
or his party’s policies. Conley<br />
wrote, saying that targeting of some<br />
unions violated the Constitution’s<br />
equal protection clause.<br />
“There is no dispute that a state<br />
may bar its public employees from<br />
engaging in any form of collective<br />
bargaining. The only question<br />
is whether a state may restrict the<br />
collective bargaining rights to one<br />
category of public unions while allowing<br />
full rights to another category,”<br />
he wrote. The Court also said<br />
that Walker and his GOP allies also<br />
went too far in trying to stop the<br />
collection of union dues for some<br />
state employee unions but not others,<br />
saying that restriction violated<br />
both equal protection and freedom<br />
of assembly rights.<br />
The judge also said in a footnote<br />
that Walker’s vendetta against the<br />
unions was not related to Act’s supposed<br />
purpose of saving taxpayers<br />
money.
May 2012 <strong>Branch</strong> Nine News 11<br />
<strong>Branch</strong> 9 <strong>NALC</strong><br />
Fishing on Lake Mille Lacs<br />
Twin Pines Resort & Motel-Restaurant<br />
Located just two hours north of the Twin Cities on U.S. Highway 169 (mile marker 232).<br />
Poles and bait provided, but feel free to bring your own poles. For more<br />
information call 1.800.450.4682 or visit www.twinpinesmillelacs.com<br />
Sunday, June 10th<br />
8:00AM - 12:00PM<br />
(Meet at the resort at 7:45AM)<br />
*Twin Pines opens for breakfast at 7:00AM*<br />
$30/Adult<br />
$25/Children under 12<br />
*The <strong>Branch</strong> will be hosting a roasted chicken lunch<br />
(with hash browns, cole slaw and a drink) at Twin Pines Resort<br />
after we return from fishing. This lunch is included in the price.*<br />
Name:<br />
Amount Paid:<br />
Name of Guests (if under 14 include age):<br />
Station:<br />
Deadline is on<br />
Friday, June 1st<br />
Checks payable to: <strong>Branch</strong> 9 Fishing<br />
2408 Central Avenue NE<br />
Minneapolis, MN 55418
12<br />
President’s article from page 3<br />
obligation to make every effort to<br />
minimize the mandating of non-<br />
OTDL list carriers in accordance<br />
with Article 8.5. However, it can not<br />
be considered reasonable to deliver<br />
mail well into the evening hours. …”<br />
The problem is that the contract<br />
doesn’t call for “every effort to<br />
minimize the mandating of non-<br />
OTDL...” It requires much more.<br />
For more information see your<br />
steward.<br />
Traditional observance of<br />
Memorial Day has diminished<br />
over the years. Many Americans<br />
nowadays have forgotten<br />
the meaning and traditions of<br />
Memorial Day. At many cemeteries,<br />
the graves of the fallen<br />
are increasingly ignored and neglected.<br />
Most people no longer<br />
remember the proper flag etiquette<br />
for the day. While there<br />
are towns and cities that still<br />
hold Memorial Day parades,<br />
many have not held a parade in<br />
decades. Some people think the<br />
day is for honoring any and all<br />
dead, and not just those fallen in<br />
service to our country.<br />
To help re-educate and remind<br />
Americans of the true meaning<br />
of Memorial Day, the "National<br />
Moment of Remembrance"<br />
resolution was passed on December<br />
2000 which asks that<br />
at 3:00PM local time, for all<br />
Americans "To voluntarily and<br />
informally observe in their own<br />
way a moment of remembrance<br />
and respect, pausing from<br />
whatever they are doing for a<br />
moment of silence or listening<br />
to “Taps."<br />
<strong>Branch</strong> Nine News<br />
Twas the Night<br />
Before Christmas...<br />
Submitted by: Peter Joseph<br />
(Elmwood)<br />
Are you tired of hearing the misinformed<br />
reports of the doom &<br />
gloom of the postal sevice? Frustrated<br />
with the horrible management<br />
tactics and their lack of direction and<br />
honesty? Well gather round boys and<br />
girls and let me tell you a story about<br />
the heart and soul of the post office;<br />
the dedicated men and women in<br />
blue- the letter carrier.<br />
This story starts on December 1st<br />
at the Elmwood station. My wife,<br />
Cheryl and I have made a few sacrifices<br />
along the way to provide great<br />
education opportunities for our kids,<br />
Zach & Julie. We just went to Las<br />
Vegas for Cheryl’s 50th birthday, so<br />
this year it was all about me. With<br />
hip replacement surgery coming in<br />
March, I was going to take my tip<br />
money and get a big, comfy, leather<br />
recliner.<br />
On the day I reached my goal I<br />
found out my son needed his wisdom<br />
teeth removed and another<br />
minor surgery done. Oh well, easy<br />
come easy go, and my old beat up<br />
sofa still kinda looked comfortable.<br />
Arriving home on Christmas Eve,<br />
I sensed a giddy, excited family<br />
awaiting me. After a little chit-chat,<br />
I walked through the living room<br />
and, to my great shock, there was<br />
the most beautiful leather recliner<br />
evveerrr. I turned to thank my wife<br />
and kids but they just shrugged their<br />
shoulders and said it was not from<br />
them. I was going to call my mother<br />
in Florida to thank her, but nope,<br />
wrong again. I’m kindof old to believe<br />
in Santa Claus, but????<br />
Cheryl finally told me that Mike<br />
Erhard, P.O. Johnson, Kelly Kjeseth-<br />
Goering, and Perry Korzenowski,<br />
had ponied up their money and<br />
May 2012<br />
bought it for me. She said that they<br />
(allegedly) went off their routes, went<br />
to Slumberland Furniture at the last<br />
minute, delivered the chair, and vanished.<br />
I was in complete shock and<br />
can honestly say I was speechless ( a<br />
status my wife and many co-workers<br />
wish would become permanent). It<br />
was a Christmas I will never forget.<br />
We have a unique, crazy cast of<br />
characters at Elmwood Station, but<br />
we really do look out for each other.<br />
When I quizzed them why they did<br />
this selfless act, they said it’s because<br />
I’m willing to give 110%, and I point<br />
out daily that we are turning the corner,<br />
and Elmwood is on the verge of<br />
greatness. Thanks so much to those<br />
four wonderful fellow carriers.<br />
Peter Joe<br />
P.S. I wonder if they noticed that I<br />
don’t have a big screen TV? Hmmm?<br />
Reprinted From:<br />
savethepostoffice.com
May 2012 <strong>Branch</strong> Nine News 13<br />
Memorial Day Salute<br />
At each General Membership Meeting, we begin by standing and reciting the Pledge of Allegiance. We as a union<br />
can be proud that, regardless of our differences, be it political or religious, we stand together in support of our<br />
republic. Red Skelton (a 50’s & 60’s comic) recited the Pledge of Allegiance on his television show. It may make<br />
reciting it more meaningful for us at the next GMM.<br />
On January 14, 1969, I presented “The Little Old Man” as a teacher. The time was 1923. The students had finished<br />
reciting the Pledge of Allegiance which at the time was but 10 years old. The old sage called the children together<br />
and said--<br />
“Boys and girls, I have been listening to you recite the Pledge of Allegiance all semester and it appears that it has<br />
become monotonous to you or could it be you do not know the meaning of those words. If I may, I would like to<br />
recite the Pledge and give to you a definition of the words.<br />
I----meaning me, an individual, a committee of one.<br />
Pledge----dedicate all of my worldly goods to give without self pity.<br />
Allegiance----my love and my devotion.<br />
To the Flag----our standard, Old Glory, a symbol of freedom. Wherever she waves, there is respect because your<br />
loyalty has given her a dignity that shouts freedom is everybody’s job.<br />
Of the United----that means that we have all come together.<br />
States----individual communities that have united into 48 great states. 48 individual communities with pride and dignity<br />
and purpose, all divided with imaginary boundaries, yet united to a common cause, and that’s love of country.<br />
Of America.<br />
And to the Republic----a republic, a state in which sovereign power is invested in representatives chosen by the<br />
people to govern. And government is the people and it’s from the people to the leaders, not from the leaders to the<br />
people.<br />
For which it stands!<br />
One nation----meaning, so blessed by God.<br />
Indivisible----incapable of being divided.<br />
With Liberty----which is freedom and the right of power to live one’s life without threats or fear or any sort of<br />
retaliation.<br />
And justice----The principle and quality of dealing fairly with others.<br />
For all.----which means, boys and girls, it’s as much your country as it is mine.”<br />
Since I was a small boy, two states have been added to our nation, and two words have been added to the Pledge of<br />
Allegiance “under God.” Wouldn’t it be a pity if someone said, “That’s a prayer” and that would be eliminated from<br />
schools, too?<br />
The Twin Cities Postal Headquarters<br />
Minneapolis<br />
2220 Lyndale Avenue South<br />
Minneapolis, MN 55405<br />
612-377-0011<br />
USA<br />
Union preferred<br />
St. Paul<br />
935 N. Dale Street<br />
St. Paul, MN 55103<br />
651- 224 - 7567
14<br />
<strong>Branch</strong> Nine News<br />
May 2012<br />
It was a very good year: The salaries of USPS executives<br />
Source: Save the Post Office http://www.savethepostoffice.com<br />
The Gannett 2012 salary finder for USPS employees came out this week, and it contains a wealth of information.<br />
You can find the salary, job title, workplace, and year of hire for any postal employee. That includes all the executives<br />
in L’Enfant Plaza.<br />
Unfortunately, the salary finder doesn’t contain information about bonuses and compensation packages, which for<br />
upper echelon executives can add up to almost as much as the base salary. For example, according to the USPS Form<br />
10-K for 2011 (p. 54), Chief Operating Officer Megan Brennan earned $225,308 in 2011, but brought in a total of<br />
358,996, and Chief Information Officer Ellis Burgoyne earned $220,846 but brought in $508,688.<br />
Even though the salary finder does not provide this kind of information about total compensation, it is still a useful<br />
tool and lots of fun. For instance, here’s one use for the salary finder.<br />
Back in November, the Federal Times revealed that “as the U.S. Postal Service was careening toward a record $8.5 billion<br />
loss in 2010, it was paying more than three dozen top executives and officers salaries and bonuses exceeding that<br />
of Cabinet secretaries.” A list was not available at that time, but using the salary finder, we’ve produced a list of the<br />
38 postal executives earning the highest (base) salary as of February 2012. You can see the list here.<br />
Searching the salary finder for zip code 20260, the zip for postal headquarters at L’Enfant Plaza, and then sorting by<br />
salary, we’ve learned that there are over one thousand employees in HQ who earn $100,000 a year or more.<br />
We’ve also analyzed the data for the top 300 salaries in HQ, the 28 Vice Presidents (not all are in HQ), the 49 District<br />
Managers, and 57 plant managers. (There are over a hundred job titles listed on the website, so we probably missed a<br />
few other high-paying jobs.)<br />
There are 415 employees who fall into one of these categories. You can see a list of their salaries here. We’ve omitted<br />
names as a courtesy, but if you’re curious about anyone in particular, the salary finder can help.<br />
The salaries of these 415 employees range from $103,480 to $276,840, and the average is about $152,500. Here’s the<br />
breakdown:<br />
Position<br />
Number in<br />
group Average Salary Average years of service<br />
Top 300 salaries in HQ 300 $151,210 22<br />
Vice Presidents 28 $189,000 25<br />
District Managers 49 $163,135 32<br />
Plant Managers 57 $143,101 29<br />
Combined list 415 $152,428 25<br />
The salary finder also provides the<br />
date of hire for postal employees, from<br />
which we’ve calculated years of service.<br />
Most of these 415 executives and<br />
managers have put in a lot of time at<br />
the Postal Service, some as many as 44<br />
years. The median is 28 years, and the<br />
average is 24 years.<br />
If you’d like to put some faces on some<br />
of the top earners, the USPS website provides an organizational chart — complete with photos — of Postal Leadership,<br />
the 37 folks running the show.<br />
As for the significance of the information on the salary-finder website, make of it what you will. Wages and salaries<br />
are relative — what looks like a huge salary to one person may look meager to another. It just depends on where<br />
you’re sitting.<br />
Wages around the world range from virtually nothing — Third-World peasants earn a dollar or two a day — to the<br />
millions of dollars earned annually by the super rich. The bottom 90% of American households average $31,244 a<br />
year, while the top 0.1% average $3.2 million a year and the top 0.01% average $27 million a year. (See this article in<br />
Mother Jones for more data on income inequality.)<br />
Just to take an example, consider Fred Smith, CEO of the Postal Service’s biggest supplier, FedEx. Smith earns $8 to<br />
$10 million a year — about $4,500 an hour (if he’s putting in a 40-hour week) — which puts him in the top 0.1% of<br />
the nation. For the rest of us — the other 99.9% — that sounds like a pretty nice salary, but from the point of view<br />
of the billionaire Koch brothers, two of the richest people in the world, it’s probably not very impressive. They’re<br />
worth $25 billion each, and between March 2010 and September 2011, they accumulated $15 billion in wealth. (Some<br />
of that wealth goes to fund think tanks that publish books and articles advocating postal privatization.)As for postsalaries<br />
overall, the average USPS employee — this includes the entire workforce, from non-career casuals to the Post-
May 2012 <strong>Branch</strong> Nine News 15<br />
master General — earns $57,000 a year, not counting benefits. The following numbers come from the Form 10-K for<br />
FY 2011, and the averages use 645,950 as the total workforce, as indicated in the 10-K.<br />
Category of payment Total(in billions) Average<br />
Compensation $36.8 $57,003<br />
Retirement $5.9 $9,101<br />
Health benefits $5.2 $8,084<br />
Other $0.4 $601<br />
Total $48.3 $74,789<br />
From the point of view of a Wal-Mart employee earning $10 an<br />
hour, the salaries of postal workers must look quite enviable. Lots<br />
of people think postal workers make too much, and there are many<br />
stakeholders in the mail industry who argue that high wages and<br />
generous benefits are driving up costs and making rates too high.<br />
Postal management seems to think the same way. It’s been saying<br />
that it needs to get rid of the no-layoff clause in union contracts,<br />
replace full-time employees with contract workers, and take control<br />
of the pension plans and retiree health care plan so that wages and benefits can be brought down to meet the “private<br />
sector comparability standard.”<br />
That’s a reference to a passage Title 39, the 1971 Postal Reorganization Act (PRA), which says, “As an employer, the<br />
Postal Service shall achieve and maintain compensation for its officers and employees comparable to the rates and<br />
types of compensation paid in the private sector of the economy of the United States.”<br />
The irony is that postal executives use the same passage in Title 39 to justify their large compensation packages. The<br />
Form 10-K states that given the “size and scope of operations, the comparability requirement in Title 39 would suggest<br />
that the Postal Service’s executive officer compensation and benefits should be on par with the compensation and<br />
benefits of the very largest private sector companies in the United States. Even in these challenging economic times,<br />
comparably sized companies typically provide their top executives with annual salaries well in excess of $1 million and<br />
total compensation and benefits valued at several million dollars.”<br />
If postal executives had their way, then, the salaries and benefits of regular postal workers would be decreased while<br />
their own compensation packages would be increased — all to bring postal salaries into compliance with Title 39 and<br />
the “private sector comparability standard.”<br />
Needless to say, postal management would probably prefer if the public did not know very much about their compensation<br />
packages, and they’ve fought the APWU’s effort to find out more about performance bonuses. But as the<br />
salary finder FAQ page explains, government workers aren’t entitled to the same kind of privacy as workers in the<br />
private sector:<br />
“Open record laws and court decisions for at least the last 40 years have maintained that a government employee’s<br />
name, salary and job-related information is open to anyone who requests it. Courts and government rules have long<br />
held that federal employees are public servants, and that the public has a ‘significant interest’ in knowing how their<br />
employees are paid.”<br />
With the fiscal situation of the Postal Service a matter of intense public debate right now, there’s obviously “significant<br />
interest” in how postal workers and executives are paid. Last week, revelations about the postal salaries of<br />
executives, coupled with news about impending plant closings, prompted New York Congresswoman Kathy Hochul<br />
to introduce legislation limiting compensation for postal executives to the same level of pay as the President’s Cabinet.<br />
Huchel is concerned about the 700 jobs that will be lost in Buffalo when its mail processing plant closes.<br />
“The Postal Service cannot make the argument that they need to cuts costs and let go hard-working postal workers<br />
when their own management team continues to rake in bonuses and make more than the President’s Cabinet,” said<br />
Hochul. “The jobs of over 700 Western New Yorkers and thousands of Americans across this country are worth<br />
more than bonuses for a handful of individuals at the United States Postal Service.”<br />
In response to Hochul’s proposal, postal officials are using the argument they make in the Form 10-K. They say that<br />
because the Postal Service functions like a business, it is important for executive salaries to remain competitive with<br />
the private sector.<br />
USPS spokesman Mark Saunders put it this way: “When you compare the size and scope of an organization that employs<br />
well over half a million employees operating among 32,000 locations linked by more than 210,000 vehicles, our<br />
officer compensation is well below that of similar private sector positions.”<br />
Maybe so, but there are a lot of people wondering how postal officers and managers can pay themselves so well and<br />
at the same time say that the financial crisis is so bad that they need to eliminate 155,000 jobs and close half of those<br />
“32,000 locations” (a.k.a. “post offices”). It’s something to wonder about.
<strong>Branch</strong> Nine News<br />
2408 Central Avenue NE<br />
Minneapolis, MN 55418-3712<br />
Change Service Requested<br />
PRSRT STD<br />
US POSTAGE<br />
PAID<br />
TWIN CITIES MN<br />
PERMIT NO. 91964<br />
<strong>Branch</strong> Nine Calendar<br />
May 22<br />
Nokomis Retiree Breakfast<br />
9:00AM<br />
Fred Babcock VFW<br />
6715 Lakeshore Drive<br />
Richfield<br />
June 5<br />
Northside Retiree’s Breakfast<br />
9:30AM<br />
Elsie’s<br />
729 Marshall St. NE<br />
Minneapolis<br />
Sunday, June 10<br />
Fishing on Lake Mille Lacs<br />
Twin Pines Resort<br />
2hrs. north on U.S. Hwy 169<br />
mile marker 232<br />
8:00AM - Noon<br />
June 12<br />
Southside Retiree Breakfast<br />
9:00AM<br />
Fred Babcock VFW<br />
6715 Lakeshore Drive, Richfield<br />
June 12<br />
Stewards Meeting<br />
7:00PM<br />
Golden Valley VFW Post 7051<br />
7775 Medicine Lake Rd<br />
Golden Valley<br />
June 26<br />
Nokomis Retiree Breakfast<br />
9:00AM<br />
Fred Babcock VFW<br />
6715 Lakeshore Drive<br />
Richfield<br />
Tuesday, June 26<br />
General Membership Meeting<br />
7:00PM<br />
Golden Valley VFW Post 7051<br />
7775 Medicine Lake Rd<br />
Golden Valley<br />
July 3<br />
Northside Retiree’s Breakfast<br />
9:30AM<br />
Elsie’s<br />
729 Marshall St. NE<br />
Minneapolis<br />
July 10<br />
Stewards Meeting<br />
7:00PM<br />
Golden Valley VFW Post 7051<br />
7775 Medicine Lake Rd<br />
Golden Valley<br />
July 10<br />
Southside Retiree Breakfast<br />
9:00AM<br />
Fred Babcock VFW<br />
6715 Lakeshore Drive<br />
Richfield