03.07.2015 Views

In Central And Eastern Europe - Microfinance Centre

In Central And Eastern Europe - Microfinance Centre

In Central And Eastern Europe - Microfinance Centre

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 2<br />

THE CEE AND NIS REGIONAL CONTEXT FOR MICROFINANCE<br />

This chapter describes the origin, development, and broader role of microfinance in <strong>Central</strong> and <strong>Eastern</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> and the New<br />

<strong>In</strong>dependent States—all in the context of the larger macroeconomic environment. Specifically, it explains how a rise in unemployment<br />

and poverty, in the transition from socialist-run economies, has triggered the growth of micro and small enterprises. It is their<br />

needs for financing that have, in turn, spurred the development of microfinance in the region.<br />

The Rise of Unemployment and Poverty in the Region<br />

The countries of <strong>Central</strong> and <strong>Eastern</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> and the New <strong>In</strong>dependent States are diverse in their traditions,<br />

cultures, and histories. Yet, they share two important historical elements. First, at some point after 1917, each<br />

was ruled by a communist regime—whether the soviet, state-bureaucracy variety or Yugoslavia’s self-management<br />

variety. Second, for more than a decade now, each has been in transition toward democratic rule and a<br />

market economy.<br />

Different countries in the study are at different stages in this transition. The 10 EU accession countries (Bulgaria,<br />

Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia) are the most<br />

advanced. They have successfully developed more democratic governments and active private sectors. <strong>In</strong> many<br />

of the other countries, particularly those in the Caucasus and NIS, democracy is less established, and the private<br />

sector remains underdeveloped.<br />

Despite finding themselves at different stages of transition, all of the countries in the region share certain fundamental<br />

macroeconomic characteristics. Most important is that poverty has increased significantly in each over<br />

the last 10 years. While the transition toward a market economy has brought new opportunities to many people,<br />

it has brought material hardship and the loss of economic security to others.<br />

The development of poverty in these countries differs from its development elsewhere by the speed and magnitude<br />

of its onset. Here, unlike in developing but nontransitional countries, poverty has been a new and sudden<br />

condition. It emerged instantly in the 1990s, as a decline in the well-being of much of the population, and created<br />

an enormous class of “new poor.” Between 1988 and 1998, absolute poverty rates increased from 2% of the<br />

region’s population to 21%. 1<br />

Today, the percentage of people living below the poverty line is as high as 68% of the population of Tajikistan,<br />

50% of Kyrgyzstan, and 40% of Armenia. By contrast, such poverty is virtually nonexistent in most of the countries<br />

of <strong>Central</strong> <strong>Europe</strong>. The main cause of the region’s poverty is unemployment. <strong>In</strong> many of these countries,<br />

unemployment has become a persistent problem due to ongoing privatization and low levels of growth. The<br />

1 World Bank, Making Transition Work for Everyone: Poverty and <strong>In</strong>equality in <strong>Europe</strong> and <strong>Central</strong> Asia (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 2000).<br />

The CEE and NIS Regional Context for <strong>Microfinance</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!