08.07.2015 Views

primary school teachers the twists and turns of ... - ERU Consultants

primary school teachers the twists and turns of ... - ERU Consultants

primary school teachers the twists and turns of ... - ERU Consultants

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Version 20 Oct 08, edited finalstates para-<strong>teachers</strong> receive as little as five days <strong>of</strong> induction training (forexample, West Bengal).- He received TWO days <strong>of</strong> in-service or refresher training a year. Even <strong>the</strong>se twodays were largely spent on issues unrelated to teaching <strong>and</strong> learning.Ramesar’s situation is by no means unique. Although details may vary from state tostate, what is clear is that para-<strong>teachers</strong> are wholly unprepared <strong>and</strong> poorlycompensated for what is, by any st<strong>and</strong>ard, an extremely difficult <strong>and</strong> complex task:bringing education to first-generation learners in remote, poor <strong>and</strong> disadvantagedcorners <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> country.Corruption makes <strong>the</strong> situation even more unbearable. In Rajasthan, for example, asingle (para) teacher <strong>school</strong> was opened in a Schedule Caste (SC) settlement under<strong>the</strong> erstwhile Rajiv G<strong>and</strong>hi Swarna Jayanti Patashala (RGSJP). An important politicalleader was appointed as <strong>the</strong> teacher. Although all <strong>the</strong> children from <strong>the</strong> settlementwere enrolled, <strong>the</strong> <strong>school</strong> was almost never opened. In o<strong>the</strong>r villages also, RGSJP<strong>school</strong>s functioned irregularly as <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>teachers</strong> were ‘too busy to teach’ (Sharma <strong>and</strong>Ramach<strong>and</strong>ran, forthcoming).The para-teacher phenomenon is widespread <strong>and</strong> exp<strong>and</strong>ing all over <strong>the</strong> country,although <strong>the</strong>re is a wide range <strong>of</strong> policies with respect to <strong>the</strong>ir employment. In somestates such as Kerala, for example, a few ‘contract’ <strong>teachers</strong> have been appointed,supposedly as a purely temporary <strong>and</strong> stopgap measure. At <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>spectrum, Madhya Pradesh had (at one point <strong>of</strong> time—<strong>the</strong> current policy is not clear)decided to discontinue <strong>the</strong> appointment <strong>of</strong> regular <strong>teachers</strong> <strong>and</strong> even declaredregular <strong>teachers</strong> as a dying cadre. In between <strong>the</strong>se extremes we find Maharashtra,where all new <strong>primary</strong> level <strong>teachers</strong> are appointed on a three-year contract <strong>and</strong>with a low honorarium, even though <strong>the</strong>ir qualifications are <strong>the</strong> same as ‘regular’<strong>primary</strong> <strong>teachers</strong>; after three years <strong>the</strong>y are eligible for appointment as ‘regular’<strong>teachers</strong>. There is also Orissa, where on completion <strong>of</strong> nine years on contract SikhyaSahayaks can be appointed as regular <strong>teachers</strong> in <strong>primary</strong> <strong>school</strong>s against vacantposts with regular scales <strong>of</strong> pay. This decision was taken by <strong>the</strong> state government in2007. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, after completion <strong>of</strong> five years as para-<strong>teachers</strong>, <strong>the</strong>ir monthlyremuneration increases to Rs. 3,600, which is equal to <strong>the</strong> basic scale <strong>of</strong> pay <strong>of</strong> atrained regular <strong>primary</strong> teacher with a diploma in education.Table 3.1: Number <strong>of</strong> para-<strong>teachers</strong>/contract <strong>teachers</strong>, selected states (2006-2007)Primary PrimaryUpperPrimarywith with upper Upper <strong>primary</strong>%Totalupper <strong>primary</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>primary</strong> withWomen<strong>primary</strong> secondarysecondaryAndhra Pradesh 24,355 21,045 3 0 17,920 63,323 44.85Bihar 43,730 23,756 655 305 282 68,728 37.81Karnataka 114 176 27 7 6 330 51.82Kerala 736 987 215 255 240 2,438 74.45Madhya Pradesh 75,597 20,794 3,499 17,910 1,403 119,212 30.56Maharashtra 851 1,469 195 9 1,181 3,922 40.03Rajasthan 24,384 6,700 647 37 404 32,172 26.87Tamil Nadu 1,350 534 952 1,718 0 4,554 76.31Uttar Pradesh 94,853 458 64 349 45 95,773 47.91West Bengal* 1,345 26 135 746 6,942 9,221 49.42India 330,389 94,810 9,285 32,610 31,444 498,944 38.6831

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!