Semidefinite Programming Relaxation vs Polyhedral Homotopy ...
Semidefinite Programming Relaxation vs Polyhedral Homotopy ...
Semidefinite Programming Relaxation vs Polyhedral Homotopy ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A POP alkyl from globalibmin − 6.3x 5 x 8 + 5.04x 2 + 0.35x 3 + x 4 + 3.36x 6sub.to − 0.820x 2 + x 5 − 0.820x 6 = 0,0.98x 4 − x 7 (0.01x 5 x 10 + x 4 ) = 0, −x 2 x 9 + 10x 3 + x 6 = 0,x 5 x 12 − x 2 (1.12 + 0.132x 9 − 0.0067x 2 9) = 0,x 8 x 13 − 0.01x 9 (1.098 − 0.038x 9 ) − 0.325x 7 = 0.574,x 10 x 14 + 22.2x 11 = 35.82, x 1 x 11 − 3x 8 = −1.33,lbd i ≤ x i ≤ ubd i (i = 1, 2,...,14).14 variables, 7 poly. equality constraints with deg. 3.SparseDense (Lasserre)r ǫ obj ǫ feas cpu ǫ obj ǫ feas cpu2 1.0e-02 7.1e-01 1.8 7.2e-3 4.3e-2 14.43 5.6e-10 2.0e-08 23.0 out of memoryǫ obj = approx.opt.val. − lower bound for opt.val.ǫ feas = the maximum error in the equality constraintsWorkshop on Advances in Optimization, April 19-21, 2007 – p.11/24