09.07.2015 Views

InSAR Stack Processing — Deformation Mapping in the Area of ...

InSAR Stack Processing — Deformation Mapping in the Area of ...

InSAR Stack Processing — Deformation Mapping in the Area of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.8. ADJUSTMENT MODEL 17However, this solution is not robust – <strong>in</strong> a case <strong>of</strong> a small change <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> r vector, significantlydifferent ambiguity vector is computed.The <strong>in</strong>terferogram triples are computed just once for each location (and <strong>the</strong> correspond<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terferograms).However, <strong>the</strong> steps 2 and 3 are performed <strong>in</strong>dependently for each pixel. Although computationallyrequir<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> computation takes a reasonable time <strong>in</strong> MATLAB for small <strong>in</strong>terferograms (approx. 200by 200 pixels).A significant disadvantage <strong>of</strong> perform<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> computations <strong>in</strong>dependently for each pixel is that <strong>the</strong> computedambiguities may not be smooth spatially, caus<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> unwrapped phases to be nonsenseful. Therefore,we decided to use <strong>the</strong> same ambiguity vector for all pixels – that one which was computed for most<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pixels. Due to <strong>the</strong> fact that all <strong>in</strong>terferograms are unwrapped, it is reasonable to apply a s<strong>in</strong>gleambiguity to <strong>the</strong> whole <strong>in</strong>terferogram.3.8 Adjustment modelThe <strong>in</strong>terferometric phase (after topography subtraction) conta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g components:• DEM errors (this component is directly propotional to <strong>the</strong> perpendicular basel<strong>in</strong>e),• deformation signal (possibly split <strong>in</strong>to l<strong>in</strong>ear and nonl<strong>in</strong>ear components),• atmospheric delay (i.e. <strong>the</strong> difference between <strong>the</strong> delay <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> master and slave scenes),• noise.In <strong>the</strong> literature deal<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>in</strong>terferometric stacks, <strong>the</strong>re are basically two models for deformationadjustments:• deformation model, where <strong>the</strong> deformations <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> times <strong>of</strong> acquisitions are searched for,• velocity model, where <strong>the</strong> deformations are considered l<strong>in</strong>ear <strong>in</strong> time and <strong>the</strong>ir velocity is searchedfor, toge<strong>the</strong>r with o<strong>the</strong>r parameters.Both approaches have <strong>the</strong>ir advantages and disadvantages, which will be discussed below.For both approaches, let us <strong>in</strong>troduce <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g vectors and matrices:• matrix A denot<strong>in</strong>g which <strong>in</strong>terferogram was created from which scenes: it has n columns (one foreach scene) and m rows (one for each <strong>in</strong>terferogram) and conta<strong>in</strong>s -1 if <strong>the</strong> correspond<strong>in</strong>g scene wasmaster for <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terferogram, and 1 if it was slave.• vector <strong>of</strong> acquisition times t, conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g n rows, one for each scene. Due to <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> ERS-1/2satellites are sunsynchronous and mov<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> same orbit, <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> day <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong> acquisitiontimes is <strong>the</strong> same. Therefore, <strong>the</strong> values <strong>in</strong> t are <strong>in</strong>teger multiples <strong>of</strong> days.• vector <strong>of</strong> temporal basel<strong>in</strong>es dt, conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g m rows, one for each <strong>in</strong>terferogram. Here, dt = A · t.• vector <strong>of</strong> perpendicular basel<strong>in</strong>es B, conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g m rows, one for each <strong>in</strong>terferogram. The perpendicularbasel<strong>in</strong>es is used for assess<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> DEM error and do not need to be precise. Although <strong>the</strong>perpendicular basel<strong>in</strong>e significantly changes with<strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>terferogram, <strong>the</strong> values computed for <strong>the</strong>scene center (i.e. <strong>the</strong> values are <strong>the</strong> same for all locations) are used. The ratio between <strong>the</strong> used andtrue basel<strong>in</strong>e should be almost <strong>the</strong> same for all <strong>in</strong>terferograms <strong>in</strong> a stack. The GAMMA s<strong>of</strong>twaredoes not provide <strong>the</strong> perpendicular basel<strong>in</strong>e length, so <strong>the</strong> basel<strong>in</strong>es were computed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> DORISs<strong>of</strong>tware.• vector <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> measured phases ϕ, conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g m rows, one for each <strong>in</strong>terferogram.Let us note here that both models assume that <strong>the</strong> adjustment is performed <strong>in</strong>dependently for each pixel<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terferogram stack.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!