09.07.2015 Views

The Standard, Winter 2012 - College of Nurses of Ontario

The Standard, Winter 2012 - College of Nurses of Ontario

The Standard, Winter 2012 - College of Nurses of Ontario

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Discipline decisionsAnab Mohamed0291872Allegations and plea<strong>The</strong> <strong>College</strong> alleged that the Membermisappropriated a box <strong>of</strong> sterile glovesfrom an employer; provided falseinformation about her employmenthistory and job references; mademultiple medication administrationerrors; signed for medication beforehaving administered it; failed to chartthoroughly about clients and keeprecords as required; failed to assess;failed to introduce herself to clients;left clients unattended; arrived latefor work; and took extended breaks,all <strong>of</strong> which would be regarded asdishonourable and unpr<strong>of</strong>essionalconduct.<strong>The</strong> Member admitted to theallegations, and the <strong>College</strong> andthe Member submitted a writtenstatement to the Panel in which theyagreed to the following facts.Agreed facts<strong>The</strong> Member worked at threefacilities and two agencies between2006 and 2010.She was seen misappropriating abox <strong>of</strong> sterile gloves from facility A.When approached, she <strong>of</strong>fered toreturn the gloves and give $100 tothe manager.<strong>The</strong> Member subsequentlysubmitted a resumé to facility Band facility C; on her resumé, sheindicated that she was still workingat agency A. She also described one<strong>of</strong> her references as her supervisor,and confirmed this during her jobinterview at facility B. However, theMember had actually resigned fromagency A seven months earlier andthe alleged supervisor was actually avisiting nurse at agency A.At facility C, the Member mademedication errors with two clients;failed to document a client’s status;failed to introduce herself and attendto two clients; failed to work asscheduled; and failed to assess twoclients.At facility D, the Member failedto administer high-risk medicationsappropriately on two occasions,failed to transcribe a physician’sorder correctly and failed to follow aphysician’s order.Finding<strong>The</strong> Panel found that the factssupported findings <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionalmisconduct as alleged. All <strong>of</strong>the Member’s conduct would beconsidered unpr<strong>of</strong>essional, themisappropriation <strong>of</strong> property wouldalso be considered dishonourable, andthe misrepresentation to employerswould also be considered disgracefuland dishonourable.Submissions on order<strong>The</strong> <strong>College</strong> and the Membersought an oral reprimand and a twomonthsuspension. <strong>The</strong> Memberwould be required to completespecified remediation activities inpreparation for a remedial programwith a nursing expert, and approvedcourses on medication administrationand assessment. For 12 monthsafter completing the courses, theMember would not be allowed topractise independently and wouldbe required to advise the <strong>College</strong> <strong>of</strong>her employers, provide employerswith a copy <strong>of</strong> the Panel’s decisionand reasons, and only practise foran employer who agreed to conductregular spot audits and advise the<strong>College</strong> if the Member breachedthe standards <strong>of</strong> practice <strong>of</strong> thepr<strong>of</strong>ession.Panel order<strong>The</strong> Panel accepted the jointsubmission, but also ordered theMember to complete a review <strong>of</strong> the<strong>The</strong>rapeutic Nurse-Client Relationship,Revised 2006 practice document andthe online learning module associatedwith it. <strong>The</strong> Panel concluded thatthe penalty is reasonable and inthe public interest. <strong>The</strong> Memberaccepted responsibility for her actionsand cooperated with the <strong>College</strong> byagreeing to the facts and admitting topr<strong>of</strong>essional misconduct.Sheila Odumeru8119588Allegations and plea<strong>The</strong> <strong>College</strong> alleged that the Memberexchanged contact information andengaged in communications withthe Client in which she disclosedpersonal information; told the Client<strong>of</strong> her feelings; asked to visit theClient; and contacted the Clientafter being cautioned not to do so.It was alleged that the Member’sconduct emotionally abused theClient, breached the standards, andwould be regarded as disgraceful,dishonourable or unpr<strong>of</strong>essional.<strong>The</strong> Member admitted to theseallegations, and the <strong>College</strong> andthe Member submitted a writtenstatement to the Panel in which theyagreed to the following facts.Agreed facts<strong>The</strong> Member worked at a facilitythat provides addiction treatmentand psychiatric services. <strong>The</strong> Clientwas admitted to the facility witha diagnosis <strong>of</strong> alcohol dependencesyndrome.While he was still a Client onthe unit, the Member gave him abirthday card. She said it wouldbe nice to know how he was doingafter discharge and they exchangedemail addresses. After the Clientwas discharged, they exchanged<strong>College</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nurses</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ontario</strong> the standard winter <strong>2012</strong>39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!