18.11.2012 Views

Organizational Atmospheres: Foam, Affect and Architecture

Organizational Atmospheres: Foam, Affect and Architecture

Organizational Atmospheres: Foam, Affect and Architecture

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Organizational</strong> <strong>Atmospheres</strong><br />

Christian Borch<br />

To end this discussion, my claim is that, while each of the five dimensions<br />

listed above may be identified (at least to some extent) in established<br />

theories of organization, foam theory presents a different interpretation of<br />

each dimension. Even more important, foam theory does not pay attention<br />

merely to one or two of these dimensions, but offers a way to conceptualize<br />

all these dimensions simultaneously. Observing organizations as foam<br />

therefore means taking into account at once their a-centric nature, their<br />

immunity strategies, their imitations <strong>and</strong> their spatiality. To give but a brief<br />

illustration of how a specific organizational foam analysis could proceed,<br />

one could take as the starting point the immunity strategies of new-hires.<br />

In the novel The Mezzanine, Nicholson Baker suggests that new-hires have<br />

a higher bathroom frequency than people who have been in the organ-<br />

ization for a longer period (Baker, 1998). The reason is, speculates Baker,<br />

that ‘the corporate bathroom is the one place in the whole office where<br />

you underst<strong>and</strong> completely what is expected of you’ (1998: 71, n. 1). Paying<br />

attention to the behaviour in corporate bathrooms clearly follows an<br />

a-centric view on the organization, but it also opens up for an analysis<br />

of how the spatial atmosphere of such corporate bathrooms provide immunity<br />

<strong>and</strong> afford specific behaviours, <strong>and</strong> how the atmospheres may be<br />

transmitted imitatively to other parts of the organization, thereby affecting<br />

behaviours outside the bathrooms (which is all beautifully described in<br />

Baker’s novel).<br />

The Spatiality of <strong>Foam</strong><br />

I have claimed that in particular the spatial-architectural dimension is important<br />

to the theory of foam, <strong>and</strong> in the following I want to demonstrate<br />

in more detail how space <strong>and</strong> architecture are analysed by Sloterdijk.<br />

Since I have already pointed to the spatial connotations of the notion of<br />

foam, I will now discuss three additional ways in which foam theory<br />

addresses space <strong>and</strong> architecture. To begin with, Sloterdijk is concerned<br />

specifically with the architectural embeddedness of foam. In his book on<br />

foam, he provides fascinating analyses of a number of architectures, including<br />

dwellings, stadiums <strong>and</strong> convention centres. Particularly the latter<br />

are interesting in the present context, as they are most directly related to the<br />

organizational realm. Convention centres are of many different kinds,<br />

covering everything from huge buildings containing fairs that last for<br />

several days to small conference rooms intended for brief meetings. 6<br />

Sloterdijk finds such convention centres interesting because they signify a<br />

distinctively modern solution to the problem of how to convene or assemble<br />

in physical isolation (2004a: 646). Indeed, he believes, these buildings<br />

have a characteristically contemporary character, because they offer an<br />

architectural reflection of a society devoted to meetings (2004a: 648).<br />

Sloterdijk here presents a diagnostic interpretation of architecture,<br />

pointing to how it supports <strong>and</strong> makes possible temporary gatherings <strong>and</strong><br />

discussions among people who only assemble because of a shared topic,<br />

231<br />

Downloaded from<br />

org.sagepub.com at Stockholms Universitet on March 30, 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!