THE HANDLOADING BENCH308 Winchester Rides Again Part 3By Laurie Hollandguilty of giving a dirtier burn than extruded types. Thecause is the absence of the tubular form’s hole up themiddle that causes the kernel to burn outwards as wellTo Laurie’s surprise, the SRP ‘Palma’ brass version (right) of the 175gn BTLR + H414 ball powder came out on top despitetesting in cool conditions.better in this role as well as being viable in F/TR. Itspreferred rifling twist rate runs a bit tighter at 1-12”though.Ball PowderThat left one more thing to try with ‘Palma’ brass– ball or spherical powders, again using the 175gnBerger BTLR which the barrel obviously liked. Putmost 175gn or heavier bullets through a QuickLOAD.308 Win Charge Weight Table run and you’ll findHodgdon H414 / Winchester 760 (same powder,different bottles) at or near the top of the predictedvelocity listing. This is a double-base propellant that’sbeen around forever, has a slightly faster burning ratethan the 4350s and Viht N550, and is well suited tomid-size cartridges because of its density. I usuallyavoid ball powders as they’ve been traditionally foundas from the outside in. As the ball kernel’s surface areacan only reduce as it is consumed, this form producesa ‘regressive’ burning behaviour (high gas productioninitially reducing as the charge is consumed). Tocounter this, a thick coating of non-inflammable‘deterrents’ is used to slow the early-stage burn, butthese chemicals are left behind as fouling, usuallybaked on hard thanks to the double-base propellant’sflame temperatures. Another consequence of heaviersurface coatings is greater difficulty in igniting thesepowders, hence the common advice to use magnumLR primers. Actually, ball propellant technologiesand ingredients have moved on a lot over the years,reducing these and other alleged downsides. However,if there is any doubt about the SRP’s ability to light upa heavy charge in .308W, it would likely show up withthis powder.66
Following 3-round group-tests designed to get a feelfor how these combinations performed, I ran five by5-round grouping trials side by side on yet anothermiserable, wet and chilly late June day, temperaturesstruggling to break 10°C / 50F. ‘Palma charges’ ranhigher than those used in standard brass to giveequivalent MVs, the charge weight range being 48.4to 49.2gn x 0.2gn steps in standard LRP Lapua cases;48.9 to 49.9gn x 0.3gn followed by 0.2gn steps in SRP‘Palma’ cases. CCI-BR4 primers were again used inthe latter, but due to accident not design, I grabbeda box of LRP brass primedwith CCI-200s instead of theF210M match type used inother comparisons. I reallyexpected the ‘Palma’ loadsto struggle with this powderin the conditions especiallywith charges nudging50-grains, but this wasn’thow things worked out. Thefive LRP groups covered apoor 0.6” to 1.25” and MVsplateaued over a 0.6gncharge weight range, 48.8to 49.2gn producing 2,855to 2,860 fps. ‘Palma loads’grouped between 0.4” and0.8” and MVs rose in linewith charges ending up at2,877 fps. So far as velocityspreads went, neither casegave great results with thispowder, but the ‘Palma’case again came out thewinner with a range of 17-31 fps over the five batchesaveraging 23 fps; the LRP loads ran between 19 and50 fps for an average of 29 fps. Both produced thecharacteristic ball powder hard fouling on outsideneck surfaces that took a lot of cleaning when I cameto reload the cases. Incidentally, there is a claimedmethod of alleviating this problem – spray the foulingwith WD40, better still that unique German coal basedoil, Ballistol immediately after shooting, wait 10minutes and wipe the softened muck off with a papertowel. I must try this trick one day, although it couldprove rather difficult logistically in a match.67THE HANDLOADING BENCH308 Winchester Rides Again Part 3By Laurie HollandHeaviesLet’s move onto heavy bullets in the cartridge,especially in the F/TR role where an 18lb rifle andbi-pod support can cope with recoil and torque levelsthat would be unacceptable to sling shooters, alsothose in tactical, McQueens, or service rifle disciplineswith their need for minimal sight-disturbance andquick follow-up shots. First of all, what is a heavyOld and new ‘heavies’. Left to right: 155gn Sierra MK (for comparison); 190gn SMK;200gn SMK; 208gn A-Max; 210gn Berger BTLR; 210gn Berger VLD; 210gn SMK. Notethe short blunt nose sections and long boat-tails on the two older SMKs compared tothe more modern bullets. Sierra’s 210 on the extreme right is a VLD design and verydifferent from its geriatric stablemates.bullet in .308? Many TR shooters reckon anythingabove 155gn is ‘heavy’, while Bryan Litz of BergerBullets argues that 230gn is the .30-calibre equivalentof the 140s routinely used in 6.5mm and 180s in 7mm.I’ve arbitrarily set 190gn as my floor for this exercise.On this definition, we’ve 14 bullets from threemanufacturers (Berger, Hornady, and Sierra) availablein the UK at the time of writing, although I expect FoxFirearms UK to have some more from a fourth maker(Swampworks / JLK) available by the time you readthis. Table 1 lists their key ballistic statistics, predicted1,000 yard performance, and the rifling twist rate thatproduces an Sg (stability factor) value of 1.4 at theirexpected MVs. Four of the 14 are elderly: Sierra’s 190,