owed out in the mind of the man of architecturalOn which day God created the heaven and theskill, had no external place but was stampedearth, and every green herb of the field, before itsolely in the mind of the workman, so in the sameappeared on the earth, and all the grass before itmanner can the world which existed in ideas havesprang up. (Genesis2:4-5.)had no other local position except the logos(DivineReason) which made them.z8 Then Philo's exegesis explains his Neoplatonic interpretationof that passage:The process of Divine Reason in Philo's writingwas explicidy portrayed--again, as in the Timaeus By his own supremely manifest and far-shining(29E)--as a negentropic one. The process of creation Reason (logos),by one command God makes bothwas the process of imposing a man-made harmony on things: the idea of mind, which, speaking symdisorder:bolically, Moses calls "heaven," and the idea ofsense-perception, which he figuratively callsFor of itself (the world) was without order, "earth" .... What he means is something of thiswithout quality, without soul; it was full of sort. As before the particular and individual mindinconsistency, ill-adjustment, disharmony: but itthere subsists a certain original as an archetypewas capable of turning and undergoing acom-and pattern of it, and again before the particularplete change to the best, the very contrary of allsense-perception, a certain original of sense-perthese,to order, quality, life, correspondence,ception related to tlaeparticular as a seal makingidentity, likeness, perfect adjustment, to har- an impression is to the form which it makes; justmony, to all that is characteristic of the moreso, before the individual objects of intellectualexcellent model._perception came into being, there was existing asa genus the "intellectually-perceptible" itself,by par-To understand the central epistemological con- ticipation in which the name has been given tocepts of PhiloJudaeus, we now examine more system- the membersof the genus;andbefore the individaticallythe nature of the logos,ual objects of sense-perception came into exist-The logosdoctrine of Philo rigorously elaborated ence, there was.existing as a genus the "sensiblytheidea that, within one generation, became firmly perceptible" itself, by sharing in whose being allestablished as the Christian Trinity. Just as, in the other objects of sense have become such....Christian framework, Jesus Christ was the mediator Before, then, the particular "intellectually-perbetweenGod and Man (Creation), so Philo's logos ceptib!e" came into being, the Creator producesserved as the principle that explained the relationship the solely abstract "intellectually-perceptible" asbetween the Creator and Creation. _ a generic existence?° [emphasisadded]In the dialogue Parmenides and elsewhere, Platofour centuries earlier has teasingly set forth a paradox- Now, let us examine the hierarchy of creationical problem. How, asked Plato, could a single, that Philo sets up here. First, above, all, there is Godundifferentiated One give rise to a multi-faceted the Creator. Then, immediately beneath God is theMany without compromising the essential, unity of first of God's creations, the abstract principle of mind,the One? In other words, how can a universal Idea, what Philo calls the generic "intellectually-perceptiexistingof itself, also have a relationship to the ble itself." This is the Idea of Ideas, the Iogosor divineindividual predicates that "comprise" the uni- _ Reason, out of which is derived the various conceptsversal? _ of the world of intellectual perception.Much the same question was put forward, in a In effect, Philo has created a structure in whichsomewhat different form, in the Timaeus, where Plato the logosbears a generic relationship to the so-calledasks about the nature of the relationship of the Creator "intelligible world." The intelligible world containsGod to being and becoming, to mind, to time and the totality of ideas, the "commonwealth ofimperishspace,to necessity, and so forth, able and incorporeal ideas." It is the parent of theIt is to solve this problem that Philo set forth his visible world:logos, which he also called the "Idea of Ideas." It isexplicitly analogous to Plato's well-known "hypoth- Having resolved to create this visible world ofesis of the higher hypothesis."ours, He (God) first fashioned the intelligibleIn Philo, the concept of the logos as the Idea of world, in order that in fashioning the physicalIdeas is most sharply stated in the following passages world He might be able to use an immaterial andon the Creation. Philo begins by quoting from the godlike model, producing from this elder modelOld Testament's Genesis: a younger imitation which would contain within36 August 1980 / CAMPAIGNER
itself as many sensible classes of being as there quoted above, there also exists the "particular 'intelwereintelligible ones in the original.31 lectually-perceptible' " as a simple "generic" idea.These are the logoispermatikoi.Now the intelligible world, consisting as it does of In a passage of the Allegories, Philo comes close toideas, must then be the product of a mind--the Mind naming the Trinity of the Christians (God, Son, andof God, "The world consisting of the ideas could Spirit). He first cites the passage in Genesis where Godhave no other place than the <strong>Logos</strong> of God which shapes Adam from a lump of clay and then "breathesordered them" writes Philo, clearly letting Mind and into his face the breath of life." Says Philo, "Now<strong>Logos</strong> be synonymous, that which breathes in is God, that which receivesThen what is the act of creation? what is breathed in is the Mind, and that which isIn Philo, by the act of creation the Mind-<strong>Logos</strong> of breathed in is the Spirit. What then is collected fromGod generates the intelligible world, and thereby the these three things? A union of the three taxes--place."-32ideas take on a real existence of their own. A basic From another direction, Philo approaches thetransformation has taken same problem by assertingplace: what initially was that God exists in a Trinitymerely a potential world has with his two chief powers, thebecome an existent one. The creative power and the regalIdea of Ideas within the Mind power, the latter that whichof God has been actualized, administers the world and thegiving birth to the intelligible former that which creates it.world. An analogy can be By calling the creative powerdrawn with the process by "God," he allows the Suwhichan idea within the hu- preme Being to remain unmanmind, when it is actual- named, calling him only Heized, is spoken that is, it be- That Is (ho _n).comes a Word. So, the Idea of "On either side of him areIdeas has become a Word, the the most senior powers, the<strong>Logos</strong>. We should immedi- nearest to him, the creativeately recognize here the pas- and the regal. The title of thesage from the famous Pro- former is 'God,' (theos), sincelogue to the Gospel of St. it made and ordered the uni-John: "And the Word (<strong>Logos</strong>) verse; the title of the latter isbecame flesh and dwelt among 'Lord' (kyrios) since it is theus." fundamental right of theThe <strong>Logos</strong>, the principle maker to rule and controlof creative reason, is the gen- Christ with the Samaritan Woman what he has brought intoerative principle behind the being. ''33world of ideas. In turn, the <strong>Logos</strong> gives rise to the Iogoi Then Philo describes how the Three--He Thats_ermatikoi ("the seeds of the logos"), which Philo Is, God, Lord--appear assometimesThree, sometimesescribes as the seminal reason-principles by which One, depending on the state of the beholder. "So thethe ideas of the intelligible world are realized. The central Being, attended by each of his powers, pre-Trinity that Philo thus suggests is as follows: God; the sents to the Mind which has vision the appearanceIogos;and the logoispermatikoi or the ideas. Philo's God sometimes of One, sometimes of Three; of One,is utterly transcendant and, in that sense, is the "most when that Mind is highly purified and, passing notgeneric" of all; God is "unnameable," "unutterable," merely beyond the multiplicity of other numbers, butand absolutely without any predicates. Those "initi- even beyond the Dyad which is next to the Monad,ated into the true mysteries of the Existent," wrote presses on to the ideal form which is free from mixturePhilo, with a "generously gifted nature and educa- and complexity, and being self-contained needs nothtion,"are those who "do not attribute to God any ing more; of Three, when, as yet uninitiated into theproperties of a Created Being." highest Mysteries, is still a votary only of the minorWrote Philo, "The most generic is God, and next rites and unable to apprehend the Existent alone byto him is the Iogosof God, but all other things have an itself and part from all else, but only through itsexistence only in word .... The <strong>Logos</strong> of God is actions, as either 'creative' or 'ruling.' This, as theyabove the world, and is eldest and most generic of say, is a 'second-best voyage.'-34created things." And, concludes Philo, in the passage Now, we must consider here in preliminary formCAMPAIGNER / August 1980 37
- Page 8 and 9: Behind theMiami Riotsby Felice Merr
- Page 11 and 12: 1. Policy-making: the Trila- their
- Page 13 and 14: _•_• •_• convention, was al
- Page 15 and 16: FEMA's vision of thefuture: a racia
- Page 17 and 18: Janet Reno completely bungled and f
- Page 19 and 20: IntroductionFor we wrestle not agai
- Page 21 and 22: esponding to his message, Philo ass
- Page 23 and 24: The enemy of the Christians was ind
- Page 25 and 26: ing of Rome itself, lasted hundreds
- Page 27 and 28: notions about the gods and views on
- Page 29 and 30: people who live in cities do not kn
- Page 31 and 32: prevailing bestiality would have to
- Page 33 and 34: Mediterranean elite, and in the pop
- Page 35 and 36: self-denial and a disassociation of
- Page 37: wearily strive, but from which they
- Page 41 and 42: altered or forged. The existence an
- Page 43 and 44: Certainly,Jesus entered Jewish soci
- Page 45 and 46: commitment to that ideal against we
- Page 47 and 48: Christ Presented to the People by P
- Page 49 and 50: cast into his garden, and it grew a
- Page 51 and 52: uilt the Christian movement was a b
- Page 53 and 54: pagan cults to bore inside the move
- Page 55 and 56: despite their inhuman behavior--whi
- Page 57 and 58: early gnostic text, Thunder, Perfec
- Page 59 and 60: And said, "O full of all subtlety a
- Page 61 and 62: • Rome• M A C ED O N IA "_i_::i
- Page 63 and 64: the level spaces. Then it climbed t
- Page 65 and 66: latter half of the second century,
- Page 67 and 68: great many people could be reformed
- Page 69 and 70: And upon her forehead was a name wr
- Page 71 and 72: 60 A.D. PAUL's Roman imprisonmenL a
- Page 73 and 74: The drugplagueis onlypartof tile st
- Page 75 and 76: severalanti-Falk letters, not just
- Page 77 and 78: BOOKSWhy the Green Nigger,Re-mythin
- Page 79 and 80: pathy, clairvoyanCe,*:;_'_%cogni- d
- Page 81 and 82: netarist school of economics beat a
- Page 83 and 84: illegal seizure of property rights)
- Page 85 and 86: of Cardinal Nicholas of Cusa as obl
- Page 87 and 88: I.mERSiThis criticism of Carter is
- Page 89 and 90:
several years in England as the yea