10.07.2015 Views

SURYA NEPAL PRIVATE LIMITED - ITC i

SURYA NEPAL PRIVATE LIMITED - ITC i

SURYA NEPAL PRIVATE LIMITED - ITC i

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>SURYA</strong> <strong>NEPAL</strong> <strong>PRIVATE</strong> <strong>LIMITED</strong>SCHEDULES TO THE ACCOUNTS (Contd.)SCHEDULE 17 - NOTES TO THE ACCOUNTS (Contd.)NRs. 10,69,66,056 (` 6,68,53,785) and the basis of demand is theoreticalproduction. The Company has filed a writ petition in the Supreme Courton 7th August 2009 requesting that the said demand order be quashedand orders issued such that the tax demanded not be collected. TheSupreme Court admitted the petition on 9th August 2009 and directedissue of Show Cause Notices to the respondents and the hearing onthe matter is pending.5. A demand letter dated 14th May 2010 was issued to the Company bythe Large Taxpayers Office, Lalitpur, for the financial year 2064-65(2007-08) for NRs. 11,46,91,649 (` 7,16,82,280) the basis of which istheoretical production. An administrative review petition on the ValueAdded Tax matter was filed before the Director General on 11th July2010, and the matter is pending.(iii) Income Tax Demand for NRs. 28,58,68,507 (` 17,86,67,817)1. A demand letter dated 12th August 2007, for the financial year 2059-60 (2002-03) was issued to the Company by the Large Taxpayers Office,Lalitpur, on 14th August 2007 for a sum of NRs. 19,60,92,971(` 12,25,58,107) on theoretical production. The Company has filed awrit petition in the Supreme Court on 11th September 2007 requestingthat the said demand order be quashed and orders issued such thatthe tax demanded not be collected. The Supreme Court admitted thepetition on 12th September 2007, and the hearing on the matter ispending.2. A demand letter dated 15th September 2008 for the financial year2060-61 (2003-04) was issued to the Company by the Large TaxpayersOffice, Lalitpur. Of a total demand of NRs. 2,25,36,944 (` 1,40,85,590)the basis of the demand for NRs. 1,91,39,653 (` 1,19,62,283) is ontheoretical production.The Company has filed a writ petition in the Supreme Court on 7thDecember 2008 seeking that the said demand order be quashed andorders issued such that the tax demanded not be collected. The SupremeCourt admitted the petition on 8th December 2008 and hearing onthe matter is pending.3. A demand letter dated 16th October 2009 for the financial year 2061-62 (2004-05) was issued to the Company by the Large Taxpayers Office,Lalitpur. Out of a total demand of NRs. 2,26,26,609 (` 1,41,41,631),the basis of the demand for NRs. 2,15,65,409 (` 1,34,78,381) is ontheoretical production. The Company has filed an administrative reviewpetition before the Director General, Inland Revenue Department on18th December 2009. However, the Director General without dealingwith the issues raised by the Company, summarily dismissed the petitionby an order dated 2nd March 2010. The Company thereafter filed anappeal before the Revenue Tribunal, on 17th June 2010, and the matteris pending.4. A demand letter dated 16th September 2010 for the financial year2062-63 (2005-06) was issued to the Company by the Large TaxpayersOffice, Lalitpur. Out of a total demand of NRs. 4,92,55,186(` 3,07,84,491), the basis of the demand for NRs. 4,90,70,474(` 3,06,69,046) is on theoretical production. The Company, inconsultation with its counsel, is in the process of challenging it throughappropriate legal remedies.The Management considers that all the demands listed above have nolegal or factual basis. Accordingly, the Management is of the view thatthere is no liability that is likely to arise, particularly in the light of thedecision in favour of the Company by the Full Bench of the HoníbleSupreme Court.b) Other demands raised on account of,1. Income Taxes for various assessment years amounting to NRs.10,32,83,725 (` 6,45,52,328) {(2065-66 - NRs. 10,32,83,725(` 6,45,52,328)} (net of provision made for the above assessment years)against which the Company has filed appeals with the appropriateauthorities.2. Value Added Tax matters under dispute, pertaining to financial years2055-56 to 2057-58, amounting to NRs. 31,00,750 (` 19,37,969){(2065-66 - NRs. 31,00,750 (` 19,37,969))}, which are under appeal.C. In the matter related to theoretical production, a Show Cause Notice dated 19thJanuary 2010 was issued by the Inland Revenue Office seeking reasons as to whya demand of NRs. 19,65,37,807 (` 12,28,36,129) by way of Excise Duty shouldnot be raised on the Company for the financial year 2064-65 (2007-08). TheCompany has filed a writ petition in the Supreme Court on 4th February 2010seeking a stay order on the Department from raising a demand on this matter inview of the favourable decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter narratedin paragraph B(a)(i)(1) above. On 7th March 2010, Supreme Court stayed thedemand, pending final disposal.In respect of the above Show Cause Notice, the management is of the view thatthe Company has a strong case on merits and has been advised by eminent counselthat the Show Cause Notice is not sustainable, particularly in the light of the decisionby the Full Bench of the Supreme Court on a similar mannerD. Estimated amount of contracts remaining to be executed on capital accountNRs. 38,94,00,452 (` 24,33,75,283) {(2065-66 NRs. 1,36,12,442 (` 85,07,776))}.E. Payment to Managing Directors:Particulars Year ended Year ended32nd Asadh 2067 31st Asadh 2066(16th July 2010) (15th July 2009)In NRs. In ` In NRs. In `Salary, Bonus etc. (Short Term) 1,31,55,061 82,21,913 1,11,98,602* 69,99,126*Post Employment Benefits** — — — —Total 1,31,55,061 82,21,913 1,11,98,602 69,99,126* Includes NRs. 39,44,756 (` 24,65,473) paid to former Managing Director as per terms and conditions approved by the Shareholders.**Post employment benefits are actuarially determined on overall basis for all employees.F. Miscellaneous Expenses include reimbursement of expenses to statutory auditors amounting to NRs. 68,410 (` 42,756) {(2065-66 – NRs. 2,48,754 (` 1,55,471))}.G. The major components of the Deferred Tax Assets/Liabilities, based on the tax effect of the timing difference are as under:Particulars As at As at31st Asadh 2067 31st Asadh 2066(16th July 2010) (15th July 2009)In NRs. In ` In NRs. In `Deferred Tax AssetOn employees’ separation and retirement 1,08,20,523 67,62,827 1,36,75,628 85,47,268On fiscal allowance on fixed assets 2,22,01,471 1,38,75,919 77,30,612 48,31,632On doubtful advance 12,66,614 7,91,634 9,60,155 6,00,0973,42,88,608 2,14,30,380 2,23,66,395 1,39,78,997Deferred Tax LiabilityOn finished goods 53,01,893 33,13,683 59,16,809 36,98,006Deferred Tax – Net 2,89,86,715 1,81,16,697 1,64,49,586 1,02,80,991H. Explanation of the relationship between tax expenses and accounting profit:Particulars For the Year ended For the Year ended32nd Asadh 2067 31st Asadh 2066(16th July 2010) (15th July 2009)In NRs. In ` In NRs. In `Accounting Profit 2,88,26,44,312 1,80,16,52,695 2,12,05,91,000 1,32,53,69,375Tax at the applicable tax rate 88,00,80,163 55,00,50,102 64,81,82,492 40,51,14,057(Cigarette manufacturing @ 30%,Garments Manufacturing @ 20% andTrading @ 25%)Factors affecting tax charge for the yearEffect of :Unused Tax Losses not recognised 2,72,77,870 1,70,48,668 2,56,08,895 1,60,05,559Expenses not deductible for tax purposes 9,40,099 5,87,562 10,42,934 6,51,834Movement in other timing differences — — 36,96,313 23,10,196Reduction in opening deferred taxes resulting from reduction in tax rate — — 12,07,382 7,54,614Total Tax Expense 90,82,98,132 56,76,86,332 67,97,38,016 42,48,36,260194

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!