augmented with those fish. The effects of these augmentation efforts need to bemonitored and evaluated.Four basic documents are used to plan, implement, and coordinate geneticsmanagement and artificial propagation for the endangered fishes. These are theGenetics Management Guidelines, Genetics Management Plan, Coordinated HatcheryFacility Plan (Facility Plan), and Integrated Stocking Plan. All four of these plans havebeen developed and will be revised or updated as needed.The Genetics Management Guidelines document provides the rationale, geneticsconcepts, and genetic risks to be considered in genetics-management planning andimplementation. For example, it indicates that a fish population is the fundamental unitof genetics management and that its definition and characterization, relative to otherpopulations, are important. Genetic surveys have been part of the identification andcharacterization process. Further, the prioritization and genetics management requiredfor each population is determined by its relative population status, demographic trends,and genetics data derived from the surveys.The Genetics Management Plan is the operational document. It tells the "what, who,when, where" of implementation. It identifies specific objectives, tasks, activities, andtype of facilities necessary to accomplish <strong>Recovery</strong> <strong>Program</strong> goals, i.e., protectpopulation genetic integrity or restore a self-sustaining population in the wild. It is theaction plan developed for implementation, directed by the <strong>Recovery</strong> <strong>Program</strong> goals, andstructured along the format presented in the Genetics Management PlanningGuidelines document.Facilities are required to meet long-term (5 years or more) augmentation andrestoration stocking needs. The plans for these facilities are the Coordinated HatcheryFacility Plan and the Facilities Plan. These plans, in accordance with the GeneticsManagement Plan, define facilities required to meet propagation needs, identify fishneeds that can be met by existing facilities, and recommend expansion or modificationof existing facilities. Genetics management requires a great deal of operationalactivity. Refugia and propagation facilities have been planned, built, and are nowoperated in a coordinated fashion.The Integrated Stocking Plan (Nesler et al. 2003) provides specific annual numbers offish and their sizes to be produced at <strong>Program</strong> hatcheries and stocked into <strong>Upper</strong><strong>Colorado</strong> <strong>River</strong> Basin river reaches. This plan has been implemented for over 7 yearsand is being revised based on recent estimates of survival of the stocked fish. . Arevised stocking plan may recommend stocking bonytail in floodplain habitats instead ofcanyon-bound reaches, since new information suggests floodplains may be moresuitable habitat.12
2.5 V. MONITOR POPULATIONS AND HABITAT AND CONDUCT RESEARCH TOSUPPORT RECOVERY ACTIONSThis category consists primarily of research and monitoring activities that haveapplication to more than one of the foregoing elements. In the General <strong>Recovery</strong><strong>Program</strong> Support Action Plan, this element includes: monitoring populations and habitatand annually assessing changes in habitat and population parameters (i.e., populationestimates); determining gaps in existing life-history information and recommending andconducting research to fill those gaps; and improving scientific research and samplingtechniques. Research activities are identified for each subbasin only to the extent thatsuch activities are related to another recovery action in that subbasin. Suchidentification now, however, does not preclude further research in that subbasin thatmay be identified later or that is identified in the General <strong>Recovery</strong> <strong>Program</strong> SupportAction Plan.2.6 VI. INCREASE PUBLIC AWARENESS AND SUPPORT FOR THEENDANGERED FISHES AND THE RECOVERY PROGRAMPublic information and education is crucial to the <strong>Recovery</strong> <strong>Program</strong>’s success. Astrategic, multi-faceted information and education program is being implemented to:develop public involvement strategies at the beginning of any and all projects; educatetarget audiences (including media, the public and elected officials) about endangeredfish and increase their understanding of and support for the recovery of these fish atlocal, state and national levels; provide opportunities for the public to participate inactivities that support recovery; and improve communication and cooperation amongmembers of the <strong>Recovery</strong> <strong>Program</strong>.Numerous site-specific activities are undertaken to promote understanding of, andsupport for, <strong>Recovery</strong> <strong>Program</strong> actions and to involve the public in decisions which mayimpact specific locations in the <strong>Upper</strong> Basin. These include public meetings,presentations, communications (e-mails, newsletters, etc.), exhibits and distribution of<strong>Recovery</strong> <strong>Program</strong> publications.The information and education program continues to develop a number of productsincluding an annual newsletter; up-to-date fact sheets; interpretive signs and displays;bookmarks; Congressional briefing documents; and a website. In addition, the<strong>Recovery</strong> <strong>Program</strong> actively seeks news media coverage of its activities. Specialeducational publications are produced as needed.Because funding for capital construction and ongoing operation and maintenance(O&M) for the <strong>Upper</strong> <strong>Colorado</strong> <strong>River</strong> and San Juan <strong>River</strong> Basin <strong>Recovery</strong> <strong>Program</strong>s istied together in Federal legislation (Public Laws 106-392, 107-375, 109-183, and 111-11), an annual publication is produced that highlights accomplishments of bothprograms. The <strong>Program</strong> Highlights publication serves as a briefing document for the13
- Page 1 and 2: RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMSECT
- Page 3 and 4: PART ONE:RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION PR
- Page 5 and 6: The Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS)
- Page 7 and 8: The Management Committee will work
- Page 10 and 11: 3.2.1 Importance 163.2.2 Recovery A
- Page 12 and 13: treated as a “recovery unit”),
- Page 14 and 15: success of recovery efforts will be
- Page 16 and 17: strategies to resolve imbalances. T
- Page 18 and 19: Historically, Upper Colorado River
- Page 20 and 21: that favor their survival over that
- Page 24 and 25: non-Federal partners’ annual visi
- Page 26 and 27: the Green River down to the conflue
- Page 28 and 29: Colorado filed for a junior instrea
- Page 30 and 31: 2005 update formalized high flow re
- Page 32 and 33: Wolford Mountain Reservoir and 5,41
- Page 34 and 35: chub (previously captured in Westwa
- Page 36 and 37: NWCDPD/PDOTBDUTUDWRUTWRWACWYGFNorth
- Page 38 and 39: GENERAL RECOVERY PROGRAM SUPPORT AC
- Page 40 and 41: GENERAL RECOVERY PROGRAM SUPPORT AC
- Page 42 and 43: GENERAL RECOVERY PROGRAM SUPPORT AC
- Page 44 and 45: GENERAL RECOVERY PROGRAM SUPPORT AC
- Page 46 and 47: GENERAL RECOVERY PROGRAM SUPPORT AC
- Page 48 and 49: GREEN RIVER ACTION PLAN: MAINSTEM G
- Page 50 and 51: GREEN RIVER ACTION PLAN: MAINSTEM G
- Page 52 and 53: Green River at JensenPre and Post F
- Page 54 and 55: GREEN RIVER ACTION PLAN: YAMPA AND
- Page 56 and 57: GREEN RIVER ACTION PLAN: YAMPA AND
- Page 58 and 59: Assmt: Yampa Flows Page 119,600 cfs
- Page 60 and 61: GREEN RIVER ACTION PLAN: DUCHESNE R
- Page 62 and 63: GREEN RIVER ACTION PLAN: WHITE RIVE
- Page 64 and 65: Assmt: Yampa Flows Page 12011 peak
- Page 66 and 67: ACTIVITY WHO STATUS>* I.A.5.b.(1) P
- Page 68 and 69: COLORADO RIVER ACTION PLAN: MAINSTE
- Page 70 and 71: COLORADO RIVER ACTION PLAN: MAINSTE
- Page 72 and 73:
ACTIVITY WHO STATUSMONITOR POPULATI
- Page 74 and 75:
Assmt: Colorado Flows Tables Page 1
- Page 76 and 77:
COLORADO RIVER ACTION PLAN: GUNNISO
- Page 78 and 79:
COLORADO RIVER ACTION PLAN: GUNNISO
- Page 80 and 81:
COLORADO RIVER ACTION PLAN: DOLORES
- Page 82 and 83:
Bestgen, K. R., J. A. Hawkins, G. C
- Page 84 and 85:
Burdick, B.D. 1999. Evaluation of f
- Page 86 and 87:
Crowl, T.A., and L. Lentsch. 1996.
- Page 88 and 89:
Hawkins, J.A., and T.P. Nesler. 199
- Page 90 and 91:
Kuhn, G. And C. A. Williams. 2004.
- Page 92 and 93:
River Endangered Fish Recovery Prog
- Page 94 and 95:
Smith, G.R., and R.G. Green. 1991.
- Page 96 and 97:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 200
- Page 98 and 99:
Whitledge, G. W., B. M. Johnson, P.
- Page 100 and 101:
environment (food supply, predation