10.07.2015 Views

The Structure and Evolution of Employment in Jordan - University of ...

The Structure and Evolution of Employment in Jordan - University of ...

The Structure and Evolution of Employment in Jordan - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

experience <strong>in</strong> Egypt from the 1960s to the late 1970s. However, the reversal occurred adecade earlier <strong>in</strong> Egypt <strong>and</strong> has persisted throughout the 2000s.<strong>The</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> government employment <strong>in</strong> the 1960s <strong>and</strong> 1970s <strong>in</strong> <strong>Jordan</strong> came at theexpense <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>formal employment, whether <strong>in</strong> the form <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>formal wage employment or selfemploymentor unpaid family labor. Formal private sector work was very limited <strong>and</strong>grow<strong>in</strong>g rather slowly until the late 1980s. However, it is very clear that when the role <strong>of</strong>government began to decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> <strong>Jordan</strong> <strong>in</strong> the mid-1980s, it is the formal private sector thattook over the mantle <strong>of</strong> employment creation. <strong>The</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> its share from 10 percent to 30percent <strong>of</strong> new jobs <strong>in</strong> one decades almost completely makes up for the decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g share <strong>of</strong>government. Although <strong>in</strong>formal private wage work grew at first <strong>in</strong> response to the decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong>government <strong>in</strong> the 1980s, its growth stabilized as that <strong>of</strong> formal private employment took <strong>of</strong>f.This picture <strong>of</strong>fers a very clear contrast with the situation <strong>in</strong> Egypt where nearly all thedecl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g share <strong>of</strong> government was made up by the growth <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>formal wage employment.Formal wage employment <strong>in</strong> Egypt grew much more slowly than <strong>in</strong> <strong>Jordan</strong>, go<strong>in</strong>g from about5 percent <strong>of</strong> employment <strong>in</strong> the mid 1970s when the share <strong>of</strong> government began to decl<strong>in</strong>e tojust over 10 percent by 2005.Another important contrast between <strong>Jordan</strong> <strong>and</strong> Egypt is <strong>in</strong> the growth <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurshipamong new entrants as measured by the share <strong>of</strong> self-employment (<strong>and</strong> employers) <strong>in</strong> theemployment <strong>of</strong> new entrants. Although this share decl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the 1960s <strong>in</strong> <strong>Jordan</strong> <strong>and</strong>rema<strong>in</strong>ed constant at about 5 percent s<strong>in</strong>ce then, it has been <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g steadily <strong>in</strong> Egypt fromless than 5 percent <strong>in</strong> 1970 to nearly 10 percent <strong>in</strong> 2005Further <strong>in</strong>sights can be ga<strong>in</strong>ed on the chang<strong>in</strong>g structure <strong>of</strong> the labor market over time, bylimit<strong>in</strong>g our analysis to the labor market experience <strong>of</strong> educated new entrants. By focus<strong>in</strong>gonly on those with secondary education <strong>and</strong> above, we can see that the decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g role <strong>of</strong>government <strong>in</strong> employment looms much larger <strong>in</strong> both <strong>Jordan</strong> <strong>and</strong> Egypt. As shown <strong>in</strong> figure12, over a little more than one decade from the mid 1980s to the mid 1990s <strong>in</strong> <strong>Jordan</strong>, theshare <strong>of</strong> government employment among educated new entrants was halved from 60 percentto 30 percent <strong>and</strong> then rema<strong>in</strong>ed at roughly that level throughout the 2000s. <strong>The</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>Egypt began earlier, was more gradual but ended up be<strong>in</strong>g larger <strong>in</strong> magnitude, withgovernment provid<strong>in</strong>g from over 70 percent <strong>of</strong> first jobs for educated new entrants <strong>in</strong> the1960s to just 20 percent <strong>of</strong> first jobs <strong>in</strong> the 2000s. Aga<strong>in</strong> the contrast<strong>in</strong>g roles <strong>of</strong> formal <strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>formal private wage employment <strong>in</strong> <strong>Jordan</strong> <strong>and</strong> Egypt <strong>in</strong> quite clear, with the former tak<strong>in</strong>gup the almost the entire slack <strong>in</strong> <strong>Jordan</strong> <strong>and</strong> the latter do<strong>in</strong>g so <strong>in</strong> Egypt.In conclud<strong>in</strong>g this discussion <strong>of</strong> the chang<strong>in</strong>g structure <strong>of</strong> the labor market fac<strong>in</strong>g newentrants, we can ascerta<strong>in</strong> that <strong>Jordan</strong> was able to avoid the <strong>in</strong>formalization <strong>of</strong> employmentthat occurred <strong>in</strong> Egypt as a result <strong>of</strong> the restructur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the economy away from the publicsector. As we will see below, <strong>Jordan</strong> managed to do so by mak<strong>in</strong>g formal private employmentmore flexible through the use <strong>of</strong> temporary contracts, while ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g social <strong>in</strong>surancecoverage.We now move to a deeper look that follows <strong>in</strong>dividuals through time as they progressthrough the labor market to see what can be learned about the chang<strong>in</strong>g structure <strong>of</strong>employment five <strong>and</strong> ten years <strong>in</strong>to workers' careers for different cohorts <strong>of</strong> workers. Aga<strong>in</strong>the share <strong>of</strong> each employment type <strong>in</strong> total employment at the time <strong>of</strong> entry is viewed by year<strong>of</strong> entry, but now we add the share five <strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> ten years <strong>in</strong>to the labor market. To make thefigures comparable, we limit the analysis to workers who stay <strong>in</strong> the labor market for at leastten years, so as to abstract away from compositional changes due to exits from employmentaltogether.8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!