Module 6: Descriptive, Normative, and Impact Evaluation Designs

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Randomized ControlTrials (RCTs)• NOT appropriate for:– complex, multi-dimensional and highly contextspecificcommunity interventions– ethical constraints• NOT needed if:– face validity is high– observed changes are dramatic– link between treatment and outcome is directIPDET 44 44
Quasi-experimentalDesign• The design is similar to trueexperimental design but:– no random assignment– uses naturally-occurring comparisongroups– requires more data to rule out alternativeexplanationsIPDET 45 45
Page 1 and 2: IPDETModule 6:Descriptive, Normativ
Page 3 and 4: Evaluation Design• The total proc
Page 5 and 6: Approach to DevelopmentEvaluationFo
Page 7 and 8: Matrix Elements• Design Matrix Pl
Page 9 and 10: Matrix Elements (page 2)• Data So
Page 11 and 12: Answering DescriptiveQuestions• D
Page 13 and 14: One-shot• Represented as:- X O 1
Page 15 and 16: Cross-sectional• Evaluation quest
Page 17 and 18: Before-and-after Designs• Also ca
Page 19 and 20: Time Series Designs• Look for cha
Page 21 and 22: Time Series• Represented as:- O 1
Page 23 and 24: Longitudinal• Evaluation question
Page 25 and 26: Case Study• Represented as:O 1O 2
Page 27 and 28: Answering Cause-EffectQuestions•
Page 29 and 30: Impact Designs• Can use experimen
Page 31 and 32: Impact and Multi-site andCluster Ev
Page 33 and 34: Before-and-AfterMeasures• Change
Page 35 and 36: Random Assignment• Random: people
Page 37 and 38: Use of Natural Variation• Inconsi
Page 40 and 41: 9 Causal TracingEvidence Sources•
Page 42 and 43: Experimental Design• Called the
Page 46 and 47: Examples of QuasiexperimentalDesign
Page 48 and 49: Case Study Design• Used when the
Page 50: To continue on to theNext Module cl

Module 6: Descriptive, Normative, and Impact Evaluation Designs

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?