19.11.2012 Views

Ahmed Azab *, Adel Hanafy *, Alaa Essa, Khaled Aref, Hesham ...

Ahmed Azab *, Adel Hanafy *, Alaa Essa, Khaled Aref, Hesham ...

Ahmed Azab *, Adel Hanafy *, Alaa Essa, Khaled Aref, Hesham ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Menoufiya Medical Journal 195 Surgical Aspects in Management<br />

Vol. 21 No . 2 July 2008 <strong>Ahmed</strong> <strong>Azab</strong> et al.,<br />

Table(5): MRI and CT findings:<br />

MRI and CT findings No. of patients Percentage<br />

Diffuse annulus disc bulge 24 80%<br />

Central hard disc protrusion 6 20%<br />

Indentation ofthecal sac 30 100%<br />

Encroachment on lateral recess and nerve root exit<br />

foraminae<br />

24 80%<br />

Caudal migration of disc prolapse 3 10%<br />

Lumbar spondylo degenerative changes 18 60%<br />

Concomitant lower lumbar disc prolapse 9 30%<br />

Concomitant lower lumbar canal stenosis 18 60%<br />

Sagittal stenosis 18 60%<br />

Table (6) Operative procedures: 60% of cases were treated with laminectomy uniletral<br />

facetectomy and discectomy at the involved level. 30% of cases were treated with laminectomy<br />

without discectomy due to hard spondylotic bar. In 3 cases constituting 10% at all cases,<br />

laminectomy, bilateral facetectomy, pediclectomy and discectomy was done followed by<br />

transpedicular fixation.<br />

Operative procedures<br />

No. of<br />

patients<br />

Percentage<br />

Laminectomy without discectomy at involved level. 9 30%<br />

Laminectomy, unilateral facetectomy with discectomy at<br />

involved level<br />

Laminectomy, bilateral facetectomy with pediclectomy<br />

discectomy and transpedicular fixation.<br />

18 60%<br />

3 10%

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!