10.07.2015 Views

2007 Annual Report - Ameristar Casinos, Inc.

2007 Annual Report - Ameristar Casinos, Inc.

2007 Annual Report - Ameristar Casinos, Inc.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Item 1A. Risk FactorsThe gaming industry is very competitive and increased competition could have a material adverse effect onour future operations.The gaming industry is very competitive and we face dynamic competitive pressures in each of our markets.Several of our competitors are larger and have greater financial and other resources. We may choose or be requiredto take actions in response to competitors that may increase our marketing costs and other operating expenses.Our operating properties are located in jurisdictions that restrict gaming to certain areas or are adjacent to statesthat prohibit or restrict gaming operations. These restrictions and prohibitions provide substantial benefits to ourbusiness and our ability to attract and retain customers. The legalization or expanded legalization or authorization ofgaming within or near a market area of one of our properties could result in a significant increase in competition andhave a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Economic difficultiesfaced by state governments, as well as the increased acceptance of gaming as a leisure activity, could lead tointensified political pressure for the expansion of legalized gaming.In April <strong>2007</strong>, the Kansas legislature enacted a law that authorizes up to four state-owned and operated landbasedcasinos and three racetrack slot machine parlors. One casino and one racetrack location are authorized in thegreater Kansas City market, within close proximity to <strong>Ameristar</strong> Kansas City, and several companies have submittedapplications to develop and manage the land-based casino. The constitutionality of the Kansas legislation wasrecently upheld by a Kansas district court, and that ruling is being appealed to the Kansas Supreme Court. If thelegislation is found to be constitutional and the new facilities open, we will face significant additional competition atour Kansas City property that would have a material adverse effect on the results of operations of that property.Our Resorts East Chicago property currently competes with seven other casino gaming facilities in theChicagoland market. The property’s principal competitor is located in Hammond, Indiana, which is closer to and hasbetter access for customers who live in Chicago, Illinois and the Chicago suburbs that are the primary feedermarkets for Resorts East Chicago. The Hammond facility is undergoing a major expansion that is expected to openin September 2008. The Illinois legislature continues to consider legislation that would authorize a land-basedcasino in the City of Chicago and new riverboat casinos in upstate Illinois. Proposed bills have also included theauthorization of slot machines at the existing racetracks, including the five in greater Chicago, and an increase in thenumber of authorized gaming positions at each of the existing Illinois casinos from 1,200 to 2,000. If Illinoismaterially expands gaming, particularly in downtown Chicago or the south Chicago suburbs, the additionalcompetition will materially adversely affect the financial performance of Resorts East Chicago.In December <strong>2007</strong>, a competitor opened a new casino in downtown St. Louis, approximately 22 miles from<strong>Ameristar</strong> St. Charles. The Missouri Gaming Commission is currently investigating a gaming license application foranother new casino facility being developed by the same competitor in southeastern St. Louis County,approximately 30 miles from <strong>Ameristar</strong> St. Charles. The southeastern St. Louis County facility is currently expectedto open in mid-2009. St. Louis city officials and members of the Missouri Gaming Commission have also stated thatthey would like to see a currently operating casino in downtown St. Louis, which is owned by the same operator,improved. The additional two new gaming operations in the St. Louis market, as well as any upgrade to the existingdowntown St. Louis casino, will result in significant additional competition for <strong>Ameristar</strong> St. Charles. In addition, iflegislation is enacted in Illinois to permit the operation of slot machines at racetracks, <strong>Ameristar</strong> St. Charles wouldface additional competition from the racetrack near East St. Louis, Illinois.In February 2008, the Missouri Gaming Commission adopted a resolution to permit the submission of gaminglicense applications for a potential new riverboat casino in Sugar Creek, Missouri, approximately seven miles from<strong>Ameristar</strong> Kansas City. If the Commission were to grant a gaming license for this location, the additionalcompetition would materially adversely affect <strong>Ameristar</strong> Kansas City’s business.In Vicksburg, a $40 million casino facility with limited amenities is currently under construction and is expectedto be completed by the fourth quarter of 2008.29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!