10.07.2015 Views

2005 - Communicating the Pan-European Ecological Network - ECNC

2005 - Communicating the Pan-European Ecological Network - ECNC

2005 - Communicating the Pan-European Ecological Network - ECNC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2 <strong>Ecological</strong> networks and support for PEEN inpolicy making in Europe2.1 The <strong>European</strong> levelPolicy frameworkAlthough <strong>the</strong>re is no international legislative framework which is aimed exclusively at <strong>the</strong> creation of aEurope wide ecological network, consisting of core areas, corridors, stepping stones and buffer zones, anumber of international legislative instruments can be seen as directly or indirectly supporting this process.From a legal point of view <strong>the</strong> Natura 2000 network has <strong>the</strong> strongest basis for <strong>the</strong> creation of a<strong>European</strong> ecological network as it is based upon <strong>the</strong> EU Habitat and Birds Directives, and <strong>the</strong>refore is‘hard law’. However, <strong>the</strong> Natura 2000 network is limited to EU countries and does not involve non-MemberStates. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> concept of corridors is not fully integrated into Natura 2000, although <strong>the</strong> issueof connectivity between sites (i.e. linking <strong>the</strong> core sites to each o<strong>the</strong>r) is included in <strong>the</strong> Habitat Directive.Whilst <strong>the</strong> Natura 2000 <strong>Network</strong> can be seen as a driver for enabling <strong>the</strong> establishment of a <strong>European</strong> ecologicalnetwork, especially with regards to <strong>the</strong> identification and protection of core areas, its restrictedgeographical scope and limited attention to corridors will not on its own suffice to create a <strong>European</strong> ecologicalnetwork. The Emerald network (based on <strong>the</strong> Council of Europe’s Bern Convention) has a widergeographical scope and includes <strong>the</strong> concept of corridors, but this Convention is described by <strong>the</strong> Councilof Europe itself as ‘soft legislation’ and non-compliance has less consequences than failing to meet <strong>the</strong>requirements of <strong>the</strong> EU Directives.At <strong>the</strong> level of international policy frameworks, <strong>the</strong> ambition to establish an ecological network for Europeis much more firmly anchored, than in international law. In 1995 <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> environment ministersendorsed <strong>the</strong> <strong>Pan</strong>-<strong>European</strong> Biological and Landscape Diversity Strategy and its Action Theme to establisha <strong>Pan</strong>-<strong>European</strong> <strong>Ecological</strong> <strong>Network</strong>. This goal was reinforced at <strong>the</strong> Kyiv ministerial conference in2003, which produced a PEEN action plan. The <strong>Pan</strong>-<strong>European</strong> <strong>Ecological</strong> <strong>Network</strong> has, technically speaking,<strong>the</strong> broadest scope because it covers not only network elements such as core areas, but also networkelements such as corridors and buffer zones, which are lacking in almost all o<strong>the</strong>r international conventions.However <strong>the</strong> potential weakness of <strong>the</strong>se policy instruments lies in <strong>the</strong>ir implementation, as thisis entirely dependent on voluntary national support and <strong>the</strong>re are no sanctions for non-compliance.9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!