10.07.2015 Views

ASPECTS OF IWASAWA THEORY OVER FUNCTION FIELDS 1 ...

ASPECTS OF IWASAWA THEORY OVER FUNCTION FIELDS 1 ...

ASPECTS OF IWASAWA THEORY OVER FUNCTION FIELDS 1 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>IWASAWA</strong> <strong>THEORY</strong> <strong>OVER</strong> <strong>FUNCTION</strong> <strong>FIELDS</strong> 172. the characteristic ideal of the Λ d−1 -module E(F d )/I d d−1 E(F d) is generated by theproduct of the f i,d ’s modulo I d d−1 , hence it is obviously equal to πd d−1 (Ch Λ d(A(F d ))).Moreover, from the fact that N(F d ) and R(F d ) are finitely generated torsion Λ d−1 -modules3 and the multiplicativity of characteristic ideals, looking at the left (resp. right) verticalsequence of the first (resp. second) diagram in (5.8), one findsandHence from (5.9) one hasCh Λd−1 (N(F d ) Γd d−1 ) = ChΛd−1 (N(F d )/I d d−1 N(F d))Ch Λd−1 (R(F d ) Γd d−1 ) = ChΛd−1 (R(F d )/I d d−1 R(F d)) .Ch Λd−1 (A(F d )/I d d−1 A(F d)) = Ch Λd−1(C(Fd )/I d d−1 C(F d) ) · Ch Λd−1 (N(F d ) Γd d−1 )= Ch Λd−1(C(Fd )/I d d−1 C(F d) ) · Ch Λd−1 (A(F d ) Γd d−1 )(where the last line comes from the isomorphism A(F d ) Γd d−1 ≃ N(Fd ) Γd d−1 ). The sequence(5.10) provides the equalityCh Λd−1 (C(F d )/I d d−1 C(F d)) = Ch Λd−1 (E(F d )/I d d−1 E(F d))= π d d−1 (Ch Λ d(A(F d ))) .Therefore one concludes that(5.11) Ch Λd−1 (A(F d )/Id−1 d A(F d)) = πd−1d (ChΛd (A(F d )) ) · Ch Λd−1 (A(F d ) Γd d−1 ) .□Our next step is to prove that A(F d ) Γd d−1 = 0 (note that it would be enough to prove thatit is pseudo-null as a Λ d−1 -module). For this we need first a few lemmas.Lemma 5.5. Let G be a finite group and endow Z p with the trivial G-action. Then for anyG-module M we haveH i (G, M ⊗ Z p ) = H i (G, M) ⊗ Z pfor all i ≥ 0.This result should be well-known. Since we were not able to find a suitable reference, hereis a sketch of the proof.Proof. Let X be a G-module which has no torsion as an abelian group and put Y := X ⊗ Q.It is not hard to prove that Y G ⊗ Z p = (Y ⊗ Z p ) G and it follows that the same holds for X,since X G ⊗ Z p is a saturated submodule of X ⊗ Z p . Applying this to the standard complex bymeans of which the H i (G, M) are defined, one can prove the equality in the case M has notorsion as an abelian group. The general case follows because any G-module is the quotientof two such modules.□Up to now we have mainly considered M(L) as an Iwasawa module (for various L), nowwe focus on its interpretation as a group of divisor classes. Let L be a finite extensions of Fand recall that we defined M(L) = (Div(L)/P L ) ⊗ Z p . From the exact sequenceF ∗ L ↩→ L ∗ ↠ P Land the fact that |F ∗ L | is prime with p, one finds an isomorphism between L∗ ⊗Z p and P L ⊗Z p .Hence we can (and will) identify the two.holds.3 It might be worth to notice that this is the only point where we use the hypothesis that Assumption 5.3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!