HMB_IPD_Study_protocol - University of Birmingham

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$(Tabellarischer \334berblick)$

Table 1c: Characteristics of available trials (Mirena versus ablation) Study reference Number randomised Heavy Menstrual Bleeding (HMB) IPD Meta-analysis Country Eligibility Criteria Randomised comparison Barrington 2003 N=44 Devon, UK Menorrhagia refractory to medical treatment Uterine length 80mls/ cycle Uterine size 100 Regular uterine cavity Malak 2006 N= 56 Egypt Age 40-50 Cavity
Heavy Menstrual Bleeding (HMB) IPD Meta-analysis Table 1d: Characteristics of available trials (Mirena versus hysterectomy) Study reference Number randomised Hurskainen 2001 N = 236 5yr report published 2007 Halmesmaki K. Country Eligibility criteria Randomised comparison Finland Menorrhagia Age 35-49 LNG IUS Mirena Hysterectomy Outcome measures Measure of Outcome Measure EQ5D Rand 36 Menstrual blood loss Not as yet Response Version 1.1 29 Date 16.11.07
Page 1 and 2: Version 1.1 Heavy Menstrual Bleedin
Page 3 and 4: Authors who have agreed to collabor
Page 5 and 6: Dr W.R. Meyer University of North C
Page 7 and 8: ABSTRACT Version 1.1 Heavy Menstrua
Page 11 and 12: 3.3 - TYPES OF INTERVENTION Version
Page 13 and 14: 4.0 - METHODS Version 1.1 Heavy Men
Page 19 and 20: 12.0 REFERENCE LIST Version 1.1 Hea
Page 23 and 24: Heavy Menstrual Bleeding (HMB) IPD
Page 25 and 26: Table 1b: Characteristics of availa
Page 27: Heavy Menstrual Bleeding (HMB) IPD
Page 31: Mirena #1 EXPLODE “contraceptive

HMB_IPD_Study_protocol - University of Birmingham

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?