10.07.2015 Views

Functional and anatomic results of amnion vaginoplasty in young ...

Functional and anatomic results of amnion vaginoplasty in young ...

Functional and anatomic results of amnion vaginoplasty in young ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TABLE 2Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) values <strong>of</strong> the five sexually active Mayer-Rokitansky-K€uster-Hausen (MRKH) syndrome patients after <strong>amnion</strong> <strong>vag<strong>in</strong>oplasty</strong> compared with the equivalent meanFSFI values <strong>of</strong> MRKH syndrome patients after sigmoid <strong>vag<strong>in</strong>oplasty</strong> <strong>and</strong> with healthy <strong>in</strong>dividuals.MRKH syndrome patientsDoma<strong>in</strong>After <strong>amnion</strong><strong>vag<strong>in</strong>oplasty</strong> (n [ 5)After sigmoid<strong>vag<strong>in</strong>oplasty</strong> (n [ 11; ref. 12)Healthy women(n [ 131; ref. 10)Desire 4.9 1.2 4.7 0.9 4.1 1.1Arousability 5.0 0.8 4.9 0.6 5.0 1.0Lubrication 4.0 0.7 5.0 0.9 5.5 0.9Orgasm 5.5 1.0 5.3 0.8 5.0 1.2Satisfaction 5.3 1.4 4.7 1.6 5.1 1.2Pa<strong>in</strong> 5.3 1.8 3.5 2 5.5 1Total score 30.0 6.9 28.1 6.8 30.2 6.1Note: The patient after rectovag<strong>in</strong>al fistula formation <strong>and</strong> subsequent sigmoid neovag<strong>in</strong>a <strong>and</strong> the patient without sexual<strong>in</strong>tercourse were not <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> this FSFI evaluation. Full FSFI score is 36 po<strong>in</strong>ts. Values are given as mean SD.Fotopoulou. Amnion neovag<strong>in</strong>a <strong>in</strong> Rokitansky syndrome. Fertil Steril 2010.method is yet established which can be universally recommended.The choice <strong>of</strong> <strong>vag<strong>in</strong>oplasty</strong> depends on numerousfactors, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g patient preparedness, preference, <strong>and</strong> expectations<strong>and</strong> certa<strong>in</strong>ly the surgeon’s experience. Regardless<strong>of</strong> the surgeon’s personal preference, the patient should bethoroughly <strong>in</strong>formed about treatment alternatives, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gdescription <strong>of</strong> potential complications, long-term durability,<strong>and</strong> <strong>results</strong> on long-term sexual function. Thomas <strong>and</strong> Brock(33), <strong>in</strong> a review <strong>of</strong> nonoperative <strong>and</strong> operative alternativesfor vag<strong>in</strong>al replacement, concluded that the most popularTABLE 3Relevant series <strong>and</strong> case reports <strong>in</strong> the literature concern<strong>in</strong>g the treatment <strong>of</strong> Rokitansky (MRKH)syndrome by human amniotic membranes.Author, y (ref.)No. <strong>of</strong> MRKHpatientsAnatomicsuccessCompleteepithelialization/metaplasia<strong>of</strong> the <strong>amnion</strong><strong>in</strong>to squamous cellsNo. <strong>of</strong> majorcomplicationsTancer et al., 1979 (36) 1 100% yes 0Karjala<strong>in</strong>en et al., 1980 3 100% yes 0(38)Morton <strong>and</strong> Dewhurst, 27 92.6% yes 1 (rectal <strong>in</strong>jury)1986 (30)Ashworth et al., 198615 100% NR NR(21)Mac, 1988 (37) 9 100% yes 0Nisolle <strong>and</strong> Donnez,— ‘‘good’’ NR NR1992 (35)Bleggi-Torres et al.,10 100% yes 01997 (16)Sharma et al., 2008 (14) 17 88.23% yes 2(1 rectal <strong>in</strong>jury <strong>and</strong> 1rectovag<strong>in</strong>al fistula)T€oz€um, 1976 (20) 1 100% yes 0Note: NR ¼ not reported.Fotopoulou. Amnion neovag<strong>in</strong>a <strong>in</strong> Rokitansky syndrome. Fertil Steril 2010.320 Fotopoulou et al. Amnion neovag<strong>in</strong>a <strong>in</strong> Rokitansky syndrome Vol. 94, No. 1, June 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!