Lacking Insight - Community Law

Office of the Chief Psychiatrist 2005, Community TreatmentOrders: Chief Psychiatrist’s Guidelines, Mental Health Branch,Department of Human Services, Melbourne.Our consumer place 2008, Welcome to our consumer place,viewed 21 August 2008.Perlin, Michael 1999, ‘‘Half-Wracked Prejudice Leaped Forth’:Sanism, pretextuality, and why and how mental disability lawdeveloped as it did’ in Symposium, Rethinking Mental DisabilityLaw: Resolving Old Issues in a New Millenium, Journal ofContemporary Legal Issues 3.Perlin, Michael 2000, The Hidden Prejudice: Mental Disabilityon Trial, American Psychological Society, Washington DC .Perlin, Michael 2003, ‘Preface’ in Kate Diesfeld and IanFreckelton (eds), Involuntary Detention and TherapeuticJurisprudence, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp xxiii- xxxv.Punch, K 1998, Introduction to Social Research. Quantitativeand Qualitative Approaches, Sage, London.Wexler, David B 1992, ‘Putting Mental Health into MentalHealth law: Therapeutic Jurisprudence’, Law and HumanBehavior, vol. 16, no. 1.Wexler, David B 2000, ‘Therapeutic Jurisprudence: AnOverview’, Thomas M. Cooley Law Review, vol. 17, no. 1.pp.125-134.Whiteford, Harvey A & Buckingham, William J 2005, ‘Tenyears of mental health service reform in Australia: are wegetting it right?’, Medical Journal of Australia, vol. 182, no. 8.pp. 396 – 400.Winick, Bruce J 1994, ‘The Right to Refuse MentalHealth Treatment: A Therapeutic Jurisprudence Analysis’,International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, vol. 17, no.1,pp. 99-117.Winick, Bruce J 1997, ‘The Jurisprudence of TherapeuticJurisprudence’, Psychology, Public Policy and Law, vol. 3,no.1, March, pp. 184-206.Rees, N 2003, ‘International Human Rights Obligations andMental Health Review Tribunals’, Psychiatry, Psychology andLaw, vol. 10, no. 1, pp 33-43.Richmond, Kate & Savy, Pauline 2005, ‘In sight, in mind:mental health policy in the era of deinstitutionalisation’, HealthSociology Review, vol.14, no. 3. p. 215.Savy, Pauline 2005, ‘Outcry and silence: the socialimplications of asylum closure in Australia’, Health SociologyReview, vol. 14, no. 3. p.205.Senate Select Committee on Mental Health, 2006.A National Approach to Mental Health-From Crisis toCommunity, Senate Select Committee on MentalHealth, Canberra.Tait, David 2003, ‘The Ritual Environment of the MentalHealth Tribunal Hearing: Inquiries and Reflections’, Psychiatry,Psychology and Law, vol. 10, no. 1,pp. 91-96.Tyler, T 1996, ‘The Psychological Consequences of JudicialProcedures: Implications for Civil Commitment Hearings’ inWexler, David B & Winick, Bruce J (eds), Law in a TherapeuticKey: Developments in Therapeutic Jurisprudence, CarolinaAcademic Press, Durham, North Carolina.Webb, David 2005, ‘Bridging the spirituality gap’, Australiane-Journal for the Advancement of Mental Health (AeJAMH),vol. 4, no. 1.93