USPTO-Judicial-Decisions-Review.pdf - Haynes and Boone, LLP
USPTO-Judicial-Decisions-Review.pdf - Haynes and Boone, LLP
USPTO-Judicial-Decisions-Review.pdf - Haynes and Boone, LLP
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc.2011 U.S. Dist. Lexis 112846 (D. Md. Sept. 30, 2011)Claim Construction: “Assuggested by the Federal Circuit,the Court construed the designpatent claim by examining theillustrations in the patent <strong>and</strong> theaccused products. The Court alsoconsidered, for backgroundpurposes, testimony from [theinventor of the claimed design], whohad experience with the sitefurnishings marketplace, includingbench end frames <strong>and</strong> prior art, <strong>and</strong>with purchasers of site furnishings.”Prior Art© 2012 <strong>Haynes</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Boone</strong>, <strong>LLP</strong>
Change language