G4S Electronic Monitoring

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Impact of curfews: Reducing Offending5.7%4.7%I stopped offending8.7%In 2008 81% of respondents agreedwith the statement that being on tagmeant that they had stoppedoffendingSource: <strong>G4S</strong> exit questionnaires received 200881.0%Strongly Agree & Agree Not Sure Disagree Strongly Disagree68% of offenders interviewed byLeeds University said that theyintended to reduce offending.Source: Leeds University Research February2006
Impact of curfews: Reduced Drug Use20.7%I reduced my drug useIn 2008 56% of respondents agreedwith the statement that being on tagmeant that they reduced their druguseSource: <strong>G4S</strong> exit questionnaires received 200811.3%56.0%12.0%Strongly Agree & Agree Not Sure Disagree Strongly Disagree41% of offenders interviewed byLeeds University reported a changeand/or a reduction in their drug use.Source: Leeds University Research February 2006
Page 1 and 2: G4SElectronic MonitoringMark Griffi
Page 3 and 4: G4S Care and Justice Services15,000
Page 6 and 7: G4S Electronic MonitoringTechnologi
Page 8 and 9: New Developments• Recent• New R
Page 10 and 11: Added Value Services - a TrustedPar
Page 12 and 13: Adult Post Release
Page 16 and 17: Impact of curfews: Reducing Alcohol
Page 18 and 19: Impact of curfews: Effecting Relati
Page 20 and 21: Key Messages• G4S is the world’
Page 22 and 23: Overall Impact• Impact varies dep
Page 24 and 25: IOM Background / ObjectivesBackgrou

G4S Electronic Monitoring

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?