School Improvement Plan Sample for Question 1

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN SAMPLEFOR QUESTION 1OUR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLSchool Improvement Planning TemplateEmbedded Evaluation: The Five QuestionsGOAL: All students will become proficient writers.MEASURABLE OBJECTIVE: Using 6 + 1 Traits of Writing Assessment, all students will achieve a minimum of 3 in writingproficiency in the areas of organization, content, and ideas by May.INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGY: Teachers will implement 6 + 1 Traits of Writing as an assessment and instructional tool.ActivitiesStaffResponsibleTimeline for Resources NeededActivityBegin End Resource Source CostMonitoring Plan:Method ofCollection,Analysis,& Use of DataEvidence of Success:Reporting Results toStakeholdersEvaluation Question 1: What is the Response to the program (positive reaction, program credibility, teacher motivation)?Teachers participate inorientation workshop in6 + 1 Traits of WritingPrincipal,K – 5, P.E.,Art, Musicand SpecialEducationstaff attendAug.25Aug.25WorkshopFacilitator6 + 1HandbooksRegionalEduc.ServiceAgency(RESA)$0Facilitator,principal andLeadership Teamwill develop endof-sessionsurveyand focus groupquestions.Facilitator willobserve groupdiscussions duringthe workshop,collect surveys inresponse to thePositive feedback fromgroup discussions, endof-sessionsurveys, andfocus group willprovide evidence ofteacher levels ofrecognition of need forchange, support for theprogram, andmotivation to moveforward

ActivitiesStaffResponsibleTimeline for Resources NeededActivityBegin End Resources Source CostMonitoring Plan:Method ofCollection,Analysis,& Use of Dataworkshop, andconduct a focusgroup following thesessionEvidence of Success:Reporting Results toStakeholdersTeachers andLeadership Teamwill receivedescriptive resultswithin one weekfrom end ofworkshopFacilitator andLeadership Teamwill use data toadjust workshopcontent and identifyneeds of teachersAdapted from the Michigan Department of Education School Improvement Framework, Worthen & Sanders (1987), and Kilpatrick (1996)

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN SAMPLEFOR QUESTION 2OUR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLSchool Improvement Planning TemplateEmbedded Evaluation: The Five QuestionsGOAL: All students will become proficient writers.MEASURABLE OBJECTIVE: Using 6 + 1 Traits of Writing Assessment, all students will achieve a minimum of 3 in writingproficiency in the areas of organization, content, and ideas by May.INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGY: Teachers will implement 6 + 1 Traits of Writing as an assessment and instructional tool.ActivitiesStaffResponsibleTimeline forActivityResources NeededMonitoring Plan:Method of Collection,Evidence of Success:Reporting Results toBegin End Resources Source Cost Analysis,& Use of DataStakeholdersEvaluation Question 2: Do teachers have the Knowledge and Skills to implement the program?All staff will receiveprofessional development in 6 +1 Traits of Writing on DistrictInservice DayAll K – 5staffin sixhourreleasedayworkshopGroupedby K – 2,3 – 5, P.E.Dept., ArtDept.,MusicDept.:SupportServiceschooseK – 2 or3 – 5groupingSept.25Sept. 25,25WorkshopFacilitator6 + 1HandbooksRESA $0 Facilitator, principal andLeadership Team will addknowledge & skills itemsto end-of-session responsesurvey.Teacher presenter includes6 + 1 Traits of Writingscoring activity in eachworkshop and test items onend-of-session surveys;collates data.Teachers and LeadershipTeam will receivedescriptive results withinone week from end ofworkshopFacilitator and LeadershipTeam will use data tocontinue to identify needsof teachers and planvoluntary after schoolworkshops to addressidentified needs.Positive feedback from end-ofsessionsurveys and analysis oftest items and scored papers willprovide evidence of teachers’level of motivation andcompetency of knowledge andskills.

ActivitiesVoluntary 2 hour after schoolworkshops on knowledge andskills needed to implement 6 +1 Traits of Writing on thesecond Tuesday of the month –See previous surveys/tests ofknowledge and skills to plandelivered content.StaffResponsibleAll staffgroupingsTimeline forResources NeededActivityBegin End Resource Source CostOct. March DistrictteachersHandoutsprovided byteacherpresentingVolunteer -TBDFederalbudget usedformaterialsand teacherstipend$100 perfacilitator:$7,000$50 perstaff:$6,000Total:$13,000Monitoring Plan:Method of Collection,Analysis,& Use of DataKnowledge and skillsidentified as needed forImplementation.Teacher presenter includesscoring activity in eachworkshop and test items onend-of-session surveys.Teacher presenter collatesdata.Teacher presenter andLeadership Team willreceive descriptive resultswithin one week from endof workshopEvidence of Success:Reporting Results toStakeholdersLevels of knowledge and skills(i.e. inter-rater reliability of 6 +1 Traits of Writing Scores onsamples of student writing andteacher performance on testitems) will increase over time.Teacher presenters andLeadership Team will usedata to continue to identifyneeds of teachers and planvoluntary after schoolworkshops to addressknowledge and skillsidentified as needed forimplementation.Staff meets in grade level teamsincluding special educationstaff to collaboratively reviewprogress of student writing toenhance their knowledge andskills.All staffgroupingsOct. May 1st teammeeting ofmonthStudentwritingscoresSamples ofstudentwritingwith scores$0 Samples of student writingwith scoresTeams submit minutes toLeadership Team withdescriptions of studentgrowth in writing asmeasured by 6 + 1 Traitsof Writing rubric. Scoreswill be report bysubgroups: low SES;gender; and specialeducation. A list ofclassroom strategies and/orinterventions planned toaddress areas of need arealso submitted.Student test scores will continueto increase. Teachers will beable to identify strategies toaddress continued areas ofstudent need.

ActivitiesStaffResponsibleTimeline forResources NeededActivityBegin End Begin End BeginMonitoring Plan:Method of Collection,Analysis,& Use of DataEvidence of Success:Reporting Results toStakeholdersShare trait lessons during atleast four of the monthly staffmeetings.All staffviews thelessonsOct. May Staffmeeting timeVolunteerpresenter/facilitatorSchool staff $0 Lessons/activities based on6 + 1 Traits of Writing areshared. End-of-sessionreflection sheets withopportunities for staff toself-report understandingof the process are collectedat the end of the meeting.Teachers include how theywould respond to specificsituation and questionsthey still have.Minutes of meetings withreflections document knowledgeand skills as self-reported byteachers.Leadership Team collectsdata from reflection sheets.Data are published inminutes of staff meeting.

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN SAMPLEFOR QUESTION 3OUR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLSchool Improvement Planning TemplateEmbedded Evaluation: The Five QuestionsGOAL: All students will become proficient writers.MEASURABLE OBJECTIVE: Using 6 + 1 Traits of Writing Assessment, all students will achieve a minimum of 3 in writingproficiency in the areas of organization, content, and ideas by May.INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGY: Teachers will implement 6 + 1 Traits of Writing as an assessment and instructional tool.ActivitiesStaffResponsibleTimeline forResources NeededActivityBegin End Resources Source CostMonitoring Plan:Method of Collection,Analysis,& Use of DataEvaluation Question 3: Do teachers Have the Opportunity to implement the program (time, support, resources, collaboration)?Evidence of Success:Reporting Results toStakeholdersCheck opportunity concernsduring voluntary after schoolworkshops needed toimplement 6 + 1 Traits ofWriting on the second Tuesdayof the monthAll staffgroupingsOct. March DistrictteachersHandoutsprovided byteacherpresentingVolunteer -TBDTitle 1budget$0 Presenter will includequestions on end-ofsessionsurvey aboutresources teachers needto implement 6:+ 1 Traitsof Writing. Presenter willcompile survey results.Leadership Team is aware ofopportunity concerns. Concernscan be addressed.Teacher presenter andLeadership Team willreceive summarizedresults within one weekfrom end of workshopTeacher presenters andLeadership Team will usedata to identify resourcesneeded to implement.Teacher presenters andLeadership Team will usedata to continue toidentify needs ofteachers.

ActivitiesStaffResponsibleTimeline forResources NeededActivityBegin End Resources Source CostMonitoring Plan:Method of Collection,Analysis,& Use of DataEvidence of Success:Reporting Results toStakeholdersProvide time in school schedulefor teachers to meetcollaboratively in grade levelteams to review student workand performance in writingAll staffgroupingsOct. May 1st teammeeting ofmonthStudentwriting scoresSamples ofstudentwriting withscores$0 Teams submit minutes toLeadership Team withinone week of the meetingwith a list of resourcesneeded to continueimplementation of 6 + 1Traits of WritingTeachers have the time,resources, support, andcollaborative opportunities toimplement 6 + 1 Traits ofWritingPrincipal will attend awarenessand district 6 + 1 Traits ofWriting workshops in order tobe prepared to support andassist teachers in implementingthe programPrincipalAwarenessAug 25DistrictSept 25Aug 25Sept 25WorkshopFacilitator6 + 1HandbooksRESA $0 Principal uses knowledgeand skills to conductclassroom walkthroughs,showing support andidentifying resourcesneededPrincipal provides usefulfeedback from walkthroughs andsecures resources needed forimplementation

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN SAMPLE FORQUESTION 4OUR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLSchool Improvement Planning TemplateEmbedded Evaluation: The Five QuestionsGOAL: All students will become proficient writers.MEASURABLE OBJECTIVE: Using 6 + 1 Traits of Writing Assessment, all students will achieve a minimum of 4 in writingproficiency in the areas of organization, content, and ideas by May 2011.INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGY: Teachers will implement 6 V+ 1 Traits of Writing as an assessment and instructional tool.ActivitiesStaffResponsibleTimeline forResources NeededActivityBegin End Resource Source CostMonitoring Plan:Method of Collection,Analysis,& Use of DataEvidence of Success:Reporting Results toStakeholdersEvaluation Question 4: Is the program Implemented as Intended?Teachers observe each otherusing a modified lesson studyapproach, modeling minilessonsin classrooms using 6 +1 Traits of Writing (Chapter 4).All groupsof staffhave atleast oneopportunitytoobserveanotherteacher.Oct.2010May 2010Volunteerteachersmodel lessonsRelease daytime once amonthSubs(3subs/day for8 mosat$100/day/sub):Total$2400Each model lesson isimmediately followed by areflection session wherelessons are revised andteachers self-report onwhat they learned aboutimplementing 6 + 1 Traitsof Writing as anassessment andinstructional tool.Lesson plans and reflectionnotes help determine level ofimplementation of use of 6 + 1Traits of Writing as anassessment and teaching system..Production of exemplary lessonDevelopment of sharedunderstandings through teacherself-reportTeachers teach writing lessonsin class. Lessons determinelevel of implementation of useof 6 + 1 Traits of Writing as anassessment, teaching system.All groups– K – 5andsupportstaffweeklyOct.2010May 2011Walkthroughchecklistswhichincludes arubrics toanalyzeteaching ofwritingPrincipal $0 Data from walkthroughdocuments level ofimplementation of 6 + 1Traits of Writing as anassessment and teachingtool. Principal providesfeedback to teachers withinone week.Principal verifies level ofimplementation of 6+ 1 Traits ofWriting with fidelity.

ActivitiesTeachers who do not teach ELAwill reinforce identified traits ofwriting at least once a month intheir subject areas.Parents will be educated on 6 +1 Traits of Writing in order tohelp their child at home.StaffResponsibleP.E., art,music,andcertifiedsupportstaffAll K – 5teacherssubmitdata forparentpresentations/communicationsTimeline forResources NeededActivityBegin End Resources Source CostOct.2010Sept.2010May 2011May 2010Lesson plansLesson planrubricPTA MeetingsClassroomand buildingnewslettersParentTeacherConferencesP.E., art,music, andcertifiedsupport staffTeacherreports viateammeetings,and staffmeetingsStudentscores on 6 +1 Traits ofWritingMonitoring Plan:Method of Collection,Analysis,& Use of Data$0 Collect lesson plans withreflections from teachersabout strengths andweaknesses of lessons/nextsteps are collected.Student response to lesson.$0 Leadership Team collectsnewsletters and studentdata.Pre and post surveys re:their perceptions of studentwriting. Note: includethese items on CNAsurvey.Evidence of Success:Reporting Results toStakeholdersLesson plans document teachingand reflections are used toinform implementation processLeadership Team monitorscollection of artifacts andcompares pre and post test dataon parent surveys.

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN SAMPLE FORQUESTION 5OUR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLSchool Improvement Planning TemplateEmbedded Evaluation: The Five QuestionsGOAL: All students will become proficient writers.MEASURABLE OBJECTIVE: Using 6 + 1 Traits of Writing Assessment, all students will achieve a minimum of 3 in writingproficiency in the areas of organization, content, and ideas by May.INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGY: Teachers will implement 6 + 1 Traits of Writing as an assessment and instructional tool.ActivitiesStaffResponsibleTimeline forResources NeededActivityBegin End Resource Source CostMonitoring Plan:Method of Collection,Analysis,& Use of DataEvidence of Success:Reporting Results toStakeholdersEvaluation Question 5: What is the Impact on students?Staff meets monthly in teams toconduct formative assessmentof student writing.SchoolteamsOct.2010May 20111 st teammeeting ofmonthStudentwriting scoresSamples ofstudentwriting withscoresGraphingmonthlygains$0 Teams submit minutes toLeadership Team withdescriptions of studentgrowth in writing asmeasured by 6 + 1 rubricand list of strategiesplanned to address areas ofneed. Submit graph ofstudent growth in writingwithin a week of meetingTeams submit minutes toLeadership Team withdescriptions of student growth inwriting as measured by 6 + 1rubric and list of strategiesand/or interventions planned toaddress areas of needGraph of student writing showsincreasing performance.Staff meets to conductsummative evaluationFirst – 5 thgradestudentsMay2011May 2011Students’scores on 6 +1 Traits ofWriting rubric6 + 1 Traitsof Writingrubric$0 First through fifth gradeteachers submit finalstudent scores toLeadership Team.All students will score 4 – 6 onall traits on the 6 + 1 Traits ofWriting rubric.