Contempt of Court
Contempt of Court
Contempt of Court
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4/3/2013Acting Without Authority The lawyer who acting without jurisdiction. Eg. A&S who does not have certificate <strong>of</strong>practice cannot represent his client in court. Any person who are not qualified to be admittedas A&S cannot represent case in Civil court.Offensive Conduct Outside <strong>Court</strong> It is not contempt in the face <strong>of</strong> the court. <strong>Contempt</strong> in scandalizing court or judge. Publication <strong>of</strong> comments on any case if amount to Subjudice and undermining judicial determination <strong>of</strong> thetruth may tantamount to criminal contempt. A criminal case remains sub judice until expiration<strong>of</strong> the time allowed for appeal.Scandalizing the court Making remarks outside the court Ag/court/private person may institute contemptproceedings Hock Hua Bank (sabah) Bhd v Yong Liuk Thin &Ors It is the most serious matter to allege bias againstjudge particularly unfounded and unwarrantedallegation <strong>of</strong> bias.Sub Judice Making public comments before/during trial Chandra Sri Ram v Murray Hiebert The appellant is committed to 6 weeks imprisonmentfor writing an article which constitutes COC. AG v Times Newspaper ltd Sunday times published an article criticizing the law onliability and the method <strong>of</strong> assessing the damages. The HOL held that it was contempt <strong>of</strong> court to publishsuch an article which may give rise to the real risk thatthe fair trial <strong>of</strong> an action would be prejudiced.Cont… Interference in the form <strong>of</strong> public criticism PPv Seeralan S/O Suppiah Publicity-statingthat magistrate is not independent andbiased, unfair and prejudiced. AG V Arthur Lee Meng Kwang- <strong>Contempt</strong> in scandalizing court or judge. Criticized the decision made by the Supreme <strong>Court</strong> andalleged that the decision was biased and unjust. Although judges and courts are open to criticism but itmust be within the limits <strong>of</strong> reasonable courtesy andgood faith.Cont… Trustee <strong>of</strong> Leong V SM Idris & Anor Issuing press statement criticizing the judgment . AG V Manjeet Singh Dillon Criticism in affidavit that the CJ is unfit to be the Lord President. Any critism must be given within the ambit reasonable courtesyand in good faith. Subjudice- Cheak Yoke Thong v PP Salleh Abas: Lawyers should refrain themselves from briefing thepress on matters pending before the court. The lawyers are bound by Rules 45, 46, 47.5