Recumbent Cyclist NewsBack Issues For SaleBack issues for saleGet them while they lastPrice: $6 USA-CAN/$9 Airmail❑ 090 Barcroft Dakota; <strong>RANS</strong> Stratus XP;Bacchetta Giro 26, Catrike Speed & ChallengeWizard; Recumbent Sleepers; Brake Pad tip❑ 089 <strong>RANS</strong> V2F & F5, RCN 15th Anniv❑ 088 Trike Special, WW, ICE, Catrike❑ 087 WW Edge, Volae & Sun EZ Rider.❑ 085 Crank It quad & HP Velo Grasshopper❑ 084 GS GT-3, Actionbent, Giro, Rotor crank*❑ 083 HP Velo Street Mach. & ʻBent GPS*❑ 080 BiGHA, CG CGX, <strong>RANS</strong> Screamer*❑ 079 EZ Racers TE <strong>RANS</strong> Stratus & V2*❑ 078 Catrike Speed, Hase KW, Velomobiles*❑ 077 GS GTT tdm, Bacchetta Aero 1000 Mi.*❑ 076 ICE Trice trike, CG ALX20*❑ 075 HP Velo Spirit, Barcroft Columbia tdm*BUYERS GUIDE$10 US-CAN/$15 Worldwide❑ 081 2004 Buyersʼ Guide + 2005 6 pageupdate + current sample issue (or your choice ofone back issue)*Only a few copies left, please choose alternatein case this issue is sold out.SPECIALAny 6 back issues (including RCN 081) $24USA/$28 CAN/$34 AIRMAIL(sale rate good through Dec. 31, 2005)Name: ____________________________Address:___________________________City:______________________________State:_______ Zip+4_________________Email/Tel.:_________________________Mail to: RCN, PO Box 2048 PortTownsend, WA 98368For faster service visit our website andorder via PayPal, www.recumbentcyclistnews.comand emergency supplies. We stayed in hotelsalong the way. I had a good deal of unusedcapacity in my Radical Designs side bags.I was worried that my skinny 650c wheelswould be the weak link on this trip, and atthe beginning it looked like I was right. I gottwo flat tires before lunch on the first day,Recumbent Specialistfor over 10 yearsModels from:• Easy Racers• Burley• Bacchetta• Sun• <strong>RANS</strong>• WizWheelz• Cycle Genius• Lightning• Catrike• GreenspeedOver 30 different models in stock!12011 Manchester RoadSt. Louis, Missouri 63131Tel. 314-965-1444www.bikecenterstl.combut had no more the rest of the way. Earlyon day three a spoke broke on the non-driveside of my rear wheel. <strong>The</strong> Velocity Spartacuswheel barely showed any effect, which wasfortunate, since I saw no bike shops alongthe way, and they probably would have beenclosed for the holiday anyway. I just rode thelast 185 miles with 19 spokes instead of 20.Overall the bike performed very well.<strong>The</strong> route was not very challenging, mostlythrough wide, flat Illinois prairie. We rode onsmoothly paved roads, and the weather wasgreat. Headwinds were tough the first twodays, and I think my setup helped me slipthrough with relative ease. I had no discomforton the seat for 10-12 hours/day, and noproblem maintaining a moving average speedof about 14 mph. Congratulations on your15th Anniversary; Keep up the good work!Paul V. PancellaRECUMBENT FAIRINGS<strong>The</strong>re are a number of pros and cons as towhether one should invest the kind of moneyit takes to install a fairing on your bike. <strong>The</strong>reis really no reason to get one unless you consistentlyride well over 15 mph, as they havelittle effect under that speed (unless you areinterested in partial wind/weather protection).I have a fairing on my old BikeE and it helpskeep me warm on frigid days riding in Chicago.I have a full fairing on my Gold Rushand have found cross-winds to have verylittle effect because the fairing is on a prettysteep slant and is close to the bike with little“scoop.” <strong>The</strong> biggest issue has to do withhow reclined you are on your bike. If you arereally laid back, there is very little need for afairing. <strong>The</strong> more upright youʼre seated, themore positive effect a fairing will have.Jim GrossKIDS BENTSDouglas Collins was asking in RCN 088for details of anyone making ʻbents for kids.Well in addition to the leads you mentionedin reply, thereʼs a long list of links at:Mark FarringtonUPDATES: COMPUTER LONG WIREIn a recent RCN, a reader was lookingfor a long wire computer for a LWB. <strong>The</strong>Quality Bicycle Parts catalog lists the TopeakPanoram long wire, a computer. This canbe ordered through aebike.com for $32, orthrough your bike shop.Thanks to Jim Bolton for this tip. ◆September/October 2005 26
Short Cranks: Slicker, Quicker & EasierRecumbents vary greatly in length,steering, and riding position, andas RCNʼS Bob Bryant likes to say,different bikes and their components donʼt fit“every body” the same way. However, theremay be exceptions, and my recent experiencesuggests that most recumbent riders wouldbenefit from shorter cranks. By that I meancranks of 140-155mm, rather than the standard170-180mm. Short cranks simply workbetter on recumbents, so much so that it nowseems remarkable to me that most of us stillmake do with our long, road-bike-adaptedcranks.I became interested in short cranks afterreading Bobʼs comments about them in hisarticle on “Recumbent Bicycle Components”in RCN 086 (sold out issue). I had neverthought much about crank-arm lengths. Iassumed that manufacturers knew what theywere doing, crank performance-wise, andmy Ryan Vanguard, Barcroft Virginia, VisionSaber, and 1998 and 2001 <strong>RANS</strong> V-Rexesall arrived with 175mm Shimano 105 cranks.Only my present Rotator LWB was a bit different;it had 170mmʼs.Thatʼs why Bobʼs article got my attention.It so happened that I liked pedaling the Rotatorsomewhat better than pedaling my V-Rexor Saber. It just somehow felt better and moreefficient. Could the slightly shorter cranks bethe reason?Although nervous about this irreversiblemodification (shortening the cranks), I nonethelessdecided to mail the 175mm Shimano105ʼs from the V-Rex to Mark Stonich ofBikesmith Design for shortening to 153mm.This seemed to me at least worth a try. I hadcranks on my mind and the Shimanos wereFOR SHORT CRANKS• Smaller pedal circle• Promotes spinning• More aerobic• Better climbing• Lower gears• Shortens chain• Lightens chain, crank and bike• Custom chainring combinationAGAINST SHORT CRANKS• Hard to find• Only a few models can be shortened• This is a foreign language to builders, anditʼs difficult to find information if youʼrenot "in the know."• Adds x-seam to your seat or boom adjustment— allow for an extra inch (With a44.5” x-seam, this bumps me out of the fitrange of several recumbents)• Still a bit experimentalBy Thad Sitton, sitton_1@grandecom.netalready off the V-Rex. I had just tried andfailed to find any significant performanceadvantage from a set of Rotor Cranks of conventionallength (returned for a full refund).After hazarding $750 for the Rotors, $45 forcrank shortening (plus mailing, etc.) didnʼtseem like much.<strong>The</strong> 153mm Shimanos soon arrived fromMark, complete with a handsome, new,slightly downsized FSA 24/39/48 chainringset — and I gave them a try. (An unnecessarydownsizing, I now believe) I shouldremind you again of Bobʼs comment that“every body” is not the same, but Iʼm ofaverage height and weight, 5ʼ 9” and 165,and I loved these short cranks from the firsttime around the block. What were they like,you ask? Basically, they just felt much easierto use. Riding the bike was suddenly morefun. <strong>The</strong> effect was dramatic, as if somebodyhad stopped beating me with a stick! <strong>The</strong>153mmʼs were slicker, quicker, and easierthan the long cranks, which I had availablefor ready comparison on two other familiarrecumbents.While on the V-Rex my feet now whizzedaround a reduced pedaling circle at a fastercadence, and my knees now passed throughapproximate right angles at maximum flexinstead of going an awkward distance beyondthat. Riding seemed easier and more efficientright from the start.I almost couldnʼt believe it, and for twomonths I went back and forth between the153mmʼs and the 175mmʼs, though the V-Rexwith the 153mmʼs became my main ride. ButI found nothing to change my initial impressions.<strong>The</strong> bike with the short cranks just feltbetter and seemed to work better — as I said,Author Thad Sittonquicker, slicker, easier. <strong>The</strong> bikes with longcranks, each of which I had ridden severalthousand miles, now felt awkward. Ridingthem, my knees seemed to thrash aroundfuriously with inadequate payoff in vehicularmotion and a lot more muscle and joint wearand-tear.<strong>The</strong>y felt like “Yuck!”So, at least for me, the “feel” differencebetween the cranks was very great, but whatabout performance? That also improved, Iconcluded. In fact, if the $750 Rotor Crankshad worked as well as this $45 crank shortening,I would have kept them! I went faster ondowngrades, spinning faster and up-shiftingsooner. <strong>The</strong> bike also accelerated better withthe short cranks, rapidly jumping speed tomake a green light, attacking a roller hill, orescaping a pursuing roadie.Hill climbing performance was more difficultto figure out, and that is a critical factorfor any recumbent. <strong>The</strong> quickened accelerationhelped with the run-up to roller hills,spinning seemed easier, and steep, grind-uphills seemed at least no worse. <strong>The</strong> shortercrank arms decreased my leverage on thepedals, but I now used a stronger leg thrustderived from a shortened power stroke. Asany weight lifter knows, you can use moreweight in a partial squat than in a full squat.Leg power peaks in the last one-third of legextension, and I now climbed hills using thatend-of-leg thrust advantage.After a month, I put the matter to the acidtest in a favorite, very hilly, 26-mile ride inthe famous Lost Pines of Central Texas, acourse that I rode on a V-Rex in its longcrankconfiguration at least fifty times. ThisCCC-built (Civilian Conservation Corps)road between state parks is a veritable rollerSeptember/October 2005 27