tLAPTOPS TO THE FRONTLINE: Nart Villeneuve BRAVES THE TEARGAS ON THE STREETS OF QUEBEC TO CHAT ON-LINE TO FELLOW‘HACKTIVISTS’ ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE PLANET [ABOVE]ISSUE 29 AUSTRALIAN SCREEN EDUCATION2SYNOPSISTHE HACKTIVISTS IS A ONE HOUR DOCUMEN-TARY THAT EXPLORES THE WORLD OF ON-LINEACTIVISTS. THESE ARE COMPUTER EXPERTS WHOARE USING THE INTERNET AND CYBERSPACEAS VERY EFFECTIVE, NEW MEANS OF PROTESTAGAINST GLOBAL CAPITALISM AND THE POWEROF LARGE TRANSNATIONAL COMPANIES. WE MEETFOUR MAIN CHARACTERS: NART VILLENEUVE, ACANADIAN, RENAUD COURVOISIER, A FRENCH-MAN, PAUL MOBBS FROM THE UK AND RICARDODOMINGUEZ FROM THE USA. EACH HAS DIFFER-ENT SKILLS AND WAYS OF OPERATING BUT THEINTERNET ALLOWS THEM TO POOL THEIR TALENTSAND WORK COLLABORATIVELY ON-LINE TO CHAL-LENGE GOVERNMENTSAND CORPORATIONS.DEPENDING ON YOURPOINT OF VIEW, YOUMAY SEE THEM AS‘INTERNET WARRIORS’TRYING TO SAVE THEWORLD, AS ‘CYBER-TERRORISTS’ OUT TO BREAK THE LAW, OR ASFOOLISH ‘GEEKBOYS’ CAUSING DIGITAL MISCHIEFFROM THE SAFETY OF THEIR HOMES.<strong>The</strong> documentary also looks at theiropponents in what the documentarycalls an ‘information war’. <strong>The</strong> growthin web-based activism has also createdan industry devoted to opposing them.‘Cybersleuths’ such as Ben Venzkemake a lot of money by protectingcompanies from cyber attack, scouringthe web for evidence of intendedaction. It raises questions as to whatkind of globalisation we want, whatdemocracy means in a digital age andwhat power and responsibilities wehave as citizens in this time of rapidchange.<strong>The</strong> <strong>Hacktivists</strong> is the first of aplanned trilogy of films about <strong>The</strong>Information War. <strong>The</strong> second will be<strong>The</strong> Dreamweavers, looking at thetactics of corporate advertising andtheir battle for consumers’ attentionand the third will be <strong>The</strong> CultureJammers, examining the artists whouse their art skills to try to keep themedia honest by re-arranging mediamessages and reflecting them back tothose who make them.
PRECEDING PAGE: IAN WALKER, PART-TIME ANARCHIST & DIRECTOR OF THE HACTIVISTS. BOTTOM: CYBERSLEUTH BEN VENZKE:‘Now you can sit halfway around the world and shut down a company’s ability to operate on the other side of the worldby clicking a couple of buttons’. Clockwise top left this page: ‘Fences mean nothing to us’. So say the protagonists inthe documentary <strong>The</strong> <strong>Hacktivists</strong> who scared the Quebec police into shutting their website during the Summit of theAmericas protest for fear of cyber attack; DIGITAL ZAPATISTA: ‘WORDS AS WAR, NOT WORDS FOR WAR’. SO SAYS RICARDODOMINGUEZ, ONE OF THE ON-LINE AGITATORS ‘UNMASKED’ IN THE HACKTIVISTS.BEFORE WATCHING THEVIDEOEstablish viewer understanding andawareness of the many key terms andjargon used. Here is a starting list:activist, hacker, hacktivist, culturalsubversion, digital age, capitalist, anticapitalist,globalisation, anarchism,virtual, on-line, off-line, avatar, cyberterrorist, evangelist, geekboy, digitalmischief, cybersleuth, tear gas, sit-in,civil disobedience, Mahatma Gandhi,Martin Luther King, Zapatista, mobilise,multinational, transnational, spam,trilogy, free trade, WTO, World Bank,FTAA.Establishing this knowledge isparticularly helpful for students forwhom English is a second or additionallanguage and equally useful toestablish what all students alreadyknow about the topic and where theirknowledge strengths and gaps are.TOPICS FOR DISCUSSIONHere are some topics for discussionto help you to begin your work in thiscomplex and growing area.1 FILM-MAKINGA) THE ‘WAR’ METAPHOR• Identify some different uses of warimagery in the documentary. Whatare some possible effects on viewersof using this kind of language?• Can you think of a different metaphorfor this issue? How woulda different metaphor change themood of the film itself?• Compare this language with thatused in newspaper reports of antiglobalisationdemonstrations orevents.B) THE OPENING SCENES• We see a quote from Marshall Mcluhan,‘World War III will be a guerillainformation war, with no divisionbetween military and civilian participation’.This quote appears onscreen and is then deleted as itwould be on a computer screen,word by word. What purpose couldthis visual device serve in termsof effects on the viewer? What didMcluhan mean? Do you think he iscorrect in his prediction?C) THE CLOSING SCENES• <strong>The</strong> film uses a split screen to showthe forces on both sides of a protestin Canada, the Quebec police andthe protesters. Describe what yousee. What are the benefits for afilm-maker in using a split screen?How effective do you think it is inthis context?D) THE MUSIC• Listen to the music in the openingscenes, without the vision. Whatimages does it create in your mind?How well do they match and supportthe accompanying visual images?How important is the role ofmusic in documentaries?2 RESPONSIBILITY• Find out about the ‘Battle ofSeattle’. <strong>The</strong>re were 50,000 peopleprotesting on the streets in thismass anti-globalisation protest but400,000 involved in on-line protests.Groups like Electrohippies engagein virtual sit-ins, where they informparticipants how to jam a web siteso that they can prevent it doingany business on-line. Paul Mobbssays, ‘Electrohippies don’t tell themISSUE 29 AUSTRALIAN SCREEN EDUCATION3