11.07.2015 Views

CAMPAIGN MONITORING - Cornwallis Group

CAMPAIGN MONITORING - Cornwallis Group

CAMPAIGN MONITORING - Cornwallis Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

192 THE CORNWALLIS GROUP VI: ANALYSIS FOR ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND CRISIS MANAGEMENTchange. The example in Figure 2 is in the category of declarations and communications andwe can see the positive comment made by Thaci has come through to contribute to a green inthe final assessment on Declarations and Communications.OAB COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT OF UCK AS AT 032359B SEP 99 – K+741. General. There has been a significant decrease in the number of non-compliantissues that can be attributed directly to the UCK/PU. This is can be accounted for byimproved compliance from the UCK/PU, but there are other factors to consider. TheUNIP are now taking responsibility for investigating incidents at an earlier stage. Thiscauses loss of OAB visibility on the final outcome of an investigation and the subsequentapportionment of blame. In addition the connection between organised crime and crimecommitted by UCK/PU members is becoming harder to define.…8. Declarations & Communication of Undertaking. The UCK leadership has publiclydeclared its compliance and does seem genuinely eager to co-operate with KFOR. Thesituation in the OZs is less clear…Compliant13. Summary Table. The summary table is attached as Annex A.Ser Compliance Category Assessment Text Graphic Trend1 Cessation of Hostilities Minor non-compliance -2 Location of Forces Compliant 3 De-Militarisation Minor non-compliance -4 Adherence to Procedure Minor non-compliance -5 Co-operation with KFOR Minor non-compliance - 6 Co-operation with Civil Presence Non-compliant 7 Declarations and Communication Compliant 8 Minefields obstacles and Checkpoints Compliant 9 Response to enforcement Compliant 10 Authority and General Provisions Compliant 11 Timelines Minor non-compliance -“ ” indicates deterioration in compliance,"" indicates an improvement.Figure 2: Kosovo Compliance example.Figure 3 shows a compilation of the weekly executive summary indicators forcompliance, showing the improving trend during the disbandment period of the UCK (theKosovo liberation army). This diagram was part of the final report on compliance producedafter the disbandment of the UCK.UCK COMPLIANCE K+12 TO K+903 Jul 99 10 Jul 99 17 Jul 99 20 Jul 99 1 Aug 99 8 Aug 99 21 Aug 99 28 Aug 99 4 Sep 99 11 Sep 99 19 Sep 99Ser Compliance Category K+12 K+19 K+26 K+29 K+41 K+48 K+61 K+68 K+75 K+81 K+901 Cessation of (23) - (16) - (23) - (23) - (8) - - - - -Hostilities(14)2 Location of Forces - (10) - (8) (5) - (9) (3) (2) 3 De-Militarisation - (10) - (1) - (1) (2) - (8) - (6) - - - - -4 Adherence to - (8) (13) (17) (19) (13) - - - - -Procedure(18)5 Cooperation with (5) (2) (4) (5) - (6) (6) - - -KFOR6 Cooperation with Civil (0) (1) - (1) (3) - (5) - (1) -Presence7 Declarations and (1) (1) (0) - (0) - (1) (0) Communication8 Minefields obstacles - (5) - (2) (1) - (5) - (3) - (3) - and Checkpoints9 Response to (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) enforcement10 Authority and General (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) (0) Provisions11 Timelines (20) (13)(10)- (21) - (26) (22) - - - - -Figure 3: Summary of Kosovo Liberation Army disbandment monitoring.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!