11.07.2015 Views

Does your library have National Lawyers Guild Review?

Does your library have National Lawyers Guild Review?

Does your library have National Lawyers Guild Review?

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

testimony on torture policy113That memo was withdrawn as of June 1, 2004. A new opinion, authoredby Daniel Levin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Office of Legal Counsel,is dated December 30, 2004. It specifically rejects Yoo’s definition oftorture, and admits that a defendant’s motives to protect national securitywill not shield him from a torture prosecution. The rescission of the August2002 memo constitutes an admission by the Justice Department that the legalreasoning in that memo was wrong. But for the twenty-two months it was ineffect, it sanctioned and led to the torture of prisoners in U.S. custody.John Yoo admitted the coercive interrogation “policies were part of acommon, unifying approach to the war on terrorism.” Yoo and other Departmentof Justice lawyers, including Jay Bybee, David Addington, WilliamHaynes and Alberto Gonzalez, were part of a common plan to violate U.S.and international laws outlawing torture. It was reasonably foreseeable thatthe advice they gave would result in great physical or mental harm or deathto many detainees. Indeed, more than 100 <strong>have</strong> died, many from torture.ABC News reported last month that the <strong>National</strong> Security Council PrincipalsCommittee consisting of Dick Cheney, Condoleezza Rice, DonaldRumsfeld, Colin Powell, George Tenet, and John Ashcroft met in the WhiteHouse and micromanaged the torture of terrorism suspects by approvingspecific torture techniques such as waterboarding. Bush admitted, “yes, I’maware our national security team met on this issue. And I approved.”These top U.S. officials are liable for war crimes under the U.S. WarCrimes Act and torture under the Torture Statute. They ordered the torturethat was carried out by the interrogators. Under the doctrine of commandresponsibility, used at Nuremberg and enshrined in the Army Field Manual,commanders, all the way up the chain of command to the commander in chief,can be liable for war crimes if they knew or should <strong>have</strong> known their subordinateswould commit them, and they did nothing to stop or prevent it.The Bush officials ordered the torture after seeking legal cover fromtheir lawyers.But Yoo and the other Justice Department lawyers who wrote the enablingmemos are also liable for the same offenses. They were an integral part of acriminal conspiracy to violate our criminal laws. Yoo admitted in an Esquireinterview last month that he knew interrogators would take action based onwhat he advised.The President can no more order the commission of torture than he canorder the commission of genocide, or establish a system of slavery, or wagea war of aggression.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!