11.07.2015 Views

Operational Mission Analysis and Simulation using STK - AGI

Operational Mission Analysis and Simulation using STK - AGI

Operational Mission Analysis and Simulation using STK - AGI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Operational</strong> <strong>Mission</strong> <strong>Analysis</strong> <strong>and</strong><strong>Simulation</strong> <strong>using</strong> <strong>STK</strong>Grant Keller May 2003grant.e.keller@boeing.comwww.stk.com Pg 1 of 15


AbstractThe capability to model, simulate, <strong>and</strong> analyze projected operationalmissions for new <strong>and</strong> potential weapon systems is critical to sellingthose systems to customers.The Satellite Tool Kit suite of software is being used to simulate <strong>and</strong>analyze both tactical <strong>and</strong> strategic systems in representative operationalenvironments. Clear three-dimensional visualizations <strong>and</strong> quantitativeanalyses allow the demonstration <strong>and</strong> evaluation of the effectiveness ofnew systems in achieving mission objectives.This simulation <strong>and</strong> analysis capability improves the developer’s strengthas a system integrator, <strong>and</strong> facilitates the establishment of systemrequirements, validation of system designs, <strong>and</strong> will allow simulatedinteraction between new or proposed systems <strong>and</strong> other military assets.www.stk.comPg 2 of 15


Role of <strong>Operational</strong> <strong>Mission</strong><strong>Analysis</strong> & <strong>Simulation</strong>• Assess Proposed/Evolving Design– Exercise proposed solutions in simulated missions to see how they meetcustomer defined needs <strong>and</strong> mission objectives– Generate data for system design, mission planning & support planning• Evaluate Figures of Merit against System Requirements & <strong>Mission</strong>Objectives– Assure requirements flow from customer need & mission objectives– Assess mission effectiveness measures & system robustness (flexibility)• Predict/Validate System Performance– Gain better underst<strong>and</strong>ing of system operational potential & limits– See how well the system performance satisfies system requirements• Educate Users <strong>and</strong> Market the System– Show stakeholders how the system meets their needs– Demo new concepts of operation for entirely new systems– Demo system capabilities to potential customerswww.stk.comPg 3 of 15


Systems Engineering ApproachCustomer Defined <strong>Operational</strong> ScenarioSynthesize DesignReference <strong>Mission</strong>Functional FlowBlock DiagramsPlatform & WeaponModes & StatesTimelines forEach FunctionPlatform Locationfor Each Function<strong>STK</strong> <strong>Mission</strong> <strong>Simulation</strong>Time Dependent GeometryFOR, Slew Rates, Range, etcRealistic TimelineRetarget & Burn Duration<strong>Mission</strong> EffectivenessNumber of Kills,Negate Commwww.stk.com<strong>Operational</strong>System RequirementsPg 4 of 15


<strong>Operational</strong> <strong>Mission</strong> Description<strong>Mission</strong>: Support Hostage Rescue OperationObjectives:• Prevent Alarm of Assault• Provide Close Support During Assault, Rescue, Withdrawal• Minimize Collateral Casualties• Prevent Egress of Terrorists (escape)• Prevent Ingress of ReinforcementsApproach:• Safeguard Approach –Disable Air Defense• Prevent Alarm - Disable Com Links• Provide Close Support - Create Distractions (fires)• Prevent Escape - Immobilize Terrorist Vehicles• Prevent Ingress of Reinforcements - Stop Incoming Terrorist Vehiclewww.stk.comAssault Timeline Requirements Dictate LaserEngagement SequencePg 5 of 15


Overall <strong>Mission</strong> <strong>Simulation</strong>TakeoffIngressIngressEgressLoiter onStationEgressLoiteronStationSensor Fieldof RegardTarget ZoneSensor Fieldof ViewEngageTargetsAircraftSatellite Tool Kit (<strong>STK</strong>)Simulates Tactical Battlefieldwww.stk.comPg 6 of 15


Target ZoneEngage 1: Disable AAA Radar• Range to target: X km• Engagement Duration: XX secacquire: X secevaluate: X secRequest authority to fire: X SecFire Laser: X secTerroristReinforcementsAAA RadarStationaryVehiclesDistractingFiresHostageLocationCommunicationNodesEngage 2: Disable Communications• Range to target: X km• Engagement Duration: XX secAcquire node #1: X secEvaluate node #1 : X secFire Laser: X secAcquire node #1: X secEvaluate node #1: X secFire Laser: X sec<strong>STK</strong> <strong>Simulation</strong> AidsEngagement Planningwww.stk.comPg 7 of 15


Animation of <strong>Operational</strong> <strong>Mission</strong>www.stk.comPg 8 of 15


<strong>Simulation</strong> Provides QuantitativeEngagement DataTarget-CellPhone1-To-Aircraft-C130Range Limits (acquisition to lasing) Min: x.xxx km Max: xx.xxx kmTime (EpSec) FromAngularRate (rad/sec) FromAzimuthRate (rad/sec) FromElevationRate (rad/sec) RangeRate (km/sec)------------ ------------------------- ------------------------- --------------------------- ------------------2222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00Slew Rate 0.001234 0.001234Min: x.xxx rad/s 0.001234Max: x.xxx -0.012345rad/s2222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00Min AC-to-Target 0.001234Elevation 0.001234Az: x.xxx° 0.001234El: x.xxx°-0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00Max0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 AC-to-Target Elevation0.001234 Az:0.001234 x.xxx° El:0.001234 x.xxx°-0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 Sensor Field Of 0.001234 Regard 0.001234 Az: xxxx° 0.001234 El: xx° to xx°-0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00Time to Engage 0.001234Comm Nodes0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00Time0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 to Engage AAA0.001234 Radar0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 Time 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.012345for Close Air Supportxx sec.2222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.0123452222.00 0.001234 0.001234 0.001234 -0.012345xx sec. (initial acquisition thru lasing)xx sec. (initial acquisition thru lasing)www.stk.comPg 9 of 15


<strong>Simulation</strong> Addressed <strong>Operational</strong>Issues• <strong>STK</strong> <strong>Simulation</strong> Allowed Rapid Definition of EngagementGeometry & Timing– Impact of target range, airspeed, banking angle on sensor FOR• Example - Initial proposed engagement pattern put targets outsidesensor Field Of Regard– Impact of different sensor <strong>and</strong> laser mounting locations & sensorrotation rate on engagement windows & mission effectiveness• Computer <strong>Simulation</strong>s Validate System Performance– <strong>Mission</strong> Effectiveness - How Many Kills? Do Kills Occur On-Time?Able to Prevent Alarm? Provide Enough Close Air Support?– Robustness - Variations in Aircraft/Weapon Design, Variations inWeather, Variations In Threat Responsewww.stk.comPg 10 of 15


Impact of Platform Banking on FORAircraftXX°bank<strong>STK</strong> Provides True-to-ScaleEngagement GeometrySensorField of ViewY kmTarget ZoneX kmSensorField of Regardwww.stk.comPg 11 of 15


Constant Bank EngagementProblemInitial engagement scenario put targets outside sensor fieldof regard at specified engagement rangeRemodeled engagement geometryprovides better target windowswww.stk.comPg 12 of 15


BibliographyRechtin, Eberhardt. Systems Architecting: Creating & BuildingComplex Systems, NJ: Prentice-Hall 1991Cloud, David J., Rainey, Larry B. Editors, Applied Modeling <strong>and</strong><strong>Simulation</strong>: An Integrated Approach to Development <strong>and</strong> Operation,McGraw-Hill, 1998Eisner, Howard. Essentials of Project <strong>and</strong> Systems EngineeringManagement, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1997Prisker, Alan. Introduction to <strong>Simulation</strong> <strong>and</strong> SLAM II, New York, NY:John Wiley <strong>and</strong> Sons. 1995www.stk.comPg 14 of 15


Questions & Answerswww.stk.com Pg 15 of 15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!