11.07.2015 Views

Having problems seeing the embedded document below? - General ...

Having problems seeing the embedded document below? - General ...

Having problems seeing the embedded document below? - General ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Being proportionateChanging<strong>the</strong> order?We have recommended a series ofchanges to <strong>the</strong> Pharmacy Orderin advance of <strong>the</strong> Law Commission'sreview of <strong>the</strong> legislative framework forhealth professions regulation. ThePharmacy Order is <strong>the</strong> piece oflegislation which sets out <strong>the</strong> role andpowers of <strong>the</strong> GPhC.The government announced last year thatit intended to simplify <strong>the</strong> existinglegislative framework and develop a draftBill for consultation. The LawCommission's review is part of thatprocess. We have developed ourrecommendations so we are best placedto influence <strong>the</strong> design andimplementation of any new legislativeframework. Our recommendations havebeen agreed by <strong>the</strong> GPhC Council.They include:• enabling us to require evidence ofEnglish language co mpetence fromEuropean Economic Area (EEA)applicants for registration• removing <strong>the</strong> detail which specifiesregistration periods and expiry dates.We would like to have <strong>the</strong> flexibility todeal with length of registration periodsand expiry dates by way of rules,which we would consult on before<strong>the</strong>y were finalised• increasing <strong>the</strong> flexibility and efficiencyof <strong>the</strong> initial stages of <strong>the</strong> fitness topractise process by allowing greateruse of administrative decision-makingby <strong>the</strong> registrar in less serious cases,and enhancing <strong>the</strong> scope of <strong>the</strong>Council's powers to issue criteria toguide referrals to and by <strong>the</strong>investigating committee• enabling us to work in a more joinedupway with o<strong>the</strong>r regulators andauthorities, like <strong>the</strong> police, by requiringthird parties to provide informationabout people applying for registration.We have experienced difficulties insome cases in obtaining necessaryinformation• removing <strong>the</strong> requirements to specifyin rules <strong>the</strong> intervals at whichinspectors may conduct routineinspections and <strong>the</strong> circumstances forspecial inspections and o<strong>the</strong>r visits.This is so we can continue to develop arisk-based and proportionate approachto regulation.Government would be required toconsult on any changes to <strong>the</strong> PharmacyOrder.10 Regula+e: February 2012 | Issue 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!