11.07.2015 Views

in the Jesuit Tradition - Rockhurst University

in the Jesuit Tradition - Rockhurst University

in the Jesuit Tradition - Rockhurst University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Photo courtesy of Smith-Lamar & Associates.delivered <strong>the</strong>ir own as well (Who could forgetLloyd Bentsen’s “Senator, you are no JackKennedy” crack to Dan Quayle <strong>in</strong> 1988?).In <strong>the</strong> past 25 years, presidents and <strong>the</strong>ircommunication staffs have made it a priority tocapitalize on television, particularly throughpublic address. Although reluctantly, Carter wasamong <strong>the</strong> first presidents to hire a staff whosecharge it was to concern <strong>the</strong>mselves primarilywith <strong>the</strong> media. He brought <strong>in</strong> a film directorfrom Hollywood to manipulate his image andenhance his leadership. Such a position is nowwidely accepted and promoted. Though hisspeechwriters would construct speechescompletely, Carter would scratch out revisionson <strong>the</strong> marg<strong>in</strong>s. On an archived draft of onespeech he wrote “make me sound morepresidential here” and o<strong>the</strong>r staff memorandaencourage <strong>the</strong> president to be “hard hitt<strong>in</strong>g”to show leadership qualities.Peggy Noonan, speechwriter for PresidentsReagan and George Bush, wrote <strong>in</strong> her bookWhat I Saw at <strong>the</strong> Revolution that for <strong>the</strong> firstyear <strong>in</strong> office all she really saw of Reagan was hisfoot. Her job was not to know <strong>the</strong> president butspeak with his voice and collaborate on leadership.President Reagan also drew from his act<strong>in</strong>gexperience <strong>in</strong> front of <strong>the</strong> camera to become<strong>the</strong> “great communicator.” Bill Cl<strong>in</strong>ton showedhow a president, despite be<strong>in</strong>g caught <strong>in</strong> lies bytelevision, could turn <strong>the</strong> tables and use <strong>the</strong>same medium to buildan image so strong thathis popularity actually<strong>in</strong>creased.Despite an apparenttelevision assault onpresidential leadership,<strong>the</strong> medium also serves avaluable purpose <strong>in</strong> timesof crisis. On Sept. 20,2001, an anxious andwounded nation turnedtoward George W. Bushfor leadership n<strong>in</strong>e daysafter terrorist attacks<strong>in</strong> New York City,Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, D.C., andrural Pennsylvania. Bush’swell-crafted speech transcended party l<strong>in</strong>es tounderscore shared values and ignite <strong>the</strong> passionsof a unified country. On that night, televisionbecame <strong>the</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle-most significant reflector ofleadership; its presence was crucial to <strong>the</strong> earlystages of American heal<strong>in</strong>g. Millions watchedfrom home, taverns and restaurants. A NationalHockey League game between <strong>the</strong> New YorkRangers and Philadelphia Flyers was suspendedafter two periods when fans demanded to watch<strong>the</strong> president’s address on <strong>the</strong> arena’s video screen.Television became <strong>the</strong> channel through whichleader led follower, and served as <strong>the</strong> test for <strong>the</strong>president’s ability to rise to <strong>the</strong> occasion. Hepassed <strong>the</strong> test. In <strong>the</strong> clarity of <strong>the</strong> moment,television was an essential channel for a messagethat forced <strong>the</strong> president to strip away rhetoricaldebris and use his language to lead o<strong>the</strong>rs.Television will take us places we have yet toforesee and affect presidential leadership <strong>in</strong> wayswe cannot yet articulate. Its impact on <strong>the</strong> outcomeof <strong>the</strong> 2000 presidential election has calledfor legislation to restrict its freedom to shapevoters’ perceptions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> future. Despite<strong>the</strong> notion that leadership is under siegefrom television, fundamentalleadership pr<strong>in</strong>ciples may neverchange. Character. Commitment.Service. Courage. Thesepr<strong>in</strong>ciples can be spun <strong>in</strong> onlyone direction. Peter Bicak, Ph.D.ROCKHURST 20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!