11.07.2015 Views

The effectiveness of hand hygiene procedures in reducing the risks ...

The effectiveness of hand hygiene procedures in reducing the risks ...

The effectiveness of hand hygiene procedures in reducing the risks ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Bloomfield et al December 2007 S39or <strong>the</strong>ir immediate environment, was necessary for<strong>in</strong>fection. 106Sources and spread <strong>of</strong> RT pathogens to <strong>the</strong> <strong>hand</strong>s. Figure3 illustrates that <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> exposure to RT pathogensvia <strong>hand</strong>s depends on <strong>the</strong> extent to which <strong>the</strong>sepathogens are spread from an <strong>in</strong>fected person dur<strong>in</strong>gnormal daily activities. Relevant data come from varioussources and are summarized below. Taken toge<strong>the</strong>r,<strong>the</strong> data suggest that, when a household member is<strong>in</strong>fected, exposure <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r household members via<strong>hand</strong>s is likely to occur dur<strong>in</strong>g normal daily activitiesand that <strong>the</strong> numbers <strong>of</strong> organisms <strong>in</strong>volved are with<strong>in</strong>those required to <strong>in</strong>itiate <strong>in</strong>fection if transferred to <strong>the</strong>eyes or nose.People <strong>in</strong>fected with cold viruses shed large quantities<strong>of</strong> virus-laden mucus. Droplets <strong>of</strong> nasal secretionsgenerated by cough<strong>in</strong>g, sneez<strong>in</strong>g and talk<strong>in</strong>g can travelover a distance .3 m to contam<strong>in</strong>ate surround<strong>in</strong>gsurfaces. 37,98,107-109 Up to 10 7 <strong>in</strong>fectious <strong>in</strong>fluenza particlesper milliliter has been detected <strong>in</strong> nasal secretions.110 <strong>The</strong> mean duration <strong>of</strong> a cold is 7.5 days.Viral shedd<strong>in</strong>g may occur 24 to 48 hours before illnessonset but generally at lower titers than dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>symptomatic period. Titers generally peak dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>first 24 to 72 hours <strong>of</strong> illness and decl<strong>in</strong>e with<strong>in</strong> severaldays, with titers low or undetectable by day 5. Childrencan shed virus for up to 3 weeks, whereas immunocompromisedpeople may cont<strong>in</strong>ue to shed virus forweeks to months. 98Infectious material can also be deposited directly on<strong>hand</strong>s and tissues dur<strong>in</strong>g sneez<strong>in</strong>g and blow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>nose. Contam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> <strong>hand</strong>s can occur by <strong>hand</strong>shak<strong>in</strong>gor touch<strong>in</strong>g contam<strong>in</strong>ated surfaces. Pathogens shed<strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> environment from <strong>the</strong>se sources can survivefor significant periods and are readily spread around<strong>the</strong> home to and from <strong>the</strong> <strong>hand</strong>s and via <strong>hand</strong>kerchiefsand tissues, tap and door <strong>hand</strong>les, telephones, or o<strong>the</strong>r<strong>hand</strong> contact surfaces:ddGwaltney and Hendley demonstrated that most subjectswith experimental colds had rh<strong>in</strong>ovirus on <strong>the</strong>ir<strong>hand</strong>s and that virus could be recovered from 43% <strong>of</strong>plastic tiles <strong>the</strong>y touched. 104 For people with rh<strong>in</strong>oviruscolds, virus was found on 39% <strong>of</strong> <strong>hand</strong>s and 6%<strong>of</strong> objects <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir immediate environment. 100 Reeddemonstrated recovery <strong>of</strong> virus from naturally contam<strong>in</strong>atedobjects <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> surround<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> personswith rh<strong>in</strong>ovirus colds. 102In a recent study, W<strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong>r et al 111 recruited volunteerssuffer<strong>in</strong>g from colds to stay overnight <strong>in</strong> hotelrooms. After checkout, but before room clean<strong>in</strong>g,10 objects identified as frequently touched weresampled for rh<strong>in</strong>ovirus. Virus was found on 35%<strong>of</strong> objects, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g door <strong>hand</strong>les, light switches,pens, faucet and toilet <strong>hand</strong>les, and televisionremote controls. Some people contam<strong>in</strong>ated noneor few sites, most contam<strong>in</strong>ated several, and somecontam<strong>in</strong>ated almost all (up to 8) sites. In a secondstudy <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> same subjects stayed overnight<strong>in</strong> a hotel room <strong>in</strong> which <strong>hand</strong> contact surfaces (lightswitch phone button and <strong>hand</strong>set) had been contam<strong>in</strong>atedwith rh<strong>in</strong>ovirus-contam<strong>in</strong>ated mucus, 60% <strong>of</strong>subjects became contam<strong>in</strong>ated with rh<strong>in</strong>ovirus.d Ansari et al showed that <strong>hand</strong>s readily pick up rh<strong>in</strong>ovirusand PIV by touch<strong>in</strong>g contam<strong>in</strong>ated objects. 112As much as 70% <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>fectious rh<strong>in</strong>ovirus has beenshown to transfer to a recipient’s f<strong>in</strong>gers after contactfor 10 seconds. 113 In a study with volunteers who<strong>hand</strong>led contam<strong>in</strong>ated doorknobs or faucets, recoveryrates from 3 to 1800 plaque-form<strong>in</strong>g units <strong>of</strong> rh<strong>in</strong>oviruswere obta<strong>in</strong>ed from f<strong>in</strong>gertips. 114d In a study <strong>of</strong> US day care centers and domestichomes, <strong>in</strong>fluenza A virus was detected on 23% <strong>of</strong>day care center surfaces sampled dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> fall <strong>of</strong>2003 and 53% <strong>of</strong> surfaces sampled dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g.Although no <strong>in</strong>fluenza was detected on home surfacesdur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> summer, <strong>in</strong>fluenza was detected on59% <strong>of</strong> surfaces sampled dur<strong>in</strong>g March <strong>in</strong> 5 homes<strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong>re was an <strong>in</strong>fluenza-<strong>in</strong>fected child. No viruswas recovered from 3 o<strong>the</strong>r homes <strong>in</strong> which allhousehold members were healthy. Influenza viruswas recovered most frequently from telephone receivers(80%) and least frequently from computerkeyboards (40%). O<strong>the</strong>r surfaces found to be contam<strong>in</strong>ated<strong>in</strong>cluded refrigerators; kitchen faucets; lightswitches; microwaves; TV remote controls; doorknobs;and bath, faucet, and toilet <strong>hand</strong>les. Influenzavirus was recovered from 69% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> day care centerdiaper chang<strong>in</strong>g areas, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g presence <strong>of</strong> virus <strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>fant feces. 94Transfer <strong>of</strong> RT <strong>in</strong>fections via contam<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>hand</strong>s dependson <strong>the</strong> ability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> virus to survive and reta<strong>in</strong>its <strong>in</strong>fectivity outside <strong>the</strong> human host. <strong>The</strong> potentialfor survival varies significantly between nonenvelopedrh<strong>in</strong>ovirus and RSV, compared with <strong>the</strong> enveloped <strong>in</strong>fluenzavirus and PIV:d Kramer et al 81 and Hendley et al 100 review data show<strong>in</strong>gthat rh<strong>in</strong>ovirus and RSV can survive for significantperiods (2 hours to 7 days for rh<strong>in</strong>ovirus, up to6 hours for RSV) on dry surfaces and for at least 2hours on human sk<strong>in</strong>.d Ansari et al 115 and Brady et al 116 showed that, althoughPIV can survive on nonabsorbent surfacesfor up to 10 hours, survival on <strong>hand</strong>s was relativelypoor (1-2 hours).d Bean et al 117 showed that <strong>in</strong>fluenza virus could surviveup to 24 to 48 hours on nonporous surfaces and up to8 to 12 hours on cloth, paper, and tissues. By contrast,virus could be recovered from <strong>hand</strong>s for only 5 m<strong>in</strong>utesand <strong>the</strong>n only if <strong>hand</strong>s were contam<strong>in</strong>ated with

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!