Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g>Reducing Corrupti<strong>on</strong>term reform measures and develop a broader c<strong>on</strong>stituency to sustain reform at <strong>on</strong>e and the same time.Key factors in sustaining reform are technical proficiency and broad-based support. This implies thatCIPE projects should:♦ work to effect immediate change in laws and procedures as opportunities emerge;♦ reach out to varied stakeholders to enhance trust and build social capital, develop c<strong>on</strong>sensus am<strong>on</strong>g abroad c<strong>on</strong>stituency for an <strong>on</strong>going reform effort; and♦ engage large d<strong>on</strong>ors to ensure that nati<strong>on</strong>al reform and anti-corrupti<strong>on</strong> efforts are c<strong>on</strong>textualized andenjoy broad ownership.
Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g>Reducing Corrupti<strong>on</strong>INTRODUCTIONThis <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g> will cover:1) The success or lack of success with which the activities required of each project were completed;2) The impact these activities had up<strong>on</strong> level of debate, promoting strategies to combat corrupti<strong>on</strong>,changes in laws and policy as well as and other broader project and CIPE objectives;3) The nati<strong>on</strong>al and organizati<strong>on</strong>al c<strong>on</strong>text in which these activities were accomplished;4) The validity of presuppositi<strong>on</strong>s related to both c<strong>on</strong>textual factors – political will, public interest inissue, commitment and leverage of key stakeholder groups, instituti<strong>on</strong>al capacity to digest andimplement reform – and project methodology;5) Recommended next steps for grantee organizati<strong>on</strong>s and CIPE that flow from these two projects;Finally, the evaluati<strong>on</strong> will include:6) A brief comparis<strong>on</strong>s of the two projects; and7) Comments <strong>on</strong> what these projects suggest about a possible CIPE anti-corrupti<strong>on</strong> strategy for theregi<strong>on</strong>.METHODOLOGYIn order to: 1) explicitly evaluate the various comp<strong>on</strong>ents of each project; 2) assess levels ofachieving broader objectives and; 3) identify anti-corrupti<strong>on</strong> opportunities suggested by the two projects,the evaluati<strong>on</strong> utilized a number of sources of informati<strong>on</strong>.1) Background Interviews: with d<strong>on</strong>or representatives, advocacy and academic organizati<strong>on</strong>s, as well asregi<strong>on</strong>al governance and development experts.2) Structured Interviews with Grantee Staff and Key Stakeholders: in Rio de Janeiro (May 24 - 26,1999); Brasilia (May 26 - 30, 1999) and; Quito (May 31–June 4, 1999) with key pers<strong>on</strong>nel at both theLiberal Institute and ANDE, and with select in-country stakeholders and experts from the privatesector, the NGO community, the press, d<strong>on</strong>or community, c<strong>on</strong>sumer, youth, religious andprofessi<strong>on</strong>al organizati<strong>on</strong>s as well as relevant state entities. (see Annex A for a list of in-countrypers<strong>on</strong>s interviewed)3) File and Literature Review: including project documents, missi<strong>on</strong> statements, final reports, diagnosticstudies, commentary <strong>on</strong> forums and other project events, promoti<strong>on</strong>al documents, press reports,speeches, government documentati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> changes in procedures, legislati<strong>on</strong>, policy and strategy(including acti<strong>on</strong> plans), documentati<strong>on</strong> regarding c<strong>on</strong>sensus building and participatory acti<strong>on</strong>planning experiences and methodologies employed by key d<strong>on</strong>or, academic and grant makingorganizati<strong>on</strong>s, as well as, studies assessing ec<strong>on</strong>omic and instituti<strong>on</strong>al reform efforts in the regi<strong>on</strong>.1