Definition 4 (The 3M Property - The Three Misses Property)We say that the KFC,N(·) :S → P w ∗ f(X),has the 3M property if given any e E ∈ S, anyE 0 ∈ S eE , any pair of disjoint closedsets F 1 <strong>and</strong> F 2 in D( e E) ⊆ X, <strong>and</strong> any open ball B hw ∗ ×w ∗ (δ 0 ,E 0 ) ∩ S eE , δ 0 > 0, theD-restricted KFC,E → N eE (E),is such that if B hw ∗ ×w ∗ (δ 0 ,E 0 ) ∩ SE e contains two D-equivalent Ky Fan sets, E1 <strong>and</strong>E 2 , such thatN eE (E 1 ) ∩ F 1 = ∅ <strong>and</strong> N eE (E 2 ) ∩ F 2 = ∅,then the larger open ball B hw ∗ ×w ∗ (3δ 0 ,E 0 ) ∩ SE e contains a third D-equivalent Ky Fanset, E 3 , such thatN eE (E 3 ) ∩ [F 1 ∪ F 2 ]=∅.Conversely, if KFC N(·) fails to have the 3M property, then for some pair of KyFan sets,eE ∈ S <strong>and</strong> E 0 ∈ S eE ,there exists a pair of disjoint closed sets F 1 <strong>and</strong> F 2 in D( e E) ⊆ X, <strong>and</strong> an open ball,B hw ∗ ×w ∗ (δ 0 ,E 0 ) ∩ S eE , δ 0 > 0, containingtwoD-equivalent Ky Fan sets, E 1 <strong>and</strong> E 2such thatN eE (E 1 ) ∩ F 1 = ∅ <strong>and</strong> N eE (E 2 ) ∩ F 2 = ∅,but such that for all E 3 ∈ B hw ∗ ×w ∗ (3δ 0 ,E 0 ) ∩ S e EN e E (E3 ) ∩ [F 1 ∪ F 2 ] 6= ∅.Theorem 12 (All KFCs Have the 3M Property)Any KFC,N(·) :S → P w ∗ f(X),corresponding to a parameterized collection of games,{G z : z ∈ Z} ,satisfying assumption [A-1] has the 3M property.The proof of Theorem 12 will be given in Appendix 4.In summary, for the collection of z-games, {G z : z ∈ Z}, satisfying [A-1], the Nashcorrespondence is given byN (z) =N(K(z)) for all z ∈ Z, (44)where the Ky Fan valued GCS mapping, K(·) :Z → S, isw ∗ -w ∗ × w ∗ -upper semicontinuouson Z with values given byK(z) :=GrΛ(z,·) ∈ S for each z ∈ Z, (45)26
<strong>and</strong> where the KFC, N(·) :S → P w ∗ f(X), is an USCO with values given byN(E) =∩ y∈D(E) {x ∈ R(E) :(y, x) ∈ E} ,foreachE ∈ S. (46)Thus, given the GCS function K(·), wehaveforallz ∈ ZN (z) =N(K(z)) = ∩ y∈Φ(z) {x ∈ Φ(z) :(y, x) ∈ K(z)} ,where K(z) ∈ S z ⊆ S <strong>and</strong> D(K(z)) = R(K(z)) = Φ(z).We will denote byU 3M := U 3M (S,P w ∗ f(X)) (47)the set of all 3M USCOs defined on the hyperspace of Ky Fan sets, S, withvaluesinP w ∗ f(X).We have shown that all KFCs are 3M <strong>and</strong> that all minimal USCOs contained ina KFC have minimally essential values. Thus, we know that because K(z) ∈ S forall z, the induced USCO, z → n(K(z)), has minimally essential values on Z. For ourfinal result of this section, we show that if n(·) ∈ [N(·)], thenn(K(·)) ∈ [N (·)] forGCS mapping, K(·), corresponding to the parameterized collection.Theorem 13 (Minimal KFCs <strong>and</strong> Minimal Nash USCOs)Suppose the collection of z-games, {G z : z ∈ Z}, satisfies assumption [A-1] withcorresponding Nash USCO N (·) =N(K(·)) whereN(·) ∈ U 3M (S,P w ∗ f(X))is the KFC <strong>and</strong> K(·) is the GCS function. Then,n(K(·)) ∈ [N (·)] for all n(·) ∈ [N(·)].Proof. Suppose not <strong>and</strong> let m(·) be a minimal USCO of n(K(·)) ∈ U(Z, P w ∗ f(X))(i.e., an USCO defined on Z with values in P w ∗ f(X) such that m(·) ∈ [n(K(·))]) suchthat for some z 0 ∈ Z, m(z 0 ) is a proper subset of n(K(z 0 )). By Lemma 10, becausem(·) ∈ [n(K(·))], m(z 0 ) ∈ M n(K(z 0 ))(P w ∗ f(X)) implying that for any ε 0 > 0 thereexists δ 0 > 0 such that for allz δ0 ∈ B ρZ (δ 0 ,z 0 ⎫) ∩ Z, ⎬(48)n(K(z δ0 )) ∩ B w ∗(ε 0 ,m(z 0 ⎭)) 6= ∅.Becausen(K(z δ0 )) ∩ B w ∗(ε 0 ,m(z 0 ))is a closed subset of both n(K(z δ0 )) <strong>and</strong> B w ∗(ε 0 ,m(z 0 )), n(K(z δ0 )) ∩ B w ∗(ε 0 ,m(z 0 ))is not an essential for n(K(z δ0 )) in Z. Therefore, there is some ε 1 > 0 such that foreach n there exists z δn ∈ B ρZ ( 1 n ,zδ0 ) ∩ Z such thathin(K(z δn )) ∩ B w ∗ ε 1 ,n(K(z δ0 )) ∩ B w ∗(ε 0 ,m(z 0 )) = ∅. (49)27
- Page 5: cally approximated by continuous fu
- Page 12 and 13: the set x 0 x 1 ∈ C w ∗ f(X) is
- Page 14 and 15: defined on some probability space,
- Page 16 and 17: contains at most one arc (i.e., ¯
- Page 18 and 19: into the collection of Ky Fan sets
- Page 20 and 21: 3.1 Best Response MappingsLetting p
- Page 22 and 23: 4.1 Nikaido-Isoda FunctionsWith eac
- Page 24 and 25: Because Φ(z) × Φ(z) is w ∗ ×
- Page 26 and 27: where for all n, C n ∈ S E n,then
- Page 30 and 31: Given (48) and the fact that for n
- Page 32 and 33: We note that if m(z) ∈ P w ∗ f(
- Page 34 and 35: 6.3 AK Convergence of Minimal Nash
- Page 36 and 37: and Gr ρZ ×w ∗f ∗ (·) is the
- Page 38 and 39: In particular, for all n ≥ N 0 an
- Page 40 and 41: the cutting defined by the cut poin
- Page 42 and 43: According to our main result, under
- Page 44 and 45: By our main approximation result, f
- Page 46 and 47: 9 Appendix 1: USCO FundamentalsIn t
- Page 48 and 49: 9.3 Equi-QuasicontinuityIn order to
- Page 50 and 51: 9.5 Dense SelectionsFor each F ∈
- Page 52 and 53: 10 Appendix 2: The Proof of Lemma 8
- Page 54 and 55: Noting that if E ∈ D eE ,thenn eE
- Page 56 and 57: 12 Appendix 4: The Proof That All K
- Page 58 and 59: Letting E 1 =[E 1 \(X × U 2 )] ∪
- Page 60 and 61: [10] Bryant, V. W. (1970) “The Co
- Page 62: [42] Ward, L. E., Jr. (1958) “A F