Externalities, Nonconvexities, and Fixed Points
Externalities, Nonconvexities, and Fixed Points
Externalities, Nonconvexities, and Fixed Points
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
6.4 Graph ConvergenceBecause the hyperspace of all nonempty ρ ρZ ×w ∗-closed subsets of Z×X, P ρ Z ×w ∗ f(Z×X), is a compact metric space with Hausdorff metric h ρZ ×w∗, we can assume WLOGthat the sequence of graphs, {Grf n } n ⊂ P ρZ ×w ∗ f(Z × X), corresponding to ourpointwise converging, USCO bounded sequence of ρ Z -w ∗ -continuousfunctionsissuchthatGrf n → F ∗hρZ ×w ∗for some F ∗ ∈ P ρZ ×w ∗ f(Z×X). Moreover, because the sequence {f n } n AK-convergesto minimal Nash USCO η(·) =n(K(·)), we have corresponding to {f n } n a sequenceof USCOs, {ψ n } n ⊂ U ρZ -w ∗ with graphs {Grψn } n ⊂ P ρZ ×w ∗ f(Z × X) such thatGrf n ⊆ Grψ n for all n <strong>and</strong> such that {Grψ n } n decreases to the graph of the exteriorAK-limit USCO ψ ∞ ∈ QM ρZ -w ∗,whereGrψ∞ := ∩Grψ n . Thus, we have that<strong>and</strong> becausewithwe can conclude thatGrf nGrψ n→ Grψ ∞ := ∩Grψ n ,hρZ ×w ∗→ F ∗ <strong>and</strong> Grψ n → Grψ ∞hρZ ×w ∗ hρZ ×w ∗Grf n ⊆ Grψ n for all n,F ∗ ⊆ Grψ ∞ .By Hola <strong>and</strong> Holy (2009 - e.g., see Corollary 3.3 - also see Appendix 1), our Baire1 selection, f ∗ ∈ ρ Z -s ∗ B 1 of the minimal Nash USCO, η(·) =n(K(·)), isinfactρ Z -w ∗ -quasicontinuous (i.e., f ∗ ∈ QC ρZ -w ∗)withGr ρZ ×w ∗f∗ = Grη.Also, because f ∗ (z) =w ∗ -lim n f n (z) for all z ∈ Z, wheref ∗ ∈ QC w ∗ -w ∗η(z) for all z ∈ Z, wealsohaveGr ρZ ×w ∗f ∗ ⊆ F ∗ implying that<strong>and</strong> f ∗ (z) ∈Gr ρZ ×w ∗f ∗ = Grη ⊆ F ∗ .Thus, we haveor equivalently,Gr ρZ ×w ∗f ∗ = Grη ⊆ F ∗ ⊆ Grψ ∞ , (57)Gr ρZ ×w ∗f ∗ (z) =η(z) ⊆ F ∗ (z) ⊆ ψ ∞ (z) for all z ∈ Z, (58)where F ∗ (·) is the USCO induced by F ∗ ∈ P ρZ ×w ∗ f(Z × X), givenbyz → F ∗ (z) :={x ∈ X :(z,x) ∈ F ∗ } ,33