<strong>Forest</strong> <strong>Resilience</strong>, <strong>Biodiversity</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Climate</strong> <strong>Change</strong>published predicted changes for the boreal forestas: increased fire, increased infestation, northwardexpansion, <strong>and</strong> altered st<strong>and</strong> composition <strong>and</strong>structure. To that list we add reduced old-growthforest <strong>and</strong> conversion to grassl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> steppeof southern-central dry forests (Thompson et al.1998, Price <strong>and</strong> Scott 2006). Warming climate hasbeen implicated as a cause for current extensiveoutbreaks of mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonusponderosae) in western Canada <strong>and</strong> the USA(Taylor et al. 2006). Productivity is expectedto rise, but net carbon losses are likely to occurbefore the end of the century, owing to increaseddisturbances <strong>and</strong> higher rate of respiration (Kurzet al. 2008). However, significant stocks of biomass<strong>and</strong> soil carbon will remain. The net exchange <strong>and</strong>resultant st<strong>and</strong>ing stock will depend on, amongother things, changes in fire regimes <strong>and</strong> forestmanagement activities (Chen et al. 2008). Someareas of the boreal forest are predicted to becomewetter <strong>and</strong> others drier, with consequently moreor less fire (Johnson 1992, Bergeron <strong>and</strong> Flannigan1995, Kellomaki et al. 2008). Generally firefrequency has been predicted to increase in theboreal biome (Flannigan et al. 1998) <strong>and</strong> evidencehas accumulated confirming this prediction inNorth America <strong>and</strong> Russia (Gillette et al. 2004, Sojaet al. 2007). Our first case-study on lodgepole pine(Pinus contorta) reflects that prediction (table 4).5.1.2 Case-study: western North Americanlodgepole pineLodgepole pine forests are a self-replacing, firedrivenecosystems (Brown 1975) <strong>and</strong> climatechange is generally predicted to reduce the fire intervalover much of their distribution (Flanniganet al. 2005). However, ecosystem models suggestthat st<strong>and</strong>s may remain as carbon sinks even underincreased fire regimes, in part because of theincrease in production in response to temperature,but also depending on the model selected <strong>and</strong> theclimate change regime that is modelled (Kashianet al. 2006, Smithwick et al. 2009). Insect infestation,notably mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonusponderosae) can significantly alter the dynamicinfluence of fire, to the point of being the dominantfactor responsible for st<strong>and</strong> renewal over hugel<strong>and</strong>scapes (Logan <strong>and</strong> Powell 2001), <strong>and</strong> the combinationof fires <strong>and</strong> insect infestation may lead tonew forest states (Shore et al. 2006). If the insectkilledst<strong>and</strong>s do not burn, then a large amount ofcarbon would enter the detrital pool. In lodgepolepine forests, the impact of climate change on carbonstocks may be marginal depending on infesta-Lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta)killed by themountain pine beetle (in red) inBritish Columbia, Canadation levels <strong>and</strong> this forest ecosystem may be resilientduring at least the next 50-100 years.5.1.3 Case study: North American borealmixedwoodsA second boreal case-study is from a moisterecosystem where fire has an influence but the fireregime is much more protracted, resulting in broadexpanses of mixed species (hardwood <strong>and</strong> softwood)forests (table 5). Here, the relatively large numberof species, relative to many other boreal types,appears to increase the resilience of these forests(Girard et al. 2008). However, even in these moremoist systems, fire frequency is predicted to increaseby 50-80% in boreal mixedwoods in the next 50+years, in North America (Krawchuk et al. 2009).Under a high disturbance regime, carbon stocks inmixedwood forests are predicted to be about 16-50%or more of current stocks, depending on location(Price et al. 1999, Bhatti et al. 2001, Ni, 2002, Yarie<strong>and</strong> Parton 2005). These forests will still providehabitat <strong>and</strong> most of the same goods <strong>and</strong> services,but they will most likely change states in response tothe increased disturbance regime. While the casestudypresented is from central Canada, in Finl<strong>and</strong>,increased moisture <strong>and</strong> elevated temperatures areexpected to result in an increase in production <strong>and</strong>carbon sequestration (Kellomaki et al. 2008).5.2 Temperate forest biomeTemperate deciduous forests can be found acrosscentral-western <strong>and</strong> eastern North America, central<strong>and</strong> western Europe, <strong>and</strong> northern Asia. Theseforests have a four distinct seasons, <strong>and</strong> a growingseason lasting 150-200 days. The continental climateis subject to a wide range of air temperature variation(i.e. 30 o C to -30 o C), <strong>and</strong> annual precipitation of 750Credit: T. Gage31
<strong>Forest</strong> <strong>Resilience</strong>, <strong>Biodiversity</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Climate</strong> <strong>Change</strong>Table 4. A case study of expected forest resilience in boreal lodgepole pine(Pinus contorta) forests of western North America under current climate (A) <strong>and</strong>expected under climate change (B).Numbers refer to time (yrs) to recover from disturbance (i.e., resilience). A zero suggests that the forest willonly recover to a new state <strong>and</strong>/or not recover the attribute in question.Biome: BorealEcosystem: Boreal lodgepole pine forest ecosystemA. Current <strong>Climate</strong>Natural disturbance regimes:(a) Fire - st<strong>and</strong> replacing fires 100 yrs,0=not resilient (statechange)Attributes that areindicators of systemchangeDominant canopy speciesSt<strong>and</strong> structure (canopyheight + density; layers)Ecosystem servicesSite/st<strong>and</strong> (species <strong>and</strong>structures)L<strong>and</strong>scape <strong>and</strong>/or watershed(st<strong>and</strong> mixtures<strong>and</strong> age structure)≤100 ≤100 Resilient≤50 >100 Resilient1. Total carbon ≤50 Resilient Resilient2. Water ≤50 ≤50 Resistant3. Habitat ≤100 Resilient ResilientB. Expected under <strong>Climate</strong> <strong>Change</strong>Natural disturbance regimes: Fire - st<strong>and</strong> replacing fires 100 yrs,0= not resilient (statechange)Attributes that areindicators of systemchangeDominant canopy speciesSt<strong>and</strong> structure (canopyheight + density; layers)Ecosystem servicesSite/st<strong>and</strong> L<strong>and</strong>scape <strong>and</strong>/orwatershed≤50 ≤50 ≤ 500 0 01. Total carbon ≤50 (+9 to -37% of ≤50≤50original C stocks)2. Water ≤ 50 ≤ 50 ≤ 503. Habitat ≤100 ≤100 ≤100Bioregion/ecoregionBio(eco)region32
- Page 1 and 2: Secretariat of theConvention onBiol
- Page 3 and 4: Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, an
- Page 5 and 6: Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, an
- Page 7 and 8: Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, an
- Page 9 and 10: Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, an
- Page 11 and 12: Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, an
- Page 13 and 14: Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, an
- Page 15 and 16: Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, an
- Page 17 and 18: Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, an
- Page 19 and 20: Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, an
- Page 21 and 22: Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, an
- Page 23 and 24: Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, an
- Page 25 and 26: Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, an
- Page 27 and 28: Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, an
- Page 29 and 30: Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, an
- Page 31: Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, an
- Page 35 and 36: Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, an
- Page 37 and 38: Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, an
- Page 39 and 40: Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, an
- Page 41 and 42: Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, an
- Page 43 and 44: Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, an
- Page 45 and 46: Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, an
- Page 47 and 48: Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, an
- Page 49 and 50: Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, an
- Page 51 and 52: Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, an
- Page 53 and 54: Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, an
- Page 55 and 56: Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, an
- Page 57 and 58: Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, an
- Page 59 and 60: Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, an
- Page 61 and 62: Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, an
- Page 63 and 64: Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, an
- Page 65 and 66: Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, an
- Page 67 and 68: Forest Resilience, Biodiversity, an