- Page 5 and 6: determine if the strategies remaine
- Page 7: RECORD OF CHANGESCHANGE NUMBER DATE
- Page 10 and 11: Estimated Losses to State Facilitie
- Page 12: SECTION 5 - COMPREHENSIVE STATE HAZ
- Page 18: SECTION 1 - PLANNING PROCESSDocumen
- Page 26 and 27: SECTION 2 - RISK ASSESSMENTGeneralT
- Page 28 and 29: Figure 2-1: Interaction of Seasonal
- Page 30 and 31: Figure 2-3: Average Annual Precipit
- Page 32 and 33: 2.2 PHYSIOGRAPHYFour principal phys
- Page 34 and 35: million years old) inland sea. Natu
- Page 36 and 37: Sand is also deposited just off sho
- Page 38 and 39: POPULATIONThe population of Texas o
- Page 42 and 43: The most obvious tool a local entit
- Page 44 and 45: Table 2-6: 100-Year Flood AreasZone
- Page 46 and 47: TROPICAL STORMS AND HURRICANESHurri
- Page 48 and 49: Table 2-10: Saffir-Simpson ScaleCat
- Page 50 and 51: HAZARD PROFILE WORKSHEETHazard: Tro
- Page 52 and 53: Map 2-2: NOAA Tornado Zones in Texa
- Page 54 and 55: The Enhanced Fujita Scale, or EF Sc
- Page 56 and 57: DROUGHTDrought is defined as the co
- Page 58 and 59: HAZARD PROFILE WORKSHEETHazard: Dro
- Page 60 and 61: Table 2-14: Wildfire Occurrences in
- Page 62 and 63: Map 2-5: UWI-Areas in South TexasMa
- Page 64 and 65: COASTAL EROSION IS A HYDROLOGIC HAZ
- Page 66 and 67:
environmental damage in the process
- Page 68 and 69:
Map 1.3: Critical Eroding Areas of
- Page 70 and 71:
Thirty-nine faults with a cumulativ
- Page 72 and 73:
Tropical Storms - Tropical storms a
- Page 74 and 75:
ars. Similar to the swash regime, t
- Page 76 and 77:
Sector Counties GLO $ at RiskSector
- Page 78 and 79:
DAM AND LEVEE FAILUREA dam failure
- Page 80 and 81:
FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCEHistorically
- Page 82 and 83:
HAZARD PROFILE WORKSHEETHazard: Dam
- Page 84 and 85:
- 87 -Figure 12BMap indicating prob
- Page 86 and 87:
Because damaging earthquakes are ra
- Page 88 and 89:
Figure 12E:Felt area and ModifiedMe
- Page 90 and 91:
Regional Hazard AssessmentNortheast
- Page 92 and 93:
Events of these magnitudes seldom p
- Page 94 and 95:
HAZARD PROFILE WORKSHEETHazard: Ear
- Page 96 and 97:
Texas is a State severely challenge
- Page 98 and 99:
HAZARD PROFILE WORKSHEETHazard: Exp
- Page 100 and 101:
Table 2-20: Extreme Heat Occurrence
- Page 102 and 103:
HAILSTORMMap 2-15: Hail Occurrences
- Page 104 and 105:
SizeCodeH10IntensityCategoryModifie
- Page 106 and 107:
LAND SUBSIDENCELand subsidence is d
- Page 108 and 109:
SEVERE WINTER STORMSevere winter st
- Page 110 and 111:
Figure 2-4: NOAA Wind Chill ChartSo
- Page 112 and 113:
ElPasoHudspethCulbersonJeffDavisPre
- Page 114 and 115:
HAZARD PROFILE WORKSHEETHazard: Sev
- Page 116 and 117:
Table 2-24: Beaufort Wind ScaleWind
- Page 118 and 119:
HIGH WINDTexas is subject to damagi
- Page 120 and 121:
The graphic above is the mixed anal
- Page 122 and 123:
Assessing Vulnerability and Estimat
- Page 124 and 125:
damages. A 100-year flood even alon
- Page 126 and 127:
ALAMO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (
- Page 128 and 129:
(h) Gas Pipelines(1) Primary Impact
- Page 130 and 131:
i. High: 15ii. Significant: 35iii.
- Page 132 and 133:
(f) Thunderstorms - Potential annua
- Page 134 and 135:
Average annual insured loss: $2,633
- Page 136 and 137:
Please note that due to FEMA reduci
- Page 138 and 139:
(n) Wildfires(1) Tarrant County has
- Page 140 and 141:
significant events documented the e
- Page 142 and 143:
(g) Winter/Ice StormsTarrant County
- Page 144 and 145:
damaged or destroyed. There could b
- Page 146 and 147:
Sabine River Authority (SRA)This pl
- Page 148 and 149:
(1) The likelihood or future probab
- Page 150 and 151:
VulnerabilityVery High Risk - Peopl
- Page 152 and 153:
transportation of hazardous materia
- Page 154 and 155:
Minor: Minor extent is the lower en
- Page 156 and 157:
(1) The extent of a disaster would
- Page 158 and 159:
(1) The extent of a disaster would
- Page 160 and 161:
As mitigation grant applications ar
- Page 162 and 163:
So, while development in hazard pro
- Page 164 and 165:
sources), placed on a Web site, and
- Page 166 and 167:
Dam Failure -Earthquake -Hail -Wint
- Page 168 and 169:
Flood -Hurricane -Tornado -Wildfire
- Page 170 and 171:
Infrastructure that was determined
- Page 172 and 173:
Table 2-29: Flood Loss Estimates to
- Page 174 and 175:
Coastal ErosionTotaling the expecte
- Page 176 and 177:
EarthquakeWhile the most severe ear
- Page 178 and 179:
- 181 -
- Page 180 and 181:
- 183 -
- Page 182 and 183:
- 185 -
- Page 184 and 185:
SECTION 3 - MITIGATION STRATEGYRequ
- Page 186 and 187:
only expends the FMA and SRL grant
- Page 188 and 189:
HOUSE BILL 1018The 77 th Texas Legi
- Page 190 and 191:
ut could be an effective lobbying o
- Page 192 and 193:
Figure 1. Boundary of the Coastal M
- Page 194 and 195:
Most coastal states use all or most
- Page 196 and 197:
The Hazard Mitigation Program serve
- Page 198 and 199:
Oil Spill personnel are specificall
- Page 200 and 201:
TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD (TWDB
- Page 202 and 203:
THE LOWER COLORADO RIVER AUTHORITY
- Page 204 and 205:
Commission in the EMC is to provide
- Page 206 and 207:
For private landowners, we're worki
- Page 208 and 209:
previous Long Term Recovery committ
- Page 210 and 211:
insurable property for windstorm an
- Page 212 and 213:
The priority ranking was determined
- Page 214 and 215:
Houston, Mesquite, and San Antonio.
- Page 216 and 217:
Program: Pre-Disaster Mitigation (P
- Page 218 and 219:
in federal funds for 10 projects, C
- Page 220 and 221:
yards of beach quality sand was pla
- Page 222 and 223:
Bolivar Peninsula. The estimated co
- Page 224 and 225:
The GIWW also handles 90% of all ga
- Page 226 and 227:
and processing of all hazard mitiga
- Page 228 and 229:
measures to take by property owners
- Page 230 and 231:
Data Shortfall Strategies(a) Local
- Page 232 and 233:
Join the Community Rating System in
- Page 234 and 235:
REPETITIVE FLOOD CLAIM (RFC) PROGRA
- Page 236 and 237:
actions orenforcement such aszoning
- Page 238 and 239:
Promote and provideenhanced warning
- Page 240 and 241:
SECTION 4 - LOCAL MITIGATION PLANNI
- Page 242 and 243:
Local Plan IntegrationSTATE REVIEW
- Page 244 and 245:
Up to 7% of HMGP money may be used
- Page 246 and 247:
our Financial and Technical Service
- Page 248 and 249:
SECTION 5 - COMPREHENSIVE STATE HAZ
- Page 250 and 251:
(6) All jurisdictions within the de
- Page 252 and 253:
Summary of HMGP, FMA, SRL, RFC and
- Page 254 and 255:
documentation as part of the grant
- Page 256 and 257:
to the BCA. If there are any discre
- Page 258 and 259:
G711 - PUBLIC OFFICIALS MITIGATION
- Page 260 and 261:
PartnershipsTEXAS ASSOCIATION OF RE
- Page 262 and 263:
See Section 3.C.3.b for information
- Page 264 and 265:
SECTION 6 - PLAN MAINTENANCE PROCES
- Page 266 and 267:
Monitoring Progress of Mitigation A
- Page 268 and 269:
project is then reported on the qua
- Page 270 and 271:
Single Audit Act of 1984, Public La
- Page 272 and 273:
SECTION 7 - ATTACHMENTSAttachment O
- Page 274 and 275:
Aerial View of Klein High School Ca
- Page 276 and 277:
The inlet grates (wide black line o
- Page 278 and 279:
Jersey Village and Property locatio
- Page 280 and 281:
Again, using FEMA’s Benefit-Cost
- Page 282 and 283:
the parking lot. Windows failed und
- Page 284 and 285:
Attachment 5Attachment 5 includes a
- Page 286 and 287:
Attachment 5 (continued)AGENDAState
- Page 288 and 289:
Attachment 5 (continued)- 291 -
- Page 290 and 291:
IntroductionA major challenge faced
- Page 292 and 293:
B. Federally Authorized Programs1.
- Page 294 and 295:
w. Section 406 Hazard Mitigation Gr
- Page 296 and 297:
ProgramAuthorityFundingSourcePurpos
- Page 298 and 299:
ProgramAuthorityFundingSourcePurpos
- Page 300 and 301:
ProgramAuthorityFundingSourcePurpos
- Page 302 and 303:
ProgramAuthorityFundingSourcePurpos
- Page 304 and 305:
ProgramAuthorityFundingSourcePurpos
- Page 306 and 307:
ProgramAuthorityFundingSourcePurpos
- Page 308 and 309:
ProgramAuthorityFundingSourcePurpos
- Page 310 and 311:
ProgramAll HazardsEmergencyOperatio
- Page 312 and 313:
ProgramAuthorityFundingSourcePurpos
- Page 314 and 315:
ProgramAuthorityFundingSourcePurpos
- Page 316 and 317:
ProgramAuthorityFundingSourcePurpos
- Page 318 and 319:
ProgramAuthorityFundingSourcePurpos
- Page 320 and 321:
ProgramAuthorityFundingSourcePurpos
- Page 322 and 323:
ProgramAuthorityFundingSourcePurpos
- Page 324 and 325:
ProgramAuthorityFundingSourcePurpos
- Page 326 and 327:
ProgramAuthorityFundingSourcePurpos
- Page 328 and 329:
ProgramAuthorityFundingSourcePurpos
- Page 330 and 331:
ProgramAuthorityFundingSourcePurpos
- Page 332 and 333:
ProgramAuthorityFundingSourcePurpos
- Page 334 and 335:
ProgramAuthorityFundingSourcePurpos
- Page 336 and 337:
ProgramAuthorityFundingSourcePurpos
- Page 338 and 339:
ProgramAuthorityFundingSourcePurpos
- Page 340 and 341:
ProgramAuthorityFundingSourcePurpos
- Page 342 and 343:
SECTION 9 - APPENDICESAppendix AThe
- Page 344 and 345:
Four principal physiographic region
- Page 346 and 347:
Water Development Board (TWDB, 2007
- Page 348 and 349:
Table 2-1: Features of Major River
- Page 350 and 351:
statewide data indicates that appro
- Page 352 and 353:
- 357 -
- Page 354 and 355:
Figure 2-4: Repetitive Loss Propert
- Page 356 and 357:
In the future, the TWDB will coordi
- Page 358 and 359:
cover entire watersheds, major or m
- Page 360 and 361:
Effectiveness -Yes. Application pri
- Page 362 and 363:
TWDB will coordinate with TDEM and
- Page 364 and 365:
FEMA‘s Web Data Exchange database
- Page 366:
SECTION 10 - REFERENCESAlvarez, E.