11.07.2015 Views

Manchu Years in the History of Mongolia

Manchu Years in the History of Mongolia

Manchu Years in the History of Mongolia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Manchu</strong> <strong>Years</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong> No.36 2006 7 Buyanlham TumurjavKey words: Mongols, <strong>Mongolia</strong>, <strong>Manchu</strong> rule, Ch<strong>in</strong>g dynasty, Khan, khoshuuTable <strong>of</strong> contents1. Historical <strong>in</strong>sights on relations <strong>of</strong> Mongols and <strong>Manchu</strong>s2. Adm<strong>in</strong>istrative system and social structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong> under <strong>Manchu</strong> rule3. Trade relations with <strong>the</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese merchants4. What <strong>Manchu</strong> rule brought to <strong>Mongolia</strong>?5. Relations with Russia6. References1. Historical <strong>in</strong>sights on relations <strong>of</strong> Mongols and <strong>Manchu</strong>sBy early 20 th century Mongol territories were under <strong>Manchu</strong> or Ch<strong>in</strong>g dynasty rule, which lasted more than200 years. Like any o<strong>the</strong>r nationals, who became subjects to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> rule, Mongols certa<strong>in</strong>ly were notalways obedient followers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir policy. Mongol nationals became parts <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>g dynasty one after ano<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong> accordance with <strong>the</strong>ir peculiar structure based on <strong>the</strong> regions. Therefore, it is not only <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g, but alsoimportant to see how <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong>s managed to rule such a big territory for such a long time.- 37 -


<strong>Manchu</strong> <strong>Years</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>BuyanlhamAlthough <strong>the</strong> Mongols showed <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>terests <strong>in</strong> unit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir efforts, no positive actions were taken after <strong>the</strong>conference for <strong>the</strong> jo<strong>in</strong>t Mongol and Oirat struggle. After <strong>the</strong> death <strong>of</strong> Baatar Khuntaij his son Galdan seized <strong>the</strong>power. Galdan cont<strong>in</strong>ued his fa<strong>the</strong>r’s policy to expand peaceful political and economic relations with Russia. Healso tried to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> trade relations with Ch<strong>in</strong>a by dispatch<strong>in</strong>g embassies and caravans <strong>the</strong>re every year.However, his relations with <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong>s deteriorated after a <strong>Manchu</strong> Emperor Kansi put a limit to <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong>embassies and caravans. “Realiz<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> person <strong>of</strong> Galdan he had a serious opponent, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> EmperorKansi made numerous efforts to set <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r Mongol feudal nobles aga<strong>in</strong>st Galdan”. 10 Subsequently <strong>the</strong><strong>Manchu</strong>s succeeded <strong>in</strong> provok<strong>in</strong>g a war between Khalkha and Oirat Mongols <strong>in</strong> 1688 but Galdan managed tow<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fight. The defeat <strong>of</strong> Khalkha <strong>Mongolia</strong> <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>tra-Mongol struggle made <strong>the</strong>m much more weaker andf<strong>in</strong>ally <strong>in</strong> 1691, “<strong>in</strong> an elaborate ceremony at Dolonor <strong>in</strong> Inner <strong>Mongolia</strong>, <strong>the</strong> subjection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Khalkha Mongolsto <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> rule was formalized, and eastern <strong>Mongolia</strong> effectively became a part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> empire”. 11It took about six more decades for <strong>the</strong> last Mongol state-Zuungar or Oirat <strong>Mongolia</strong> to fall a victim to <strong>the</strong><strong>Manchu</strong> rule. Dur<strong>in</strong>g 1755-1758 Zuungar <strong>Mongolia</strong> was engaged <strong>in</strong> an active struggle aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong>s and<strong>the</strong> major anti-<strong>Manchu</strong> movements were led by Amarsanaa, an Oirat-Mongol pr<strong>in</strong>ce, and Ch<strong>in</strong>gunjav, aKhotogoid 12 Pr<strong>in</strong>ce. Compared with <strong>the</strong> resistance <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r Mongols’ struggle aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong>s, <strong>the</strong>se revoltscarried several peculiar characteristics: 1) it comprised all level <strong>of</strong> society, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g arats (common people), lowrank lamas and representatives <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ces or high rank people with titles; 2) those engaged <strong>in</strong> revolts used notonly arms but also used different oppos<strong>in</strong>g methods like leav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>Manchu</strong> duties, driv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir cattle deep<strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> steppes and mov<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to o<strong>the</strong>r areas etc.; and f<strong>in</strong>ally, although most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> management <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> revoltswere carried out by high or low rank pr<strong>in</strong>ces, <strong>in</strong> some places management <strong>of</strong> revolt groups were even <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>hands <strong>of</strong> arats. Despite <strong>the</strong>ir active struggle, Oirat Mongol revolts were severely suppressed by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong>s andf<strong>in</strong>ally with <strong>the</strong> fall <strong>of</strong> an Oirat Mongol state <strong>in</strong> 1756, all <strong>Mongolia</strong> became subjects to <strong>the</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>g dynasty rule.Thus, by late 18 th century all Mongol territories, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Inner <strong>Mongolia</strong>, Khalkha <strong>Mongolia</strong> and Oirat<strong>Mongolia</strong> became parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> state. Mongols lost all <strong>the</strong>ir power to have <strong>the</strong>ir own and <strong>in</strong>dependentpolicy regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir territories. Under <strong>Manchu</strong> rule <strong>the</strong>y had no Khan, no government and even no capitalcity and all its state authority was <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> hands <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> state and its Emperor. The Mongol pr<strong>in</strong>ces weregiven <strong>the</strong> right to be <strong>in</strong> charge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir only regional <strong>of</strong>fices. These <strong>of</strong>fices, <strong>in</strong> turn, had to report on <strong>the</strong>iractivities to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> Emperor.- 40 -


No.36 2006 7 The <strong>Manchu</strong>s carried out separate policies with regard to <strong>the</strong> nationals who became <strong>the</strong>ir subjects, <strong>in</strong>particular with regard to <strong>the</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese and <strong>Mongolia</strong>ns up to an early 20 th century. Perhaps, as it is stated <strong>in</strong> abook titled <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>, <strong>the</strong>y (<strong>Manchu</strong>s) had doubt on <strong>the</strong>ir long last<strong>in</strong>g existence, thus, <strong>the</strong>y pursueda policy to keep <strong>Mongolia</strong>n affairs, which had a similar lifestyle to <strong>the</strong>m, separate from <strong>the</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese. And if<strong>the</strong>ir power failed to exist <strong>in</strong> Beij<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong>y might have thought that <strong>the</strong>y could move <strong>the</strong>ir government to<strong>Mongolia</strong>. However, no such th<strong>in</strong>gs were dest<strong>in</strong>ed to be happened.2. Adm<strong>in</strong>istrative system and social structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong> under <strong>Manchu</strong> ruleThe ma<strong>in</strong> apparatus that was govern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Mongolia</strong> under <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> rule was <strong>the</strong> M<strong>in</strong>istry, govern<strong>in</strong>g stateaffairs <strong>of</strong> Outer <strong>Mongolia</strong>. It was located <strong>in</strong> Beij<strong>in</strong>g and developed policies and guidel<strong>in</strong>es to be used on<strong>Mongolia</strong>. The most authoritative organization <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> state with a duty to control and supervise Outer<strong>Mongolia</strong> was located <strong>in</strong> Uliastai, a town <strong>in</strong> Western <strong>Mongolia</strong>. The follow<strong>in</strong>g table illustrates <strong>the</strong>organizational structure <strong>of</strong> Khalkha <strong>Mongolia</strong> under <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> rule dur<strong>in</strong>g 1691-1754 (Table 1).Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> rule aimag (some sources say aimak) became <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> and major unit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>adm<strong>in</strong>istration. After subjugat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Mongolia</strong>, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong>s rema<strong>in</strong>ed Tusheet Khan, Setsen Khan and ZasagtKhan aimags as <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istrative units. In addition, <strong>the</strong>y established Sa<strong>in</strong> Noyon Khan aimag bytak<strong>in</strong>g 19 khoshuus from Tusheet Khan aimag. This aimag was established and given to a pr<strong>in</strong>ce namedDashdondov for his assistance to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong>s <strong>in</strong> a struggle aga<strong>in</strong>st Oirat Mongols <strong>in</strong> 1725.Khoshuus (banner) were governed by Zasag noyon 13 . They were similar to a division <strong>in</strong> military terms. Thema<strong>in</strong> unit under khoshuu was soum (squadron), which was similar to a military unit. A soum was formed <strong>of</strong>150 men (<strong>of</strong> military age) with <strong>the</strong>ir families. If <strong>the</strong> number exceeded 150 men after establish<strong>in</strong>g a soum, <strong>the</strong>na half soum or khondogo was formed. Soums were divided <strong>in</strong>to arvans (arav means ten <strong>in</strong> numbers). Taijs 14were not subject to soums, <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>the</strong>y formed bags or otogs separately.Ikh Khuree 15 ’s Department was established <strong>in</strong> 1758 and was responsible for not only <strong>the</strong> affairs <strong>of</strong> TusheetKhan and Setsen Khan aimags and Bogd Jibzundamba’s shav but also was responsible for <strong>the</strong> relations withRussia. In 1762 Khovd Department was formed and was <strong>in</strong> charge <strong>of</strong> affairs <strong>of</strong> a Khovd prov<strong>in</strong>ce.- 41 -


<strong>Manchu</strong> <strong>Years</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>BuyanlhamThe <strong>Manchu</strong> EmperorDepartment supervis<strong>in</strong>gadm<strong>in</strong>strative affairs <strong>of</strong> Outer<strong>Mongolia</strong>Uliastai <strong>Manchu</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficeUliastai and 4 aimag's jasaaSa<strong>in</strong> NoyonaimagZasagtNoyonaimagTusheetKhan aimagSetsenKhan aimagKhoshuuKhoshuuKhuree's ErdeneShanzav (treasurer)KhoshuuKhoshuuSoumSoumJibzundambaKhutagt's shav’ otogSoumSoumBag Bag Bag Bag10 gers 10 gers 10 gers 10 gersTable 1 Source: <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>. Ulaanbaatar: Admon Publish<strong>in</strong>g House, 1999, p. 86- 42 -


No.36 2006 7 After occupy<strong>in</strong>g Oirat <strong>Mongolia</strong>, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong>s created two aimags by divid<strong>in</strong>g Durvud 16<strong>in</strong>to left and rightsw<strong>in</strong>gs –Dalai Khan and Unen Zorigt Khan aimags <strong>in</strong> 1759. Moreover, <strong>the</strong>y created many small khoshuus withan aim to prevent from any opportunities for all Mongols to become united. Consequently, <strong>Mongolia</strong> wasdivided <strong>in</strong>to many small adm<strong>in</strong>istrative units and by <strong>the</strong> 2 nd half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 18 th century it had 125 khoshuus,which <strong>in</strong>cluded Khuvsgul, Khovd and Tagna Uriankhai 17prov<strong>in</strong>ces as well.Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> rule, <strong>the</strong> population <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong> was divided <strong>in</strong>to two categories as noble and non-noblecitizens. The noble population was also divided among <strong>the</strong>mselves as rul<strong>in</strong>g (those who governed khoshuus)and non-rul<strong>in</strong>g (those who did not). The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g population was ei<strong>the</strong>r arats 18or lamas. Arats <strong>in</strong> turn weredivided <strong>in</strong>to albat, khamjlaga 19and shavi nars 20 . Arats were subject to <strong>Mongolia</strong>n khoshuus or banners and <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> end to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> authority. They had no land and needed a permission to move from one place toano<strong>the</strong>r and <strong>in</strong> general were burdened by numerous labor and taxes. They were engaged <strong>in</strong> services such aspostal relays, frontier guards, military men and herdsmen. Hamjlagas were owed by nobles, both rul<strong>in</strong>g andnon-rul<strong>in</strong>g, and engaged <strong>in</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> services for <strong>the</strong>ir owners and <strong>the</strong>ir families. Shavis had <strong>the</strong> samefate as hamjlagas but were owed by monasteries and <strong>the</strong>ir khutagts.As for lamas, <strong>the</strong>y had an exclusive position dur<strong>in</strong>g this period. Both <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluence and number <strong>of</strong> monasteriesand lamas or Buddhist priests <strong>in</strong>creased. Lamas were divided among <strong>the</strong>mselves <strong>in</strong>to ranks and degrees. Thehighest role was given to khuvilgaans or “liv<strong>in</strong>g gods” who were equal to upper class nobles. In 1641 <strong>the</strong> son<strong>of</strong> Tusheet Khan Gombodorj was promulgated as khuvilgaan under <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> Under Gegeen. He greatly<strong>in</strong>fluenced Khalkha pr<strong>in</strong>ces to accept <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> rule dur<strong>in</strong>g Doloon Nuur congress <strong>in</strong> 1691.Consequently, <strong>the</strong> monasteries and temples became powerful and enormous amount <strong>of</strong> wealth was circulat<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir hands. The monasteries were ruled by khutagts or senior monastery lamas, who <strong>in</strong> turn were divided<strong>in</strong>to seal-bear<strong>in</strong>g and non-seal bear<strong>in</strong>g khutagts. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> rule, seals were given to thosekhutagts whose shavi nars number reached 700 and <strong>the</strong>re were 11 seal-bear<strong>in</strong>g and around 50 non-sealbear<strong>in</strong>g khutagts and khuvilgaans. The khutagts had <strong>the</strong>ir own shavi nars who played <strong>the</strong> same duties as albatarats. “Predictably, <strong>the</strong> Ch’<strong>in</strong>g government was sensitive to <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lamaist church and to <strong>the</strong>obedience it commanded among all <strong>Mongolia</strong>n and Tibetan Buddhists.” 21Thus, <strong>the</strong>y exempted higher ranklamas from service duties and payment <strong>of</strong> taxes. The highest-rank<strong>in</strong>g khutagt was Jibzundamba (or- 43 -


<strong>Manchu</strong> <strong>Years</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>BuyanlhamJavzandamba) Khutagt <strong>of</strong> Urga. Jibzundamba Khutagt’s shavi system was formed when many pr<strong>in</strong>ces hadgiven shavi nars to Undur Gegeen. Later both human and material capital <strong>of</strong> Jibzundamba Khutagt was calledIkh shav’ (great disciple). Most <strong>of</strong> its wealth was formed <strong>of</strong> gifts (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g men) and <strong>of</strong>fers given to <strong>the</strong>monastery and by “…1873, <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>n Bogd Javzandamba, <strong>the</strong> head <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>n religion, had under him9.916 households, total<strong>in</strong>g 83.983 people. Their total herd counted half a million head, <strong>of</strong> which 36.000 were<strong>the</strong> property <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> supreme lama.” 22As shav’ was also exempted from most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> taxes and duties, <strong>the</strong>re had been many who wanted to be shav<strong>in</strong>ars. In addition, many nobles registered <strong>the</strong>ir livestock on <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> monasteries and lamas, and this later(when <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> regime fell) led to many arguments over who owned <strong>the</strong> cattle. However, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong>government started tak<strong>in</strong>g some restrictive measures aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> above-stated practices. They issued an orderunder which only lamas who were resid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> monastery and those, who did not possess any livestock <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> countryside, could benefit exemptions from services and taxes.As most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> men <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> country were engaged <strong>in</strong> religious activities, <strong>Mongolia</strong> had not seen anyprogressive improvements with regard to <strong>the</strong> economy <strong>in</strong> early 20 thcentury. “Lamaism diverted aconsiderable proportion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> male population from productive labour, thus imped<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>national economy and hold<strong>in</strong>g back <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> country’s population.” 23The country was fac<strong>in</strong>gserious problems, <strong>in</strong> particular, impoverished economy, high taxes, decreases <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> population aswell as cattle, and enormous debts owed to <strong>the</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese merchants.3. Trade relations with <strong>the</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese merchantsBoth <strong>Mongolia</strong> and Ch<strong>in</strong>a became subjugated to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> or Ch<strong>in</strong>g dynasty rule and although <strong>the</strong><strong>Manchu</strong>s had given to <strong>Manchu</strong>, Mongol and Ch<strong>in</strong>ese languages <strong>of</strong>ficial status, it pursued different policieswith regard to <strong>Mongolia</strong> and Ch<strong>in</strong>a. The <strong>Manchu</strong>s did not want to m<strong>in</strong>gle all <strong>the</strong> nationalities, which wereunder <strong>the</strong>ir control. Perhaps, <strong>the</strong>y were fear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> any possible opposition that may be carried out collectivelyby different nationalities aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong>ir rule. Or perhaps, as earlier stated, <strong>the</strong>y were not sure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir eternalexistence. Thus, if <strong>the</strong>y failed <strong>in</strong> one area <strong>the</strong>y might have thought that <strong>the</strong>y could move to ano<strong>the</strong>r one.- 44 -


No.36 2006 7 Moreover, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong>s also prohibited <strong>in</strong>termarriages among Mongols and Ch<strong>in</strong>ese, use <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese language<strong>in</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>, and Ch<strong>in</strong>ese traders br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir families to <strong>Mongolia</strong>.However, commercial relations between <strong>Mongolia</strong> and Ch<strong>in</strong>a did have a special impact <strong>in</strong> relations between<strong>the</strong>se countries. Prior to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> rule, <strong>Mongolia</strong> had trade relations with Ch<strong>in</strong>a on its frontier areas. As<strong>Manchu</strong>s had no <strong>in</strong>tention to mix <strong>the</strong> nationalities under its rule, it was employ<strong>in</strong>g a strict policy towards <strong>the</strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ese merchants. To conduct trade <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese needed to have trad<strong>in</strong>g licenses. At <strong>the</strong>beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g only three places were authorized for trade activities - Khaalgan, Khukh-khot and Doloon Nuur.Later <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong>s allowed <strong>the</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese traders to go to o<strong>the</strong>r areas but special restrictions were imposed, forexample, on <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> people stay<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> one place, <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> items, and etc. At <strong>the</strong> same time, aone-year time limit was imposed for those who wished to rema<strong>in</strong> longer.Trade relations between <strong>Mongolia</strong> and Ch<strong>in</strong>a were based on a barter trade. Livestock produces were <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>items for such a trade as <strong>Mongolia</strong>’s economy is based on animal husbandry s<strong>in</strong>ce old times. Mongols growfive types <strong>of</strong> domestic animals, which <strong>in</strong>clude sheep, goat, horse, cow and camel. These animals are bred andtra<strong>in</strong>ed from wild animals, thus, <strong>the</strong>y suit well to <strong>the</strong> constant migration or lifestyle <strong>of</strong> nomadic people. Inaddition, this economy has a seasonal character as livestock produces can be processed only dur<strong>in</strong>g warmseasons.Despite <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> restrictions, <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese merchants was grow<strong>in</strong>g. They were settled <strong>in</strong>populated areas <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong> such as Urga, Khyagta, Uliastai and Khovd. As stated above, <strong>Mongolia</strong>ns used<strong>the</strong>ir livestock produces as trade items and purchased <strong>in</strong> return Ch<strong>in</strong>ese silk, cotton fabrics, tea, tobacco,metal, porcela<strong>in</strong> and pottery wares, and household items. Due to <strong>the</strong> seasonal character <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir economy,<strong>Mongolia</strong>ns had to purchase necessary items on credit, which later became <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> cause <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>impoverishment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> population and badly hurt <strong>the</strong> whole economy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> country.Credit operations <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese traders dated back to <strong>the</strong> late 17 th century. At <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial stage, though <strong>the</strong><strong>Manchu</strong>s were impos<strong>in</strong>g various restrictions, <strong>the</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese managed to have a firm base <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>. ForCh<strong>in</strong>ese traders it was a pr<strong>of</strong>itable bus<strong>in</strong>ess and <strong>the</strong>y used any opportunity to charge high <strong>in</strong>terest rates. Therewere such big money-lend<strong>in</strong>g or usurer firms as Da Sh<strong>in</strong> Ku, Tyan I de (or Nast), Yuan Shan de, Se Sun chan,- 45 -


<strong>Manchu</strong> <strong>Years</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>BuyanlhamYun She hyo whose capital was worth <strong>of</strong> 40 million roubles. 24Besides provid<strong>in</strong>g high <strong>in</strong>terest credits, <strong>the</strong>ygot a huge pr<strong>of</strong>it by purchas<strong>in</strong>g cattle and raw materials at a very low price <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong> and sell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m at ahigher price <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. For <strong>in</strong>stance, “<strong>the</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese were purchas<strong>in</strong>g a sheep for a half brick <strong>of</strong> tea and a horsefor 7 bricks <strong>of</strong> tea and sell<strong>in</strong>g a sheep for 3 lan 25 s (1 lan was worth 10 bricks <strong>of</strong> tea <strong>in</strong> Khaalgan <strong>the</strong>n) and ahorse for 18 lans”. 26Some large Ch<strong>in</strong>ese trad<strong>in</strong>g firms <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong> formed a jo<strong>in</strong>t company. Such companies set monopoly pricesfor raw materials as well as for transportation <strong>of</strong> such goods. They <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>the</strong> high annual <strong>in</strong>terest rate <strong>of</strong>36%, set by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> government, as many times as <strong>the</strong>y wished by add<strong>in</strong>g more <strong>in</strong>terests if a borrowerfailed to pay debts by due date. In some cases, such people were obliged to perform any types <strong>of</strong> work for <strong>the</strong>usurers. Therefore, by <strong>the</strong> late 19 th century <strong>the</strong> economy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong> was <strong>in</strong> disorder due to huge debtsowed to <strong>the</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese usurers, decrease <strong>in</strong> number <strong>of</strong> livestock and ris<strong>in</strong>g taxes. <strong>Mongolia</strong>n nobles were alsous<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> service <strong>of</strong> usurers and even some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> high-rank<strong>in</strong>g nobles were shift<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir personal debts to <strong>the</strong>people <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir khoshuu or soums, and that made <strong>the</strong> lives <strong>of</strong> ord<strong>in</strong>ary people unbearable.4. What <strong>Manchu</strong> rule brought to <strong>Mongolia</strong>?Hence, it is important to see what <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> rule brought to Mongols and <strong>Mongolia</strong>. How <strong>the</strong>y managed tocontrol <strong>Mongolia</strong> more than 200 years. From <strong>the</strong> above discussion <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g conclusions can be made.What <strong>Mongolia</strong> ga<strong>in</strong>ed or lost:1. Dis<strong>in</strong>tegration: The <strong>Manchu</strong>s tried to make Mongols as dis<strong>in</strong>tegrated as possible. Thus, regionsalready <strong>in</strong> dis<strong>in</strong>tegration were easy targets though some could resist for quite a long time. The<strong>Manchu</strong>s knew that united Mongols would be very difficult to deal with, so, <strong>the</strong>y took all possiblemeasures to divide <strong>Mongolia</strong> <strong>in</strong>to many small units. As a result, <strong>Mongolia</strong> was dividedadm<strong>in</strong>istratively <strong>in</strong>to 4 aimags, which <strong>in</strong> turn <strong>in</strong>to many khoshuus, and <strong>the</strong>y were followed bysoums, bags and gers respectively. In addition, such a division made <strong>the</strong> population split up andscattered over a huge territory.2. Poverty: <strong>Mongolia</strong>n people became highly dependent on <strong>Manchu</strong> or Ch<strong>in</strong>ese usurers who werecharg<strong>in</strong>g enormous rates for any types <strong>of</strong> credits. As stated earlier, <strong>the</strong>y charged a very high <strong>in</strong>terest- 46 -


No.36 2006 7 rate on credits, which were supposed to be paid with<strong>in</strong> a certa<strong>in</strong> period <strong>of</strong> time. If such a time limitexpired, <strong>the</strong>y added up ano<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>terest and such a cycle was cont<strong>in</strong>ued fur<strong>the</strong>r. Consequently, <strong>the</strong>borrowers, ma<strong>in</strong>ly arats became tied <strong>in</strong> most cases for <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> his life to <strong>the</strong> usurers. To such aheavy burden <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>mselves <strong>the</strong>y also had to pay for <strong>the</strong> loans made by <strong>the</strong>ir pr<strong>in</strong>ces <strong>of</strong> khoshuu orsoums. It made <strong>the</strong> life <strong>of</strong> ord<strong>in</strong>ary people enormously difficult as <strong>the</strong>y became impoverished <strong>in</strong>masses.3. Backward economy: Although social life did not change much dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> rule, no changewas seen <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>n economy. Its economy rema<strong>in</strong>ed as backward aftermore than 200 years <strong>of</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> rul<strong>in</strong>g.4. Illiteracy: The major teach<strong>in</strong>g that was practiced <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong> was Lamaism which had its roots <strong>in</strong>Tibet. Consequently, all religious books were written <strong>in</strong> Tibetan, thus, any religious services wereconducted <strong>in</strong> Tibetan. For <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> population <strong>the</strong>se religious services and preach<strong>in</strong>g weresometh<strong>in</strong>g very magic and important. Only lamas with high ranks could understand <strong>the</strong>m and shav<strong>in</strong>ars who became pupils <strong>of</strong> religions centers had to memorize all <strong>the</strong> preach<strong>in</strong>g or <strong>in</strong>cantations.Besides shavi centers, <strong>the</strong>re were no o<strong>the</strong>r educational <strong>in</strong>stitutions and <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> populationwas illiterate. Consequently, no journals or newspapers were published <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>n.5. Decrease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> population: For various reasons, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g support by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> rulers<strong>the</strong> expansion <strong>of</strong> religion <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong> and tax benefits for religious centers and <strong>the</strong>ir permanentsettlers-lamas, <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> lamas was on <strong>in</strong>crease. Therefore, out <strong>of</strong> 100.000 male population70.000 were lamas at <strong>the</strong> onset <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 20 th century 27 and <strong>Mongolia</strong> was experienc<strong>in</strong>g low rates <strong>in</strong>both marriages and birthrates. At <strong>the</strong> same time, medical services were ra<strong>the</strong>r primitive as it wasma<strong>in</strong>ly based on <strong>in</strong>cantations or prayers. If prayers did not help Tibetan medic<strong>in</strong>e was used. All<strong>the</strong>se factors, as some scholars observe, made <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> population drop significantly.6. Decrease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> livestock: The country’s ma<strong>in</strong> economy animal husbandry sufferedgreatly dur<strong>in</strong>g this period as well. <strong>Mongolia</strong>ns used <strong>the</strong>ir cattle and <strong>the</strong>ir produces as <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>trad<strong>in</strong>g items and borrowed heavily from Ch<strong>in</strong>ese traders on credit. Consequently, <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong>livestock decreased <strong>in</strong> huge numbers.Although <strong>Manchu</strong> years brought such negative consequences how <strong>the</strong>y managed to control this country forsuch a long period <strong>of</strong> time? Firstly, as most scholars observe <strong>the</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>n pr<strong>in</strong>ces’ struggle to be a- 47 -


<strong>Manchu</strong> <strong>Years</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>Buyanlhamdom<strong>in</strong>ant power on Mongol territories made <strong>the</strong>m an easier target for a <strong>Manchu</strong> penetration. To weaken <strong>the</strong>strong determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> Mongol pr<strong>in</strong>ces not to be subjects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> rule, <strong>the</strong> outsiders used <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ces<strong>the</strong>mselves smartly. As Thomas E. Ew<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts out, “…it was <strong>the</strong> rul<strong>in</strong>g nobles (banner pr<strong>in</strong>ces) who wereobjects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest—sometimes affectionate, sometimes implacable, but never impassive. Descendedfrom Ch<strong>in</strong>ggis Khan, <strong>the</strong>y claimed to be <strong>the</strong> lawful and hereditary rulers <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>n society, and <strong>the</strong>Ch’<strong>in</strong>g did all it could re<strong>in</strong>force this claim. Ultimately, <strong>the</strong> success <strong>of</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> rule h<strong>in</strong>ged on <strong>the</strong> supportwhich it could draw from <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ces, and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutional history <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ch’<strong>in</strong>g adm<strong>in</strong>istration <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>testifies to how pr<strong>of</strong>oundly <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong>s understood this.” 28This way <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong>s used smartly <strong>the</strong> Mongolpr<strong>in</strong>ces’ struggle among <strong>the</strong>mselves by at times support<strong>in</strong>g some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ces, at times putt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m aga<strong>in</strong>stone ano<strong>the</strong>r or suppress<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m when force as needed. As a result, <strong>the</strong>y managed to have all Mongolterritories under <strong>the</strong>ir rule region after region. Secondly, when <strong>Manchu</strong>s became <strong>the</strong> rulers <strong>of</strong> Mongolterritories <strong>the</strong>y divided <strong>the</strong>m <strong>in</strong>to many small units as <strong>the</strong>y were fear<strong>in</strong>g from any possible unification <strong>of</strong>Mongol pr<strong>in</strong>ces. After <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong>s divided <strong>the</strong> territories <strong>in</strong>to aimags, khoshuus and o<strong>the</strong>r small units, <strong>the</strong>ygave power to control <strong>the</strong>ir respective territories to <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ces <strong>of</strong> aimag, khoshuus and o<strong>the</strong>r units. Whensuch pr<strong>in</strong>ces or leaders got <strong>the</strong> power to control <strong>the</strong>ir own territories <strong>the</strong>y did not fight aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> regime aswhat <strong>the</strong>y were <strong>of</strong>fered, a territory, a title, a monetary allowance etc. were better <strong>of</strong>fers than to fight with oneano<strong>the</strong>r for a power. For Mongol pr<strong>in</strong>ces at that time <strong>the</strong> most important th<strong>in</strong>g was to keep <strong>the</strong>ir power <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>irsovereign territories as well as keep <strong>the</strong>ir titles as <strong>the</strong> rulers over <strong>the</strong>ir territories. Thus, <strong>Manchu</strong>s <strong>in</strong>troducedsuch titles as van, beil, beis and gung and respective monetary allowances for <strong>the</strong>se titles. It looked as if <strong>the</strong>yhad not changed <strong>the</strong> Mongol pr<strong>in</strong>ces' titles and power, but <strong>in</strong> fact <strong>the</strong>y were titles and power authorized by <strong>the</strong><strong>Manchu</strong> state. Thirdly, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong>s exercised favorable policies towards <strong>the</strong> religious centers, <strong>the</strong>ir leadersand religion as a whole. They excluded high-rank<strong>in</strong>g religious leaders, <strong>the</strong>ir monasteries, and those lamaswho permanently stay<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> monasteries from taxes and duties. Of course, such a policy was greeted with apleasure on <strong>the</strong> religious side. The lamas became silent prayers who did not wish to be engaged <strong>in</strong> a fightaga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> regime. This <strong>in</strong> turn made <strong>the</strong> male population <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> country less productive as most <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> men became permanent settlers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> monasteries and temples. Consequently, <strong>Mongolia</strong> was lack<strong>in</strong>g tohave its permanent army and effective soldiers. F<strong>in</strong>ally, all <strong>the</strong> above-mentioned factors h<strong>in</strong>dered <strong>the</strong>development <strong>of</strong> not only <strong>the</strong> economy but also <strong>the</strong> population growth as well. Both external and <strong>in</strong>ternalfactors contributed negatively for <strong>Mongolia</strong> to have a leader who could have <strong>the</strong> country <strong>in</strong> his hands. More- 48 -


No.36 2006 7 than 200 years <strong>of</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> dom<strong>in</strong>ation exhausted <strong>the</strong> country and dissatisfaction with <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> regime wason rise not only <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong> but also <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r territories ruled by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong>s <strong>in</strong> early 20 th century.5. Relations with RussiaAs for external relations, <strong>Mongolia</strong> did not exercise <strong>in</strong>dependent policy under <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> rule. When<strong>Manchu</strong>s were expand<strong>in</strong>g its areas <strong>in</strong>to Mongol territories some <strong>of</strong> Mongol sovereign pr<strong>in</strong>ces did have<strong>in</strong>dependent external relations ma<strong>in</strong>ly with Russia. Dur<strong>in</strong>g Baatar Khuntaij’s rule Western Mongols hadma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed both diplomatic and commercial relations with Russia. As mentioned earlier, dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> earlyyears <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> rule Ikh Khuree’s Department was <strong>in</strong> charge <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>n affairs with Russia. However,when <strong>Manchu</strong>s were ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g more power and territories <strong>the</strong>y prohibited <strong>Mongolia</strong> to have <strong>in</strong>dependentforeign policy with regard to Russia. It wanted to make <strong>Mongolia</strong> as isolated as possible fear<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong>penetration <strong>of</strong> not only Russia but also o<strong>the</strong>r countries’ penetration <strong>in</strong>to this land. As a result, Mongol pr<strong>in</strong>cesbecame responsible only for <strong>the</strong>ir local affairs and had a duty to report to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong>s. Such a policyconsequently made <strong>Mongolia</strong>n pr<strong>in</strong>ces passive observers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world situation. Although Mongol pr<strong>in</strong>cesreached Russia to ask for <strong>the</strong>ir assistance several times, when <strong>the</strong>y faced a threat to <strong>the</strong>ir existence,particularly early 1600s and 1757. However, <strong>the</strong>y were not provided <strong>the</strong> support <strong>the</strong>y wanted except foroccasional assistances. Russia, perhaps, ei<strong>the</strong>r was not ready to be <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>n affairs. Orperhaps, <strong>the</strong>y sensed <strong>the</strong> situation that a lot more powerful state , <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>g dynasty, was emerg<strong>in</strong>gon <strong>the</strong> land <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> East.Thus, <strong>the</strong> succession struggle <strong>of</strong> Mongol sovereign pr<strong>in</strong>ces made this country rema<strong>in</strong> dis<strong>in</strong>tegrated for a longtime and eventually two <strong>of</strong> its neighbors had been given <strong>the</strong> opportunity to expand <strong>the</strong>ir dom<strong>in</strong>ance over <strong>the</strong><strong>Mongolia</strong>n affairs. Such a vulnerable position was also facilitated with <strong>the</strong> fact <strong>the</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong> lacked a solidleader who could unite all <strong>the</strong> sovereign pr<strong>in</strong>ces and control such a vast territory. The small pr<strong>in</strong>cedomsscattered over a huge territory and <strong>the</strong>ir constant struggle for power opened spaces for outside forces to comeand ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir control.As for relations between <strong>Mongolia</strong> and Russia, <strong>the</strong>y had no permanent character. In <strong>the</strong>ir struggle aga<strong>in</strong>steach o<strong>the</strong>r some <strong>of</strong> Mongol pr<strong>in</strong>ces were seek<strong>in</strong>g Russian help and even sometimes agreed to be under a- 49 -


<strong>Manchu</strong> <strong>Years</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>BuyanlhamRussian protectorate. However, such agreements bore a permanent nature and as Thomas E. Ew<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts out“<strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong>variably cooled once <strong>the</strong> threat had passed (apparently only <strong>the</strong> Altyn Khan Ombo Erdene <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> 1630s actually did swear fealty to <strong>the</strong> Tsar)”. 29After Altan Khanate became a part <strong>of</strong> Zasagt Khan <strong>the</strong>irrelations with Russia were dim<strong>in</strong>ished. Torguuds, a part <strong>of</strong> Oirat Mongols, started develop<strong>in</strong>g friendlyrelations with Russia and as stated previously Kho-Urlug pr<strong>in</strong>ce moved to Volga river with his people andestablished <strong>the</strong>re Kalmyk Khanate. When Oirat Mongols became powerful <strong>the</strong>y did develop more frequentrelations with Russia. In particular, dur<strong>in</strong>g Baatar Khuntaij’s rule <strong>the</strong>y had more regular trade relations withRussia. After his death his son Galdan cont<strong>in</strong>ued such relations with Russia. When Mongols were fac<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><strong>Manchu</strong> threat <strong>the</strong>y sought for Russian help as well. However, Russia was not keen to <strong>in</strong>terfere as ei<strong>the</strong>r it didnot want to worsen its relations with <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong>s or <strong>the</strong>y were not ready to come to this area as it had o<strong>the</strong>rconcerns on its o<strong>the</strong>r borders.However, <strong>the</strong> situation had changed after <strong>Mongolia</strong> was subjugated to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong> state. Although <strong>Mongolia</strong>did have some <strong>in</strong>dependent foreign policy with regard to Russia, it did not last long. Consequently, Russiaand <strong>Manchu</strong> became <strong>the</strong> ones who to decide <strong>the</strong> fate <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>. They signed <strong>the</strong> Treaty <strong>of</strong> Nerch<strong>in</strong>sk (orNerchuu) <strong>in</strong> 1689 and <strong>the</strong> Khyagta Treaty <strong>in</strong> 1727 where <strong>the</strong>y def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong>ir respective borders. KhyagtaTreaty, as Baabar observes “as compared with <strong>the</strong> Nerchuu treaty <strong>of</strong> forty years previous, this one provided aclearer framework for <strong>the</strong> relations between <strong>the</strong> two countries and fixed <strong>the</strong>ir jo<strong>in</strong>t border from Central Asiato <strong>the</strong> Pacific shores. Mongols <strong>of</strong> Lake Baikal region were to become Russia’s subjects, and Mongols south <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> Selenga those <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a. But <strong>the</strong> state <strong>of</strong> Zuungar-lands to <strong>the</strong> west <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Uriankhai territory, known to be<strong>the</strong> geographical center <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Asian cont<strong>in</strong>ent-managed to rema<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependent.” 30For some time <strong>the</strong>re was not much contact between <strong>Mongolia</strong> and Russia. General Muraviev’s trip to Ch<strong>in</strong>amade <strong>the</strong> Russians to turn <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>terests to <strong>Mongolia</strong> aga<strong>in</strong>. Muraviev, a governor general <strong>of</strong> Eastern Siberia,became a historical figure for his role to br<strong>in</strong>g Amur bas<strong>in</strong> region under Russia’s control. Subsequently underAigun and Tients<strong>in</strong> Treaties <strong>of</strong> 1858 and Beij<strong>in</strong>g Treaty <strong>of</strong> 1860 not only Amur region but also PriAmur,Ussuri regions as well as some parts <strong>of</strong> Central Asia became parts <strong>of</strong> Russia’s jurisdiction. General Muravieveven suggested that Russia should also br<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Mongolia</strong> under its control by writ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 1853 “In case <strong>the</strong><strong>Manchu</strong> Dynasty fell and decided to retreat <strong>in</strong>to its homeland <strong>in</strong> <strong>Manchu</strong>ria, we should act at once to takesteps to prevent a new Ch<strong>in</strong>ese government <strong>in</strong> Pek<strong>in</strong>g from extend<strong>in</strong>g its authority over <strong>Mongolia</strong>, which <strong>in</strong>- 50 -


No.36 2006 7 such an event could be proclaimed our protectorate”. 31Thus, a special Committee (Amur Committee)reviewed Muraviev’s report but suggested to have friendly relations with Mongols. The reason for mak<strong>in</strong>gsuch a decision is quoted <strong>in</strong> Between <strong>the</strong> Hammer and <strong>the</strong> Anvil? Ch<strong>in</strong>ese and Russian Policies <strong>in</strong> Outer<strong>Mongolia</strong>. 1911-1921 as“…<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Committee any unnecessary participation <strong>in</strong> this matter,and <strong>in</strong> particular <strong>the</strong> plac<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se two prov<strong>in</strong>ces (<strong>Manchu</strong>ria and <strong>Mongolia</strong>) under our protection, will on<strong>the</strong> contrary arouse <strong>the</strong> opposition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> European powers and could force <strong>the</strong>m moreover to occupy any part<strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, Korea for example, and <strong>the</strong>reby put us <strong>in</strong> contact with a neighbor far more dangerous than <strong>the</strong>territory <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a”. 32Though Russia was not enthusiastic <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terfer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to <strong>Mongolia</strong>n affairs due to various reasons, it diddevelop commercial activities <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>. In 1860 Russia opened its consulate <strong>in</strong> Urga 33and <strong>in</strong> about twodecades <strong>the</strong> Russians were given rights for unrestricted trade and movement throughout <strong>Mongolia</strong>. Thesecommercial rights were resulted from a number <strong>of</strong> agreements, which were f<strong>in</strong>ally made <strong>in</strong>to aRusso-Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Treaty <strong>in</strong> 1881. Many Russian firms operated <strong>in</strong> Urga and o<strong>the</strong>r towns along with <strong>the</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>esefirms. Moreover, <strong>the</strong> Russians were given <strong>the</strong> rights to open consulates <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r Mongol towns such as Khovdand Uliastai.Russia could not compete <strong>the</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese firms which had made a firm base <strong>the</strong>re, although it openedcommercial firms and was engaged <strong>in</strong> commercial activities. Consequently <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> Russian firmsstarted to decl<strong>in</strong>e. In 1910 P.P. Riabush<strong>in</strong>skii, a Moscow merchant, organized a conference withrepresentatives <strong>of</strong> Moscow firms and banks <strong>in</strong> Moscow. This conference issued a decision to dispatch a group<strong>of</strong> Russian merchants to <strong>Mongolia</strong> with an aim “to survey travel routes, trade centers, <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> importsand exports between <strong>Mongolia</strong> and Russia, <strong>the</strong> way <strong>of</strong> life and needs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>n population, and, <strong>in</strong>particular, <strong>the</strong> situation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn and northwestern <strong>Mongolia</strong>n towns <strong>of</strong> Urga, Uliastai, and Kobdo.Special focus was to put on <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>roads allegedly be<strong>in</strong>g made by Ch<strong>in</strong>ese merchants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> northwest”. 34Upon <strong>the</strong>ir return, <strong>the</strong>y published articles on <strong>the</strong>ir trip with a title The Moscow Trade Expedition to <strong>Mongolia</strong>,which provided a valuable <strong>in</strong>formation on <strong>the</strong> trade situation, <strong>the</strong> statistics on <strong>Mongolia</strong>n imports and exportsas well as on a whole <strong>Mongolia</strong>. Moreover, <strong>the</strong>y <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>the</strong>ir concerns over <strong>the</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> Russian trade <strong>in</strong><strong>Mongolia</strong> and agreed on <strong>the</strong>ir observation that <strong>the</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese managed to control <strong>the</strong> trade activities <strong>the</strong>re as<strong>the</strong>y were well organized, united and had a good support <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> local government. On <strong>the</strong> contrary, <strong>the</strong>- 51 -


<strong>Manchu</strong> <strong>Years</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>BuyanlhamRussian merchants <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong> were not organized and coord<strong>in</strong>ated though <strong>the</strong> Russian consulate wasoperat<strong>in</strong>g for about 40 years. Prior to this expedition <strong>the</strong>re had been several o<strong>the</strong>r expedition groups fromRussia, headed N.M. Przhevalsky, G.N. Potan<strong>in</strong>, P.K. Kozlov, G.E. Grumn-Grzhimailo, B.Ya. Vladimirtsovand V.A. Obruchev, which did extensive research <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>.Besides <strong>the</strong> unfavorable position <strong>of</strong> Russian merchants, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational situation did contribute for Russianot to be <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> full scale <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> affairs <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>. Although Russia saw <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong> a strategicposition <strong>in</strong> its Far East, it did not take an active participation <strong>in</strong> this area unless a real threat to <strong>the</strong> Russiansecurity was seen <strong>the</strong>re. At <strong>the</strong> same time, Russia was aware <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r Western nations’ <strong>in</strong>terests <strong>in</strong> secur<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong>ir commercial rights <strong>in</strong> different strategic regions <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, thus, <strong>the</strong>y were wait<strong>in</strong>g for an opportunity toclaim <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>terests as well. Never<strong>the</strong>less, Russia did make two different agreements, one with Brita<strong>in</strong> andano<strong>the</strong>r with Japan, which directly or <strong>in</strong>directly concerned <strong>the</strong> position <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>. In 1899 Russia andBrita<strong>in</strong> signed an agreement where <strong>the</strong>y recognized each o<strong>the</strong>r’s spheres <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluences respectively.Accord<strong>in</strong>g to this Scott-Muraviev agreement, <strong>the</strong> Yangtze was recognized as Brita<strong>in</strong>’s sphere <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluencewhereas <strong>the</strong> territory north <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Great Wall, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Mongolia</strong>, as Russia’s sphere <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluence.There was ano<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>terested party, besides Western powers, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> affairs <strong>of</strong> Far East – Japan. Russia andJapan had tried to reach consensus on <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>terests <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Manchu</strong>ria, several times.Consequently <strong>the</strong>se two powers clashed <strong>in</strong> a Russo-Japanese war which brought a victory to a Japanese side.They f<strong>in</strong>ally reached an agreement with respect to <strong>the</strong>ir spheres <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluences <strong>in</strong> this region, Russiarecogniz<strong>in</strong>g sou<strong>the</strong>rn <strong>Manchu</strong>ria and Korea as Japan’s spheres <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terests while nor<strong>the</strong>rn <strong>Manchu</strong>ria and<strong>Mongolia</strong> were recognized as Russia’s respectively.Thus, <strong>Mongolia</strong> had a subord<strong>in</strong>ate position <strong>in</strong> Russia’s foreign policy regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Far East until <strong>the</strong>beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 20 th century. The Russians had extensive borderl<strong>in</strong>es with Ch<strong>in</strong>a whom <strong>the</strong>y wanted to havefriendly relations whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y were <strong>Manchu</strong>s or Ch<strong>in</strong>ese. Ch<strong>in</strong>a was <strong>the</strong> biggest trad<strong>in</strong>g partner to Russia. Inaddition, Russia like o<strong>the</strong>r Western powers were seek<strong>in</strong>g special privileges <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, <strong>in</strong> particular <strong>in</strong><strong>Manchu</strong>ria, thus, <strong>the</strong>y had to be careful <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Western powers’ reaction when deal<strong>in</strong>g with different affairs<strong>the</strong>re.- 52 -


No.36 2006 7 6. References1 A word Mongols is used to refer to all Mongols, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Inner and Western <strong>Mongolia</strong>.2 Batmunkh or Dayan Khan’s life is shown <strong>in</strong> a <strong>Mongolia</strong>n historical film titled “Mandukhai Tsetsen Khatan”.3 <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>. Ulaanbaatar: Admon Publish<strong>in</strong>g House, 1999, p. 116.4 Tumen can be understood as small k<strong>in</strong>gdoms.5 <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>n People’s Republic. Honolulu: University Press <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pacific, 2000, p. 169.6 Clubb, Edmund O. Ch<strong>in</strong>a and Russia: The Great Game. New York: Columbia University Press, 1971, p. 20.7 <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>n People’s Republic. Honolulu: University Press <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pacific, 2000, p. 170.8 Ethnic group <strong>of</strong> Western <strong>Mongolia</strong>9 Ethnic group <strong>of</strong> Western <strong>Mongolia</strong>10 <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>n People’s Republic. Honolulu: University Press <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pacific, 2000, p. 174-5.11 Clubb, Edmund O. Ch<strong>in</strong>a and Russia: The “Great Game”. New York: Columbia University Press, 1971, p. 35.12 Ethnic group <strong>of</strong> Western <strong>Mongolia</strong>13 A title for a higher rank<strong>in</strong>g person, similar to lord or pr<strong>in</strong>ce14 Taij – a title <strong>of</strong> nobility held by <strong>the</strong> descendents <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>gis Khan and his bro<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Borjig<strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e.15 The capital city <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong> was called Ikh Khuree <strong>the</strong>n16 Durvud – ethnic group <strong>of</strong> Western <strong>Mongolia</strong>. By <strong>the</strong>n so called Durvud tumen (a small pr<strong>in</strong>cedom) <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> itselfbesides durvud o<strong>the</strong>r ethnic groups such as bayad17 Today’s Kalmykia18 Common people19 work<strong>in</strong>g people20 pupils <strong>of</strong> monasteries and temples21 Uralic and Altaic Series. Volumes 138-139 ( Thomas E. Ew<strong>in</strong>g. Between <strong>the</strong> Hammer and <strong>the</strong> Anvil? Ch<strong>in</strong>ese andRussian Policies <strong>in</strong> Outer <strong>Mongolia</strong>. 1911-1921). London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2004, p. 11.22 Baabar. <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>. Ulaanbaatar: Monsudar, 2004, p. 94.23 <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>n People’s Republic. Honolulu: University Press <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pacific, 2000, p. 194.24 <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>. Ulaanbaatar: Admon Publish<strong>in</strong>g House, 1999, p. 276.25 tael, ounce (usually <strong>of</strong> silver)26 Ibid., p. 276.27 Baabar. <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>. Ulaanbaatar: Monsudar. 2004, p.99.28 Uralic and Altaic Series. Volumes 138-139 (Thomas E. Ew<strong>in</strong>g. Between <strong>the</strong> Hammer and <strong>the</strong> Anvil? Ch<strong>in</strong>ese andRussian Policies <strong>in</strong> Outer <strong>Mongolia</strong>. 1911-1921). London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2004, p. 10.29 Uralic and Altaic Series. Volumes 138-139 (Thomas E. Ew<strong>in</strong>g. Between <strong>the</strong> Hammer and <strong>the</strong> Anvil? Ch<strong>in</strong>ese andRussian Policies <strong>in</strong> Outer <strong>Mongolia</strong>. 1911-1921). London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2004, p. 17.30 Baabar. <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>. Ulaanbaatar: Monsudar, 2004, p. 87.31 Rupen, Robert. How <strong>Mongolia</strong> is really ruled. A Political <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>n People’s Republic, 1900-1978.Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, 1979, pp. 6-7.32 Uralic and Altaic Series. Volumes 138-139 (Thomas E. Ew<strong>in</strong>g. Between <strong>the</strong> Hammer and <strong>the</strong> Anvil? Ch<strong>in</strong>ese andRussian Policies <strong>in</strong> Outer <strong>Mongolia</strong>. 1911-1921). London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2004, p. 19.33 Urga or Urgee – <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> capital city <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>34 Endicott, Elizabeth. Russian Merchants <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mongolia</strong>: The 1910 Moscow Trade Expedition. Published <strong>in</strong>. StephenKotk<strong>in</strong> and Bruce A. Elleman (eds). <strong>Mongolia</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Twentieth Century: Landlocked Cosmopolitan. Armonk: M.E.Sharpe, 1999, p. 60.- 53 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!