International Single Species Action Plan for the Conservation - AEWA

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Objectively Verifiable Indicator Means of Verification National government reports to the CMS, Bern, Biodiversity and Ramsar Conventions, and AEWA Ruddy Duck eradicated from Europe by 2015 International and national Ruddy Duck working group reports Papers in internationally refereed journals Key knowledge gaps filled by 2015 International and national White-headed Duck working group reports Summary of Objectives / Activities 4. No hybridisation and competition for food and nesting sites with Ruddy Duck Priority: Essential Timescale: Long 5. Knowledge gaps filled Priority: Essential Timescale: Long CMS Technical Series No. 13 AEWA Technical Series No. 8 International Single Species Action Plan for the Conservation of the White-headed Duck 47
CMS Technical Series No. 13 AEWA Technical Series No. 8 6. Activities by country This section identifies Activities needed to implement the Results of this White-headed Duck action plan. Activities are given at the generic level (to address the threats identified in the Problem Tree) whilst specific Activities are also identified at the individual Range State level. Where possible, Responsible Organisations are also identified for each Activity. Country groups have been identified depending on whether they are White-headed Duck and /or Ruddy Duck Range States. 6.1 General Activities - White-headed Duck Range States (Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, China, France, Georgia, Greece, Iraq, Islamic Republic of Iran, Israel, Italy, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Morocco, Pakistan, Romania, Russian Federation, Spain, Syrian Arab Republic, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan). Result National Activities Priority Timescale Responsible Organisations 1. Further habitat loss and 1.1 Produce and implement national White-headed Duck action plan Essential Short National governments/NGOs degradation prevented 1.2 Form national White-headed Duck working group Essential Short National governments/NGOs 1.3 Designate all key sites for the species (including IBAs) as SPAs in EU High Short National governments member states or as Ramsar Sites or protected areas outside of the EU 1.4 Protect all White-headed Duck IBAs under national legislation and ensure High Short National governments this legislation is enforced 1.5 Implement appropriate assessments for all projects and plans affecting Essential Ongoing National governments these sites, with special attention to agricultural development, drainage, diversion of rivers, abstraction of water and building of dams 1.7 Introduce legislation to prohibit the introduction, and allow the control and Low Long National governments eradication of Common Carp and Grass Carp 1.8 Identify all key White-headed Duck sites where Common Carp and Grass Low Short National governments Carp occur and eradicate them 1.9 Introduce public awareness schemes to promote the conservation of the Low Ongoing National governments/NGOs White-headed Duck and its habitat and circulate this information to relevant policy makers, interest groups (e.g. hunters, fishermen, reserve managers) and local people; provide information on identification of protected species 2. Direct mortality of 2.1 Provide legal protection for White-headed Duck and its habitat Essential Short National governments adults prevented and reproductive success increased 2.2 Provide adequate wardening of all key sites Medium Long National governments and regional administrations, NGOs and other landowners 48 International Single Species Action Plan for the Conservation of the White-headed Duck
Page 1 and 2: TECHNICAL SERIES No.13 (CMS) No. 8
Page 3 and 4: Compiled by: Baz Hughes 1 , James R
Page 6 and 7: CMS Technical Series No. 13 AEWA Te
Page 10 and 11: Executive Summary CMS Technical Ser
Page 12 and 13: 1. Biological assessment The White-
Page 14 and 15: Survival and Productivity Given the
Page 16 and 17: Figure 1. Western Palearctic distri
Page 18 and 19: 2. Available key knowledge The most
Page 20 and 21: Data on habitat use and diet of Whi
Page 26 and 27: Figure 2. Problem tree for the Whit
Page 28 and 29: 4. Policies and legislation relevan
Page 32 and 33: Year of Penalties for For Game Annu
Page 34 and 35: For Game Annual Highest Species, gi
Page 36 and 37: Country Breeding Season Non-breedin
Page 38 and 39: Table 8 (a). Recent conservation me
Page 40 and 41: Table 8 (b). Research and conservat
Page 42 and 43: Country Research and Conservation E
Page 44 and 45: Country Research and Conservation E
Page 46 and 47: 5. Framework for action This sectio
Page 50 and 51: Result National Activities Priority
Page 52 and 53: 6.3 General Activities - Knowledge
Page 54 and 55: Dolgushin, I.A. 1960. Ptisty Kazakh
Page 58 and 59: Annex 2. Contracting parties to int
Page 60 and 61: Annex 3. Important Bird Areas of re
Page 62 and 63: Country International Name Area (Ha
Page 64 and 65: Annex 4. Protection status of Impor
Page 66 and 67: Management Plan CMS Technical Serie

International Single Species Action Plan for the Conservation - AEWA

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?