11.07.2015 Views

Book 4 - Appraisal Institute of Canada

Book 4 - Appraisal Institute of Canada

Book 4 - Appraisal Institute of Canada

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2. a description <strong>of</strong> any research conductedby the expert that led him orher to form the opinion, and3. a list <strong>of</strong> every document, if any, reliedon by the expert in forming theopinion.7. An acknowledgement <strong>of</strong> expert’s duty(Form 53) signed by the expert.An expert is restricted as to what he or she cantestify to under Rule 53 which provides:(3) An expert witness may not testify with respectto an issue, except with leave <strong>of</strong> the trial judge,unless the substance <strong>of</strong> his or her testimonywith respect to that issue is set out in,(a) a report served under this rule; or(b) a supplementary report served onevery other party to the action notless than 30 days before the commencement<strong>of</strong> the trial.Judges’ impressions and impressing thejudge – the function <strong>of</strong> the expert“I am not aware that the expert is an expert inlogic, and I do not understand that the expert hasa corner on the market <strong>of</strong> what conclusions arelogical and which are not.”– Justice Osborn“The function <strong>of</strong> the expert witness is toprovide for the judges, and sometimes the jury,• an opinion as to the significance <strong>of</strong>, or the inferencewhich may be drawn from,• proved facts,• in a field in which the expert possesses specialknowledge and experience,• going beyond that <strong>of</strong> the trier <strong>of</strong> fact.”(M. F. Harrington ‘Expert Witnesses: The Good,The Bad and The Ugly’ (Canadian College <strong>of</strong>Construction Lawyers 6th Annual Conference:May 29, 2003))The Supreme Court <strong>of</strong> <strong>Canada</strong> has providedthat courts should only allow an expert to provideopinion evidence where the evidence is advancedwith respect to matters that are beyond thecommon understanding <strong>of</strong> the judge or jury.“An expert’s function is precisely this: to providethe judge and jury with a ready-made inferencewhich the judge and jury, due to the technicalnature <strong>of</strong> the facts, are unable to formulate” …The expert should be “a neutral observer whoguides judges and juries through complicatedPROPERTY TAXVALUATIONIFRSCONSULTINGADVISORYWhen you need the most sophisticated adviceregarding your real estate holdings for thetransition to IFRS, only one consultancy hasthe technical expertise and unrivalled globalplatform to respond.With valuation pr<strong>of</strong>essionals in 90 <strong>of</strong>ficesacross the globe, including Montreal, Ottawa,Toronto, London, Calgary, Edmonton andVancouver, Cushman & WakefieldValuation & Advisory group has Regional,National and Global insight.Our clients and pr<strong>of</strong>essionals benefit fromaccess to the latest technology and resources,enabling us to deliver in-depth appraisals andvaluations with insightful market commentaryon time and within budget. We’re There.Sheila BottingExecutive Managing Director <strong>Canada</strong>416.359.2378Sheila.Botting@ca.cushwake.comwww.cushmanwakefield.com/valuationevidence so that they can draw their ownconclusions about the issues at hand.” (JusticeDickson in R. v. Abbey)For more on expert witnesses, read Part 2 <strong>of</strong> thisarticle in Volume 55, <strong>Book</strong> 1, 2011 <strong>of</strong> CanadianProperty Valuation magazine.WE’RE THEREclick here to return to table 0f contentsCanadian Property Valuation Volume 54 | book 4 | 2010 Évaluation Immobilière au <strong>Canada</strong> 31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!