Case 2:10-cv-04420-SJO-JC Document 17 Filed 08/20/10 Page 6 of 26 Page ID #:3222TABLE OF CONTENTS[Continued]342.Public Interest Factors ................................................................... 145678a. California Law Will Not Govern This Case ....................... 14b. Other Public Interest Factors Also Favor Transfer ............. 15CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................. 15910111213141516171819202122232425262728Gibson, Dunn &Crutcher <strong>LLP</strong>11
Case 2:10-cv-04420-SJO-JC Document 17 Filed 08/20/10 Page 7 of 26 Page ID #:3232345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728Gibson, Dunn &Crutcher <strong>LLP</strong>TABLE OF AUTHORITIESPage(s)CasesA.J.Indus., Inc. v. Us. Dist. Court for Cent. Dist. of Cal. ,503 F.2d 384 (9th Cir. 1974) ................................................................................... 10ABF Capital Corp. v. Berglass,30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 588 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005) .............................................................. 15Am. Emplo]Jers Groul!, Inc. v. Employment Dev. Dep't,65 Cal. Rptr. 3d 233 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007) ................................................................ 5A rete Power, Inc.. v. Beacon Power Corp.,No. C 07-5167 WDB, 2008 WL 508L1-77 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2008) ........................ 9Ashcro.fi v. Iqbal,129 S. Ct. 1937 (2009) ............................................................................................... 4Beckv. Am. Health Group Int'l, Inc.,260 Cal. Rptr. 237 (Cal. Ct. App. 1989) ........................................................... 5,6,8Bell Atl. CoqZ. v. Twombly,550 U.S. 544 (2007) ................................................................................................... 4Bustamante v. Intuit, Inc.,45 Cal. Rptr. 3d 692 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006) ................................................................ 5Coto Settlelnent v. Eisenberg,593 F.3d 1031 (9th Cir. 2010) .................................................................................. .4Doe I v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.572 F.3d 677 (9th Cir. 2009) ..................................................................................... 3Expf15sJ~f.2d roform.y.! 09~ .~ ... !!:.~.~~~~~~.~:..~~.~(~~~~~~ ... ,.............................. 5, 6Fields v. Legacy Health Sys.,413 F.3d- 943 (9th Cir. 2005) ................................................................................... 14Frontier Oil Corp. v. RLI Ins. Co.,63 Cal. Rptr. 3d 816 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007) .............................................................. 14Gates Learjet Corp. v. Je,nsen,743 F.2d 1325 (9th CIT. 1984) ................................................................................. 13Gu~3~iL ~S.f~O r (?~~7).~~ .............................................................................................. 14Hernandez v. Graebel Van Lines,761 F. Supp. 983 (E.D.N.Y. 1991) .......................................................................... 12Ironworkers Local Union No. 68 & Participating Employers Health &Welfare Fund v. Amgen,No. CV 07-5157 PSG (AGRx), 2008 WL 312309 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 22,2008) ........................................................................................................................ 13Joe Boxer Corp. v. R. Siskind & Co.,No. C 98-4899 SI, 1999 WL 429549 (N.D. Cal. June 8, 1999) .............................. 10Jordan Panel ~ys., Corp. v. Tttrner Constr. Co.,841 N.Y.S.2d 561 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007) ................................................................. 8111'.