The counter argument is that making some drugs illegal<strong>and</strong> yet allowing demonstrably harmful drugs liketobacco <strong>and</strong> alcohol to be freely available to adults ishypocritical <strong>and</strong> undermines respect for <strong>the</strong> <strong>law</strong> <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rsocial institutions. Forcing up <strong>the</strong> price of drugs doesnot prevent people using drugs, but it might encouragepeople to commit property crimes, or to engage in drugsupply offences, to obtain <strong>the</strong> necessary funds.The enforcement of <strong>law</strong>s criminalising drug use cancontribute to risk taking behaviours – for example,injecting drugs alone, or consuming party drugs all atonce to avoid sniffer dog detection.There is a good deal of evidence to suggest that <strong>the</strong>re is alink between illicit drug use <strong>and</strong> property crime, but <strong>the</strong>evidence is less strong in proving that drug use actuallycauses property crime. It may be that people who commitproperty crime are more likely to be drug users, so thatdrug use is not a cause. But it is clear that at least somedrug-dependent people commit very large numbers ofproperty crimes.Similarly, <strong>the</strong>re is a good deal of evidence to suggesta connection between cannabis use by teenagers <strong>and</strong>psychosis, but <strong>the</strong> evidence is less strong that cannabisactually causes psychosis. Most studies cannot rule outo<strong>the</strong>r drug use (especially amphetamines) as a potentialcause of mental health problems, <strong>and</strong> it may be thatpeople with mental health problems are more likelythan o<strong>the</strong>rs to use cannabis (so that <strong>the</strong> cannabis useis a feature, but not a cause). It is interesting that <strong>the</strong>national prevalence of psychosis in young people has notincreased over <strong>the</strong> last twenty years, despite significantincrease in cannabis use by young people.The drugs policy debate is one in which most argumentscan be supported by evidence from a study somewhereor an experience in one country or ano<strong>the</strong>r. It can beargued that prohibition causes drug crime <strong>and</strong> preventsdrug crime; that it discourages drug use or that itencourages harmful drug use; it complements efforts atdrug rehabilitation or it draws valuable resources awayfrom treatment programs.The debate about <strong>the</strong> relative merits of <strong>the</strong>se broadpolicy positions is not likely to end soon. However, it islikely that we will continue to see a variety of new <strong>law</strong>s<strong>and</strong> measures introduced – at times prohibitionist <strong>and</strong>at times harm reductionist – in an ongoing attempt toaddress <strong>the</strong> social consequences of drug use.discriMinaTiOn againsTdrug usersThe social stigma attached to illicit drug use meansthat people who are identified as drug users canexperience discriminatory treatment such as denial ofservices or accommodation.is drug addiction a disability?Under both NSW <strong>and</strong> federal anti-discrimination<strong>law</strong>s, it is un<strong>law</strong>ful to discriminate against a person on<strong>the</strong> grounds of disability. Over a number of years, ithad been frequently suggested that drug dependencewas a form of disability, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore covered by <strong>the</strong>discrimination <strong>law</strong>s, but <strong>the</strong>re was no case deciding<strong>the</strong> point.Drug addiction <strong>and</strong> federal <strong>law</strong>In Marsden v HREOC <strong>and</strong> Coffs Harbour RSL [2000]FCA 1619, a man was refused alcohol service at a club,<strong>and</strong> later expelled from club membership, because hewas on a methadone program. He made a complaintof disability discrimination to <strong>the</strong> Human Rights <strong>and</strong>Equal Opportunity Commission (HREOC). Thecommission conducted an inquiry <strong>and</strong> concluded<strong>the</strong>re had been no disability discrimination. Marsdenappealed to <strong>the</strong> Federal Court, which decided thatdrug addiction could be classed as a disability for<strong>the</strong> purposes of <strong>the</strong> relevant federal legislation (<strong>the</strong>Disability Discrimination Act 1992).amendments to nsW <strong>law</strong>In response to <strong>the</strong> Marsden decision, <strong>the</strong> NSW Government amended <strong>the</strong> NSW <strong>law</strong> (<strong>the</strong> Anti-Discrimination Act 1977) to legally allow discrimination against a person on <strong>the</strong> grounds of addiction to a prohibited drug – but only in employment. Discrimination remains un<strong>law</strong>ful in o<strong>the</strong>r fields, including:> providing goods <strong>and</strong> services> education> accommodation.The NSW Act does not allow discrimination: > against users of methadone or buprenorphine> on <strong>the</strong> grounds of being hepatitis C or HIV positive, or having any o<strong>the</strong>r medical condition.So, if a person is refused a job because <strong>the</strong>y areon a methadone or buprenorphine program or areseropositive, <strong>the</strong>y could make a claim for disabilitydiscrimination under <strong>the</strong> NSW Act.history of drug <strong>law</strong>s 5
Drug <strong>law</strong>s inNSW WHaT are illegal drugs?In NSW, it is an offence to possess, use, produce orsupply a drug which has been declared prohibited. Mostdrug charges in NSW are laid under <strong>the</strong> Drug Misuse <strong>and</strong>Trafficking Act 1985. The Commonwealth Customs Act1901 covers offences involving importing <strong>and</strong> exportingdrugs.THe drug Misuse <strong>and</strong> TraffickingacT 1985The NSW Drug Misuse <strong>and</strong> Trafficking Act 1985classifies a wide range of drugs as ‘prohibited drugs’ (<strong>and</strong>‘prohibited plants’ in <strong>the</strong> case of cannabis, opium <strong>and</strong>coca). The Act creates offences for:> use of prohibited drugs> possession of prohibited drugs> supply <strong>and</strong> trafficking of prohibited drugs (with <strong>the</strong>seriousness of <strong>the</strong> offence depending on <strong>the</strong> quantitiesinvolved)> cultivation <strong>and</strong> possession of prohibited plants> manufacture of prohibited drugs> aiding <strong>and</strong> abetting <strong>and</strong> taking part in offencesinvolving prohibited drugs or plants> possession of drug-use implements.Specific offences are covered in more detail from pp 816.The drugs covered by <strong>the</strong> Act are listed in a schedule.They include <strong>the</strong> common street drugs – cannabis(marijuana), heroin, ecstasy, amphetamines, LSD,cocaine, methadone – <strong>and</strong> many o<strong>the</strong>rs.THe cusTOMs acTThe Customs Act 1901 is a federal <strong>law</strong> that aims, amongo<strong>the</strong>r things, to prevent <strong>the</strong> import <strong>and</strong> export ofprohibited drugs. The range of drugs (listed in a scheduleto <strong>the</strong> Act) is similar to that in <strong>the</strong> Drug Misuse <strong>and</strong>Trafficking Act.Customs Act offences include dealing with importeddrugs after <strong>the</strong>y have been brought into <strong>the</strong> country.cOnfiscaTing prOceeds Of criMeThere is both NSW <strong>and</strong> federal legislation that canbe used to seize assets obtained through serious drugoffences, <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r offences. Some of <strong>the</strong>se <strong>law</strong>s applyonly after a person is convicted of an offence. Some applywithout a conviction, or even without a criminal chargebeing laid.These confiscation <strong>law</strong>s do not apply to minor drugoffences, such as use <strong>and</strong> possession, or small-scaledealing.The Acts that come into operation after conviction are:> <strong>the</strong> Confiscation of Proceeds of Crime Act 1989 (NSW)> <strong>the</strong> Proceeds of Crime Act 1987 (Cth).The Acts that apply regardless of criminal conviction are: > <strong>the</strong> Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 (NSW)> <strong>the</strong> Customs Act 1901 (Cth), sections 229A <strong>and</strong> 243B. how cases proceedCases run under <strong>the</strong>se <strong>law</strong>s are civil, not criminalactions. This means that a person does not get a criminalrecord if <strong>the</strong> court orders forfeiture of <strong>the</strong>ir property,or <strong>the</strong> payment of a monetary penalty. It also meansthat <strong>the</strong> court must only be satisfied on <strong>the</strong> balance ofprobabilities (not beyond reasonable doubt) that <strong>the</strong>property in question is tainted. NSW cases are conductedin <strong>the</strong> Supreme Court, with proceedings brought by <strong>the</strong>NSW Drug Crime Commission. Federal cases are run in<strong>the</strong> Federal Court.inTernaTiOnal TreaTies <strong>and</strong>cOnvenTiOnsAustralia is a signatory to a number of internationaltreaties <strong>and</strong> conventions about drugs <strong>and</strong> drug policy.These treaties are all prohibitionist in <strong>the</strong>ir basic intent.Countries that sign <strong>the</strong>se treaties must agree to pass <strong>law</strong>sagainst using <strong>and</strong> trading of recreational drugs.International treaties <strong>and</strong> conventions are not <strong>law</strong> inAustralia. The only <strong>law</strong> in NSW is legislation passedby state or federal parliament <strong>and</strong> precedent decisions6HOT TOPICS <strong>59</strong> > <strong>Drugs</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>law</strong>