11.07.2015 Views

mammalian fauna of the chagai desert and adjoining areas

mammalian fauna of the chagai desert and adjoining areas

mammalian fauna of the chagai desert and adjoining areas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Mammalian <strong>fauna</strong>: Chaghai <strong>desert</strong> 20Degradation <strong>of</strong> natural habitats <strong>and</strong> decline <strong>of</strong><strong>fauna</strong>l capital in Pakistan has been a rapid processin last few decades. This trend is also very muchvisible in Chagai Desert as it is a hunting area forArab dignitaries. Moreover, many mega projectslike exploration <strong>of</strong> gold, silver <strong>and</strong> Copper inS<strong>and</strong>ak <strong>and</strong> Ricko Diq <strong>areas</strong> <strong>and</strong> extraction <strong>of</strong>Onyx Chagai have probably contributed towards<strong>the</strong> degradation process. Despite <strong>the</strong>se naturalchallenges <strong>and</strong> potential anthropogenic threats,<strong>the</strong>re is limited information on <strong>the</strong> status <strong>and</strong>diversity <strong>of</strong> <strong>mammalian</strong> <strong>fauna</strong> from <strong>the</strong> area.There are several studies in <strong>the</strong> <strong>desert</strong> regions <strong>of</strong>Pakistan [1-16] which describe general diversity<strong>and</strong> distribution pattern <strong>of</strong> mammals. However,information specific to <strong>the</strong> Chagai Desert is notavailable. This study aimed at documentingactual diversity <strong>and</strong> status <strong>of</strong> mammals in <strong>the</strong>area.Materials <strong>and</strong> MethodsThe data for this study were collected throughtrapping <strong>and</strong> sign surveys carried out in ChaghiDesert in three phases. The first survey wasconducted in October 2005, second in May 2008,<strong>and</strong> final one in November 2008. Sherman <strong>and</strong>snap traps were used for <strong>the</strong> small mammals.A mixture <strong>of</strong> rice <strong>and</strong> wheat grains, sunflower<strong>and</strong> cori<strong>and</strong>er seeds, oats <strong>and</strong> onion all mixedwith peanut butter was used as bait for Shermantraps. The traps were checked on <strong>the</strong> next day asearly as possible <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> trapped specimens wereidentified <strong>and</strong> released. Necessary relevant dataas date <strong>of</strong> trap setting, date <strong>of</strong> collection, habitat,location, wea<strong>the</strong>r conditions etc., were recordedat <strong>the</strong> spot on a data sheet. Catch rates werecalculated as <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> individuals captured/species/100 trap nights, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>se were used asan index <strong>of</strong> relative abundance (17).The large mammals are mostly nocturnal <strong>and</strong>avoid any visual contact. Their record, <strong>the</strong>refore,was mainly based on indirect observations suchas foot tracks, feces, <strong>and</strong> dens. Sign survey siteswere selected r<strong>and</strong>omly, <strong>and</strong> at each site one-hoursearch was carried out to detect any sign <strong>of</strong> largemammals. A portable spotlight was used duringnight survey to scan <strong>the</strong> area along <strong>the</strong> selectedtracks <strong>and</strong> to spot nocturnal mammals. Thenocturnal surveys were conducted in transects <strong>of</strong>approximately 5 to 15 km length. The data wassupplemented with <strong>the</strong> information available in<strong>the</strong> literature, <strong>and</strong> information was also collectedfrom local people <strong>and</strong> wildlife <strong>of</strong>ficials. Based onsightings <strong>and</strong> signs <strong>of</strong> mammals in <strong>the</strong> area, <strong>the</strong>irabundance was categorized as; rare, common,abundant.ResultsTwenty three species <strong>of</strong> mammals wererecorded from <strong>the</strong> Chagai Desert (Table 1).Among <strong>the</strong>se, 13 species belong to smallmammals <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> rest to <strong>the</strong> large mammals.One species, Canis lupus, is included in CITESAppendix I, two species in <strong>the</strong> Appendix II (Felismargarita, Vulpes cana), <strong>and</strong> two in AppendixIII (Canis aureus, Vulpes vulpes). One species,Gazella subgutterosa, is endangered, two datadeficit (Vulpes rueppelli, Vulpes cana), one isnear threatened (Felis margarita) while <strong>the</strong> restare lower risk species according to <strong>the</strong> IUCNconservation status. Based on <strong>the</strong> country’sconservation status, two species (Felis margarita,Gazella subgutterosa) are critically endangered,one (Canis lupus) endangered, three (Vulpesrueppelli, Gazella benitti, Lepus capensis)vulnerable <strong>and</strong> four (Vulpes vulpes, Vulpes cana,Gerbillus gleadowi, Rhombomys opimus,) arenear threatened (Table 1).The catch rates <strong>of</strong> small mammals in ChagaiDesert (Table 2), suggest that <strong>the</strong> Gerbillusgleadowi <strong>and</strong> Jaculus blanfordi were <strong>the</strong> mostabundant species with trapping success <strong>of</strong> 23.08<strong>and</strong> 18.46%, respectively, whereas Meriones

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!