GIFTED AND TALENTED STUDENTS: MEETING THEIR NEEDS IN NEW ZEALAND SCHOOLSSome important def<strong>in</strong>itions have affected attitudes to giftedness <strong>and</strong> talent over the last threedecades. Some of these are:The Marl<strong>and</strong> Report (1972)This report was presented to the United States Office of Education <strong>and</strong> had a significant impacton gifted education. It conta<strong>in</strong>ed the first truly multicategory def<strong>in</strong>ition.Renzulli (1978)Renzulli developed a def<strong>in</strong>ition of giftedness based on the <strong>in</strong>teraction between three basicclusters of human traits:• above average ability• a high level of task commitment• a high level of creativity.Renzulli <strong>and</strong> Reis (1985) claim that gifted <strong>and</strong> talented children “are those possess<strong>in</strong>g orcapable of develop<strong>in</strong>g this composite set of traits <strong>and</strong> apply<strong>in</strong>g them to any potentiallyvaluable area of human performance” (page 28).Furthermore, they emphasise that such children “require a wide variety of educationalopportunities <strong>and</strong> services that are not ord<strong>in</strong>arily provided through regular <strong>in</strong>structionalprograms” (page 28).Renzulli’s concept of giftedness is represented <strong>in</strong> the diagram below:AboveaverageabilityCreativityTaskcommitmentBrought to bear onGeneral performance arease.g. MathsSocial sciencesLanguagesMusicSpecific performance arease.g. Film mak<strong>in</strong>gElectronicsCity plann<strong>in</strong>gSculptureRENZULLI’S CONCEPT OF GIFTEDNESSThe <strong>New</strong> Zeal<strong>and</strong> Department of Education (1986)In 1986, the <strong>New</strong> Zeal<strong>and</strong> Department of Education published a draft policy statement forchildren with special abilities, which was very similar to the Marl<strong>and</strong> Report. It suggested thatteachers exam<strong>in</strong>e a wide range of areas, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g:• specific academic, technical, or mechanical aptitude <strong>and</strong> achievement;• creative, productive, or <strong>in</strong>tuitive th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g;• cultural arts: verbal, visual, perform<strong>in</strong>g;• general <strong>in</strong>telligence;14
PART ONE: DEFINITIONS, CHARACTERISTICS, AND IDENTIFICATION• psychomotor skills;• cultural traditions, values, <strong>and</strong> ethics;• social skills <strong>and</strong> leadership;• aesthetics.The Javits <strong>Gifted</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Talented</strong> Act (1988) <strong>and</strong> the United States Offi ce of Educational Research <strong>and</strong> ImprovementReport on National Excellence <strong>and</strong> Develop<strong>in</strong>g Talent (1993)The Javits Act, <strong>in</strong> the United States, def<strong>in</strong>ed gifted <strong>and</strong> talented students as those who giveevidence of high-performance capability <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tellectual, creative, artistic, leadership, or specificacademic fields <strong>and</strong> who require programmes not ord<strong>in</strong>arily provided by the school <strong>in</strong> order tofully develop such capabilities.While there is little new here, Javits began to push for giftedness <strong>and</strong> talent as a “naturalresource vital to the nation’s future” that is, for the concept of national talent. This trendwas taken up more vigorously by a Javits advisory panel <strong>and</strong> by the US Office of EducationalResearch <strong>and</strong> Improvement, which produced a report entitled National Excellence <strong>and</strong>Develop<strong>in</strong>g Talent (1993). The report dropped the term “gifted” <strong>in</strong> favour of “exceptionaltalent”. It emphasised the need to identify talent <strong>in</strong> students across all cultural groups <strong>and</strong>socioeconomic strata <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> all areas of human endeavour. It also stated that supply<strong>in</strong>g rich<strong>and</strong> varied learn<strong>in</strong>g experiences is a productive way of encourag<strong>in</strong>g talent development.National Excellence <strong>in</strong>to Practice: Suggestions to Schools1. Seek variety <strong>in</strong> the range of abilities of talented students.2. Enable equality of opportunity <strong>and</strong> access to provisions free from cultural <strong>and</strong> otherbiases.3. Identify potential as well as demonstrated achievement.4. Use a variety of assessment procedures for identify<strong>in</strong>g students with exceptionaltalents.5. Assess the motivation of learners so as to take account of the drive <strong>and</strong> passion whichplays a key role <strong>in</strong> accomplishments.(United States Office of Educational Research <strong>and</strong> Improvement, 1993)The Differentiation of <strong>Gifted</strong>ness <strong>and</strong> TalentOften the terms “gifted” <strong>and</strong> “talented” are jo<strong>in</strong>ed together as “gifted <strong>and</strong> talented”.Sometimes the term “G/T” is used to express this s<strong>in</strong>gle-concept approach. Where the termis differentiated, giftedness is usually associated with high <strong>in</strong>telligence or aptitude, whereastalent is usually related to a high level of performance <strong>in</strong> such areas as music, art, craft, dance,or sport.Gagné (1996) has argued consistently, however, for differentiat<strong>in</strong>g the two terms by claim<strong>in</strong>gthat giftedness relates more to aptitude doma<strong>in</strong>s (<strong>in</strong>tellectual, creative, socioaffective,perceptual/motor) while talent is associated more with outst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g achievements <strong>in</strong> avariety of fields of human endeavour (academic, technical, artistic, <strong>in</strong>terpersonal, <strong>and</strong>athletic fields).15
- Page 1 and 2: Gifted and Talented StudentsMeeting
- Page 3 and 4: GIFTED AND TALENTED STUDENTS: MEETI
- Page 5 and 6: ForewordGifted and Talented Student
- Page 7 and 8: INTRODUCTIONNew Zealand teachers ar
- Page 9 and 10: GETTING STARTEDMany schools have di
- Page 11 and 12: GETTING STARTEDtheir skills should
- Page 13: PART ONE: DEFINITIONS, CHARACTERIST
- Page 17 and 18: PART ONE: DEFINITIONS, CHARACTERIST
- Page 19 and 20: PART ONE: DEFINITIONS, CHARACTERIST
- Page 21 and 22: PART ONE: DEFINITIONS, CHARACTERIST
- Page 23 and 24: PART ONE: DEFINITIONS, CHARACTERIST
- Page 25 and 26: PART ONE: DEFINITIONS, CHARACTERIST
- Page 27 and 28: PART ONE: DEFINITIONS, CHARACTERIST
- Page 29 and 30: PART ONE: DEFINITIONS, CHARACTERIST
- Page 31 and 32: PART ONE: DEFINITIONS, CHARACTERIST
- Page 33 and 34: PART ONE: DEFINITIONS, CHARACTERIST
- Page 35 and 36: PART TWO: PROGRAMME DEVELOPMENT AND
- Page 37 and 38: PART TWO: PROGRAMME DEVELOPMENT AND
- Page 39 and 40: PART TWO: PROGRAMME DEVELOPMENT AND
- Page 41 and 42: PART TWO: PROGRAMME DEVELOPMENT AND
- Page 43 and 44: PART TWO: PROGRAMME DEVELOPMENT AND
- Page 45 and 46: PART TWO: PROGRAMME DEVELOPMENT AND
- Page 47 and 48: PART TWO: PROGRAMME DEVELOPMENT AND
- Page 49 and 50: PART TWO: PROGRAMME DEVELOPMENT AND
- Page 51 and 52: PART TWO: PROGRAMME DEVELOPMENT AND
- Page 53 and 54: PART TWO: PROGRAMME DEVELOPMENT AND
- Page 55 and 56: PART TWO: PROGRAMME DEVELOPMENT AND
- Page 57 and 58: PART TWO: PROGRAMME DEVELOPMENT AND
- Page 59 and 60: RECOMMENDED READINGSRecommended Rea
- Page 61 and 62: REFERENCESAdditional Recommended Re
- Page 63 and 64: REFERENCESHigh Ability StudiesThe o
- Page 65 and 66:
REFERENCESKrathwohl, D. R., Bloom,