11.07.2015 Views

annual report 2009 - Aer Lingus

annual report 2009 - Aer Lingus

annual report 2009 - Aer Lingus

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Directors’ Report <strong>Aer</strong> <strong>Lingus</strong> Group Plc – Annual Report <strong>2009</strong>29Events after the <strong>report</strong>ing dateIn October <strong>2009</strong>, the Group launched its Cost ReductionProgramme (“Greenfield”), which targeted <strong>annual</strong>ised cost savingsof approximately €97m over the period to 2012. On 5 March 2010,the Group was notified that the Greenfield proposals were rejectedin a staff ballot of cabin crew represented by IMPACT. The Groupwas separately notified that the four other staff ballots conductedby Pilots (IALPA), Middle Management (IAESA), SIPTU (GroundOperations/Support areas/certain cabin crew) and MaintenanceStaff (Craft Union) had supported the Greenfield proposals. On9 March 2010, the Group announced that it would immediatelycommence the implementation of those elements of the Greenfieldprogramme that were agreed with the four union groups thatsupported the proposals. On 26 March 2010 the Group was notifiedthat the Greenfield proposals were supported in a re-ballot of cabincrew staff represented by IMPACT. The Group then commenced theimplementation of the Greenfield programme with cabin crew staff.In April 2010, a volcanic eruption in Iceland caused severe disruptionto European air traffic and caused the cancellation of more than 1,500<strong>Aer</strong> <strong>Lingus</strong> flights. The current estimate of the impact on the Group’sprofits is approximately €20 million but the long-term impact oncustomer confidence is unclear.In April 2010, the Group entered into a finance lease arrangementfor the purchase of an Airbus A330 aircraft, resulting in an increasein finance lease obligations of €58.5m.Financial risk managementDetails regarding financial risk management are set out at Note 3to the consolidated financial statements.Corporate governance statement – year ended31 December <strong>2009</strong>The Report of the Remuneration Committee on Directors’Remuneration is set out on pages 38 to 42. The Directors’ CorporateSocial Responsibility Statement is set out on pages 13 to 25.The Company is committed to maintaining the highest standards ofcorporate governance and the Directors recognise their accountabilityto the Company’s shareholders in this regard. This statement describeshow the principles of section 1 of the Combined Code on CorporateGovernance (June 2008) published by the Financial ReportingCouncil in the UK have been applied by the Company in the year.A copy of the Combined Code can be obtained from the FinancialReporting Council’s website, www.frc.org.uk.Statement of complianceExcept as disclosed below, the Directors consider that the Companyhas complied with all relevant provisions of the 2008 FRC CombinedCode throughout the year and the Company intends to continuedoing so in the future.• Rotation of directors: The Minister for Transport of Ireland(acting through the Minister for Finance of Ireland in his capacityas shareholder) and the ESOT each have specific rights under theCompany’s Articles of Association in relation to the nominationand rotation of Directors. These rights may not comply with therequirement under the Combined Code that the AppointmentsCommittee lead the process for Board appointments and makerecommendations to the Board regarding Board appointmentsand the requirement under the Combined Code that all Directorsbe submitted for re-election at regular intervals.• Composition of the Board and independence: As part of thearrangements entered into by the Minister for Finance of Irelandin 2003 in respect of the Company and as part of the arrangementsput in place immediately prior to the flotation of the Company in2006, it was provided in the Company’s Articles of Association thatthe Minister for Transport of Ireland would be entitled to nominatefor appointment up to three Directors on the basis set out in theInitial Public Offering Prospectus and that the ESOT would beentitled to nominate for appointment up to two Directors onthe basis set out in the Initial Public Offering Prospectus. At timesduring <strong>2009</strong>, at least half the Board, excluding the Chairman didnot comprise non-executive Directors determined by the Boardto be independent. Under the Company’s Articles of Association,the maximum number of Directors is set at fifteen. Throughoutmost of <strong>2009</strong> a total of five Directors were nominated by eitherthe Minister for Transport of Ireland or by the ESOT (these fiveDirectors represent the full nomination entitlement of three andtwo Directors, respectively of these two shareholders). Thesefive non-executive Directors were not considered independent.Similarly, throughout much of <strong>2009</strong>, there were two executiveDirectors on the Board (the Chief Executive and the ChiefFinancial Officer) neither of whom is considered independent.Therefore seven Directors out of a possible maximum of fifteenwere not considered independent. Accordingly, as the independentnon-executive Chairman is excluded from the calculation, asingle appointment to or resignation from the Board can causenon-compliance with this particular requirement under theCombined Code. The Company was in full compliance with thisCombined Code requirement in the period from 6 March <strong>2009</strong>to 13 September <strong>2009</strong>. Due to changes in Board composition on31 December <strong>2009</strong> and since the year end, as at 28 April 2010the Company is in full compliance with this Combined Coderequirement. It is the Company’s intention to continue to reviewthe composition of the Board to endeavour to continue tocomply with this requirement.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!