RUNNING HEAD: The IAT in Consumer Behavior - Wharton Marketing

The IAT in Consumer Behavior 35Mick, D. G. (1996). Are studies of dark side variables confounded by socially desirableresponding? The case of materialism. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(2), 106-119.Mowen, J. C., & Spears, N. (1999). Understanding compulsive buying among collegestudents: A hierarchical approach. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(4), 407-430.Netemeyer, R. G., Burton, S., & Lichtenstein, D. R. (1995). Trait aspects of vanity:Measurement and relevance to consumer behavior. Journal of ConsumerResearch, 21(4), 612-626.Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Harvesting implicit groupattitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site. Group Dynamics, 6(1), 101-115.Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2004). Math - Male, M = Female,therefore Math does not equal Me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,83(1), 44-59.Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2004). Understanding and using theImplicit Association Test: II. Methodological issues. Working Paper.Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2005). The Implicit Association Testat age 7: A methodological and conceptual review. In J. A. Bargh (Ed.),Automatic processes in social thinking and behavior: Psychology Press.Nosek, B. A., & Smyth, F. L. (2005). A multitrait-multimethod validation of the ImplicitAssociation Test: Implicit and explicit attitudes are related but distinctconstructs.Unpublished manuscript.