asphaltNEWS - Southern Africa Bitumen Association
asphaltNEWS - Southern Africa Bitumen Association
asphaltNEWS - Southern Africa Bitumen Association
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
volume 25<br />
issue 1<br />
<strong>asphaltNEWS</strong><br />
April 2011
In this issue<br />
CEO comments 3<br />
Culmination of SA's WMA trials 4<br />
Local and International events 9<br />
Gravel roads - a thing of the past? 10<br />
Go for Gold gains industry recognition 11<br />
SAT plant for 2011 12<br />
SARF to head up CapCoR initiative 12<br />
Sabita's Outstanding Achievement award 2010 13<br />
AsAc and SARF join forces 14<br />
CAPSA'11 update 15<br />
Cover picture: WMA paving trials on the Higginson Highway<br />
Opposite: Paver at work during the Higginson Highway WMA trials<br />
Asphalt News is published by the <strong>Southern</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>n <strong>Bitumen</strong> <strong>Association</strong> (Sabita), a<br />
non-profit organisation sponsored by its members to serve all stakeholders through<br />
engineering, service and education.<br />
No articles, extracts, photographs or other elements of this publication<br />
may be reproduced in any form whatsoever without the written permission<br />
of the <strong>Southern</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>n <strong>Bitumen</strong> <strong>Association</strong><br />
Editorial board: John Fensham and Jeanette Nichol<br />
Effects of cement in bitumen emulsion slurries 16<br />
Reducing the bitumen industry's carbon footprint 20<br />
Much Asphalt commissions recycling plant 22<br />
BitCert certificates presented 23<br />
Sabita supports contractor recognition scheme 25<br />
<strong>Bitumen</strong> emulsions in 2010 - a watershed year 27<br />
Revised Sabita manuals issued in CD format 28<br />
Sabita publications 29<br />
Sabita members 29
A<br />
record 445 000t of bitumen was consumed in South <strong>Africa</strong><br />
during 2010, showing an increase of some 10% on 2009.<br />
Government’s recently announced billions in future<br />
infrastructure spend bodes well for the industry, although<br />
the challenge to unlock funds in a manner that enables consistent<br />
demand over at least a 3 year cycle still appears illusive.<br />
A recent development of framework agreements by the CIDB,<br />
endorsed by Treasury, is a step in the right direction to deal with<br />
this tough nettle and as such is worth pursuing.<br />
Council activity<br />
We have a change of faces on Council with the departure of Hugues de Champs and Gary Catin, both of<br />
whom served Sabita ably during their tenure, we are grateful for their contribution. As we say good bye to<br />
them, we warmly welcome their replacements, Rocco Lehman of Rand Roads and Thierry Madelon of<br />
Colas SA, who no doubt will bring fresh perspectives to Council deliberations.<br />
The Sabita Award for Excellence was presented to Arthur Taute for his many years of unstinting service to<br />
the industry, and to Sabita as chairman of the Technology Development Focal Point. He was also<br />
prominent in canvassing the consulting engineering sector on Sabita’s behalf, resulting in a significant rise<br />
in the number these companies on our membership list. Congratulations Arthur, and Sabita thanks you.<br />
Asphalt Academy (AsAc)<br />
The AsAc/SARF alliance kicks off with the announcement that all Continuing Professional Development<br />
courses at NQF level 5 and above, previously run by AsAc, will now be run jointly under the management<br />
of SARF. AsAc will also provide inputs into some of the relevant SARF courses, and the two organisations<br />
will work together to develop new courses in line with the needs of industry.<br />
Technology development<br />
Work has started on the asphalt mix design manual, with the objective to update the South <strong>Africa</strong>n<br />
guidelines for the design of premixed asphalt based on the latest available technology. These guidelines<br />
will be linked to structural pavement design methods with the intent to compile a national standard<br />
specification for asphalt. We should also see the completion of Phase 2 of the HiMA project within the<br />
next few weeks.<br />
Environmental legislation<br />
The newly promulgated Air Quality Act (39 of 2004) came into effect on 1 April 2010, and was derived<br />
from the Air Prevention Pollution Act (1946) and similar legislative processes and procedures currently<br />
being implemented in Europe. The intention of the legislative authorities is to keep up with changes in the<br />
industry and to amend legislation that will facilitate and encourage the incorporation of new,<br />
environmentally-friendly technology.<br />
Discussions have been held with the Department of Environmental Affairs to deal with matters specific to<br />
the asphalt industry. This resulted in the compilation of a comprehensive report (see Sabita’s website) to<br />
serve as a guideline for use by the asphalt production industry in obtaining environmental authorisation,<br />
and to enlighten the environmental authorities on the history and operational cycles of the asphalt<br />
production industry in South <strong>Africa</strong>.<br />
Future greenhouse gas legislation is being developed, and is set to take on the form of a proposed carbon<br />
tax. A report (see Sabita’s website) on this legislation has been commissioned to gain an understanding of<br />
the the implications for the asphalt industry and the strategies which may be applied to reduce the carbon<br />
intensity of operations.<br />
33 3<br />
CEO's comments<br />
2010 lays the groundwork from which<br />
Sabita can move forward<br />
Sabita CEO Saied Solomons
Culmination of South <strong>Africa</strong>’s warm<br />
mix asphalt trials a huge success<br />
As reported in previous issues of <strong>asphaltNEWS</strong>, strenuous efforts have been made over the past two years to<br />
gather sufficient know-how for warm mix asphalt (WMA) to be implemented in South <strong>Africa</strong>.<br />
The use of WMA, whereby asphalt is manufactured and paved at significantly lower temperatures, is accelerating<br />
rapidly around the world, driven strongly by factors such as significant reductions in greenhouse gases, much<br />
improved working conditions, as well as reduced fuel and energy usage. Other spinoffs include improved<br />
compactibility and the ability to haul WMA over longer distances compared to HMA.<br />
The first WMA trial in RSA was undertaken during November 2008, and the second trial in May and June 2009.<br />
This work culminated in the completion of the final and most extensive WMA trial on Durban’s Higginson<br />
Highway over a period of nine months during 2010. Preparation work commenced with the initial laboratory mix<br />
designs in April, full-scale plant mix trials in May, June and July, with the main trials undertaken from 25 October<br />
to 8 December 2010.<br />
The trials, which cover a 3,4 km length of the outbound carriageway and include ten base and eight surfacing mixes,<br />
are undoubtedly the largest of their kind ever carried out in South <strong>Africa</strong>; the total quantity of mix paved in the<br />
plant mix and main trials amounted to approximately 15 000 tons.<br />
With both the previous trials having shown that WMA can be successfully manufactured and paved at temperatures<br />
at least 20 o C below those of conventional asphalt, the intention of the Higginson Highway trials was to push the<br />
boundaries by:<br />
• reducing temperatures further;<br />
• increasing reclaimed asphalt (RA) contents;<br />
• using polymer modified binders; and<br />
• achieving quality and performance characteristics equal to conventional HMA.<br />
These trials also provided the opportunity to manufacture and pave both base and surfacing mixes.<br />
Managing the trials<br />
In the same way as in the previous trials, decisions regarding the scope of the trials, as well as the management of<br />
the work throughout the trials, were directed by the WMA Interest Group, comprising representatives of eThekwini<br />
Municipality, road authorities, asphalt suppliers, contractors, technology suppliers, consultants, as well as Sabita<br />
and SARF. Agreement was reached for a temperature reduction of at least 30 o C for mixes using conventional<br />
bitumen and 20 o C for mixing using polymer modified binders.<br />
Site selection and investigation<br />
The section selected for the trial is situated on<br />
the outbound (West bound) carriageway<br />
between the interchanges at 42nd Avenue<br />
(M20 Pelican Drive) and Chatsworth<br />
Circle/Shallcross Road 337, a distance of<br />
approximately 3,5 kilometres. The<br />
carriageway consists of two traffic lanes with<br />
the total width of about 7,4 metres.<br />
Based on the full rehabilitation investigation<br />
carried out on the section, the rehabilitation<br />
strategy decided upon was to mill out most of<br />
the two upper layers of aged, cracked asphalt<br />
from the existing pavement, and to pave an<br />
80mm thick asphalt base and an asphalt<br />
surfacing with a thickness of 50mm. A 25mm<br />
to 30mm asphalt leveling course was paved<br />
on the exposed milled surface before<br />
5 4<br />
Tony Lewis, Tony Lewis Consulting cc<br />
The paving and monitoring team for the Higginson<br />
Highway trials
proceeding with the asphalt base and surfacing layers. This project therefore provided an ideal test bed for the<br />
WMA trials, with an opportunity to include both asphalt base and surfacing mixes in the trials.<br />
Selection of basic mix design and WMA technologies<br />
For the asphalt surfacing mixes the same grading requirements as in the previous WMA trials were used, i.e.<br />
eThekwini Municipality’s Mix “D”, which is similar to that of the COLTO “medium” continuously graded asphalt<br />
surfacing mix. In the case of the asphalt base, agreement was reached to use eThekwini’s Mix “B”, a continuously<br />
graded asphalt base mix with 100% passing the 26,5 mm sieve size.<br />
The Sasobit® technology of Sasol Wax, which had been used previously in both previous WMA trials, was used<br />
again in one of the surfacing mixes. Rediset WMX®, a product of Akzo Nobel, used for the first time in RSA in the<br />
Leicester Road WMA trials, was used in one of the surfacing mixes by itself, and in combination with a plastomer<br />
(EVA) in two of the asphalt base mixes. A product of Sasol Wax not used in the previous trials, SasolWax Flex,<br />
which acts as both a WMA technology and as an elastomer, was used in both surfacing and base mixes.<br />
During the initial design stage of the trials it was found that softer, 150/200 penetration grade bitumen was required<br />
in the 40% RA mixes to achieve acceptable recovered binder properties. Readily available 80/100 penetration grade<br />
bitumen was treated with a Sasol Wax product known as SasolWax Exp 1655, a high performance modifier<br />
designed for high RA applications. Another WMA technology, NA Foamtec, was used for the first time in South<br />
<strong>Africa</strong>, in both surfacing and base mixes. This foamed bitumen technology was developed locally by National<br />
Asphalt and was used in a surfacing mix with penetration grade bitumen and with a plastomer (EVA) modified<br />
binder in one of the base mixes.<br />
Raw materials<br />
Aggregate, sand, and filler: The aggregate was sourced from two quarries, and an active filler, consisting of 1%<br />
hydrated lime, was used in all the mixes, including “warm” and “control” mixes, for both base and surfacing.<br />
Reclaimed asphalt (RA): RA sourced from various projects in the eThekwini Metro, was used in the trial mixes.<br />
Regular grading and binder content testing was carried out; an average 4,4% binder content was obtained on the<br />
coarser fraction while that of the finer fraction was higher, at 5,6%. Recovered binder property testing showed the<br />
penetration of the RA to be in a narrow range of 5 - 6 pen, with R&B softening points of around 84 o C. The results<br />
therefore indicate that the binder in the RA is significantly age hardened. This obviously has to be taken into<br />
account at mix design stage, particularly when designing mixes with high RA contents.<br />
Laboratory mix designs<br />
In brief summary, the Bailey Method was used to optimise the volumetric properties of the mix, with three mixes<br />
with different aggregate/RA grading blends being manufactured and compacted at conventional temperatures. The<br />
blend that produced the most satisfactory volumetric properties was selected for further testing. These designs are<br />
regarded as the “control” mix designs.<br />
The same aggregate blends and RA were used in the manufacture of the “warm” mixes. In these cases the mixes<br />
were manufactured at three different temperatures; 20 o C, 25 o C, and 30 o C, respectively, below conventional<br />
mixing temperatures.<br />
It should be noted that it was not possible to carry out laboratory mixes using the NA Foamtec WMA technology,<br />
and instead full-scale plant mixes, where the binder content was purposely varied so as to determine the optimum<br />
binder content of the mixes, were undertaken.<br />
Plant mix trials stage<br />
The plant mix trials were regarded as the second essential step in the trials; by mixing and paving a substantial<br />
quantity of each mix it was possible to verify the laboratory mix design. Importantly, the plant mix trials provided<br />
the opportunity to gain experience in adjusting the mixing plant to achieve the required reductions in temperature.<br />
Once the results of the various plant mix trials had been assessed and found to be satisfactory they were accepted<br />
for use in the main trials on Higginson Highway.<br />
5
Manufacturing and paving the main trials<br />
Paving site preparations: The preparation work consisted essentially of milling out approximately 100mm of the<br />
existing asphalt and paving a 25mm to 30mm levelling course. The levelling course provided an ideal, smooth surface<br />
on which to place the grid. Before paving of the base layer trials, Glasgrid strips were laid out and rolled with a<br />
pneumatic tyred roller. The pressure sensitive adhesive on the lower side of the grid ensures that it adheres to the<br />
asphalt surface under the action of the roller tyres. The tack coat was applied to cover the full width of the lane before<br />
paving the base layer.<br />
Transporting the mix to the paving site: Transportation of the various asphalt mixes from National Asphalt’s<br />
mixing plant to the paving sites, for both the plant mix trials and the main trials on Higginson Highway, was carried<br />
out by means of tip trucks with load capacities ranging from 7 tons to 16 tons. The trucks’ load bins were sprayed<br />
with Sasolwax BituGlide, a releasing agent, before they were filled with asphalt. Canvas tarpaulins covers were<br />
used to reduce temperature loss during transportation.<br />
Trial findings<br />
Mix temperatures: Tables 1 (base mixes) and 2 (surfacing mixes) describe the various parameters used in the trials.<br />
Also shown are the RA contents used in the trial mixes.<br />
The temperature limits mandated by the WMA Interest Group are detailed in these tables; the higher temperatures<br />
required for the “control” mixes relative to the “warm” mixes are evident. The significantly higher temperature<br />
requirements for the polymer modified mixes, compared to those of the mixes where unmodified bitumen was used,<br />
should also be noted.<br />
For ease of access, the results of compaction tests carried out on the trial sections are recorded in Tables 1 and 2. As<br />
can be seen, the minimum 92% of voidless density requirement was easily achieved in all the trial mixes.<br />
Table 1. Temperature limits applied to the base mixes<br />
Mix<br />
No.<br />
Description<br />
Asphalt base<br />
Mix<br />
type<br />
Temperature limits ( o C) Actual<br />
field<br />
compaction<br />
Manufacturing Arrival on<br />
site<br />
Compaction<br />
(% of<br />
voidless<br />
density)<br />
92% min.<br />
B9 Mix B (40/50 Pen, no RA) Control 155-165 150-160 140-145 96,6<br />
Mix containing 10% RA<br />
B3 Mix B A-E2 Control 165-175 160-170 142-147 96,9<br />
B4 Mix B A-P1 mixes 165-175 160-170 142-147 97,3<br />
B1<br />
Mix B A-E2 (SasolWax Flex) 60/70<br />
pen<br />
"Warm"<br />
140-150 130-140 120-130 96,1<br />
B2 Mix V A P-1 + Rediset® 60/70 pen mixes 140-150 130-140 120-130 95,7<br />
B10 Mix B A P-1 Foamtec 60/70 pen 140-150 130-140 120-130 94,4<br />
Polymer modified mixes containing 40% RA<br />
B8 Mix B A-E2 80/100 pen + EXP Control 165-175 160-170 142-147 94,9<br />
B5 Mix B A-P1 80/100 pen + EXP mixes 165-175 160-170 142-147 96,8<br />
B6<br />
B7<br />
Mix B A-E2 (SasolWax Flex) 80/100<br />
pen "Warm"<br />
Mix B A-P1 + RedisetWMA® 80/100<br />
pen + EXP<br />
mixes<br />
140-150 130-140 120-130 96,0<br />
140-150 130-140 120-130 95,5<br />
During the course of the trials the mix temperatures were taken in each truck at the weighbridge, with temperature<br />
requirements at the midpoint of the manufacturing ranges for control and “warm”mixes. The goals set for reduced<br />
temperatures were successfully achieved and in fact substantially exceeded.<br />
6
Table 2. Temperature limits applied to surfacing mixes<br />
Mix<br />
No.<br />
Description<br />
Asphalt surfacing<br />
Mix<br />
type<br />
Mix containing 10% RA<br />
Temperature limits ( o C) Actual<br />
field<br />
compaction<br />
Manufacturing Arrival on<br />
site<br />
Compaction<br />
(% of<br />
voidless<br />
density)<br />
92% min.<br />
S6 Mix D 60/70 RA Control 155-165 145-155 135-145 94,9<br />
S2 Mix D Sasobit® 60/70 pen mixes 120-130 110-120 100-110 95,2<br />
S3 Mix D RedisetWMX® 60/70 pen "Warm" 120-130 110-120 100-110 93,6<br />
S7 Mix D Foamtec 60/70 pen mixes 120-130 110-120 100-110 93,4<br />
Polymer modified mixes containing 20% RA<br />
S4 Mix D A-P1 80/100 pen Control 165-175 160-170 142-147 93,7<br />
S5 Mix D A-E2 80/100 pen mixes 165-175 160-170 142-147 94,4<br />
S8<br />
S9<br />
Mix D A-E2 (SasolWax Flex) 80/100<br />
pen "Warm"<br />
Mix D A-P1 + RedisetWMX® 80/100<br />
pen<br />
In summary :<br />
mixes<br />
140-150 130-140 120-130 95,0<br />
140-150 130-140 120-130 94,8<br />
• Base mixes:<br />
All the “warm” mixes were paved at average temperatures approximately 35 o C below the mid value of the<br />
“control” mix manufacturing temperature range, and about 25 o C below the average temperatures at which<br />
the “control” mixes were paved. This includes the mixes containing 40% RA.<br />
• Surfacing mixes:<br />
o Mixes using unmodified bitumen: Temperature reduction of around 35 o C was achieved.<br />
o Mixes containing polymer modified binder: Approximately 30 o C reduction in temperature between mid<br />
value of the “control” mix manufacturing temperature range, and about 20 o C between actual “control” and<br />
“warm” mix manufacturing temperatures is evident.<br />
Comparison of some engineering properties of “warm” and “control” mixes<br />
One of the main aims of these trials was to establish whether the engineering properties of WMA are at least as good<br />
as those of similar, conventional HMA mixes. This evaluation can be undertaken by comparing WMA and HMA<br />
results of the following test parameters, summarised in Tables 3 and 4:<br />
• resilient modulus;<br />
• dynamic creep;<br />
• indirect tensile strength (ITS); and<br />
• MMLS rutting.<br />
An examination of the results in these tables shows that the “warm” mixes perform at least as well as the “control’<br />
mixes, and the effect that polymer modification of the binder has in stiffening the mixes is clearly evident.<br />
It should be noted that at the time of writing the results of the stiffness and fatigue testing on beam samples was not<br />
yet available; these results will no doubt add a useful additional dimension to the trial findings.<br />
7<br />
8
Table 3. Summary of some of the engineering properties of the base trial mixes<br />
Mix<br />
No.<br />
Description<br />
Asphalt base<br />
ITS<br />
(kPa)<br />
Gyratory<br />
voids (%)<br />
Dynamic<br />
creep<br />
(MPa)<br />
Resilient<br />
modulus<br />
(MPa)<br />
MMLS<br />
rutting<br />
(mm)<br />
B89 Mix B (40/50 Pen, no RA) 1157 0,8 42,4 4651 2,0<br />
Mix containing 10% RA<br />
B3 Mix B A-E2 1289 2,1 38,2 7744 1,0<br />
B4 Mix B A-P1 1575 2,5 47,9 7744 1,2<br />
B1<br />
Mix B A-E2 (SasolWax Flex) 60/70<br />
pen<br />
1167 2,6 42,0 5010 1,8<br />
B2 Mix V A P-1 + Rediset® 60/70 pen 1261 2,0 54,3 4713 1,4<br />
B10 Mix B A P-1 Foamtec 60/70 pen 1727 5,9 49,0 3875 1,0<br />
Polymer modified mixes containing 40% RA<br />
B8 Mix B A-E2 80/100 pen + EXP 1830 1,0 36,8 8684 1,3<br />
B5 Mix B A-P1 80/100 pen + EXP 1990 1,2 49,2 8602 0,9<br />
B6<br />
B7<br />
Mix B A-E2 (SasolWax Flex) 80/100<br />
pen<br />
Mix B A-P1 + RedisetWMA® 80/100<br />
pen + EXP<br />
Table 4. Summary of some engineering properties of the surfacing trial mixes<br />
Mix<br />
No.<br />
Description<br />
1586 1,5 41,0 6101 1,4<br />
1454 2,0 43,2 6566 0,9<br />
Asphalt surfacing<br />
ITS<br />
(kPa)<br />
Gyratory<br />
voids (%)<br />
Mix containing 10% RA<br />
Dynamic<br />
creep<br />
(MPa)<br />
Resilient<br />
modulus<br />
(MPa)<br />
MMLS<br />
rutting<br />
(mm)<br />
S6 Mix D 60/70 RA 1365 2,5 36,2 4747 2,1<br />
S2 Mix D Sasobit® 60/70 pen 1032 4,5 33,6 3772 1,6<br />
S3 Mix D RedisetWMX® 60/70 pen 1143 2,7 27,3 2590 1,8<br />
S7 Mix D Foamtec 60/70 pen 1030 3,5 36,9 3820 1,5<br />
Polymer modified mixes containing 20% RA<br />
S4 Mix D A-P1 80/100 pen 1322 3,5 51,1 5020 0,7<br />
S5 Mix D A-E2 80/100 pen 1423 2,3 31,7 4428 1,2<br />
S8<br />
S9<br />
Mix D A-E2 (SasolWax Flex) 80/100<br />
pen<br />
Mix D A-P1 + RedisetWMX® 80/100<br />
pen<br />
Conclusions<br />
1547 2,0 54,0 4855 1,6<br />
1168 1,3 50,5 4744 1,0<br />
The information and practical experience gained from the Higginson Highway trials is the culmination of all three<br />
WMA trials undertaken in the Durban area over the past two years. During this time confidence has been gained that:<br />
• all the WMA mixes included in these trials have performed well against the fundamental requirement of being<br />
at least as good as conventional HMA;<br />
• a variety of asphalt mixes can be manufactured and paved at significantly lower temperatures, with potential<br />
burner fuel savings, as well as reduced emissions, fumes and odours that result in healthier working conditions;<br />
8
• “warm” technologies can be combined with recycled asphalt at contents of up to 40%. This not only results in<br />
the environmentally-friendly practice of reusing the old asphalt, but also in real savings as significantly less<br />
new aggregate and bitumen has to be used in the recycled mixes;<br />
• combining WMA technologies with conventional polymers and reclaimed asphalt works well.<br />
• there is convincing evidence that WMA should be considered as a standard specified option for all pavement<br />
classes.<br />
The way forward<br />
The following recommendations are made regarding the way forward:<br />
• Reduce manufacturing and paving temperatures further, while taking into consideration practical limitations<br />
such as weather conditions, haulage distance, as well as paving quality control and crew skill level;<br />
• Monitor cost benefits due to reductions in burner fuel consumption when WMA is used on full-scale projects;<br />
• Optimise the design of the mix, based on each specific WMA technology;<br />
• Utilise the information gained from these trials, together with that gained from work in other countries where<br />
WMA is used, in the compilation of a national guideline and specification.<br />
The resounding success of this project was no doubt the result of excellent cooperation and teamwork between all<br />
parties involved in the trials.<br />
Local events 2011<br />
SAT <strong>Southern</strong> Region cocktail hour (Presentation on<br />
WMA)<br />
7 April (Date may change)<br />
SAT <strong>Southern</strong> Region seminar (Bituminous binders for<br />
road construction)<br />
14 April (Date may change)<br />
Road Pavements Forum<br />
10 - 11 May, Villa Via Hotel, Gordons Bay<br />
SAT <strong>Southern</strong> Region seminar (Plant types and asphalt<br />
transport)<br />
19 May (Date may change)<br />
SARF Road Safety Conference<br />
7 - 8 June CSIR Pretoria<br />
CAPSA'11 Exco and Steering Committee meetings<br />
8 June<br />
SATC 2011<br />
11 - 14 July, CSIR, Pretoria<br />
Sabita Council meeting<br />
21 July, Cape Town<br />
SAT <strong>Southern</strong> Region seminar (Asphalt paving)<br />
28 July (Date may change)<br />
CAPSA'11<br />
11 - 14 September, Drakensberg, South <strong>Africa</strong><br />
SAT <strong>Southern</strong> Region seminar (Testing and testing<br />
procedures)<br />
20 October (Date may change)<br />
Road Pavements Forum<br />
8 - 9 November, CSIR, Pretoria<br />
Sabita Board and Council meeting<br />
9 November (after the RPF)<br />
Local and international events<br />
9<br />
International events 2011<br />
Road Asset Management (PIARC)<br />
4 - 6 April, Swakopmund, Namibia<br />
2 nd Middle East <strong>Bitumen</strong> 2011<br />
2 - 5 May, Dubai<br />
Mexican Asphalt Conference (AMAAC)<br />
4 - 6 May, Mexico<br />
ARRB 3 rd international surface friction conference<br />
15 - 18 May, Gold Coast, Queensland<br />
5 th International conference (ICONFBMP)<br />
2 - 3 June, Thessaloniki, Greece<br />
10 th International conference on low volume roads<br />
24 - 27 July, Orlando, Florida, USA<br />
14 th AAPA International Flexible Pavements<br />
Conference<br />
25 - 28 September, Sydney, Australia<br />
24 th PIARC World Road Congress<br />
26 - 30 September, Mexico<br />
2 nd International Conference on WMA<br />
11 - 13 October, St Louis, Missouri, USA<br />
International Events 2012<br />
TRA 2012<br />
23 - 26 April, Athens, Greece<br />
5 th Eurasphalt & Eurobitume Congress<br />
13 - 15 June, Istanbul, Turkey<br />
7th RILEM International Conference on<br />
cracking in pavements<br />
20 - 22 June, Delft, Netherlands<br />
ISAET<br />
9 - 12 October, Crystal City, Virginia, USA
Gravel roads - a thing of the past?<br />
A<br />
report by Don Ross (University of Cape Town’s School of Economics) and Kim Field (Department of<br />
Finance, University of Alabama at Birmingham), commissioned by Sabita and entitled South <strong>Africa</strong>n road<br />
surfacing policy, international oil price changes, and the shadow pricing of costs and benefits, concludes that<br />
South <strong>Africa</strong>’s policy of maintaining gravel roads cannot be supported or sustained.<br />
The report also notes that in the current climate of “infrastructure push” and increased funding, the administrative<br />
structures to facilitate a coordinated, dynamic optimisation of overall infrastructure expenditure do not exist.<br />
“Roads constitute the single largest component of the actual and planned infrastructure allocation, constituting<br />
roughly one-quarter of the budgeted expenditure through 2010. The budget of South <strong>Africa</strong>n National Roads Agency<br />
Ltd (SANRAL) has increased from R2,1billion in 2005-06 to a projected R11,5-billion in 2009-2010. Outside of this<br />
amount, R3-billion has been allocated toward rural roads through the Provincial Infrastructure Grant for the<br />
Expanded Public Works Programme (EPWP). National government has set aside an additional R9-billion for<br />
municipal transport, roads and precinct upgrading specifically relating to 2010. Municipalities and provinces spend<br />
further amounts on roads as aspects of integrated projects (e.g. port enhancements) funded separately. Finally,<br />
SANRAL raises funds from tolling and Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) schemes that are reinvested in roads. (BOT<br />
revenues alone are forecast to reach an eventual steady state of R20-billion.)<br />
“The point is that we will waste much of these resources if we are not strategic with their investment. As it progresses,<br />
the infrastructure push changes the background conditions against which national departments, provinces,<br />
municipalities and parastatal agencies plan and budget. Therefore, planning and budgeting practices need to adjust in a<br />
coordinated way, progressively and continuously. This is the main aspect of what economists mean by ‘dynamic optimisation’.<br />
Figure 1. South <strong>Africa</strong>'s provincial and municipal<br />
road network<br />
(Data source NDOT, 2001)<br />
This proportion of unsurfaced roads is higher than in other<br />
countries with per capita GDPs similar to SA’s. There are strong<br />
economic reasons for thinking that many of these roads, at least<br />
among those made with gravel rather than dirt, should be<br />
upgraded to bituminous pavement. Other gravel roads, and most<br />
dirt roads, should not presently be maintained at all except<br />
where a community is crucially dependent on them for basic<br />
mobility, or where a road can be entirely maintained by local<br />
labour with no public contribution beyond workers’ salaries.<br />
The detailed economic analysis, too lengthy to be included here,<br />
is summarised, with principal conclusions, as follows:<br />
High proportion unsurfaced<br />
The report notes that South <strong>Africa</strong>’s 18 000 km of<br />
national roads (that is, roads administered by<br />
SANRAL) are surfaced. However, 80% of the<br />
remaining 530 000 – 550 000 km of ‘proclaimed’<br />
(provincial and municipal) roads is unsurfaced.<br />
There are an additional 221 000 km of<br />
unproclaimed access roads, made of gravel or earth,<br />
not falling within the official maintenance<br />
responsibility of any tier of government. Figures 1<br />
and 2 provide a visual summary.<br />
• A substantially higher proportion of the price of gravel<br />
roads than of surfaced roads is driven by the petroleum price. As the petroleum price rises, the relative<br />
opportunity costs of gravel and surfaced roads should be expected to shift in favour of surfaced roads;<br />
• At present oil prices any gravel road that averages more than 10 km in haulage distance from nearest sources of<br />
adequate aggregate material should either be allowed to deteriorate and then be abandoned or, if worth<br />
maintaining, be sealed with a bitumen surface at its soonest scheduled maintenance point;<br />
10<br />
Figure 2. South <strong>Africa</strong>'s road surfaces<br />
(Data source NDOT, 2001)
• The specific figure cited in (2) will get smaller, at an accelerating rate, as the price of oil rises;<br />
• Barring a persistent surge in inflation beyond the official target of the Reserve Bank, an investment in a<br />
bitumen surface seal on any road that is worth maintaining at all for the sake of traffic volumes (see below)<br />
recoups its value in 5 - 6 years;<br />
• Significant but not quantified negative externalities associated with gravel roads make it likely that the supply<br />
of gravel will continue to contract, the oil-minimising haulage distance threshold for gravel roads will shrink<br />
(over and above shrinkage caused by rising oil prices), and the duration between a decision to surface and the<br />
break-even point will shorten;<br />
• Rural bitumen-surfaced roads constructed and maintained using labour-intensive methods bring two positive<br />
externalities: potential augmentation of human capital, and exploitation of SA’s large gap between shadow<br />
wages of underemployed workers and formal-sector market wages. This may directly benefit urban workers if<br />
migration from the countryside is in part a race for scarce wage premiums. It is probable that labour-intensive<br />
road construction and maintenance in urban areas would also raise welfare by exploiting a gap between shadow<br />
wages and market wages. Government should therefore subsidise use of labour-intensive methods to construct<br />
and maintain bitumen-surfaced low-volume roads in rural areas, and possibly also in urban areas. The positive<br />
externalities associated with bitumen surfaced roads maintained by labour-intensive methods reduce the<br />
duration between the surfacing of such roads and the break-even point.<br />
“It is thus arguable that South <strong>Africa</strong> should maintain gravel roads only where average annual daily traffic levels are<br />
too low to normally justify expenditure on any road except those crucial to a community’s access to a minimally<br />
acceptable quality of life. We suspect that if maintenance of a low-volume road is justified by traffic volumes, then<br />
sealing of that road’s surface with bitumen is also justified. The end of the gravel road in SA may be at hand."<br />
In 1999 Go for Gold started out as a pilot project aimed at<br />
attracting talented, disadvantaged youth into the<br />
construction industry. It was a slow, but steady journey.<br />
An Impumelelo Gold Award in 2005 marked the<br />
beginning of a new era of growth, followed by the launching<br />
of a second campus that year and a third campus in 2008.<br />
On reflection there is no doubt that 2010 has been a year of resounding success in the quest for recognition as a<br />
unique contributor to skills development in the industry. A number of significant facts attest to this.<br />
During the course of the year 39 matriculants were employed by industry partners as part of the structured gap<br />
year programme, known as Phase Two. These inexperienced, untrained individuals were offered employment in<br />
spite of the general decline in the volume of work. Tertiary institutions accepted 30 first year students although<br />
some of them were not the best candidates in terms of academic results. They had spent a year working in the<br />
industry confirming their choice of career and carried the Go for Gold recommendation.<br />
In May industry partners filled Kelvin Grove to capacity for the annual Go for Gold dinner. A record amount was<br />
raised in spite of the general economic downturn. In July the Master Builders <strong>Association</strong> Western Cape launched<br />
the Go for Gold Sponsorship Fund at their annual dinner. Candidates who are not successful in obtaining<br />
sponsorship for training within the built environment, would be assisted with these funds.<br />
Go for Gold students during a visit to an<br />
asphalt mixing plant<br />
11<br />
Go for Gold gains<br />
industry recognition<br />
In November Go for Gold was awarded a substantial<br />
grant by a new and very significant partner, Basil<br />
Read. This represented the largest single donation ever<br />
received by the programme and added a leading<br />
national construction company to the ranks of the Go<br />
for Gold partners. This was particularly momentous as<br />
the Go for Gold footprint is still restricted to the<br />
Western Cape, and was affirmation from a national<br />
role player.<br />
The final matric results were excellent. There were 54<br />
candidates who all passed and 41 attained bachelor<br />
degree access.<br />
What does 2011 have in store for Go for Gold?<br />
Extending the footprint to other provinces? If 2010 is<br />
anything to go by, it will definitely be another<br />
triumphant year!
Society for Asphalt Technology: plans for 2011<br />
The Society has a full programme for 2011, with national seminars and workshops in the planning stages on:<br />
• Prime coats using Sabita manual 26 as basis;<br />
• Interim guidelines on Warm Mix Asphalt;<br />
• CIDB rating system - HSE priority in best practices and project delivery;<br />
• Different properties of stabilisation cement (a cocktail hour presentation by Kobus<br />
Louw);<br />
• Best practice guide for design and construction of slurry seals;<br />
• Binder selection.<br />
The Society's Annual General Meeting will be held after conclusion of the RPF on 11 May 2011.<br />
SAT Visit to warm mix asphalt trials on Higginson Highway - Durban (Rob Archibald)<br />
On 23 November 2011 the Society for Asphalt Technology (SAT) Eastern Region arranged a site visit to the<br />
WMA trials then under way on Higginson Highway in Chatsworth, Durban. Daniel Mthimkhulu, eThekwini<br />
Municipality's project manager presented the background to the Higginson Highway rehabilitation project, and<br />
Krishna Naidoo provided an overview of past WMA trials and updated all on the progress of the current trials.<br />
Representatives of the three WMA technology suppliers presented brief overviews of their respective technologies.<br />
These included Akzo Nobel, Sasol Wax and National Asphalt, each of which supplied additives used in the various<br />
WMA trials.<br />
After a general safety induction, Tony Lewis of Tony Lewis<br />
Consulting cc led an inspection of the paving operations. A<br />
WMA trial using a polymer modified binder was being<br />
constructed on the day - a first in South <strong>Africa</strong>.<br />
The event ended with a question and answer session back at<br />
the marquee tent - fortunately, because the skies provided<br />
another heavy shower in a series that had characterised the<br />
weather throughout the trials. Delegates from as far as the<br />
City of Cape Town and the University of Stellenbosch<br />
attended the site visit. Dr Malcolm Mitchell of the South<br />
<strong>Africa</strong>n Road Federation, who attended the site visit, took the<br />
opportunity to congratulate the WMA Interest Group on<br />
undertaking such an ambitious set of trials.<br />
For SAT, the site visit was a great success. The large turnout<br />
indicated the level of interest in asphalt technology and<br />
confirmed the valuable role and contribution the society<br />
makes towards the asphalt industry.<br />
SARF to head up CapCoR initiative<br />
At a Capacity Coordination for Roads (CapCoR) committee meeting held on 1 March 2011, it was agreed that as<br />
an established independent section 21 company, the South <strong>Africa</strong>n Road Federation (SARF) should take the lead<br />
in setting up CapCoR as a separate business unit within its organisation with its own individual bank account and<br />
self-sustaining financing structure. Prospective funders and contributors to CapCoR would be canvassed mainly<br />
from within the SARF membership.<br />
Discussion are also on-going with the Department of Transport to ensure that they are fully apprised of the<br />
situation to ensure that CapCoR is in line with, and supportive of, their broader transport related capacity<br />
building initiatives. The business model of a public-private partnership for CapCoR is still being considered.<br />
It is anticipated that once the business unit has been established advertisements will be placed to identify and<br />
appoint a suitable person to drive the establishment process and manage the unit on a daily basis.<br />
12<br />
SAT members check the rate of density<br />
achievement during their site visit
2010 Sabita<br />
award<br />
acknowledges<br />
Taute's<br />
comprehensive<br />
service<br />
In particular Sabita’s appreciation is focussed<br />
on Arthur’s role in initiating and fostering a<br />
more productive – and less adversarial –<br />
relationship between the sector advising<br />
client bodies and the sector providing<br />
products and services, a development which<br />
has laid the foundation for a productive<br />
application of professional skills for the<br />
benefit of roads in South <strong>Africa</strong>.”<br />
Taute was also involved in a number of<br />
national committees and working groups on<br />
the efficient and cost-effective delivery, and<br />
has also served on numerous Sabita technology<br />
development task groups, notably on the<br />
manufacture and construction of hot mix<br />
asphalt.<br />
CAPSA<br />
Sabita’s 2010 Award for Outstanding achievement in sustainable bituminous<br />
product technology was presented to Arthur Taute of Vela VKE<br />
Consulting Engineers at Sabita's AGM in Durban on 24 March 2011. The<br />
award acknowledges Taute’s significant contributions both to the civil<br />
engineering industry and bituminous products sector in general, and to Sabita in<br />
particular. The citation was made by Sabita Chairman Phillip Hechter.<br />
Following Sabita's 1997 efforts to include the consulting engineering fraternity<br />
in its membership, Taute became the first from this sector to join the Sabita<br />
Council as Chairman of our Technology Development Focal Point, a position he<br />
still holds 22 years later.<br />
During his tenure Arthur was prominent in canvassing Sabita membership from<br />
the consulting profession, participating in national initiatives, working groups<br />
and committees to advance bituminous product technology, and assuming an<br />
influential role in the presentation of CAPSA.<br />
Arthur has also served on the Steering Committee of CAPSA since 1994, contributed several papers to the conference,<br />
convened and chaired plenary and workshop sessions, and<br />
chaired the conference in 2004 (Sun City) and 2007 (Gaborone,<br />
Botswana.)<br />
Donald Stuart (Sasol Oil) and Brian<br />
Mchunu (Much Asphalt) pictured at the<br />
Sabita awards function<br />
Arthur Taute, flanked by Sabita CEO Saied Solomons (left)<br />
and Chairman Phillip Hechter, with his Outstanding<br />
Achievement award<br />
In addition to his service to Sabita, Arthur is widely respected<br />
throughout the civil engineering and consulting fraternity, which<br />
has enabled him to offer invaluable service as a SAICE reviewer<br />
of civil engineering candidates for ECSA professional<br />
registration. He is also on the Council and Executive committee<br />
of CESA.<br />
Permanent councillors<br />
AM Haycock, RL Hornsey<br />
M Leenaerts, MW Samsam<br />
D Stuart<br />
Elected councillors<br />
AJ Broom, PJ Hechter<br />
R Lehman, KG Rocher<br />
MD Winfield<br />
Co-opted councillors<br />
GM James, T Madelon<br />
13<br />
Sabita Council and Board<br />
Appointed councillors<br />
DA Rose, A Taute<br />
Board<br />
MC Cronje ( will resign shortly)<br />
PJ Hechter<br />
RL Hornsey<br />
DE Pagel<br />
MW Samsam<br />
D Stuart (replaces MC Cronje)
AsAc and SARF join forces<br />
One of the major objectives of the Capacity Coordination for Roads (CapCoR)<br />
initiative is to ensure a coordinated approach to the presentation of road related courses, workshops and<br />
seminars, and to reduce the overlaps and date clashes that have been experienced in the past between the<br />
activities of the various organisations.<br />
As a first step towards achieving a more coordinated approach, the Asphalt Academy (AsAc) and the South <strong>Africa</strong>n<br />
Road Federation (SARF) announced, at the Road Pavements Forum of November 2010 in Pretoria, that all<br />
Continuous Professional Development courses at NQF level 5 and above, previously run by AsAc, will now be run<br />
jointly under the management of SARF. AsAc will also provide more inputs into some of the relevant SARF courses,<br />
and work together to develop new courses in line with the needs of the industry. Coordination of these activities will<br />
now be managed through the SARF Education Committee.<br />
The existing courses that will now be run jointly from 1 March 2011 are:<br />
• Bituminous binders for roads;<br />
• Design application and construction of surfacing seals;<br />
• Overview of hot mix asphalt;<br />
• Design of hot mix asphalt;<br />
• Sustainable asphalt practice;<br />
• Flexible pavement design and materials classification;<br />
• Stabilisation;<br />
• Compaction of road building materials;<br />
• Introduction to road building materials.<br />
In addition, two new courses are being scheduled:<br />
• Interpretation of test results:<br />
• Design, construction and maintenance of paved low volume roads.<br />
Course schedules and registration for all courses can be accessed on the AsAc web site www.asphaltacademy.co.za, or<br />
the SARF web site www.sarf.org.za.<br />
Other AsAc offerings<br />
The Materials Tester Course modules will continue to be managed by AsAc, and registration can still be done through<br />
the AsAc web site. An alliance with the University of Pretoria is also being investigated to present a modularised<br />
version of the Road Engineering course previously run as a pilot course in association with the Gauteng Department<br />
of Public Transport Roads and Works. The inclusion of existing SARF/AsAc courses is being investigated to provide<br />
some of the modules.<br />
CSIR, SARF and AsAc respond to the pothole crisis<br />
In line with the recently formed alliance between AsAc and SARF, both organisations are pleased to announce an<br />
additional association with the CSIR to assist in addressing the pothole crisis being experienced on many of our urban<br />
and rural roads. From late February until May 2011 a series of regional half-day workshops will be presented<br />
throughout the country to launch the latest CSIR technical guide on The causes, identification and repair of potholes.<br />
The workshops will be presented by Phil Paige-Green and Amy Maharaj of CSIR, along with Basil Jonsson of SARF.<br />
The repair of potholes in South <strong>Africa</strong> is currently done on an ad hoc basis, usually without paying attention to the<br />
underlying causes. This generally results in rapid failure of the patches and the need for repeated repair. The<br />
workshops are open to all interested stakeholders but are specifically targeted at engineers, technicians, contractors<br />
and road inspectors involved in the routine maintenance of sealed surfaced roads.<br />
The guideline is currently the only one of its kind in South <strong>Africa</strong>, and includes an innovative pothole classification<br />
system developed by the CSIR based on the causes and nature of the pothole. Each of the seven categories of potholes<br />
in the system requires a different repair technique, which is described in a way which ensures that the fundamental<br />
causes of the pothole is addressed during the repair.<br />
14
The guideline and launch workshops are directly in line with the statement made by the Minister of Transport at a<br />
media briefing on 15 February 2011, in which he announced the S’Hamba Sonke ("walking together") programme.<br />
S’Hamba Sonke is a new and innovative road maintenance programme that will focus on the maintenance of our<br />
secondary road infrastructure using labour intensive methods. Funds being set aside for the programme are R6,4<br />
billion in 2011/12, R7,5 billion in 2012/13 and R8,2 billion for 2013/14 - a total of R22,3 billion over the next three<br />
years. The programme is expected to create 70 000 jobs in 2011 alone.<br />
S’Hamba Sonke includes a massive pothole repair programme that will be rolled out nationally with immediate effect<br />
in an attempt to arrest the decline of our secondary road infrastructure. Roads engineers and superintendents will be<br />
deployed all over the network with the responsibility of early identification and repair of the potholes. In this regard<br />
the manual will be vital in providing guidance to ensure that the correct repair procedures are undertaken.<br />
Details of the schedule of workshops throughout the country and registration can be viewed through the SARF web<br />
site, www.sarf.org.za.<br />
CAPSA'11<br />
update<br />
The preparations for CAPSA'11 at the Champagne Sports Resort in the Central<br />
Drakensberg of KwaZulu Natal from 11 - 14 September 2011 are well<br />
underway. The theme of the Conference is “Roads to the Future” and will<br />
examine and demonstrate the commitment and capacity of producers and users<br />
of bituminous products to advance sustainable practice through the reduced reliance<br />
on non-renewable resources, care of the environment and assist in the sound<br />
development of society. The technical focus areas of the conference are:<br />
• Reduced energy consumption in the construction of bituminous layers;<br />
• Reducing the impact of road building activities on the environment;<br />
• Designing for extended performance of bituminous layers;<br />
• Flexible pavement systems for extended life;<br />
• Asset management.<br />
To date, 86 papers have been accepted for formal peer review and publication in the<br />
conference proceedings. A number of bulletin papers have also been submitted, with<br />
more expected until the closing date of 31 March 2011.<br />
The Champagne Sports Resort will provide a stunning venue that will ensure that CAPSA'11 continues the<br />
CAPSA tradition of providing an outstanding technical programme coupled with an exciting social and<br />
networking programme, including a gala dinner spectacular. A stimulating companions' programme is being<br />
organised for those who will be bringing partners to the conference. Superb exhibition facilities are also available<br />
for industry stakeholders to demonstrate their products and expertise.<br />
Registrations are now open and early bird registration was extended to 31 March 2011 following which the<br />
normal conference fee of R8 750 (ex VAT) will be effective until 30 June 2011. Late registration penalties will be<br />
effective from 1 July 2011. In addition, excellent accommodation rates have been negotiated with the venue and<br />
delegates are encouraged to book early through the hotel to ensure accommodation at the conference venue.<br />
To register for the conference and for more detailed information please visit the CAPSA web site at<br />
www.capsa-events.co.za or www.capsa11.co.za.<br />
Some views of the Champagne Sports Resort, the venue for CAPSA'11<br />
15
Seminars on Sabita's Manual 28 prompt study<br />
of cement in bitumen emulsion slurries<br />
The three Society for Asphalt Technology seminars on slurry seal design and construction held in Cape Town,<br />
Durban and Pretoria provided excellent feedback on the draft Manual 28: A guide to best practice in the<br />
design and construction of slurry seals. A common question asked at all seminars was: "Could any cement be<br />
used for slurry?" The affirmative answer to this question raised some debate as some practitioners disagreed,<br />
based on their own experience.<br />
Even though testing of the different available cements would postpone the publishing of Manual 28, it was<br />
considered important that this matter be resolved, and Sabita commissioned a study to obtain definitive results for<br />
inclusion in Manual 28.<br />
A total of 22 different cement samples were obtained from different suppliers and 1% per mass of aggregate mixed<br />
with both anionic and cationic emulsions.<br />
The results obtained proved that all cement types, including CEM V, could work i.e. no segregation occurred.<br />
However, the viscosity (thickness) of the mixes with different cement types varies, and is also influenced by the<br />
type of emulsion. It has definitely been observed that the purer cements "gel" better, leading to the additional testing<br />
to correlate the calcium oxide (CaO) content with an easily measureable parameter on site such as the "flow". These<br />
tests are nearing completion.<br />
Some interesting conclusions drawn from this extensive study are as follows:<br />
• The viscosity of cationic slurries is much higher (less flow) than the anionic slurries;<br />
• It was confirmed that in the case of anionic slurries, the "gelling" is caused by the presence of calcium ions in<br />
the cement, while in the case of cationic slurries this reaction is caused by the change in pH (from<br />
approximately 2 - 11);<br />
• The more pure the cement (CEM I), the higher the viscosity of the slurry (less flow). Refer to the comparison<br />
Sample<br />
No.<br />
Supplier Type CEM classification<br />
in the table below.<br />
Note: * Values to be verified<br />
Much was learnt from this study and will be incorporated into Manual 28 as soon as the final results are available.<br />
The effort of Kobus Louw and Morne Labuschagne from Colas SA (Pty) Ltd is highly appreciated.<br />
To resolve the issue of the influence of cement on the rheological properties of emulsion slurries raised during<br />
2010, Sabita commissioned a study on the topic for inclusion in Manual 28: A guide to best practice in the<br />
design and construction of slurry seals. Kobus Louw of Colas SA (Pty) Ltd, who carried out the study,<br />
submitted the following report.<br />
<strong>Bitumen</strong> emulsion slurry consists of crusher dust/sand, Portland cement, bitumen emulsion and water used in<br />
various surfacing applications such as texture slurries, Cape Seals, overlays and rut filling. Normally 1 - 2% cement<br />
by mass of aggregate is added to the slurry to improve the workability of the mix and enhance the ease of<br />
application.<br />
It is estimated that more than 90% of slurries prepared in South <strong>Africa</strong> are manufactured with anionic stable grade<br />
emulsions. Cationic stable grade emulsions are used to a limited extent in the Eastern Cape, where some<br />
practitioners believe that better adhesion is obtained between the binder and the quartzitic aggregates prevalent in<br />
16<br />
Gerrie van Zyl, Mycube Management Services cc<br />
Anionic emulsion Cationic emulsion<br />
Viscosity<br />
(s)<br />
Flow<br />
(mm)<br />
Viscosity<br />
(s)<br />
Flow<br />
(mm)<br />
CaO<br />
content<br />
(%mm/)<br />
1 Afrisam RHC CEM 1 52,5N 40 47 121 10 60,3*<br />
3 Afrisam RHC CEM V A (V-S) 32,5N 20 75 70 30 29,45*
the region. Stable grade emulsions cure by evaporation of the water phase, while the quick-set, microsurfacing<br />
emulsions cure by chemical and electrostatic interaction between the aggregate and cement.<br />
Interaction between Portland cement and bitumen emulsions<br />
<strong>Bitumen</strong> emulsions are microscopically sized dispersions of bitumen droplets in water that contains an emulsifying<br />
agent. The emulsifying agent adheres to the surface of the bitumen droplets, giving them a specific electrostatic<br />
charge. Anionic emulsions carry a negative charge and the pH of the emulsion is usually more than 10. Cationic<br />
emulsions carry a positive charge and the emulsion is acidic in character with a pH of less that 4.<br />
The specific emulsions used for preparation of bitumen emulsion slurries are the stable and microsurfacing (a<br />
special type) grades, and the addition of a small quantity of cement to the slurry mixture causes the emulsion to<br />
thicken, preventing segregation and resulting in a homogeneous mix. The addition of the cement also improves the<br />
workability of the mix. However, the interaction of the cement with the emulsion is different for each specific type<br />
of emulsion.<br />
Consistency tests were performed using the method prescribed in ASTM D 3910, i.e. placing slurry in a small cone<br />
on a plate with graduated concentric circles. The slurry is allowed to flow out of the cone and the degree of slump,<br />
measured in millimetres, is an indication of the consistency of the mixture.<br />
Viscosity was measured using a Stormer viscometer (ASTM D562), a rotational viscometer consisting of a paddle<br />
type rotor that is spun by an internal motor. The rotor speed can be adjusted by changing the amount of load<br />
supplied onto the rotor. A fixed load was applied for all the slurry samples evaluated and the time required to rotate<br />
the rotor for a fixed number of rotations was established.<br />
A comparison of the consistency and viscosity results appear in the graphs below:<br />
From the above results it is clear that there is a reasonably good correlation between the consistency and viscosity<br />
results obtained on slurries prepared with anionic emulsion. The correlation obtained on the cationic slurries was<br />
not so good. The most important information gleaned from these results is that the consistency of slurries prepared<br />
with cationic emulsion, is considerably higher than the equivalent anionic slurries.<br />
The relationship between the CaO content and the viscosity appears in the graphs below.<br />
17
Due to the ASTM D3910 consistency test (slump or flow) being done on site, the relationship between CaO content<br />
and flow was determined. The results appear in the graph below, with the effect of CEM I cements on anionic<br />
emulsions highlighted in yellow.<br />
Important conclusions drawn from these results are that:<br />
• Cationic emulsion slurries have a higher water demand to obtain a specific flow, resulting in potential higher<br />
permeability of the slurry;<br />
• The flow obtained with CEM 1 cements from different sources react differently, specifically with anionic<br />
emulsions, resulting in the recommendation that re-evaluation of water demand is required when cement is<br />
obtained from a different source.<br />
Summary<br />
• A good relationship was obtained<br />
between slump and viscosity for<br />
anionic stable grade emulsion. A<br />
poorer relationship for the same<br />
properties was obtained with<br />
cationic stable grade emulsion;<br />
• All the cements evaluated<br />
thickened the slurry<br />
substantially, and no segregation<br />
was observed with either<br />
anionic or cationic emulsions;<br />
• Cationic stable grade emulsion<br />
generally thickens more than<br />
anionic stable grade emulsion<br />
through the interaction with the<br />
cement;<br />
• A poor relationship was obtained between the CaO content of the cement and the viscosity and slump<br />
properties;<br />
• Not all cements evaluated yielded the same degree of thickening of the emulsions. The degree of thickening<br />
determines the amount of mixing water required to yield a certain workability or slump. The quantity of water<br />
added can influence the permeability of the final cured slurry obtained. The choice of cement could be very<br />
important when slurries are applied, as it has a direct influence on the water demand of the slurry and<br />
subsequent permeability of the cured layer;<br />
• The water demand for specific purposes should be determined using the cement on site. Any change in type<br />
and/or source of cement would require re-evaluation.<br />
Acknowledgement<br />
The experimental work performed by Morne Labuschagne and the valued input by Gerrie van Zyl is appreciated.<br />
18
Reducing the carbon footprint of the<br />
bituminous products industry<br />
In line with its commitment to assisting its members to maximise the sustainability of their operations, Sabita has<br />
developed a series of technology interventions and management strategies which will allow members to monitor<br />
and manage greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and energy consumption. These recommendations are described<br />
in a report entitled Implications of the proposed carbon tax legislative and policy framework on Sabita<br />
members, drawn up by Oliver Stotko of Carbon and Energy <strong>Africa</strong>.<br />
The report also contains a comprehensive outline of the proposed legislation, and an analysis of the energy usages<br />
and costs facing the industry once the legislation is implemented. The legislation addressed in the report —<br />
National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act (Act No. 39 of 2004), the Customs and Excise Act (Act No.<br />
91 of 1964) and the National Climate Change Response Strategy green paper - is geared towards managing,<br />
reporting and controlling carbon emissions through the use of taxes and levies. The monitoring of on-site<br />
combustion fuel emissions is envisaged to ascertain the quantity of carbon tax to be paid, while in the case of<br />
electricity and liquid fuels consumption (vehicles) the carbon tax may be implemented through addition of<br />
environmental levies onto the tariff charged.<br />
The proposed carbon tax as outlined in the Treasury discussion paper (Reducing Green House Gas emissions: The<br />
carbon tax option - December 2010) has been developed in line with the policy framework covered in the National<br />
Climate Change Response Strategy. The cost implication of this proposed carbon tax is highlighted below. The<br />
typical hot mix asphalt plant energy consumption values for drier aggregate heating and drying, electricity<br />
consumption and diesel consumption are 85%, 12% and 3% respectively. The estimated cost implications of the<br />
carbon tax on a typical HMA plant and the sector as a whole are presented in Table 1.<br />
Table 1: Cost implications of the carbon tax<br />
Parameter Asphalt sector 0,18Mtpa 1 asphalt plant<br />
Expected CO2 Emissions (tons/yr) 235 000 - 273 000 5 300 - 6 200<br />
Expected Carbon Tax (at R75/ton CO2) R17-20 million/yr R400 000 - R460 000<br />
Expected Carbon Tax (at R200/ton CO2) R47-54 million/yr R1,0-1,2 million<br />
1 Mtpa = Mega ton per annum<br />
Figure 1 highlights the split in terms of energy use on a typical hot mix asphalt plant, which has an energy<br />
intensity of 0,3-0,35 GJ/ton of asphalt processed.<br />
Given the recent figures presented in the CEO's<br />
comments on page 3 of 415 000 tons bitumen<br />
processed per year, and the average bitumen<br />
composition of asphalt being 5%, a rounded figure<br />
of 8 million tons of asphalt is assumed to be<br />
produced by the industry per year, since accurate<br />
figures are not available. Based on these<br />
assumptions the expected energy use of the asphalt<br />
sector is presented below:<br />
Table 2: Estimated asphalt sector energy<br />
consumption<br />
Energy source Energy use (GJ/yr)<br />
Lower value Upper value<br />
Diesel 72 000 84 000<br />
Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO) 2 040 000 2<br />
Figure 1: Typical split in terms of asphalt plant<br />
energy usage<br />
380 000<br />
Electricity 288 000 336 000<br />
Total 2 400 000 2 800 000<br />
20
Based on the expected energy consumption of the asphalt manufacturing sector and the CO2 emission factor of the<br />
various energy sources 2 , the overall CO2 emissions of the sector can be determined as follows:<br />
Table 3: Overall CO2 emissions<br />
Energy source<br />
CO2e emissions (tons CO2e/year)<br />
Lower value Higher value<br />
Diesel 5 300 6 200<br />
HFO 150 000 174 000<br />
2 Diesel: 74,1 kg CO2e/GJ; HFO: 73,3 kg CO2e/GJ; Electricity: 277,8 kg CO2e/GJ<br />
Making use of the expected quantity of CO2 emissions for the sector, the anticipated cost implications of the carbon<br />
tax at R75/ton and R200/ton are highlighted in the following table.<br />
Table 4: Cost implications of the carbon tax<br />
Energy source<br />
Cost (Rand/year)<br />
Lower value Upper value<br />
Diesel R397 500 R465 000<br />
HFO R11 250 000 R13 050 000<br />
Electricity R6 000 000 R6 975 000<br />
Total R17 647 500 R20 490 000<br />
The negative impact of these figures on the bituminous products industry's cost-effectiveness and sustainability is<br />
obvious, and Sabita believes the implementation of the technological and management recommendations contained in<br />
the report will do much to minimise both unwanted cost and environmental degradation.<br />
Technical recommendations<br />
The report offers the following technological recommendations for reducing plant energy consumption:<br />
• Stockpiling aggregates under a roof on sloped concrete floors (drainage in opposite direction to loading point);<br />
• Counter-current flow design of burner gas and aggregate flow direction in single drum plants;<br />
• Frequent replacement of worn flights in drier;<br />
• Effective lagging of all vessels and pipelines containing heated materials;<br />
• Flue gas heat recovery (if appropriate);<br />
• Asphalt product storage in closed silos;<br />
• Use of batch plants for applications requiring large product diversity.<br />
Management recommendations<br />
Management recommendations to reducing plant energy consumption include:<br />
• Training of staff in reducing energy consumption (most relevant for electricity use);<br />
• Control of thermocouple monitoring variables to prevent energy wastage;<br />
• Careful monitoring of temperatures (particularly the flue gas temperature) to monitor the efficiency of the drier<br />
in terms of heat transfer to input materials and prevention of excess fuel supply into burner;<br />
• Continuous monitoring of energy consumption to keep track of performance and to facilitate continued plant<br />
efficiency improvements.<br />
21
Much Asphalt, one of southern <strong>Africa</strong>'s largest<br />
commercial suppliers of hot and cold asphalt<br />
products, has installed mobile crushing and<br />
screening equipment valued at R4-million on its<br />
Benoni site for recycling of road millings and waste<br />
material.<br />
The new machines, an impact crusher and a mobile screen,<br />
were immediately put to work on a 300 000 ton stockpile<br />
of reclaimed asphalt (RA) from various sites, including<br />
SANRAL's Gauteng Freeway Improvement Project. More<br />
than 1,3 million tons of asphalt had been supplied to this<br />
project by the end of 2010.<br />
Brian Neville, group technical manager, says the recycling<br />
of the stockpile at Benoni makes sound economic and<br />
environmental sense.<br />
"We can use about 95% of the recycled material in our<br />
various asphalt mixes where RA is included in the project specifications. Many international studies have shown that<br />
hot asphalt mixes incorporating RA produce performance characteristics equivalent to or even better than those of<br />
conventional mixes. Mixes incorporating RA can be expected to age at a slower rate than mixes with virgin materials,<br />
due to the binder in the RA having already undergone oxidation, so the rate of hardening of the mix is slowed.<br />
Stockpile<br />
"We continually add to the Benoni stockpile, which means we will have a constant supply of recycled material to add<br />
back into our asphalt mixes. This, in turn, reduces the virgin raw material input into the plant, saving not only in the cost<br />
of raw materials but reducing the pressure on our natural resources, environment and carbon footprint," Neville said.<br />
"The fact that material milled out for road rehabilitation purposes now has a value obviates the expense associated<br />
with removing it to spoil or stockpiling it in a road reserve for future use. The overall cost of transporting the material<br />
back to the asphalt plant for recycling is far lower than the cost of mining, transporting and processing virgin material.<br />
"Reclaiming asphalt material offers financial savings all round in material costs, including asphalt binder, energy costs<br />
and total job costs. So everyone benefits, including the tax payer who ultimately pays for the building and<br />
maintenance of our roads."<br />
Warm mix asphalt<br />
Warm mix asphalt (WMA)<br />
technology also allows for<br />
higher percentages of<br />
recycled material than<br />
traditional hot mix asphalt.<br />
The commissioning of a<br />
300 ton/hour WMA plant at<br />
the same facility also<br />
allows the use of foam<br />
technology for the<br />
manufacture of WMA,<br />
enabling the company to<br />
substantially decrease its<br />
carbon footprint through a<br />
reduction in the<br />
temperature at which the<br />
material is mixed and<br />
placed on the road.<br />
Temperature reductions of<br />
20 - 30 o C are possible.<br />
22<br />
Much Asphalt<br />
commissions recycling<br />
equipment at flagship<br />
Benoni plant<br />
Screening and stockpiling of RA at the Benoni plant
It also allows for the addition of significantly higher RA content to a conventional asphalt mix without excessive<br />
emissions or poor workability. Less ageing of the virgin binder in warm-mix production may also allow for higher<br />
percentages of RA.<br />
"Another advantage of recycling is the reduction of unsightly, space wasting and dust generating stockpiles of<br />
reclaimed material," says Neville.<br />
Recycling road material started four years ago at Roodepoort plant with the commissioning of new plant. This plant<br />
is capable of screening material at a rate of up to 250 tons/hour into two graded fractions and one oversize material.<br />
Immediate benefits were apparent when screened material was used on a runway rehabilitation contract at OR Tambo<br />
International Airport, where the design for the bitumen treated base course included 10% recycled material.<br />
There has been a drive to use high percentages of RA in asphalt mixes in Europe for some years, with in excess of<br />
50% sometimes recommended - even in surfacing layers. European standards make provision for RA content up to<br />
60%.<br />
Sabita presents BitCert certificates to two member companies<br />
In December 2010 three Sabita member company sites - Colas SA's Epping plant and Much Asphalt's Eerste<br />
Rivier and Contermanskloof sites - were audited for compliance with Sabita's Health, Safety and<br />
Environmental (HSE) Charter requirements, and were awarded BitCert certificates.<br />
During December Sabita CEO Saied Solomons handed a compliance certificate to Colas SA MD Hughes de<br />
Champs. The handover was made without ceremony as Mr de Champs had only a few days left in South <strong>Africa</strong><br />
before leaving to take up a position with Colas Thailand.<br />
The Much Asphalt certificate was handed over on 25 March 2011 during a ceremony at Eerste Rivier.<br />
The HSE awards acknowledge the commitment of member companies to ensure that they are legally compliant<br />
with the occupational health and safety laws during the handling and application of bituminous products. The<br />
certification is applicable to specific facilities where companies handle, manufacture or transport bituminous<br />
products, and is a first step towards qualifying for the HSE award while at the same time underscoring the<br />
internationally accepted principle that the ongoing improvement of mechanisms to ensure worker well-being and<br />
conservation of the fragile environment is an obligation, not a choice.<br />
Current holders of BitCert certificates are Unitrans Fuel and Chemical (Milnerton), Much Asphalt (Pty) Ltd (Port<br />
Elizabeth), Much Asphalt (Pty) Ltd (Eerste Rivier), Colas SA (Pty) Ltd (Epping) and Much Asphalt (Pty) Ltd<br />
Colas SA MD Hugues de Champs (left), and Phillip Hechter, MD of Much Asphalt (Pty) Ltd,<br />
receive BitCert certificates from Sabita CEO Saied Solomons on behalf of their companies<br />
23
The Construction Industry Development Board Act<br />
(Act 38 of 2000) mandates the CIDB to determine<br />
and establish best practice that promotes, inter<br />
alia, positive safety, health and environmental<br />
outcomes. The CIDB Act also requires and mandates<br />
the Board to establish a Best Practice Contractor<br />
Recognition Scheme which:<br />
a) enables organs of state to manage risk on<br />
complex contracting strategies; and<br />
b) promotes contractor development in relation<br />
to best practice standards and guidelines<br />
developed by the Board.<br />
The CIDB Best Practice Contractor Recognition<br />
Scheme achieves this by recognising externally certified<br />
Construction Management Systems.<br />
Two levels of accreditation are provided for:<br />
• Level IIIa: CIDB accreditation of SANS ISO/OSHAS certified systems – typically for Grades 8 and 9<br />
contractors; and<br />
• Level II: CIDB accreditation of CMSs certified to the CIDB standard – typically for Grade 5 to 7 contractors.<br />
Collectively, the CIDB Contractor Competence Assessment, CIDB Construction Management Systems, and CIDB<br />
Contractor Performance Reports currently form the CIDB Best Practice Contractor Recognition Scheme.<br />
Scope and overall requirements<br />
Better known management systems include the SANS ISO 9000 and 14000 Quality and Environmental Management<br />
Systems and the ¹BSI OHSAS 18001 Occupational Health and Safety Management System. However, these are<br />
often only appropriate for large organisations (such as Grade 8 and 9 contractors). To promote and recognise<br />
performance improvement by contractors in, typically, Grades 5 to 7, the CIDB has introduced complementary<br />
accreditation of Construction Management Systems, based on recognisable industry minimum standards.<br />
The CIDB standard specifies the CIDB requirements for minimum standards for a Construction Management<br />
System (CMS) covering:<br />
• health and safety management;<br />
• environmental management (covering air, water, land and waste); and<br />
• quality management.<br />
Service providers would apply for and obtain certification to this standard if they wish to apply for CIDB Level II<br />
accreditation. Clients are encouraged (or, where mandatory, are required) to specify contract requirements for<br />
Construction Management Systems, Management Plans, and Inspection and Test Plans in the request for tender and<br />
contract documents. The construction management abilities of potential service providers should be (or, where<br />
mandatory, are required to be) assessed in a tender evaluation process.<br />
Clients are encouraged to procure work from contractors with CIDB accredited CMSs in line with the guidelines<br />
given in Table 1.<br />
Sabita’s participation to date<br />
At a recent meeting discussions revolved around the CIDB pilot project to “field test” the CMS being rolled out in<br />
the Western Cape.<br />
Sabita was invited to contribute by participating in field audits planned to assess implementation of the CMS. Sabita<br />
agreed to support the initiative to establish the benefits of the CIDB CMS to Sabita members, and to ascertain how<br />
the current Sabita systems could be merged or combined with the CIDB initiative to offer an improved value<br />
proposition for its members.<br />
25<br />
Sabita actively<br />
supports the CIDB Best<br />
Practice Contractor<br />
Recognition Scheme<br />
Anton Ferreira, Sabita HSE Consultant<br />
¹ The South <strong>Africa</strong>n National Standards organisation has published two draft Standards SANS OHSAS 18001 and SANS OHSAS<br />
18002 for comment and will soon adopt the current BSI OHSAS Standards as is.
Table 1. Accreditation guidelines<br />
Tender<br />
Grade<br />
Maximum<br />
Tender Value<br />
(Rm)<br />
Impressions gained<br />
Anton Ferreira (HSE consultant to Sabita) was nominated to represent Sabita on the project. Impressions were that the<br />
CIDB CMS is not unique in structure and content, as it is designed to be fully aligned with the requirements of<br />
OHSAS 18001, ISO 14001 and ISO 9001. However the following features of the programme are unique:<br />
• the system is designed to merge the three systems into a single integrated “fit-for-purpose” (construction)<br />
management system;<br />
• certification to the CIDB CMS will be a “single integrated audit” event as apposed to three separate audits;<br />
• customised support processes, such as the CIDB CMS Construction Management Plan Template facilitates<br />
better understanding of the system requirements and will enhance user ability to implement and maintain the<br />
system;<br />
However participants unanimously agreed that the structured and systematic approach of the system is its greatest<br />
advantage. A surprising feature was that participants felt that health, safety and environment requirements were<br />
generally “well established and understood” (HSE auditors usually find the opposite in audits) but that quality<br />
management (QM) requirements are not as clear and well understood. The integration of QM in the CMS seemed to<br />
be the “biggest benefit” realised in day-to-day operations;<br />
i) A concern about the “extra workload” and generation of ”loads of extra paper” to maintain the CMS will<br />
have to be addressed by designing the system to be as “paper light” as is practicable, especially at site<br />
level;<br />
ii) A documentation system based on project/site/job specific procedures and work instructions<br />
referencing generic centrally controlled process documents appears to be an option acceptable to<br />
participants. The acceptability of such practice i.e. complying with certification requirements will<br />
however have to be tested;<br />
iii) A general impression was that participants were enthusiastic and positive about adopting the system and<br />
fully embracing the integrated approach; and a (salient) opinion appeared to be that the experience has<br />
certainly played a roll in improving productivity on projects.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Type of work and risk<br />
COMPLEX, with a HIGH or MEDIUM<br />
possibility of nonconformity with the<br />
specification and significant impacts<br />
9 Unlimited Unlimited contractors to have Level IIIa<br />
8 R130,0m accreditation<br />
7 R40,0m<br />
6 R13,0m<br />
5 R6,5m<br />
4 R4,0m<br />
3 R2,0m<br />
2 R0,65m<br />
1 R0,2m Not applicable<br />
Contractors to have Level II accreditation<br />
The CIDB CMS initiative is a practical concept and the pilot project is worthy of full Sabita support. A further<br />
(compelling) incentive for Sabita members to support and adopt a CIDB accredited CMS is the foregone conclusion<br />
that an externally certified CMS will in the not too distant future be legislated as a mandatory requirement to be<br />
considered for all public sector tenders/contracts. The current Sabita HSE Management System and other supporting<br />
initiatives available to Sabita members could be integrated with the CIDB CMS without much effort. Sabita therefore<br />
encourages its members to act sooner than later to assure that they remain competitive and, above all, profitable.<br />
26<br />
SIMPLE, or simple and repetitive with<br />
MEDIUM or LITTLE possibility of<br />
nonconformity with the specification<br />
Contractors to have<br />
Level II or III accreditation<br />
Contractors to have Level I or II<br />
accreditation<br />
Contractors to have Level I accreditation Client defined requirements<br />
Note: Notwithstanding the above the Minister may, by publication in a Government Gazette, determine a prescribed<br />
tender value requiring (mandatory) CIDB accreditation of a contractor’s CMS as a quality factor (functionality) in<br />
construction procurement on all public sector contracts.
<strong>Bitumen</strong> emulsion in 2010: a<br />
watershed year<br />
The year 2010 saw unprecedented mobilisation within the bitumen emulsion industry, illustrated by its<br />
extensive participation in the WOE2010 despite a particularly harsh environment of budget restrictions,<br />
according to Etienne le Bouteiller, Executive Director of the International <strong>Bitumen</strong> Emulsion Federation.<br />
“The industry is aware of the specific issues that could clip its wings, but also knows full well what can favour its<br />
growth. And it is ironic that it was the economic crisis itself that sparked demand for emulsion techniques, a<br />
combination of factors that has inevitably led to growth. Today, financial constraints, environmental concerns and<br />
social issues all make up the exceptional backdrop against which emulsion usage is growing. This is why 2010 was<br />
a watershed year, coinciding with the launch of the American Emulsion Task Force. In Europe, the standard<br />
EN13808 and ensuing factory production controls have helped build up decision-makers' confidence in this<br />
long-proven but ever evolving technique,” he said.<br />
In the United States, the land of pragmatism, the FHWA, in the wake of strict budget cuts, launched a genuine<br />
“think and action tank” called the Emulsion Task Force (ETF), designed to draft performance-based specifications<br />
for bitumen emulsion. Some twenty years after SHRP, which led to the Superpave system for hot mixes, the ETF<br />
has set the same targets for bitumen emulsion. In addition, the ETF’s originality, notoriety and validity lie in the<br />
fact that it pools the means and the actions of DoTs , industry, research (in particular universities) and standards<br />
bodies (AASHTO and ASTM).<br />
The idea that road preservation is an absolute necessity was also covered in a dedicated event, the 1st<br />
International conference on pavement preservation held in California in April 2010.<br />
Economics<br />
In terms of volume, it is important to note that the construction of new infrastructure in emerging countries,<br />
notably China and India, will inevitably lead to maintenance needs in the future, in which emulsion-techniques<br />
will have a major role to play. Should the Asia – Australia zone simply align with the rest of the world’s<br />
emulsion/bitumen ratios (12,4%), this will create additional needs for 2,8 million tons.<br />
To perform well in a constantly changing environment, however, the bitumen emulsion industry must never stop<br />
evaluating its markets and assessing what impacts them the most, both in the short and medium-term. To gain this<br />
knowledge the IBEF, at the end of 2009, launched a global survey on the production of road bitumen emulsions<br />
amongst its members and all related industries e.g. emulsion producers, oil companies and emulsifier<br />
manufacturers.<br />
The survey’s findings include data from over 100 countries around the world, and show that road bitumen<br />
emulsions volumes were stable from 2005 to 2009, with annual production figures totaling roughly 8 million tons.<br />
The same is true for road bitumen, with annual<br />
production of some 90 million tons. The world’s<br />
three leading emulsion producers are the United<br />
States, France and Mexico. Since 2009, however,<br />
BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China) have<br />
joined the top ten global producers.<br />
Comparing emulsion volumes and bitumen<br />
volumes, it was noted that from 2005 to 2009 a<br />
shift of bitumen volumes from industrialised<br />
countries and Latin America to emerging<br />
countries, in particular in Asia, took place. For<br />
emulsions, the shift is slighter, proof that the<br />
industry has remained dynamic and that the quality<br />
of emulsion-based techniques has helped boost the<br />
market in difficult times.<br />
Figure 1. World’s top 10 emulsion producers<br />
27
Environmental issues<br />
Figure 2 : Emulsion growth 2005 – 2009<br />
Environmental issues are always at the heart of industry concerns, if only because of increasing regulatory pressure.<br />
As such, this is not a constraint, nor is it an opportunity – environmental protection is simply a “must”.<br />
Environmental issues are becoming increasingly hard to ignore these days. For many companies, it has become a<br />
license to operate. Those who don’t consider the environmental impact of their operations will find themselves at a<br />
disadvantage, not just because their competitors are doing it, but also because the public demands it”.<br />
In France some 20 French departments have rolled out a “Convention d’Engagement Volontaire”, or voluntary<br />
commitment agreement. Redeploying surface maintenance techniques for economic reasons is first and foremost a<br />
reflection of the agreement between the Assemblée des Départements de France with its partners. In the case in<br />
point, the use of bitumen emulsions has helped reduce greenhouse gas emissions, as well as fossil fuel consumption.<br />
Customers and industrialists are all working to respond to the same sustainable development criteria by boosting the<br />
share of emulsion-based techniques in surface dressings as a substitute for cut-back and fluxed bitumen. In Ireland<br />
and the United Kingdom, where these techniques are widely used, surface dressings are all emulsion-based, as is<br />
happening with increasing frequency in Germany.<br />
“The above makes it clear that the bitumen emulsion industry has a highly promising future, and is enjoying growth<br />
around the globe with every major country now using bitumen emulsion on their road networks. However, there is<br />
still much room for progress, given the technical advantages that emulsion techniques can provide,” le Bouteiller<br />
said.<br />
Revised Sabita Manuals released in CD format<br />
Sabita's Manual 12: Methods for labour intensive construction of bituminous surfacings, and Manual 17: The<br />
design and use of porous asphalt mixes, have been revised, updated and released in CD format. Both manuals are<br />
now available at a cost of R50 to Sabita members, or R100 to non-members.<br />
Sabita's comprehensive first aid kit is available at a cost of R250 to members and R500 to non-members. The<br />
well-known green Burns Tag is available free of charge to Sabita members. Please browse the Sabita website<br />
www.sabita.co.za or email info@sabita.co.za.<br />
28
BP SA (Pty) Ltd<br />
Chevron SA (Pty) Ltd<br />
Engen Petroleum Ltd<br />
P.O. Box 1806, Durban 4000<br />
Tel 031 2758867 Fax 031 2652701<br />
P .O. Box 714 Cape Town 8000<br />
Tel 021 4037242 Fax 021 4030380<br />
P.O. Box 1043, Jhb 2000<br />
Tel 011 4806202 Fax 011 4806003<br />
SPONSOR MEMBERS<br />
Actophambili Roads (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 4434 Atlas Park 1465 Tel 011 8941433 Fax 011 8941412<br />
AG Thomas (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 100 Manzini M200 Swaziland Tel +268 5184499 Fax +268 5186363<br />
AJ Broom Road Products (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 16421 Dowerglen 1612 Tel 011 4543102 Fax 011 4542790<br />
Akasia Road Surfacing (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 259 Bon Accord 0009 Tel 012 5629500 Fax 012 5629600<br />
Aqua Transport & Plant hire (Pty) Ltd Private Bag X11 Ashwood 3605 Tel 032 5336883 Fax 032 5336695<br />
Asphalt Services cc P.O. Box 1765 East London 5200 Tel 043 7451014 Fax 043 7451245<br />
Astec – Asphalt Technology P.O. Box 589 Rothdene 1964 Tel 016 3621310 Fax 016 3623024<br />
<strong>Bitumen</strong> Constr. Services (Pvt) Ltd P.O. Box M78 Harare Zimbabwe Tel +263 4 305506 Fax +263 4 305507<br />
<strong>Bitumen</strong> Supplies & Services (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 1028 Sunninghill 2157 Tel 011 8039338 Fax 011 8039881<br />
Colas SA (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 82 Eppindust 7475 Tel 021 5316406 Fax 021 5315514<br />
Concor Roads & Earthworks P.O. Box 925 Crown Mines 2025 Tel 011 4952126 Fax 011 4952496<br />
Group Five Civil Engineering P.O. Box 1750 Bedfordview 2008 Tel 011 4096600 Fax 011 4096789<br />
Javseal (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 26317 Isipingo Beach 4115 Tel 031 9025988 Fax 031 9022457<br />
Kaulani Civils South (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 23 Vlottenburg 7604 Tel 021 8813152 Fax 031 8813512<br />
Milling Techniks (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 779 Gillits 3603 Tel 031 7929580 Fax 031 7004447<br />
More Asphalt (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 2180 Durbanville 7550 Tel 021 9750784 Fax 021 9750792<br />
Much Asphalt (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 49 Eerste Rivier 7100 Tel 021 9004411 Fax 021 9004446<br />
National Asphalt (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 1657 Hillcrest 3650 Tel 031 7362146 Fax 031 7361938<br />
Phambili Road Surfacing (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 145 Mkondeni 3204 Tel 033 3461982 Fax 033 3461995<br />
Polokwane Surfacing (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 288 Ladanna 0704 Tel 015 2931221 Fax 015 2931258<br />
Power Construction (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 129 Blackheath 7581 Tel 021 9071300 Fax 021 9056912<br />
Rand Roads (div. of Grinaker LTA) Private Bag X030 Kempton Park 1620 Tel 011 9235304 Fax 011 3976294<br />
Roadmac Surfacing (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 8378 Bloemfontein 9300 Tel 051 4300404 Fax 051 4300400<br />
Roadsmart (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 30344 Tokai 7966 Tel 021 7130129 Fax 021 7130128<br />
Roadspan Surfaces (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 30550 Jet Park 1469 Tel 011 5528505 Fax 011 5528513<br />
Spray Pave (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 647 Alberton 1450 Tel 011 8685451 Fax 011 9001470<br />
Tarfix (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 844 North Riding 2162 Tel 011 7084797 Fax 011 7084797<br />
Tarspray cc Suite 327, P.B. X09 Weltevreden Park 1715 Tel 012 6690511 Fax 012 6690003<br />
TOR Construction cc P.O. Box 914 Hartenbos 6520 Tel 044 6940008 Fax 044 6940006<br />
Tosas (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 14159 Wadeville 1422 Tel 011 3232000 Fax 011 9022755<br />
Van Wyk Tarmac cc P.O. Box 12535 Onderstepoort 0110 Tel 012 5611871 Fax 011 5611321<br />
Zebra Surfacing (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 14335 Kenwyn 7790 Tel 021 7613474 Fax 021 7971151<br />
30<br />
Sasol Oil (Pty) Ltd<br />
Shell SA Marketing<br />
(Pty) Ltd<br />
Total SA (Pty) Ltd<br />
ORDINARY MEMBERS<br />
P.O. Box 4211, Randburg 2125<br />
Tel 011 8899773 Fax 011 8899859<br />
6 Ipivi Road, Kloof 361<br />
Tel 031 5711000 Fax 031 7646208<br />
P.O. Box 579, Saxonwold 2132<br />
Tel 011 7782376 Fax 011 6876381
ASSOCIATE MEMBERS<br />
Afrisam SA (Pty) Ltd P O Box 6367 Weltevreden Park 1715 Tel 011 6705500 Fax 011 4759326<br />
Arcus Gibb (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 3965 Cape Town 8000 Tel 021 4699172 Fax 021 4245571<br />
Aurecon SA (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 1347 Cape Town 8000 Tel 021 4812400 Fax 021 4255588<br />
BKS (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 3173 Pretoria 0001 Tel 012 4213500 Fax 012 4213501<br />
Bigen <strong>Africa</strong> Services (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 5339 Rivonia 2128 Tel 011 8020560 Fax 011 8020565<br />
Dick King Lab Supplies (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 82138 Southdale 2135 Tel 011 4999400 Fax 011 4936349<br />
DuPont de Nemours Int SA P.O. Box 3332 Halfway House 1635 Tel 012 6835600 Fax 012 6835663<br />
GMH/CPP Cons. Eng. P.O. Box 2201 Randburg 2125 Tel 011 4620601 Fax 011 4620672<br />
Goba (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 180 Sunninghill 2157 Tel 011 2363331 Fax 011 8078535<br />
HHO <strong>Africa</strong> P.O. Box 6502 Roggebaai 8012 Tel 021 4252870 Fax 021 4194689<br />
Iliso Consulting (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 686 Gillits 3603 Tel 031 2662600 Fax 031 2662616<br />
Jeffares & Green (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 1109 Sunninghill 2157 Tel 011 8070660 Fax 011 8071607<br />
Kantey & Templer (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 3132 Cape Town 8000 Tel 021 4059600 Fax 021 4196774<br />
Kaymac (Pty) Ltd T/A Kaytech P.O. Box 116 Pinetown 3600 Tel 031 7172300 Fax 031 7023173<br />
Lafarge Industries (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 139 Paarden Eiland 7420 Tel 021 5088000 Fax 021 5088120<br />
Lidwala Cons. Engineers (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 2930 Nelspruit 1200 Tel 013 7532864 Fax 086 5005574<br />
Nadeson Cons. Services (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 51121 V&A Waterfront 8002 Tel 021 4184988 Fax 021 4195187<br />
Namibia Technical Services cc P.O. Box 30623 Windhoek Namibia Tel +264 61 215324 Fax +264 61 215327<br />
PDNA and Assoc. (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 7786 Roggebaai 8012 Tel 021 4182929 Fax 021 4186440<br />
Rankin Engineering Consultants P.O. Box 50566 Lusaka Zambia Tel +260 1 290562 Fax +260 1 293156<br />
Sasol Technology Fuels Research P.O. Box 1 Sasolburg 1947 Tel 016 9604068 Fax 016 5224835<br />
Sasol Wax (a div. of SCI) Chemcity 2 P.O. Box 1 Sasolburg 1947 Tel 016 9602126 Fax 016 5222063<br />
SRT (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 15324 Westmead 3608 Tel 031 7004510 Fax 031 7003165<br />
SSI Eng. & Env. Cons. (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 867 Gallo Manor 2146 Tel 011 7986051 Fax 011 7986005<br />
TPA Consulting (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 1575 Westville 3630 Tel 031 7651907 Fax 031 7652551<br />
Tshepega Engineering (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 33783 Glenstantia 0010 Tel 012 6652722 Fax 012 6655597<br />
Unitrans Fuel & Chem. (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 31 Tableview 7439 Tel 021 5510636 Fax 021 5511996<br />
Vela VKE Cons. Eng. (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 72927 Lynnwood Ridge 0040 Tel 012 4813821 Fax 012 8034411<br />
Worley Parsons RSA (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 36155 Menlo Park 0102 Tel 012 4256300 Fax 012 4601336<br />
WSP SA Civil & Struct. Eng. (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 2330 Edenvale 1610 Tel 011 4502290 Fax 011 4502294<br />
AFFILIATE MEMBERS<br />
Beosumbar & Associates cc P.O. Box 605 Westville 3600 Tel 031 2667494 Fax 031 2667404<br />
Cape Peninsula Univ. of Technology P.O. Box 652 Cape Town 8000 Tel 021 4603074 Fax 021 4603710<br />
Chemimpo SA (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 1378 Randburg 2125 Tel 011 2932048 Fax 011 7873513<br />
DMV Harrismith (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 912 Harrismith 9880 Tel 058 6222676 Fax 058 6230271<br />
Letaba Lab (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 739 White River 1240 Tel 013 7527663 Fax 086 6754843<br />
Mdubane Energy Services (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 4876 Durban 4000 Tel 031 3042470 Fax 031 3019302<br />
MTTC (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 912-387 Silverton 0127 Tel 012 8003018 Fax 012 8004381<br />
N3TC (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 2063 Bedfordview 2008 Tel 011 4543596 Fax 011 4540777<br />
Outeniqua Lab (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 3186 George Industria 6536 Tel 044 8743274 Fax 044 8745779<br />
Salphalt (Pty) Ltd P.O. Box 234 Isando 1600 Tel 011 8232218 Fax 011 8262239<br />
South <strong>Africa</strong>n Road Federation P.O. Box 31577, Braamfontein 2017 Tel 011 4035604 Fax 011 4037736<br />
31<br />
S<br />
A<br />
B<br />
I<br />
T<br />
A<br />
M<br />
E<br />
M<br />
B<br />
E<br />
R<br />
S
Asphalt News is published by the <strong>Southern</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>n <strong>Bitumen</strong> <strong>Association</strong> (Sabita),<br />
a non-profit organisation sponsored by its members to serve all stakeholders<br />
through engineering, service and education.<br />
39<br />
Sabita and the associations listed below have founded a<br />
global strategic alliance of asphalt pavement associations (GAPA) and<br />
are working jointly towards a full, open and productive partnership:<br />
Australian Asphalt Pavement <strong>Association</strong> (AAPA)<br />
National Asphalt Pavement <strong>Association</strong> (NAPA)<br />
European Asphalt Pavement <strong>Association</strong> (EAPA<br />
Japanese Road Contractors <strong>Association</strong> (JRCA)<br />
No articles, extracts, photographs or other elements of this publication<br />
may be reproduced in any form whatsoever without the written permission<br />
of the <strong>Southern</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>n <strong>Bitumen</strong> <strong>Association</strong><br />
<strong>Southern</strong> <strong>Africa</strong>n <strong>Bitumen</strong> <strong>Association</strong> (Sabita)<br />
Postnet Suite 56, Private Bag X21<br />
Howard Place 7450<br />
South <strong>Africa</strong><br />
Tel: +27 21 531 2718<br />
Fax: +27 21 531 2606<br />
email: info@sabita.co.za<br />
www.sabita.co.za