Later that day, Lauff received ano<strong>the</strong>r e-mail messagefrom O’Brien. It read:Crazy as all this seems, I actually saw ano<strong>the</strong>rflycatcher this afternoon. This one wassmaller, leaner, <strong>and</strong> [had] chestnut outerw<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>and</strong> yellow flanks...It came back severaltimes but <strong>in</strong> my haste to get a still shotI lost out because my digital camera is relativelynew <strong>and</strong> I don’t “get <strong>the</strong> hang <strong>of</strong> it” yet.I did manage however to get a video <strong>of</strong> thissecond bird...wonder<strong>in</strong>g after this day if flycatchersactually flock toge<strong>the</strong>r at this season.The second bird I saw was certa<strong>in</strong>lysmaller, leaner <strong>and</strong> with <strong>the</strong> mark<strong>in</strong>gs alreadydescribed. The one I saw earlier wasimpressive with its size, all white breast <strong>and</strong>complete grayness o<strong>the</strong>rwise...It is not anEastern <strong>K<strong>in</strong>gbird</strong> because it [did] not have<strong>the</strong> white tail fr<strong>in</strong>ge. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>, if itis a <strong>Gray</strong> <strong>K<strong>in</strong>gbird</strong>, I cannot see <strong>the</strong> fork <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> tail...If I manage to [get] ano<strong>the</strong>r photoor get to diagnose <strong>the</strong> second bird, I’ll getback to you. Sorry I did not get a betterphoto <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first bird, though, because itwas right <strong>in</strong> my face through <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>dow.It should be noted that late on 18 November,upon request by Lauff, O’Brien responded,“When [<strong>the</strong> bird] was right ‘<strong>in</strong> my face,’ I did notsee a mask.” The image <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first bird was sentto Lauff <strong>in</strong> low resolution, with <strong>the</strong> bird’s lengthonly about 5% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> frame width. The next day,Lauff reported <strong>the</strong> bird to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Nova</strong> <strong>Scotia</strong> rarebird alert (NS-RBA), <strong>and</strong> he placed <strong>the</strong> uncroppedimage—which he underst<strong>and</strong>ably characterizedas “not even diagnostic”—on hiswebsite; this image is reproduced on p. 31.<strong>Gray</strong> <strong>K<strong>in</strong>gbird</strong>. Key WestBotanical Gardens, Florida; April 1996.Photo by © Kev<strong>in</strong> T. Karlson–VIREO.High-quality photos <strong>of</strong> conveniently posed birds generally do not present challenges for experienced students <strong>of</strong> birdidentification. For example, both <strong>the</strong> <strong>Gray</strong> <strong>K<strong>in</strong>gbird</strong> (above) <strong>and</strong> Ash-throated Flycatcher (left) are easily identified <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>photos shown here. But rare birds <strong>of</strong>ten do not pose long enough to allow crisp photos show<strong>in</strong>g diagnostic field marks.In this article, we consider <strong>the</strong> difficulties presented by a gra<strong>in</strong>y photo <strong>of</strong> an <strong>in</strong>conveniently posed flycatcher far out <strong>of</strong>range <strong>in</strong> <strong>Nova</strong> <strong>Scotia</strong>. To be sure, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternet revolution has led to a proliferation <strong>of</strong> photo-documented rarities that wouldhave “gotten away” <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> past. But as this article alerts us, onl<strong>in</strong>e photo identification is not without its challenges.W W W . A B A . O R G 29
P E R I L S O F O N L I N E I D E N T I F I C A T I O NMcLaren believed <strong>the</strong> photo to be <strong>of</strong> a <strong>Gray</strong> <strong>K<strong>in</strong>gbird</strong>, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>glynoted as a vagrant <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fall to <strong>the</strong> Atlantic coastnorth <strong>of</strong> North Carol<strong>in</strong>a (Armistead <strong>and</strong> Iliff 2003). So he solicitedop<strong>in</strong>ions regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> low-resolution image from contributorsto <strong>the</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>e “Frontiers <strong>of</strong> Field <strong>Identification</strong>”(hereafter, F-ID) discussion group . Additionaldetails <strong>and</strong> context (for example, <strong>the</strong> observer’s e-mailmessage to Lauff) were not provided to F-ID; only <strong>the</strong> photoitself was submitted for discussion. As a result <strong>of</strong> his <strong>in</strong>quiry,McLaren received more than 30 public <strong>and</strong> private responses,<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g multiple responses from a few respondents.A Sight<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Next DayFulton L. Lavender, an experienced birder, observed <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gbirdat 9:15 a.m. <strong>the</strong> next morn<strong>in</strong>g, 19 November 2010, whilehis two companions were unfortunately look<strong>in</strong>g elsewhere. Inhis account, Lavender says:I stepped to my right to get a better view <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> yard <strong>and</strong>immediately noticed a large, gray-<strong>and</strong>-white, blackbirdsizedk<strong>in</strong>gbird perched horizontally, side on, below twoBlue Jays, on <strong>the</strong> bottom rail <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> back fence, perhaps 20meters away. I took a few seconds to note some critical fieldmarks <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n attempted to get [a companion’s] attention.As I began to speak...<strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gbird flipped over <strong>the</strong> fence<strong>and</strong> dropped out <strong>of</strong> sight...The rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cold, viciouslyw<strong>in</strong>dy day was spent <strong>in</strong> a fruitless search for <strong>the</strong> bird.Lavender noted <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g field marks dur<strong>in</strong>g his fairly briefsight<strong>in</strong>g:Structure: Large, heavy headed with rounded crown; verylong, heavy bill, almost disproportionate for <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> bird; proportionally short-w<strong>in</strong>ged <strong>and</strong> long-tailed;fairly long, heavy feet for a k<strong>in</strong>gbird; tail was slightlyfolded. No fork was discernable. Color: underbody whitefrom throat to undertail coverts; rear flanks with a bit <strong>of</strong>gray divid<strong>in</strong>g undertail from flanks; upper body gray, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gcrown (very dark <strong>in</strong> centre, may have been wet),nape, back, rump, uppertail, coverts <strong>and</strong> upper tail; lesser,median, greater, marg<strong>in</strong>al coverts <strong>and</strong> primaries darkergray, secondaries paler; no w<strong>in</strong>g bars; tertials black withwhite edg<strong>in</strong>gs; face with a blackish mask, contrast<strong>in</strong>g withgray crown; underw<strong>in</strong>gs whitish. Voice: No call noteswere heard.Critical Analyses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ImagesThe images obta<strong>in</strong>ed by O’Brien 18 November clearly showtwo very different birds. The first (<strong>in</strong>set, p. 31), which iscropped from <strong>the</strong> high-resolution orig<strong>in</strong>al, appears to beperched nearly parallel to <strong>the</strong> measured foreground limb, withits head po<strong>in</strong>ted to <strong>the</strong> right directly away from <strong>the</strong> camera. Itis <strong>in</strong> first-fall (“formative”) plumage, judg<strong>in</strong>g by its blunt,rounded primary tips, among o<strong>the</strong>r features. Above it is grayfrom <strong>the</strong> crown to <strong>the</strong> tip <strong>of</strong> tail, but with brownish washes onparts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> crown, mantle, <strong>and</strong> tail. It has prom<strong>in</strong>ently whitemarg<strong>in</strong>edtertials. There are whitish marg<strong>in</strong>s at <strong>the</strong> edges <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> greater coverts, <strong>and</strong> a h<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> one on an outer mediancovert, but noth<strong>in</strong>g that might be termed a w<strong>in</strong>g bar. There isno h<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> yellow on <strong>the</strong> exposed flank. Some confus<strong>in</strong>g backgroundfeatures have been clarified from later images <strong>and</strong> avisit to <strong>the</strong> scene by Lauff (see <strong>in</strong>set, p. 31).The less-focused image <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> second bird (p. 30) shows abird with a small bill, a pale gray breast, <strong>and</strong> a pale yellow belly<strong>and</strong> flanks. Its head <strong>and</strong> forew<strong>in</strong>g are gray-brown, its back ispaler, <strong>and</strong> its h<strong>in</strong>d w<strong>in</strong>gs are a darker chestnut. There appearsAlthough blurry, <strong>the</strong>se videograbs are diagnostic, depict<strong>in</strong>g a rare Ash-throated Flycatcher <strong>in</strong> a Lanark, <strong>Nova</strong> <strong>Scotia</strong>, backyardon 18 November 2010. The existence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se photos created an <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g psychological challenge for <strong>the</strong> photo-identification<strong>of</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r, even rarer flycatcher species <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same yard on <strong>the</strong> same day. See text for details. From video made by © Marilyn O’Brien.30B I R D I N G • J U L Y 2 0 1 1