SUSTAINABILITY FIELD STUDY - Mercy Corps

and Kyrgyz ethnic majority. Youth in Pahtaabad lacked access to education materials in the Kyrgyzlanguage until PCI helped bring these communities together and improve a Kyrgyz language school inKulundu. Kuldaikulova Kanyshai from Pahtaabad Community explained her experience: “Before therewere quarrels with youth from another village. Now, from what we learned in tolerance training, attitudesare better, and youth teach children to be also more tolerant [with Kulundu Village]. Communitymembers from Pahtaabad go to school at a PCI rehabilitated school in Kulundu following betterrelations established during PCI. The summer campincluded children from all neighboring villages aftertolerance training was held in each school separately.”Parents often felt compelled to add their thoughts followinginterviews with the young program participants.The mother of one PCI camp participant, AbduvahabKisir Kanakai, from the Min Oruk community in Batken,Kyrgyzstan, (near the border of Tajikistan) noted,“[Following PCI] there was a change in how youth fromthe community and from Tajik communities interact.Children now greet each other at the market and areSANDY SHEARD, 2007 FOR MERCY CORPSgenerally more friendly and positive toward each other.”Other general community and CAG members volunteeredsimilar observations during discussions with study team members. While not directly addressedin the interview questions, reduced tensions and increased tolerance and friendship betweenyouth of neighboring communities were cited frequently as important outcomes ofMercy Corps’ work, particularly in PCI communities where the program actively sought tobring together young people of varying backgrounds.3. Role of migration on youth activity.High levels of labor migration throughout Central Asia have had a huge impact on the sustainabilityof CAIP and PCI youth activities within communities. Young people, particularly young men, facedwith few opportunities for income generation within their communities frequently choose to seek workelsewhere, either permanently or for a large portion of the year. The study team observed that as aresult of this outward migration some youth felt detached from their communities, knowing that theirfutures were elsewhere. In other cases, young people took incredible initiative to invest in their communitieswith money made while working abroad.Migration and Youth Collective ActionOutward migration appeared to be a large contributing factor to the low levels of continued actionby youth in communities. Just over half of youth (52%) reported a continuation of one or more youthfocused activities that were initiated during CAIP or PCI. 26 However, youth and other community membersfrequently spoke of youth contributions to improving family and community life through labor andremittances. In the community of Khilmony in the Rasht Valley, community members told about youthin Russia who set up a fund under the management of elders from the mosque to help with expensiveevents and the needs of the poor in the community. In Kichigizi Community, also in the Rasht Valley,youth working in Russia collected money for an expansion of the community’s drinking water system to26 The study itself also suffered the effects of high levels of migration. In each of the 51 sample communities, the study team aimed to talkto two participants of the programs’ youth activities. However, locating such individuals proved incredibly difficult. Through significant time andeffort the team was able to interview a total of 89 youth participants. Because of this difficulty, the sample of youth did not always include thosewho were most involved during program implementation and at times included individuals who participated in only some small components ofthe program.Understanding What Promotes Lasting Change at the Community Level31